Türkiye’de Yaşam Memnuniyetinin Belirleyicileri Üzerine Bir İnceleme: Lojistik Regresyon Analizi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 6, 1269 - 1278, 17.12.2025

Ayhan Ünal , Hasan Bozgeyikli

https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1799733

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, bireylerin yaşam memnuniyetini yordayan farklı alanlardaki (gelir, sağlık, konut, eğitim, iş, sosyal ilişkiler vb.) memnuniyet düzeylerinin genel yaşam memnuniyeti ile olan ilişkilerini ve bu ilişkilerin göreli önem düzeylerini belirlemektir. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu’nun (TÜİK) 2024 yılı Yaşam Memnuniyeti Araştırması’na ait mikro veriler kullanılarak, 9462 katılımcının (5021 kadın, 4441 erkek; Ort. yaş = 45.7, Ss = 16.5) verileri ikili lojistik regresyon analiziyle incelenmiştir. Yaşam memnuniyeti değişkeni, ortalama puan temel alınarak “memnun” ve “memnun değil” olmak üzere iki kategoriye ayrılmıştır. Uygulanan modelin veri ile uyumunun yeterli düzeyde olduğu belirlenmiş; yaşam memnuniyetine ilişkin varyansın yaklaşık %20’si açıklanabilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular doğrultusunda, yaşam memnuniyetinin en güçlü yordayıcısının gelir memnuniyeti olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Gelir memnuniyetini sırasıyla sağlık, evlilik, arkadaşlık ilişkileri, sosyal yaşam, konut, iş, eğitim ve bireyin kendine zaman ayırma memnuniyeti izlemektedir. Yaş değişkeni, yaşam memnuniyetini negatif yönde yordarken; cinsiyetin anlamlı bir yordayıcı olmadığı görülmüştür. Bulgular, Türkiye’de yaşam memnuniyetinin ekonomik güvenlik, fiziksel sağlık ve sosyal ilişkilerle yakından ilişkili olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, gelir eşitsizliğini azaltmaya yönelik politikalar, sağlık hizmetlerine erişimi artıran uygulamalar ve sosyal bağları güçlendirmeyi amaçlayan müdahaleler, yaşam memnuniyetini artırmada etkili olabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yaşam memnuniyeti , gelir memnuniyeti , sağlık memnuniyeti , lojistik regresyon

An Examination of the Determinants of Life Satisfaction in Türkiye: A Logistic Regression Analysis

Öz

The purpose of this study is to determine the relationships between satisfaction levels in different domains (income, health, housing, education, work, social relationships, etc.) that predict individuals' life satisfaction and their overall life satisfaction, as well as the relative importance levels of these predictors. Using microdata from the Turkish Statistical Institute's (TÜİK) 2024 Life Satisfaction Survey, the data of 9,462 participants (5,021 women, 4,441 men; mean age = 45.7, SD = 16.5) were examined using binary logistic regression analysis. The life satisfaction variable was divided into two categories, “satisfied” and “not satisfied,” based on the average score. The model applied was found to be adequately fitted to the data, accounting for approximately 20% of the variance in life satisfaction. The findings indicate that income satisfaction is the strongest predictor of life satisfaction. Income satisfaction is followed by satisfaction with health, marriage, friendships, social life, housing, work, education, and time for oneself. The age variable negatively predicts life satisfaction, while gender was found to be a non-significant predictor. The findings reveal that life satisfaction in Türkiye is closely related to economic security, physical health, and social relationships. Accordingly, policies aimed at reducing income inequality, practices that increase access to health services, and interventions aimed at strengthening social bonds may be effective in increasing life satisfaction.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Life satisfaction , income satisfaction , health satisfaction , logistic regression

Kaynakça

• Acar, Y. (2019). Determinants of life satisfaction in Türkiye: A cross-sectional analysis across provinces. Journal of Fiscal Studies, 5(2), 145–157.
• Acolin, A. & Reina, V. (2022). Housing cost burden and life satisfaction. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. 37. 1-27. https://doi.org/-10.1007/s10901-021-09921-1.
• Amati, V., Meggiolaro, S., Rivellini, G., & Zaccarin, S. (2018). Social relations and life satisfaction: the role of friends. Genus, 74. https://doi.org-/10.1186/s41118-018-0032-z.
• Bartram, D. (2020). Age and life satisfaction: Getting control variables under control. Sociology, 55(2), 421-437. https://doi.org/10.-1177/0038038520926871
• Bialowolski, P., & Weziak-Bialowolska, D. (2021). Longitudinal evidence for reciprocal effects between life satisfaction and job satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 22(3), 1287–1312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00273-1
• Bişgin, A. (2024). Effect of tax burden on life satisfaction: Mist countries. Mali Çözüm, 34(182), 501-519.
• Boone, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing likert data. The Journal of Extension, 50(2), Article 48. https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.50.02.48
• Brown, J., Macdonald, R., & Mitchell, R. (2015). Are people who participate in cultural activities more satisfied with life?. Social Indicators Research, 122, 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/-S11205-014-0678-7.
• Cai, H., Liu, H., & Gao, Y. (2025). New evidence on the relationship between income and subjective well-being: the mediating and moderating roles of psychological security. BMC Public Health, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22286-2.
• Carr, D., Freedman, V., Cornman, J., & Schwarz, N. (2014). Happy marriage, happy life? Marital quality and subjective well-being in later life. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 76 5, 930-948. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOMF.12133.
• Cheung, F., & Lucas, R. E. (2015). When does money matter most? Examining the association between income and life satisfaction over the life course. Psychology and Aging, 30(1), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038682
• Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research Designing: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (S.B. Demir, Trans.) Eğiten Kitap.
• Çoban, G. S. (2021). Latent talents at the self-actualization stage of Maslow's hierarchy of needs. European Journal of Educational and Social Sciences, 6(1), 111-118.
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2021). Multivariate statistics for the social sciences: SPSS and LISREL applications (Vol. 6). Ankara: Pegem Academy.
• Doyle, D., & Forehand, M. (1984). Life satisfaction and old age. Research on Aging, 6, 432 - 448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027584-006003008.
• George, L., Okun, M., & Landerman, R. (1985). Age as a moderator of the determinants of life satisfaction. Research on Aging, 7, 209- 233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027585007002004.
• Harpe, S. E. (2015). How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 7(6), 836-850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001
• Hatipoğlu Şahin, B., & Tereci, A. (2021). Evaluation of approaches to the concept of housing and its environment in the context of quality of life. İdealkent, 12(33), 852-872. https://doi.org/10.-31198/idealkent.845251
• Joshanloo, M., & Jovanović, V. (2019). The relationship between gender and life satisfaction: analysis across demographic groups and global regions. Archives of Women's Mental Health, 23, 331-338. https://doi.org/10.1007/-s00737-019-00998-w.
• Kang, W. (2023). Understanding the associations between the number of close friends and life satisfaction: Considering age differences. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1105771.
• Kapteyn, A., Smith, J. P., & van Soest, A. H. O. (2009). Life satisfaction (Netspar Discussion Paper No. 01/2009-008). Tilburg: Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement (Netspar). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1508-438
• Kasapoğlu, F., & Yabanigül, A. (2018). Marital satisfaction and life satisfaction: The mediating effect of spirituality. Spiritual Psychology and Counseling. https://doi.org/10.37898/SPC.20-18.3.2.0048.
• Khadirnavar, A., & G, L. (2024). Marital quality of life, life satisfaction, and well-being among married couples: A community-based comparative study between the rural and urban populations in India. Journal of Family Social Work, 27, 77 - 91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.-2024.2420956.
• Korkmaz, S. (2025). The relationship between meaning in life, life satisfaction, and religiosity. Burdur İlahiyat Dergisi, (10), 39-62.
• López-Gómez, I., Chaves, C., & Vázquez, C. (2020). Life satisfaction. The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. 275-280 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118970843.ch224.
• Li, L., & Jiang, D. (2021). The magnifying effect of marital satisfaction on the dyadic effect of disabilities on life satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph-18105352.
• Ng, K., Loy, J., Gudmunson, C., & Cheong, W. (2009). Gender differences in marital and life satisfaction among Chinese Malaysians. Sex Roles, 60, 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11199-008-9503-6.
• Roth, B., Hahn, E., & Spinath, F. (2017). Income inequality, life satisfaction, and economic worries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 133 - 141. https://doi.org/10.1177/194-8550616664955.
• San Martín, J., Perles, F., & Canto, J. M. (2010). Life satisfaction and perception of happiness among university students. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(2), 617–628. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1138741600002298
• Schmidt, M., Pellicciotti, H., & Long, R. (2022). An exploration of friendship and well-being in established adulthood and midlife. Journal of Adult Development, 30, 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-022-09421-8.
• Sousa, L., Lyubomirsky, S. (2001). Life satisfaction. In J. Worell (Eds.), Encylopedia of women and gender: sex similarities and differences and the impact of society on gender (Volume:2, pp. 667–676). Academic Press.
• Steptoe, A., Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A. (2015). Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing. Lancet, 385(9968), 640–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/-S0140-6736(13)61489-0
• Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd edition) New York, USA: HarperCollins College Publishers
• Telli, R. (2025). Income inequality, democracy schools, renewable energy, and life satisfaction in Türkiye: A cumulative causality approach to development economics. Journal of Social, Human, and Administrative Sciences, 8(3), 178-198.
• TheGlobalEconomy.com. (2024). Inflation rate by country, 2024 rankings. Retrieved October 5, 2025, from https://www.theglobaleconomy.com-/rankings/inflation/
• Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2024). Life satisfaction survey microdata set [Data file]. Ankara: Turkish Statistical Institute. https://data.tuik.gov.tr
• Ulutürk-Akman, S. (2021). Determinants of happiness and life satisfaction: Findings based on data from the Turkish Statistical Institute's Life Satisfaction Survey. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 81, 35–69. https://doi.org/-10.26650/jspc.2021.81.986105
• Wright, T. A., Bennett, K. K., & Dun, T. (1999). Life and job satisfaction. Psychological Reports, 84(3), 1025-1028. https://doi.org/10.24-66/pr0.1999.84.3.1025