Araştırma Makalesi

Gathering Public Opinion about an Architectural Project: A Text Mining Approach

Cilt: 19 Sayı: 47 31 Mayıs 2022
PDF İndir
EN

Gathering Public Opinion about an Architectural Project: A Text Mining Approach

Abstract

Public opinion is growing in importance due to the widespread use of social media and the fact that people freely express their opinions on any subject on social media. It is important to include the public in the built environment because it may provide valuable feedback and enable people to share their skills, contribute to the creation of a solution and a choice, and raise awareness of the value of their neighborhood. The article aims to propose a framework for evaluating how an architectural project is perceived by the general public via the use of a machine learning model. The Tulip Tower in London has been selected as a case study to demonstrate how this framework can be applied in practice. Tweets about the Tulip Tower in London from 2018 to 2021 were collected and then have been reviewed and scored. According to the findings, this approach enables the project's current public opinion to be tracked, public concerns to be identified and addressed in real-time in the early design stage, and the project to be re-evaluated in light of the data collected.

Keywords

Public Opinion , Text Mining , Architectural Design

Kaynakça

  1. Bakri, A. F., Ibrahim, N., Ahmad, S. S., & Zaman, N. Q. (2015). Public Perception on the Cultural Significance of Heritage Buildings in Kuala Lumpur. ASLI QoL2014 (Annual Serial Landmark International Conference on Quality of Life) / AQoL 2014 Istanbul (ABRA International Conference on Quality of Life), Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey, 26 - 28 December 2014, 202, 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.233
  2. Bates-Brkljac, N. (2013). Differences and similarities in perceptions of architectural representations: expert and non-expert observers. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 30(2), 91–107.
  3. Bianco, L. (2016). In defence of baroque: The wölfflin-frankl-giedion tradition. The Journal of Baroque Studies, 1(4), 5–20.
  4. Celiker, A., & Cavusoglu, B. (2005). Requestioning architectural design regarding the role of far-eastern philosophies on human-well-being. In Proceedings of the 5th International Postgraduate Research Conference in the Built Environment (p.305–311). Manchester: University of Salford.
  5. Chen, K., & Tomblin, D. (2021). Using data from reddit, public deliberation, and surveys to measure public opinion about autonomous vehicles. Public Opinion Quarterly, 85(S1), 289–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfab021
  6. Coeterier, J. F. (2002). Lay people’s evaluation of historic sites. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00007-5
  7. Creswell, P. (2005). What is architecture? Retrieved December 21, 2021, from http://rebirthofreason.com/Articles/Cresswell/What_Is_Architecture.shtml
  8. Cross, N. (2003). Expertise in design : Design thinking research symposium. ( e Edmonds, Ed.). Sydney: UTS Printing.
  9. English Heritage. (2008). Conservation Principles, Policies and Guidance for the Sustainable Management of the Historic Environment. London: English Heritage.
  10. Evans, R. (1997). Translation from drawing to building. London: Architectural Association. London: Architectural Association.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Emekci, Ş. (2022). Gathering Public Opinion about an Architectural Project: A Text Mining Approach. OPUS Journal of Society Research, 19(47), 506-515. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1122785