The Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Commitment: The Role of Organizational Identification

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 24, 2362 - 2393, 30.04.2020

Fetullah Battal

https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.621947

Cited By: 6

Öz

The aim of this study is to reveal the relationships between organizational justice, organizational commitment level and perceptions of organizational identification. The data used in the research were collected through 206 face-to-face questionnaires working in a public university. The collected data were analyzed with the help of the original SPSS 22.0 and AMOS 25.0 package program. The most common finding reached at the end of the study is that the organizational justice perceived by the employees is positively and significantly associated with organizational commitment and organizational identification. In addition, when the relationship between the sub-dimensions of the concepts is analyzed, it is observed that there is no significant relationship between organizational justice and continuity commitment, and at the same time, it is observed that there is no significant relationship between the emotional commitment, which is a sub-dimension of organizational justice, and continuity commitment. In addition, it has been determined that organizational identification has a partial mediating role in the relationship between organizational justice perceptions and organizational commitment behavior.
Finally, in this study, the national culture of the employees is discussed and theoretical assumptions are made on the subject. Given this aspect that Turkey is a society in which the female and the feeling of moving subjects with a heavy-ness it has been revealed in previous studies. Thus, it is possible to say that the results are in harmony with the national culture.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Organizational Justice, Organizational Commitment, Organizational Identification

Örgütsel Adalet ve Örgütsel Bağlılık İlişkisinde Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin Rolü:Üniversite Çalışanları Üzerine Bir Örnek

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı örgütsel adalet, örgütsel bağlılık düzeyi ve örgütsel özdeşleşme algıları arasındaki ilişkileri ortaya koymaktır. Araştırmada kullanılan veriler, bir devlet üniversitesinde çalışan 206 personelden yüz yüze anket aracılığı ile toplanmıştır. Toplanan veriler orijinal SPSS 22.0 ve AMOS 25.0 paket programı yardımıyla analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonucunda ulaşılan en genel bulgu çalışanların algıladığı örgütsel adalet ile örgütsel bağlılık ve örgütsel özdeşleşmenin olumlu ve anlamlı yönde ilişkili olmasıdır. Ayrıca kavramların alt boyutlarının ilişkisine bakıldığında örgütsel adalet ile süreklilik bağlılığı arasında anlamlı bir ilişkinin olmadığı görülürken aynı zamanda örgütsel adaletin alt boyutlarından olan duygusal bağlılık ile süreklilik bağlılığı arasında da anlamlı bir ilişki olmadığı gözlenmiştir. Bunun yanında çalışanların örgütsel adalet algıları ile örgütsel bağlılık davranışı arasındaki ilişkide örgütsel özdeşleşmenin kısmi aracılık rolünün bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir.Son olarak bu çalışmada çalışanların ulusal kültürü ele alınmış ve konu ile ilgili teorik varsayımlar yapılmıştır. Bu yönüyle bakıldığında Türkiye’nin dişi bir toplum olduğu ve duygularıyla hareket eden bireylerin ağırlıkta olduğu daha önceden yapılan çalışmalarda ortaya koyulmuştur. Böylece sonuçların ulusal kültür ile uyum içerisinde olduğunu söylemek mümkündür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Örgütsel Adalet, Örgütsel Bağlılık, Örgütsel Özdeşleşme

Kaynakça

• Akram, T., Lei, S., Haider, M. J., Hussain, S. T., ve Puig, L. C. M. (2017). The effect of organizational justice on knowledge sharing: Empirical evidence from the Chinese telecommunications sector. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(3), 134-145.
• Alexander, S., ve Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social justice research, 1(2), 177-198.
• Allen, N. J., ve Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of occupational psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
• Allen, N. J., ve Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of vocational behavior, 49(3), 252-276.
• Ashforth, B. E., ve Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of management review, 14(1), 20-39.
• Ateş, M. F. (2015). Hizmetkâr liderlik ve örgütsel adaletin örgütsel özdeşleşmeye etkisinde örgütsel güvenin aracılık rolü. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(3), 75-95.
• Bal, V. (2014). Örgütsel adalet ve örgütsel bağlılık ilişkisi: manisa’daki eğitim kurumlarında bir araştırma. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 1-9.
• Battal, F., Durmuş, İ., ve Çınar, E. (2017). The effects of organizational citizenship behaviors and decision-making styles on transformational leadership behavıor. Electronic Turkish Studies, 12(31).1-28.
• Becker, T. E. (1992). Foci and bases of commitment: Are they distinctions worth making?. Academy of management Journal, 35(1), 232-244.
• Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull, 107(2), 238-46.
• Byrne, Z. S., ve Cropanzano, R. (2001). The history of organizational justice: The founders speak. Justice in the workplace: From theory to practice, 2(1), 3-26.
• Carmon, A. F., Miller, A. N., Raile, A. N., ve Roers, M. M. (2010). Fusing family and firm: Employee perceptions of perceived homophily, organizational justice, organizational identification, and organizational commitment in family businesses. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(4), 210-223.
• Cheney, G. (1982). Identification as process and product: A field study. Unpublished master’s thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.akt.
• Bullis, C., ve Bach, B. W. (1989). Socialization turning points: An examination of change in organizational identification. Western Journal of Communication (includes Communication Reports, 53(3), 273-293.
• Cheney, G. (1983). On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification. Communications Monographs, 50(4), 342-362.
• Choudhary, P., ve Kumar, R. (2011). Impact of organizational justice on organizational effectiveness. Industrial Engineering Letters Www. Iiste. Org, 1(3).
• Coetzee, M. (2004). The fairness of affirmative action: An organisational justice perspective (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria).
• Cohen-Charash, Y., ve Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 86(2), 278-321.
• Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., ve Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of applied psychology, 86(3), 425.
• Colquitt, J. A., Noe, R. A., ve Jackson, C. L. (2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel psychology, 55(1), 83-109.
• Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., ve Rupp, D. E. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(2), 164-209.
• Cüce, H., Güney, S., ve Tayfur, Ö. (2013). Örgütsel adalet algılarının örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(1), 1-30.
• Çetinkaya, M., ve Çimenci, S. (2014). Örgütsel adalet algısının örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerindeki etkisi ve örgütsel özdeşleşmenin aracılık rolü: Yapısal eşitlik modeli çalışması. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(23), 237-278.
• Danielsson, J., de Haan, L., Peng, L., ve de Vries, C. G. (2001). Using a bootstrap method to choose the sample fraction in tail index estimation. Journal of Multivariate analysis, 76(2), 226-248.
• Demirel, E. T., Derin, N., ve Çakınberk, A. (2011). Örgütsel özdeşleşmenin örgütsel bağlılıkla biçimlenmesi: Malatya ve Tunceli özel eğitim kurumları örneği. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 89-121.
• Dutton, J. E., J.M. Dukerich ve C.V. Harquail, (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239–263.
• Ellemers, N., Spears, R., ve Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(3), 617.
• Folger, R., ve Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management journal, 32(1), 115-130.
• Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management review, 12(1), 9-22.
• Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of applied psychology, 75(5), 561.
• Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of management, 16(2), 399-432.
• Griffin, R. W., Bateman, T. S., Cooper, C. L., ve Robertson, I. (1986). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment.
• Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of vocational behavior,66(2),358-384.
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10(4), 15-41.
• Hollensbe, E. C., Khazanchi, S., ve Masterson, S. S. (2008). How do I assess if my supervisor and organization are fair? Identifying the rules underlying entity-based justice perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1099-1116.
• Hopkins, S. M., ve Weathington, B. L. (2006). The relationships between justice perceptions, trust, and employee attitudes in a downsized organization. The Journal of Psychology, 140(5), 477-498.
• İşcan, Ö. F., ve Naktiyok, A. (2004). Çalışanların örgütsel bağdaşımlarının belirleyicileri olarak örgütsel bağlılık ve örgütsel adalet algıları. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 59(1), 181-201.
• Karabey, C. N., ve İşcan, Ö. F. (2007). Örgütsel özdeşleşme, örgütsel imaj ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ilişkisi: Bir uygulama. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 21(2), 231-241.
• Katz, D., ve Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (Vol. 2, p. 528). New York: Wiley.
• Lambert, E. G., Kelley, T., ve Hogan, N. L. (2013). The association of occupational stressors with different forms of organizational commitment among correctional staff. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(3), 480-501.
• Lapidot, Y., Kark, R., ve Shamir, B. (2007). The impact of situational vulnerability on the development and erosion of followers' trust in their leader. The leadership quarterly, 18(1), 16-34.
• Mael, F., ve Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
• Martin, C. L., ve Bennett, N. (1996). The role of justice judgments in explaining the relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Group & Organization Management, 21(1), 84-104.
• Mathieu, J. E., ve Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological bulletin, 108(2), 171.
• McFarlin, D. B., ve Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of management Journal, 35(3), 626-637.
• Meyer, J. P., ve Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human resource management review, 1(1), 61-89.
• Meyer, J. P., ve Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Sage.
• Meyer, J. P., ve Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human resource management review, 11(3), 299-326.
• Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., ve Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of applied psychology, 78(4), 538.
• Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?. Journal of applied psychology, 76(6), 845-855.
• Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., ve Steers, R. M. (2013). Employee—organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. Academic press.
• Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., ve Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of vocational behavior, 14(2), 224-247.
• Olkkonen, M. E., ve Lipponen, J. (2006).Relationships between organizational justice,identification with organization and work unit, and group-related outcomes.Organizational behavior and human decision processes,100(2),202-215.
• Orpen, C. (1994). The effect of organizational commitment on the relationship between procedural and distributive justice,135-136.
• Özdemir, A. (2013). Okul yöneticilerindeki adalet ve liyakat ile öğretmenlerdeki sadakat ve gayret arasındaki ilişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 19(1), 99-117.
• Patrick, H. A. (2012). Commitment of ınformation technology employees in relation to perceived organizational justice. IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(3), 23-40.
• Polat, M., ve Meyda, C. (2011). Örgüt kültürü bağlamında güç eğilimi ve örgütsel bağlılık ilişkisinde örgütsel özdeşleşmenin aracılık rolü. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 25(1), 153-170.
• Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., ve Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of applied psychology, 59(5), 603.
• Randeree. K. (2008). Organizational justice: migrant worker perceptions in organizations in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics 3 (4), 57-69.
• Robbins, S. P., ve Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational behavior. Pearson education limited.
• Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of vocational behavior, 66(2), 358-384.
• Spanuth, T., ve Wald, A. (2017). Understanding the antecedents of organizational commitment in the context of temporary organizations: An empirical study. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 33(3), 129-138.
• Sweeney, P. D., ve McFarlin, D. B. (1993). Workers′ evaluations of the" ends" and the" means": An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 55(1), 23-40.
• Tolman, E. C. (1943). Identification and the postwar world. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38(2), 141–148.
• Turunç, Ö. (2011). Örgütsel adaletin çalışanların örgütsel özdeşleşme ve işten ayrılma niyetine etkisi: örgütsel özdeşleşmenin aracılık rolü. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 13(1), 143-166.
• Türköz, T., Polat, M., ve Coşar, S. (2013). Çalışanların örgütsel güven ve sinizm algılarının örgütsel bağlılıkları üzerindeki rolü. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(2), 285-302.
• Tyler, T. R., ve Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and social psychology review, 7(4), 349-361.
• Usmani, S., ve Jamal, S. (2013). Impact of distributive justice, procedural justice, interactional justice, temporal justice, spatial justice on job satisfaction of banking employees. Review of integrative business and economics research, 2(1), 351-369.
• Van Knippenberg, D., ve Sleebos, E. (2006). Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: self‐definition, social exchange, and job attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal Of Industrial, Occupational And Organizational Psychology And Behavior, 27(5), 571-584.
• Wu, C. M., ve Chen, T. J. (2018). Collective psychological capital: Linking shared leadership, organizational commitment, and creativity. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 74, 75-84.
• Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46, 74-85.
• Yazıcıoğlu, İ., ve Topaloğlu, I. G. (2009). Örgütsel adalet ve bağlılık ilişkisi: Konaklama işletmelerinde bir uygulama, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi 1(1), 3-16.