Bibliometric Analysis of The Concept of "Organizational Differences" Using Visual Mapping Technique
Öz
In this study, it is aimed to perform a bibliometric analysis of the research related to the concept of organizational differences and to make inferences about the general structure of the field. In this direction, in the research, 303 scientific publications on "organizational differences" were examined with the bibliometric analysis method using the Web of Science database, and then the obtained data were visualized using the VOSviewer software program. Bibliometric methods such as keyword analysis, citation analysis, co-author analysis, co-citation analysis of authors were used on the identified scientific publications. Using bibliometric methods, a comprehensive view of the dynamics of the field is presented; the development of the literature on the concept of "organizational differences" has been mapped by determining the basic studies, types, years, authors, countries and publication areas. As a result of the study, it was found that the subject of "organizational differences" was not studied sufficiently in the literature; the most publications on a country basis were from America, the most publications on a year basis were published in 2019, and the most commonly cited author was Alstemark B. It is thought that the findings obtained as a result of the analysis will provide resources for future studies on "organizational differences".
Anahtar Kelimeler
Organizational Differences, Bibliometric Analysis, Vosviewer
Destekleyen Kurum
--
Proje Numarası
---
Etik Beyan
Çalışma Bibliyometrik analize dayalı araştırma makalesi olduğu için etik kurul beyanı gerektirmemektedir.
Teşekkür
---
Kaynakça
- Adams, J. Stacy. (1963). Towards an understanding of Inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422-436.
- Alay, H. K., & Esin, C. A. N. (2021). Work-related identity differences: Individual and organizational outcomes. Yildiz Social Science Review, 7(1), 15-22. http://doi:10.51803/yssr.839536
- Barca, M., & Saban, E. S. E. N. (2012). Rekabet avantajı sağlama ve sürdürmede stratejik yaklaşımlar. Social Sciences, 7(2), 89-107.
- Checa-Morales, C., De-Pablos-Heredero, C., Carreño, A. L., Haider, S., & García, A. (2021). Organizational differences among universities win three socioeconomic contexts: Finland, Spain and Ecuador. Relational Coordination Approach. Education Sciences, 11(8), 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080445
- Chao, C. C., Yang, J. M., & Jen, W. Y. (2007). Determining technology trends and forecasts of rfid by a historical review and bibliometric analysis from 1991 to 2005. Technovation, 27(5), 268-279.
- Chmiliar, L. (2010). Multiple-case designs. Encyclopedia Of Case Study Research, 2, 582-584.
- Chiu, W. T., & Ho, Y. S. (2007). Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research. Scientometrics, 73(1), 3-17.
- Choy, William KW (2007). “Globalisation and workforce diversity: Hrm implications for multinational corporations in Singapore”, Singapore Management Review, 29(2), 1-29.
- Coşkun, H. E., & Tabak, A. (2016). 1995-2015 Yılları arasında örgütsel davranış ve insan kaynakları yönetimi alanında dünya ne çalıştı, biz ne çalıştık? sorusunun izini sürmek. 4. Örgütsel Davranış Conference, (s. 290-299). Çukurova University, Adana
- Cox, Taylor. (2001). Creating the multicultural organization: A strategy for capturing the power of diversity. University Of Michigan Business School Management Series. San Francisco, Ca, Us: Jossey-Bass.