A Systematic Review of Quiet Quitting in the Health Sector
Öz
The concept of silent resignation, defined as employees performing only at a minimum level without going beyond their job descriptions, has become a critical behaviour discussed in recent work life. This systematic review was conducted to examine the studies conducted in the health field in a comprehensive and detailed manner and synthesize their findings. As a result of the search designed in accordance with the study purpose in databases [Science Direct (n=8), Scopus (n=10), Medline+TR Index (n=3), PubMed (n=115), Web of Science (n=117)], 253 studies were identified. After the systematic search based on the study criteria, twenty (20) studies were synthesized. A systematic search and review typology was used in the review process. The search process was implemented based on the "PRISMA" checklist. Studies have shown that adverse work environments, high workloads and poor management increase silent resignation rates, while innovation-supporting policies, strong leadership and organizational support stand out as factors that reduce silent resignation. It has been determined that there is a significant silent resignation demeanour among healthcare workers. Silent resignation is closely related to the burnout levels of employees at work, their intention to leave their jobs and their organizational commitment.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Silent resignation, health sector, working environment
Destekleyen Kurum
Çalışmayı destekleyen herhangi bir kurum yoktur
Etik Beyan
Bu çalışma, "Sağlık Sektöründe Sessiz İstifa: Sosyal Politika Etkileri Üzerine Sistematik Bir Derleme" başlıklı araştırmada etik ilkeler çerçevesinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada, yalnızca daha önce yayımlanmış ve kamuya açık akademik kaynaklar, raporlar ve resmi belgeler kullanılmıştır. Herhangi bir insan katılımcıdan veri toplanmamış olup, kişisel verilerin gizliliğini ihlal edebilecek bir yöntem uygulanmamıştır.
Kaynakça
- Abraham, R. (2000). Organizational Cynicism: Bases and Consequences. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126(3), 269-292.
- Anand, P., Patel, V., Krishnan, R., & Desai, K. (2023). The re-evaluation of work priorities: Understanding quiet quitting in the post-pandemic workforce. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 45(2), 178–195.
- Arar, T., Demirtaş, Z., & Soydan, T. (2023). A conceptual analysis on silent resignation. MANAS Journal of Social Research, 11(5), 1387–1403. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/msad.2023.005
- Arneja, J. S., & Gilardino, M. S. (2023). Quiet Quitting: Why Is It Worse in Healthcare and What Do We Do About It? Plastic Surgery, 31(4), 319-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231208495
- Atsan, N. (2023). The relationship between job dissatisfaction and organisational cynicism: An evaluation in the context of silent resignation. Business and Human Journal, 10(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/iid.2023.002
- Boz, M., Kaya, E., & Erdem, H. (2023). Harassment behaviours and organisational silence: The hidden face of silent resignation. Journal of Management and Organization Research, 18(2), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/yoar.2023.002
- Caldwell, S., Ferguson, H., & Mills, R. (2023). The role of cognitive beliefs and emotional attitudes in quiet quitting: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 37–55.
- Çalışkan, E. (2023). Silent resignation as a manifesto: The relationship between organizational silence, burnout, and dark leadership. Journal of Business Psychology, 19(3), 190–210.
- Çalışkan, K. (2023). Quiet quitting: Is beginning of the end or reborn? Journal of Organizational Behavior Review, 5(2),190–204.
- Çimen, A. İ., & Yılmaz, T. (2023). How Silent is Silent Quitting? Sakarya University Journal of Management Institute, 5(1), 27-33.