Cooperation as a Sexual Selection Trait: Insights from Gender-Specific Mate Preferences
Abstract
Cooperation is considered an essential component of natural selection due to its critical role in ensuring the survival of individuals and communities. However, whether cooperation is also a trait favored in the context of sexual selection remains an ongoing debate in evolutionary psychology. This study examined whether cooperative behavior increases individual attractiveness during the mate selection process. Participants were recruited through convenience sampling via Google Forms. In the first study, 199 participants were randomly assigned to one of three levels of cooperation. The results revealed that female participants preferred men who displayed cooperative behavior. In the second study, the effect of cooperation was evaluated together with the gender of the individuals involved. A total of 230 participants watched videos depicting different cooperation scenarios and evaluated the target person as a potential partner. The findings indicated that women found men who cooperated with both men and women more attractive, whereas men showed a preference only for women who cooperated with other women. In conclusion, cooperation is perceived differently by men and women within the framework of sexual selection, and particularly women regard cooperative behavior as a strong indicator of attractiveness.
Keywords
Cooperation , sexual selection theory , gender differences , altruism
Kaynakça
- Bressler, E. R., Martin, R. A., & Balshine, S. (2006). Production and appreciation of humor as sexually selected traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(2), 121-130. https://doi.org/10.-1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.09.001
- Buss, D. M. & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 559-570.
- Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual Strategies Theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
- Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
- Buss, D. M. (1998). Sexual Strategies Theory: Historical Origins and Current Status. The Journal of Sex Research, 35 (1), 19-31. Downloaded from: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-4499%281998%2935%3A1%3C19%3ASSTHOA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-B
- Covas, R., & Doutrelant, C. (2019). Testing the Sexual and Social Benefits of Cooperation in Animals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 34(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.-11.006
- Eshel, I., & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1982) . Assortment of encounters and evolution of cooperativeness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 79:1331–1335.
- Farrelly, D., Lazarus, J., & Roberts, G. (2007). Altruists Attract. Evolutionary Psychology, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490700500205
- Floría, L. M., Gracia-Lázaro, C., Gómez-Gardeñes, J., & Moreno, Y. (2009). Social network reciprocity as a phase transition in evolutionary cooperation. Physical Review E., 79(2), 26106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.79.026106
- Gündoğdu Aktürk, E. (2010). Attachment figure transference, caregiving styles and marital satisfaction in arranged and love marriages. [Master of Science, Middle East Technical University]. Downloaded from https://open.metu.edu.tr/handle/11511/19867