Analysis of Discourses on “Divorce and Male-Related Infertility” in an Online Forum with Focus on Social Support: Women’s

Ayşe Nur Pekasıl; Nilgün Küçükkaraca

doi:10.26466/opusjsr.1550472

EN TR

Analysis of Discourses on “Divorce and Male-Related Infertility” in an Online Forum with Focus on Social Support: Women’s

Öz

The study aimed to investigate the types of social support provided by forum members in response to questions posed by women with infertile spouses on the Women’s Club forum, specifically within discussions centered on divorce due to infertility. Topics and comments on the subject of “divorce due to male-related infertility” in the Women’s Club forum between 2008 and 2023 were analyzed. Five topics and 487 comments were analyzed through inductive thematic analysis, and 458 different codes emerged. The codes were grouped into four themes: informational support, emotional support, intellectual and critical support, and relationship improvement support. Consequently, women considering divorce due to male-related infertility are provided informational, emotional, and relationship-focused, and querying social support through the forum. These types of social support indicate factors that may affect marital adjustment during the infertility process. Therefore, it is recommended that experts who provide professional support to these couples should pay attention to these factors and that the scope of psychosocial services currently provided in Turkey should be person-specific to cover the social support needs of these couples.

Anahtar Kelimeler

infertility, marital adjustment, social support, divorce, online support groups, thematic analysis

Çevrimiçi Bir Forumda “Boşanma ve Erkek Kaynaklı İnfertilite” Konusundaki Söylemlerin Sosyal Destek Odağında Analizi: Kadınlar Kulübü

Öz

Çalışmanın amacı, Kadınlar Kulübü forumunda eşi infertil olan kadınların infertilite sebebiyle boşanma odaklı sorularına forum üyelerinin verdikleri yanıtlar üzerinden sosyal destek türlerini incelemektir. 2008-2023 yılları arasında Kadınlar Kulübü forumunda “erkeğe bağlı infertilite nedeniyle boşanma” konusuyla ilgili başlıklar ve yorumlar analiz edilmiştir. Beş konu başlığı ve 487 yorum tümevarımsal tematik analiz yoluyla analiz edilmiş ve 458 farklı kod ortaya çıkmıştır. Kodlar dört tema altında toplanmıştır: bilgi desteği, duygusal destek, entellektüel-eleştirel destek ve ilişki geliştirme desteği. Sonuç olarak erkek kaynaklı infertilite nedeniyle boşanmayı düşünen kadınlara forum aracılığıyla bilgi, duygu, ilişki ve sorgulama odaklı sosyal destek sağlanmaktadır. Bu sosyal destek türleri, infertilite sürecinde evlilik uyumunu etkileyebilecek faktörlere işaret etmektedir. Bu nedenle, bu çiftlere profesyonel destek sağlayan uzmanların bu faktörlere dikkat etmesi ve Türkiye'de hâlihazırda sunulan psikososyal hizmetlerin kapsamının bu çiftlerin sosyal destek ihtiyaçlarını karşılayacak şekilde kişiye özel olması önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

infertilite, sosyal destek, evlilik uyumu, boşanma, çevrimiçi destek grupları, tematik analiz

Etik Beyan

Ek dosya olarak sisteme yüklenmiştir.

Kaynakça

Agarwal, A., Mulgund, A., Hamada, A., & Chyatte, M. (2015). A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reproductive biology and endocrinology, 13(1), 1-9.
Akdeniz, E., Açıkgöz , A. S., & Erdemir, F. (2021). Erkek infertilitesinin medikal yönetimi. Androloji Bülteni, 23(1), 37-46. Amiri, M., Khosravi, A., Chaman, R., Sadeghi, Z., Raei, M., Jahanitiji, M. A., & Mehrabian, F. (2016). Social consequences of infertility on families in Iran. Global journal of health science, 8(5), 89-95.
Arya, S. T., & Dibb, B. (2016). The experience of infertility treatment: the male perspective. Human Fertility, 19(4), 242 – 248.
Babore, A., Stuppia, L., Trumello, C., Candelori, C., & Antonucci, I. (2017). Male factor infertility and lack of openness about infertility as risk factors for depressive symptoms in males undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment in Italy. Fertility and Sterility, 107(4), 1041-1047.
Beeder, L., & Samplaski, M. K. (2019). Analysis of online discussion boards for male infertility. Andrologia, 51(1), e13422.
Boivin, J., Bunting, L., Collins, J. A., & Nygren, K. G. (2007). International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Human reproduction, 22(6), 1506-1512.
Boivin, J., Vassena, R., Costa, M., Vegni, E., Dixon, M., Collura, B., ... & Domar, A. (2022). Tailored support may reduce mental and relational impact of infertility on infertile patients and partners. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 44(6), 1045-1054.
Chen, Z., Tanaka, N., Uji, M., Hiramura, H., Shikai, N., Fujihara, S., & Kitamura, T. (2007). The role of personalities in the marital adjustment of Japanese couples. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 35(4), 561-572.
Chiew, P. W., & Jan, J. M. (2018). In vitro fertilisation: Women’s questions and concerns in a Malaysian online forum. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum(26), 79-96.
Convery, I., & Cox, D. (2012). A review of research ethics in internet-based research. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 6(1), 50-57.

Coşkuner Potur, D., Onat, G., & Doğan Merih, Y. (2019). An evaluation of the relationship between violence exposure status and personality characteristics among infertile women. Health care for women international, 40(11), 1135-1148.
Cousineau, T. M., & Domar, A. D. (2007). Psychological impact of infertility. Best Practice and Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 21(2), 293 -308.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
Daibes, M. A., Safadi, R. R., Athamneh, T., Anees, I. F., & Constantino, R. E. (2018). ‘Half a woman, half a man; that is how they make me feel’: a qualitative study of rural Jordanian women’s experience of infertility. Culture, health & sexuality, 20(5), 516-530.
Dhillon, R., Cumming, C. E., & Cumming, D. C. (2000). Psychological well-being and coping patterns in infertile men. Fertility and Sterility, 74(4), 702-706.
Erčulj, V. I., & Žiberna, A. (2022). The role of online social support in patients undergoing infertility treatment–A comparison of pregnant and non-pregnant members. Health communication, 37(14), 1724-1730.
Fahami, F., Quchani, S. H., Ehsanpour, S., & Boroujeni, A. Z. (2010). Lived experience of infertile men with male infertility cause. Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research, 15(1), 265-271.
Folkvord , S., Odegaard, O. A., & Sundby, J. (2005). Male infertility in Zimbabwe. Patient Education and Counseling(59), 239–243.
Frederiksen, Y., Farver-Vestergaard, I., Skovgård, N. G., Ingerslev, H. J., & Zachariae, R. (2015). Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for psychological and pregnancy outcomes in infertile women and men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open, 5(1), e006592.
Granovetter, M. S. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. P. V. Marsden, & N. Lin içinde, Social structure and network analysis (s. 105-130). Sage.
Grunberg, P. H., Costa, D., Dennis, C.-L., O'Connell , S., Lahuec, A., & Zelkowitz, P. (2023). ‘How did you cope with such concerns?’: insights from a monitored online infertility peer support forum. Human Fertility, 26(1), 69-83.
Guthrie, J. A., & Kunkel, A. (2016). Communication in support groups. The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication, 1-5.
Gümüşay, M., Sarı, E., & Güngör Satılmış, İ. (2020). İnfertil çiftlerde cinsel yaşam ile ilgili araştırmaların sistematik derlemesi. Androloji Bülteni, 22(2), 74-85.
Hanna, E., & Gough, B. (2020). The social construction of male infertility: a qualitative questionnaire study of men with a male factor infertility diagnosis. Sociology of health & illness, 42(3), 465-480.
Hasanpoor-Azghdy, S. B., Simbar, M., & Vedadhir, A. (2014). The emotional-psychological consequences of infertility among infertile women seeking treatment: Results of a qualitative study. Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 12(2), 131-138.
High, A. C., & Steuber, K. R. (2014). An examination of support (in) adequacy: Types, sources, and consequences of social support among infertile women. Communication Monographs, 81(2), 157-178.
Hughes, R., Fleming, P., & Henshall, L. (2020). Peer support groups after acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Brain injury, 34(7), 847-856.
Jungwirth , A., Diemer, T., Kopa, Z., Krausz, C., Minhas, S., & Tournaye, H. (2019). EAU Guidelines on Male Infertility. European Association of Urology .
Karaca, A., Özkan, F. S., & Gülen, H. S. (2017). Perceptions of infertility in Turkish nursing students. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Nursing Sciences, 9(1), 51-60.
Kaya, Z., & Şahin, N. (2019). İnfertil Erkeklerin İnfertilite ve Tedavi Sürecine Yönelik Deneyimleri: Bir Sistematik Derleme. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(4), 328-336.
Kiani, Z., Simbar, M., Hajian, S., Zayeri, F., Shahidi, M., Naz, M. S., & Ghasemi, V. (2020). The prevalence of anxiety symptoms in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility Research and Practice, 6(7), 1-10.
Kırca, N., & Pasinlioğlu, T. (2013). Infertilite Tedavisinde Karşılaşılan Psikososyal Sorunlar. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 5(2), 162- 178.
Küçükkaraca, N., & Pekasıl , A. N. (2023, October 19-2 ). İnfertiliteye yönelik tutum ve davranışlarda kültürel izler . 25. Ulusal Sosyal Hizmet Sempozyumu "Cumhuriyetin 100. Yılında Sosyal Hizmetin Dünü, Bugünü ve Geleceği" (pp. 53-55). Tunceli : Sosyal Hizmet Uzmanları Derneği Genel Merkezi Yayını.
Kyngäs, H. (2020). Inductive content analysis. H. Kyngäs, K. Mikkonen , & M. Kääriäinen içinde, The Application of Content Analysis in Nursing Science Research (pp. 13-25). Springer.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping . Springer Publishing Company.
Lee, M. (2017). Don’t give up! A cyber-ethnography and discourse analysis of an online infertility patient forum. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 41(3), 341-367.
Lin, J. W., & Shorey, S. (2023). Online peer support communities in the infertility journey: A systematic mixed-studies review. International journal of nursing studies, 140, 104454.
Malik, S. H., & Coulson, N. (2008). The male experience of infertility: a thematic analysis of an online infertility support group bulletin board. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 26(1), 18 -30.
Malik, S. H., & Coulson, N. S. (2008). Computer-mediated infertility support groups: An exploratory study of online experiences. Patient education and counseling, 73(1), 105-113.
Martins, M. V., Peterson, B. D., Almeida, V., Mesquita-Guimarães, J., & Costa, M. E. (2014). Dyadic dynamics of perceived social support in couples facing infertility. Human Reproduction, 29(1), 83-89.
Monga, M., Alexandrescu, B., Katz, S. E., Stein, M., & Ganiats, T. (2004). Impact of infertility on quality of life, marital adjustment, and sexual function. Urology, 63(1), 126-130.
Mumtaz, Z., Shahid, U., & Levay, A. (2013). Understanding the impact of gendered roles on the experiences of infertility amongst men and women in Punjab. Reproductive health, 10(1), 1-10.
Naab, F., Lawali, Y., & Ernestina , S. D. (2019). “My mother in-law forced my husband to divorce me”: Experiences of women with infertility in Zamfara State of Nigeria. PloS one, 14(12), 1-13.
O'Connell, S. B., Gelgoot, E. N., Grunberg, P. H., Schinazi, J., Costa, D., Dennis, C.-L., . . . Zelkowitzb, P. (2021). ‘I felt less alone knowing I could contribute to the forum’: psychological distress and use of an online infertility peer support forum. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 9(1), 128-148.
Öskan Fırat, B., & Hotun Şahin, N. (2022). Toplumsal Cinsiyet Rolleri Kapsamında İnfertilite ve Damgalanma: Bir Sistematik Derleme. Ordu Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Çalışmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 93-103.
Özkan , M. (2004). İnfertil Hastaların Psikolojisi. In A. Kadıoğlu , S. Çayan, B. Semerci, İ. Orhan , R. Aşçı , Ö. M. Yaman , . . . M. Kendirci (Eds), Erkek Reprodüktif Sistem Hastalıkları ve Tedavisi (pp. 567-575). Türk Androloji Derneği Yayınları . Pearce, K. E., Donohoe, D., Barta, K., & Vitak, J. (2024). Online social support for infertility in Azerbaijan. New media & society, 26(6), 3107-3126.
Peterson, B. D. (2002). Examining the individual and dyadic coping processes of men and women in infertile couples and their relationship to infertility stress, marital adjustment, and depression. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Ramezanzadeh, F., Aghssa, M. M., Jafarabadi, M., & Zayeri, F. (2006). Alterations of sexual desire and satisfaction in male partners of infertile couples. Fertility and Sterility, 85(1), 139-143.
Read, S. C., Marie-Eve, C., Boucher, M.-E., Whitley, R., Bond, S., & Zelkowitz, P. (2014). Psychosocial services for couples in infertility treatment: what do couples really want? Patient education and counseling, 84(3), 390-395.
Rodham, K., & Gavin, J. (2006). The ethics of using the internet to collect qualitative research data. Research Ethics, 2(3), 92-97.
Rosen, A. (2002). Binewski’s Family: A Primer for the psychoanalytic treatment of infertility patients. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 38(2), 345-370.
Sarı , R., & Erciyes, C. J. (2021). İnfertil Çiftlerde Piskolojik, sosyal ve cinsel problemler. İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 79-94.
Schick, M., Rösner, S., Toth, B., Strowitzki, T., & Wischmann, T. (2016). Exploring involuntary childlessness in men–a qualitative study assessing quality of life, role aspects and control beliefs in men’s perception of the fertility treatment process. Human Fertility, 19(1), 32-42.
Schmidt, L., Holstein, B. E., Christensen, U., & Boivin, J. (2005). Communication and coping as predictors of fertility problem stress: cohort study of 816 participants who did not achieve a delivery after 12 months of fertility treatment. Human reproduction, 20(11), 3248-3256.
Sezgin, H., & Hocaoğlu, Ç. (2014). İnfertilitenin psikiyatrik yönü. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 6(2), 165-184.
Slade, P., O'Neill, C., Simpson, A. J., & Lashen, H. (2007). The relationship between perceived stigma, disclosure patterns, support and distress in new attendees at an infertility clinic. Human reproduction, 22(8), 2309-2317.
Sormunen, T., Karlgren, K., Aanesen, A., Fossum, B., & Westerbotn, M. (2020). The role of social media for persons affected by infertility. BMC women's health, 20, 1-8.
Sternke, E. A., & Abrahamson, K. (2015). Perceptions of women with infertility on stigma and disability. Sexuality and Disability, 33(1), 3-17.
Steuber, K. R., & Solomon , D. H. (2008). Relational uncertainty, partner interference, and infertility: A qualitative study of discourse within online forums. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(5), 831-855.
Sylvest, R., Fürbringer, J. K., Pinborg, A., Koert, E., Bogstad, J., Loessl, K., . . . Schmıdt , L. (2018). Low semen quality and experiences of masculinity and family building. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 97(6), 727-733.
Şener, A., & Terzioğlu, G. (2002). Ailede Eşler Arası Uyuma Etki Eden Faktörlerin Araştırılması. T.C. Başbakanlık Aile Araştırma Kurumu Başkanlığı.
Taşçı, E., Bolsoy, N., Kavlak, O., & Yücesoy, F. (2008). İnfertil kadınlarda evlilik uyumu. Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi, 5(2), 105-110.
Unnithan, M. (2019). Fertility, Health and Reproductive Politics: Re-Imagining Rights in India. London, UK: Routledge. Walther, J. B., & Boyd, S. (2002). Attraction to computer-mediated social support. C. A. Lin , & D. Atkin içinde, Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 153-188). Hampton Press.
WHO. (2023). World Health Organization . Infertility: Retrieved February 2, 2023 from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infertility
Yalçın, İ. (2015). İyi Oluş ve Sosyal Destek Arasındaki İlişkiler: Türkiye'de Yapılmış Çalışmaların Meta Analizi. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 26(1), 21-32.
Yüksekol, Ö. D., Baltaci, N., Yilmaz, A. N., & Ulucan, M. (2023). Perception of genital self-image, sexual quality of life and marital adjustment in infertile women. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 38(4), 834-847.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Danışmanlık, Refah ve Toplum Hizmetleri

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Ayşe Nur Pekasıl ^*
0000-0003-1864-0359
Türkiye

Nilgün Küçükkaraca
0000-0002-4344-1258
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

30 Kasım 2024

Yayımlanma Tarihi

2 Aralık 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

15 Eylül 2024

Kabul Tarihi

30 Kasım 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 6

DOI

https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1550472

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA34MN97DD

APA

Pekasıl, A. N., & Küçükkaraca, N. (2024). Analysis of Discourses on “Divorce and Male-Related Infertility” in an Online Forum with Focus on Social Support: Women’s. OPUS Journal of Society Research, 21(6), 465-478. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1550472

AMA

1.Pekasıl AN, Küçükkaraca N. Analysis of Discourses on “Divorce and Male-Related Infertility” in an Online Forum with Focus on Social Support: Women’s. OPUS TAD. 2024;21(6):465-478. doi:10.26466/opusjsr.1550472

Chicago

Pekasıl, Ayşe Nur, ve Nilgün Küçükkaraca. 2024. “Analysis of Discourses on ‘Divorce and Male-Related Infertility’ in an Online Forum with Focus on Social Support: Women’s”. OPUS Journal of Society Research 21 (6): 465-78. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1550472.

EndNote

Pekasıl AN, Küçükkaraca N (01 Aralık 2024) Analysis of Discourses on “Divorce and Male-Related Infertility” in an Online Forum with Focus on Social Support: Women’s. OPUS Journal of Society Research 21 6 465–478.

IEEE

[1]A. N. Pekasıl ve N. Küçükkaraca, “Analysis of Discourses on ‘Divorce and Male-Related Infertility’ in an Online Forum with Focus on Social Support: Women’s”, OPUS TAD, c. 21, sy 6, ss. 465–478, Ara. 2024, doi: 10.26466/opusjsr.1550472.

ISNAD

Pekasıl, Ayşe Nur - Küçükkaraca, Nilgün. “Analysis of Discourses on ‘Divorce and Male-Related Infertility’ in an Online Forum with Focus on Social Support: Women’s”. OPUS Journal of Society Research 21/6 (01 Aralık 2024): 465-478. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1550472.

JAMA

1.Pekasıl AN, Küçükkaraca N. Analysis of Discourses on “Divorce and Male-Related Infertility” in an Online Forum with Focus on Social Support: Women’s. OPUS TAD. 2024;21:465–478.

MLA

Pekasıl, Ayşe Nur, ve Nilgün Küçükkaraca. “Analysis of Discourses on ‘Divorce and Male-Related Infertility’ in an Online Forum with Focus on Social Support: Women’s”. OPUS Journal of Society Research, c. 21, sy 6, Aralık 2024, ss. 465-78, doi:10.26466/opusjsr.1550472.

Vancouver

1.Ayşe Nur Pekasıl, Nilgün Küçükkaraca. Analysis of Discourses on “Divorce and Male-Related Infertility” in an Online Forum with Focus on Social Support: Women’s. OPUS TAD. 01 Aralık 2024;21(6):465-78. doi:10.26466/opusjsr.1550472

Analysis of Discourses on “Divorce and Male-Related Infertility” in an Online Forum with Focus on Social Support: Women’s

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çevrimiçi Bir Forumda “Boşanma ve Erkek Kaynaklı İnfertilite” Konusundaki Söylemlerin Sosyal Destek Odağında Analizi: Kadınlar Kulübü

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Etik Beyan

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster