Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Kurum Kültürünün Devam Ettirilmesinde Sürdürülebilir Liderlik

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 44, 8232 - 8260, 26.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.910771

Öz

Geçmişte rolleri bürokratik kuralları uygulamakla sınırlı olan okul müdürleri, 21. yüzyılda farklı roller üstlenmek zorunda kalmaktadır. Bu rollerden biri, okullarda yeniliklere öncülük etmeleri ve yeniliklerin sürdürülebilir ve etkili olmasını sağlamaktır. Değişen yüzyılın şartlarına uygun olarak, okul yöneticilerinin okulları yenilikçi profesyonel öğrenme topluluklarına dönüştürülmelerini sağlayacak sürdürülebilir liderlik tarzını üstlenmeleri faydalı olabilir. Sürdürülebilir liderlik anlayışı, okulda reformist, yenilikçi ve öğrenme odaklı kurum kültürünün kalıcı olmasını sağlayabilir. Mevcut çalışmada, kurum kültürünün devam ettirilmesinde sürdürülebilir liderliğin önemine ilişkin öğretmen görüşlerine ulaşılması amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden örnek olay çalışması kullanılmıştır. Çalışma grubu olarak, kurumlarında en az 1 yıldır görev yapan 15 öğretmene ulaşılmıştır. Literatür ayrıntılı bir şekilde taranarak araştırmacılar tarafından örnek olay oluşturulmuştur. Kod, kategori ve temaların oluşturulması için içerik analizi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, öğretmenlerin sürdürülebilir kurum kültürüne karşı olumlu tutuma sahip oldukları, en çok yönetsel sürdürülebilir liderlik davranışlarına önem verdikleri ve kurum kültürünün devam ettirilmesinin tek bir kişiye bağlı olduğunu ifade ettikleri görülmektedir. Katılımcı öğretmenlerin ifadelerinden, okul müdürleri tarafından sürdürülebilir liderlik davranışlarının sınırlı düzeyde sergilendiği anlaşılmaktadır. Sürdürülebilir liderliğin eğitim kurumlarına olan etkilerinin somut ve uzun süreli olup olmadığının değerlendirilmesi için boylamsal araştırmaların yapılması faydalı olabilir.

Kaynakça

  • Aktan, E. ve Aydıntan, B. (2016). Cameron-Freeman örgüt kültürü türleri ekseninde örgüt kültürü ve bilgi güvenliği algısı ilişkisi: Devlet üniversitelerinde bir uygulama. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(4), 324-344.
  • Arif, S., Zainudin, H. K. ve Hamid, A. (2019). Influence of leadership, organizational culture, work motivation, and job satisfaction of performance principles of senior high school in medan city. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal, 2(4), 239-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.33258/birci. v2i4.619.
  • Balyer, A. (2012). Çağdaş okul müdürlerinin değişen rolleri. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2), 75-93.
  • Barkley, B. P. (2013). Teacher perception of school culture and school climate in the “leader in me” schools and non- “leader in me” schools. (Doktora tezi). The University of Southern Mississippi, Educational Administration and Supervision Commons, and the Educational Leadership, Mississippi.
  • Bastedo, M. N. (Ed.). (2012). The organization of higher education: Managing colleges for a new era. JHU Press: Baltimore.
  • Baumgartner, R. J. (2009). Organizational culture and leadership: Preconditions for the development of a sustainable corporation. Sustainable development, 17(2), 102-113.
  • Bertels, S., Papania, L. ve Papania, D. (2010). Embedding sustainability in organizational culture. A systematic review of the body of knowledge. London, Canada: Network for Business Sustainability.
  • Braun, V. ve Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf ve K. J. Sher (Der.), APA handbooks in psychology®. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (s.57–71). American Psychological Association.
  • Britannica (t. y.). “sustainability”. 10 Aralık 2020 tarihinde https://www.britannica.com/science/sustainability adresinden erişildi.
  • Cameron, K. S. ve Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Chidambaranathan, K. ve Regha, V. S. (2016). Diagnosing the organizational culture of higher education libraries in the united arab emirates using the competing values framework. LIBRES: Library ve Information Science Research Electronic Journal, 26(2), 99-112.
  • Collins, I. (2015). Using international accreditation in higher education to effect changes in organisational culture: A case study from a Turkish University. Journal of Research in International Education, 14(2), 141–154.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1475240915592589. Cook, J. W. (2014). Sustainable school leadership: The teachers' perspective. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 9(1), 1.
  • Creswell, J. W. ve Poth, C. N. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. California: Sage Publications.
  • Çayak, S. ve Çetin, M. (2018). Sürdürülebilir liderlik ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Electronic Turkish Studies, 13(11), 1561-1582.
  • Davies, B. (2007). Developing sustainable leadership. British Educational Leadership, Management and Administration Society, 21(3), 4-9.
  • De Haan, T., Jansen, P. ve Lighart, P. (2015). Sustainable Leadership: Talent requirement for sustainable enterprises. Reynolds Associates. 15 Aralık 2020 tarihinde https://www.russellreynolds.com/insights/thought-leadership/sustainable-195leadership-talent-requirements-for-sustainable-enterprises adresinden erişildi.
  • Demir, C., Ayyildiz Unnu, N. A. ve Erturk, E. (2011). Diagnosing the organizational culture of a Turkish pharmaceutical company based on the competing values framework. Journal of business economics and management, 12(1), 197-217.
  • Demir, İ. D., Uğurluoğlu, Ö. ve Ürek, D. (2017). The relationship between leadership and organization culture: A literature review. Journal of Strategic Research in Social Science, 3(2), 175-196.
  • Duignan, P. A. ve Cannon, H. (2011). The power of many: Building sustainable collective leadership in schools. ACER Press: Camberwell, VIC.
  • Emmel, N. (2013). Purposeful Sampling. Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: A realist approach içinde (s.33-45). California: Sage Publishing.
  • Eyal, O. ve Roth, G. (2011). Principals’ leadership and teachers’ motivation. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(3), 256–275.
  • Fitria, H. (2018). The influence of organizational culture and trust through the teacher performance ın the private secondary school. Palembang. International Journal of Scientific ve Technology Research, 7(7), 82-86.
  • Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership ve sustainability: System thinkers in action. California: Corwin Press.
  • Gummerson, W. M. (2015). Augmenting sustainable leadership practices with complexity theory. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 6(1), 1247-1255.
  • Hargreaves, A. (2007). Sustainable Leadership and Development in Education: Creating the future, conserving the past. European Journal of Education, 42(2), 223–233.
  • Hargreaves, A. ve Fink, D. (2003). Sustaining leadership. Phi delta kappan, 84(9), 693-700.
  • Hargreaves, A. ve Fink, D. (2004). The seven principles of sustainable leadership. Educational leadership, 61(7), 8-13.
  • Hargreaves, A. ve Fink, D. (2006). Redistributed leadership for sustainable professional learning communities. Journal of School Leadership, 16(5), 550-565.
  • Hoy, W. K. ve Miskel C. K. (2010). Okulların dış çevreleri. Eğitim yönetimi: Teori, araştırma ve uygulama içinde (S. Turan, Çev.). (7. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık. (Orijinal eserin yayın tarihi 2005).
  • İrge, N. T. ve Özkan, A. (2019). Kurum kültürü ve sürdürülebilir liderlik ilişkisine yönelik bir araştırma. Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma ve Yönetim Sempozyumu. 5 Aralık 2020 tarihinde https://surdurulebiliryonetimvekalkinma.aydin.edu.tr adresinden erişildi. Isensee, C., Teuteberg, F., Griese, K. M. ve Topi, C. (2020). The relationship between organizational culture, sustainability, and digitalization in SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122944. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122944.
  • Kaarst-Brown, M., Nicholson, S., Von Dran, G. ve Stanton, J. (2004). Organizational cultures of libraries as a strategic resource. Library Trends, 53(1), 33–53.
  • Kish, M. H. Z. (2004). Using vignettes to develop higher order thinking and academic achievement in adult learners in an online environment. (Doktora tezi). Duquesne University, Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations, Pittsburgh.
  • Linnenluecke, M. K. ve Griffiths, A. (2010). Corporate sustainability and organizational culture. Journal of world business, 45(4), 357-366.
  • Lussier, R. N. ve Achua, C. F. (2010). Leadership of culture, ethics and diversity: Culture creation and sustainability. Leadership: Theory, Application ve Skill Development içinde (s.368-387) (4. baskı). South-Western Cengage Learning: Kanada.
  • McAdams, R. P. (1997). A systems approach to school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(2), 138.
  • Ogbonna E. ve Harris L. C. (2002). Managing organisational culture: Insights from the hospitality industry, Human Resource Management Journal, 12(1), 33-53.
  • Padilla-Díaz, M. (2015). Phenomenology in educational qualitative research: Philosophy as science or philosophical science? International Journal of Educational Excellence, 1(2), 101-110.
  • Pratomo, H. W. (2020). The effect of organizational culture and school climate on the quality of education services and their ımplications on the quality of the graduates. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education, 1, 54-60.
  • Schein, E. H. (1984). Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture. Sloan Management Review, 25(2), 3-16.
  • Sezgin, F. (2010). Öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılığının bir yordayıcısı olarak okul kültürü. Eğitim ve Bilim, 35(156), 142-159.
  • Smart, J. C. ve St. John, E. P. (1996). Organizational culture and effectiveness in higher education: A test of the “culture type” and “strong culture” hypotheses. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18(3), 219–241.
  • Soukainen, U. ve Fonsén, E. (2018). Will the leadership last? Sustainable leadership in early childhood education. E. Rogulj, A. Jevtić, & A. Jurčević - Lozančić (Der.), Early Childhood Realtionships: The Foundation for a Sustainable Future: Proceedings, International Scientific and Professional Conference OMEP 2017 içinde (s.312-329). OMEP Hrvatska.
  • Strauss, A.L. ve Corbin, J.M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. New York: Sage Publications. Taslimi, M., Farastkhah, M. ve Hassanmoradi, N. (2018). Factors, Shaping Fields and Typology of Organizational Culture of School on Tehran City. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(8), 62-72.
  • Wegner, C. ve Hall, O. (1998). Improving schools through the administration and analysis of school culture audits. Mid-South Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA. 1 Aralık 2020 tarihinde https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED458299 adresinden erişildi.
  • Yıldırım, A. ve Şimsek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (10. baskı). Ankara: Şeçkin Yayıncılık.

Sustainable Leadership in Maintaining Corporate Culture

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 44, 8232 - 8260, 26.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.910771

Öz

The roles of school principals limited to applying bureaucratic rules in the past have altered in the 21st century. One of these roles is to lead reforms in schools and to ensure that the reforms are sustainable and effective. To fulfill new roles, it may be beneficial for school principals to perform sustainable leadership behaviors that will enable them to turn schools into professional learning communities. A sustainable leadership approach can ensure a reformist, innovative and learning-oriented corporate culture. The study aimed to get teachers' opinions about the importance of sustainable leadership practices to maintain an effective corporate culture. A case study was created by the researchers based on relevant literature. Content analysis was used to determine the presence of codes, categories, and themes. The result of the study exhibited that teachers had a positive attitude towards sustainable corporate culture, they drew attention to managerial sustainability, and they believed that maintaining the corporate culture depended on decisions made by a single person. Sustainable leadership behaviors were exhibited at a limited level by school principals to the participant teachers’ opinions. It might be beneficial to conduct longitudinal studies to evaluate whether the effects of sustainable leadership on educational institutions are concrete and long-term.

Kaynakça

  • Aktan, E. ve Aydıntan, B. (2016). Cameron-Freeman örgüt kültürü türleri ekseninde örgüt kültürü ve bilgi güvenliği algısı ilişkisi: Devlet üniversitelerinde bir uygulama. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(4), 324-344.
  • Arif, S., Zainudin, H. K. ve Hamid, A. (2019). Influence of leadership, organizational culture, work motivation, and job satisfaction of performance principles of senior high school in medan city. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal, 2(4), 239-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.33258/birci. v2i4.619.
  • Balyer, A. (2012). Çağdaş okul müdürlerinin değişen rolleri. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2), 75-93.
  • Barkley, B. P. (2013). Teacher perception of school culture and school climate in the “leader in me” schools and non- “leader in me” schools. (Doktora tezi). The University of Southern Mississippi, Educational Administration and Supervision Commons, and the Educational Leadership, Mississippi.
  • Bastedo, M. N. (Ed.). (2012). The organization of higher education: Managing colleges for a new era. JHU Press: Baltimore.
  • Baumgartner, R. J. (2009). Organizational culture and leadership: Preconditions for the development of a sustainable corporation. Sustainable development, 17(2), 102-113.
  • Bertels, S., Papania, L. ve Papania, D. (2010). Embedding sustainability in organizational culture. A systematic review of the body of knowledge. London, Canada: Network for Business Sustainability.
  • Braun, V. ve Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf ve K. J. Sher (Der.), APA handbooks in psychology®. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (s.57–71). American Psychological Association.
  • Britannica (t. y.). “sustainability”. 10 Aralık 2020 tarihinde https://www.britannica.com/science/sustainability adresinden erişildi.
  • Cameron, K. S. ve Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Chidambaranathan, K. ve Regha, V. S. (2016). Diagnosing the organizational culture of higher education libraries in the united arab emirates using the competing values framework. LIBRES: Library ve Information Science Research Electronic Journal, 26(2), 99-112.
  • Collins, I. (2015). Using international accreditation in higher education to effect changes in organisational culture: A case study from a Turkish University. Journal of Research in International Education, 14(2), 141–154.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1475240915592589. Cook, J. W. (2014). Sustainable school leadership: The teachers' perspective. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 9(1), 1.
  • Creswell, J. W. ve Poth, C. N. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. California: Sage Publications.
  • Çayak, S. ve Çetin, M. (2018). Sürdürülebilir liderlik ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Electronic Turkish Studies, 13(11), 1561-1582.
  • Davies, B. (2007). Developing sustainable leadership. British Educational Leadership, Management and Administration Society, 21(3), 4-9.
  • De Haan, T., Jansen, P. ve Lighart, P. (2015). Sustainable Leadership: Talent requirement for sustainable enterprises. Reynolds Associates. 15 Aralık 2020 tarihinde https://www.russellreynolds.com/insights/thought-leadership/sustainable-195leadership-talent-requirements-for-sustainable-enterprises adresinden erişildi.
  • Demir, C., Ayyildiz Unnu, N. A. ve Erturk, E. (2011). Diagnosing the organizational culture of a Turkish pharmaceutical company based on the competing values framework. Journal of business economics and management, 12(1), 197-217.
  • Demir, İ. D., Uğurluoğlu, Ö. ve Ürek, D. (2017). The relationship between leadership and organization culture: A literature review. Journal of Strategic Research in Social Science, 3(2), 175-196.
  • Duignan, P. A. ve Cannon, H. (2011). The power of many: Building sustainable collective leadership in schools. ACER Press: Camberwell, VIC.
  • Emmel, N. (2013). Purposeful Sampling. Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: A realist approach içinde (s.33-45). California: Sage Publishing.
  • Eyal, O. ve Roth, G. (2011). Principals’ leadership and teachers’ motivation. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(3), 256–275.
  • Fitria, H. (2018). The influence of organizational culture and trust through the teacher performance ın the private secondary school. Palembang. International Journal of Scientific ve Technology Research, 7(7), 82-86.
  • Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership ve sustainability: System thinkers in action. California: Corwin Press.
  • Gummerson, W. M. (2015). Augmenting sustainable leadership practices with complexity theory. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 6(1), 1247-1255.
  • Hargreaves, A. (2007). Sustainable Leadership and Development in Education: Creating the future, conserving the past. European Journal of Education, 42(2), 223–233.
  • Hargreaves, A. ve Fink, D. (2003). Sustaining leadership. Phi delta kappan, 84(9), 693-700.
  • Hargreaves, A. ve Fink, D. (2004). The seven principles of sustainable leadership. Educational leadership, 61(7), 8-13.
  • Hargreaves, A. ve Fink, D. (2006). Redistributed leadership for sustainable professional learning communities. Journal of School Leadership, 16(5), 550-565.
  • Hoy, W. K. ve Miskel C. K. (2010). Okulların dış çevreleri. Eğitim yönetimi: Teori, araştırma ve uygulama içinde (S. Turan, Çev.). (7. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık. (Orijinal eserin yayın tarihi 2005).
  • İrge, N. T. ve Özkan, A. (2019). Kurum kültürü ve sürdürülebilir liderlik ilişkisine yönelik bir araştırma. Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma ve Yönetim Sempozyumu. 5 Aralık 2020 tarihinde https://surdurulebiliryonetimvekalkinma.aydin.edu.tr adresinden erişildi. Isensee, C., Teuteberg, F., Griese, K. M. ve Topi, C. (2020). The relationship between organizational culture, sustainability, and digitalization in SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122944. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122944.
  • Kaarst-Brown, M., Nicholson, S., Von Dran, G. ve Stanton, J. (2004). Organizational cultures of libraries as a strategic resource. Library Trends, 53(1), 33–53.
  • Kish, M. H. Z. (2004). Using vignettes to develop higher order thinking and academic achievement in adult learners in an online environment. (Doktora tezi). Duquesne University, Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations, Pittsburgh.
  • Linnenluecke, M. K. ve Griffiths, A. (2010). Corporate sustainability and organizational culture. Journal of world business, 45(4), 357-366.
  • Lussier, R. N. ve Achua, C. F. (2010). Leadership of culture, ethics and diversity: Culture creation and sustainability. Leadership: Theory, Application ve Skill Development içinde (s.368-387) (4. baskı). South-Western Cengage Learning: Kanada.
  • McAdams, R. P. (1997). A systems approach to school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(2), 138.
  • Ogbonna E. ve Harris L. C. (2002). Managing organisational culture: Insights from the hospitality industry, Human Resource Management Journal, 12(1), 33-53.
  • Padilla-Díaz, M. (2015). Phenomenology in educational qualitative research: Philosophy as science or philosophical science? International Journal of Educational Excellence, 1(2), 101-110.
  • Pratomo, H. W. (2020). The effect of organizational culture and school climate on the quality of education services and their ımplications on the quality of the graduates. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education, 1, 54-60.
  • Schein, E. H. (1984). Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture. Sloan Management Review, 25(2), 3-16.
  • Sezgin, F. (2010). Öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılığının bir yordayıcısı olarak okul kültürü. Eğitim ve Bilim, 35(156), 142-159.
  • Smart, J. C. ve St. John, E. P. (1996). Organizational culture and effectiveness in higher education: A test of the “culture type” and “strong culture” hypotheses. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18(3), 219–241.
  • Soukainen, U. ve Fonsén, E. (2018). Will the leadership last? Sustainable leadership in early childhood education. E. Rogulj, A. Jevtić, & A. Jurčević - Lozančić (Der.), Early Childhood Realtionships: The Foundation for a Sustainable Future: Proceedings, International Scientific and Professional Conference OMEP 2017 içinde (s.312-329). OMEP Hrvatska.
  • Strauss, A.L. ve Corbin, J.M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. New York: Sage Publications. Taslimi, M., Farastkhah, M. ve Hassanmoradi, N. (2018). Factors, Shaping Fields and Typology of Organizational Culture of School on Tehran City. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(8), 62-72.
  • Wegner, C. ve Hall, O. (1998). Improving schools through the administration and analysis of school culture audits. Mid-South Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA. 1 Aralık 2020 tarihinde https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED458299 adresinden erişildi.
  • Yıldırım, A. ve Şimsek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (10. baskı). Ankara: Şeçkin Yayıncılık.
Toplam 45 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Alan Eğitimleri
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Münevver Çetin 0000-0002-1203-9098

Şeyda Baş 0000-0003-1218-6327

Yayımlanma Tarihi 26 Aralık 2021
Kabul Tarihi 8 Aralık 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 44

Kaynak Göster

APA Çetin, M., & Baş, Ş. (2021). Kurum Kültürünün Devam Ettirilmesinde Sürdürülebilir Liderlik. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(44), 8232-8260. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.910771