‘Vanda’ Kiraz Çeşidinin Fidan Gelişimi Üzerine Bazı Anaçların Etkisi

Yıl 2021, , 169 - 178, 31.12.2021

Mehmet Fikret Balta , Cenk Çelikbaş Orhan Karakaya , Hüseyın Kırkaya , Slawomir świerczyński Magdalena Urbaniak

https://doi.org/10.54370/ordubtd.971964

Öz

Bu araştırma ‘Vanda’ kiraz çeşidinin fidan gelişimi üzerine PHL-A, Gisela 5 ve Colt anaçlarının etkisini belirlenmek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Anaçların ‘Vanda’ kiraz çeşidinde fidan gelişimi üzerine etkisi önemli bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Genel olarak, ‘Vanda’ çeşidinin fidan gelişim üzerine Gisela 5 ve PHL-A anaçlarının etkisi benzer olmuştur. Anaçlara bağlı olarak, fidan boyu 125.7 (Gisela 5)-198.8 cm (Colt), kalem gövde çapı 12.8 (Gisela 5)-22.4 mm (Colt), yan dal sayısı 1.1 (PHL-A)-9.9 (Colt), sürgün uzunluğu 21.53 (Gisela 5)-42.63 cm (Colt), fidan yaş ağırlığı 0.5 (Gisela 5)-1.95 kg (Colt), yaprak yaş ağırlığı 145.0 (PHL-A)-323.0 g (Colt), yaprak kuru ağırlığı 56.2 (PHL-A)-117.5 g (Colt) ve yaprak alanı 109 (Gisela 5)-149.7 cm2 (Colt) arasında belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, ‘Vanda’ çeşidinde fidan gelişim performansı bakımından Colt anacının daha iyi sonuçlar verdiği belirlenmiştir. Bunun yanında, Colt anacına göre, Gisela 5 ve PHL-A anaçları üzerine aşılı fidanlar daha zayıf ve bodur bir gelişim göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

kiraz, fidan boyu, sürgün uzunluğu, yan dal sayısı, yaprak alanı

The Effect of Some Rootstocks on Growth of ‘Vanda’ Sweet Cherry Cultivar Nursery

Öz

This research was carried out to determine effect of PHL-A, Gisela 5 and Colt rootstocks on nursery growth in ‘Vanda’ sweet cherry cultivar. The effect of rootstocks on growth of Vanda trees in nursery was found to be significant (p<0.05). Generally, the effect of Gisela 5 ve PHL-A rootstocks on nursery growth of ‘Vanda’ cultivar was similar. Depending on rootstocks, nursery height, scion trunk diameter, number of lateral shoots, shoot length, fresh mass of nursery, fresh weight of leaves, dry weight and leaf area was ranked from 125.7 (Gisela 5) to 198.8 cm (Colt), 12.8 (Gisela 5) to 22.4 mm (Colt), 1.1 (PHL-A) to 9.9 (Colt), 21.53 (Gisela 5) to 42.63 cm (Colt), 0.5 (Gisela 5) to 1.95 kg (Colt), 145.0 (PHL-A) to 323.0 g (Colt), 56.2 (PHL-A) to 117.5 g (Colt) and 109 (Gisela 5) to 149.7 cm2 (Colt), respectively. Consequently, it has been determined that ‘Vanda’ cultivar showed more vigor growth on Cold rootstock when compared to Gisela 5 ve PHL-A rootstocks.

Anahtar Kelimeler

sweet cherry, nursery height, shoot length, number of lateral shoots, leaves area

Kaynakça

• Ağlar, E. ve Yıldız, K. (2014). Influence of rootstocks (Gisela 5, Gisela 6, MaxMa, SL 64) on performance of ‘0900 Ziraat’ sweet cherry. Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 10, 60-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.6000/1927-5129.2014.10.09
• Aglar, E., Yildiz, K. ve Long, L. E. (2016). The Effects of Rootstocks and Training Systems on the Early Performance of'0900 Ziraat'Sweet Cherry. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 44(2), 573-578. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha44210401
• Aydın, E. ve Yarılgaç, T. (2020). Anaç adayı kiraz ve vişne genotiplerinin doku kültürü yöntemiyle çoğaltılması. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi, 9(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.29278/azd.732181
• Baryla, P., Kaplan, M. ve Krawiec, M. (2014). The effect of different types of rootstock on the quality of maiden trees of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cv.‘Regina’. Acta Agrobotanica, 67(4). https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2014.051
• Baryla, P., Kaplan, M., Krawiec, M. ve Kiczorowski, P. (2013). The effect of rootstocks on the efficiency of a nursery of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) trees cv. ‘Regina’. Acta Agrobotanica, 66(4). https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2013.058
• Bolsu, A., ve Akça, Y. (2011). Mahlep anacı üzerine aşılı 5 kiraz çeşidinin bazı morfolojik özellikleri ile meyve kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 21(3), 152-157. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/204762
• Cantín, C. M., Pinochet, J., Gogorcena, Y. ve Moreno, M. Á. (2010). Growth, yield and fruit quality of ‘Van’and ‘Stark Hardy Giant’sweet cherry cultivars as influenced by grafting on different rootstocks. Scientia Horticulturae, 123(3), 329-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2009.09.016
• Fajt, N., Folini, L., Bassi, G. ve Siegler, H. (2014). Lapins on ten cherry rootstocks in the Alpe Adria region. Acta Horticulturae, 1020, 371-376. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1020.51
• Gómez-del-Campo, M., Ruiz, C. ve Lissarrague, J. R. (2002). Effect of water stress on leaf area development, photosynthesis, and productivity in Chardonnay and Airén grapevines. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 53(2), 138-143. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290286691
• Karakaya, O., Ozturk, B., Aglar, E. ve Balik, H. I. (2021). The influence of the rootstocks on biochemical and bioactive compound content of ‘0900 Ziraat’ sweet cherry fruit. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 63(3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-021-00542-0
• Küçükyumuk, C., Sarısu, H., Yıldız, H., Kaçal, E. ve Koçal, H. (2015). Farklı anaçlar üzerine aşılı 0900 ziraat kiraz çeşidinde su stresinin bazı vejetatif gelişim parametrelerine etkisi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 25(2), 180-192. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.236404
• Lanauskas, J., Uselis, N., Kviklys, D., Kviklienė, N. ve Buskienė, L. (2012). Rootstock effect on the performance of sweet cherry cv. Lapins. Horticultural Science, 39(2), 55-60. https://www.agriculturejournals.cz/publicFiles/50_2011-HORTSCI.pdf
• Lang, G. A. (2000). Precocious, dwarfing, and productive—how will new cherry rootstocks impact the sweet cherry industry? HortTechnology, 10(4), 719-725. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.10.4.719
• Lang, G. A. (2001). Intensive sweet cherry orchard systems-rootstocks, vigor, precocity, productivity, and management. Compact Fruit Tree, 34(1), 23-26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285788783
• Long, L. E. ve Kaiser, C. (2010). Sweet cherry rootstocks for the Pacific Northwest (1st edition). A Pacific Northwest Extension Publication. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/parent/bv73c068r/file_sets/kw52j840j
• Long, E., L., Lang, G., Musacchi, S. ve Whiting, M. (2015). Cherry training systems (1st edition). A Pacific Northwest Extension Publication. https://research.wsulibs.wsu.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/2376/6087/pnw667print_0.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
• López-Ortega, G., García-Montiel, F. Bayo-Canha, A., Frutos-Ruiz, C. ve Frutos-Tomás, D. (2016). Rootstock effects on the growth, yield and fruit quality of sweet cherry cv. ‘Newstar’ in the growing conditions of the Region of Murcia. Scientia Horticulturae, 198, 326-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.11.041
• Moreno, M. A., Adrada, R., Aparicio, J. ve BetráN, S. (2001). Performance of ‘Sunburst’sweet cherry grafted on different rootstocks. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 76(2), 167-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2001.11511345
• Özçağıran R., Ünal A., Özeker E. ve İsfendiyaroğlu M. (2011). Ilıman İklim Meyve Türleri: Sert Çekirdekli Meyveler (3. baskı). Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi.
• Poniedzialek, W., Szczygiel, A., Porebski, S. ve Gorski, A. (1997). Effect of budding dates and types of rootstock on bud establishment and growth of one-year old apple trees of two cultivars. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Rolniczej w Krakowie. Ogrodnictwo, 23, 5-18. https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=PL1999000117
• Santos, A., Santos‐Ribeiro, R., Cavalheiro, J., Cordeiro, V. ve Lousada, J. L. (2006). Initial growth and fruiting of ‘Summit’sweet cherry (Prunus avium) on five rootstocks. New Zealand journal of crop and horticultural science, 34(3), 269-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2006.9514416
• Schechter, I., Proctor, J. T. A. ve Elfving, D. C. (1991). Rootstock affects vegetative growth characteristics and productivity of ‘Delicious’ apple. HortScience, 26(9), 1145-1148. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.26.9.1145
• Szczepanski, K., Zwierz, J., Holownicki, R. ve Rejman, S. (1987). The relationship of a diameter and a height of an apple to its weight. Fruit Science Reports, 14(3). https://agro.icm.edu.pl/agro/element/bwmeta1.element.agro-5dfb32df-1dc6-452b-83db 80d67af6d9d5
• Sitarek, M. ve Bartosiewicz, B. (2012). Influence of five clonal rootstocks on the growth, productivity and fruit quality of ‘Sylvia’and ‘Karina’sweet cherry trees. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental plant research, 20(2), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10290-012-0010-z
• Sitarek, M. ve Rozpara, E. (2008). Growth of young (three-year-old) ‘Regina’ sweet cherry trees grafted on nine clonal rootstocks. Sustainable Fruit Growing: From Plant to Product (s. 117-121). Latvia State Institute of Fruit-Growing Publishing. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Grzegorz-Doruchowski/publication/46386183
• Stachowiak, A. ve Swierczynski, S. (2004). Growth of six sweet cherry cultivars on Colt and on mazzard seedling (Prunus avium L.) rootstocks in a nursery. Roczniki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu. Ogrodnictwo, 38, 149-156. http://www.up.poznan.pl/ogrodnictwo/Ogrodnictwo%2038/Stachowiak.pdf
• Stachowiak, A. ve Swierczynski, S. (2009). The influence of mycorrhizal vaccine on the growth of maiden sweet cherry trees of selected cultivars in nursery. Acta Scientarium Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 8(1), 3-11. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.574.5886&rep=rep1&type=pdf
• Stanisavljević, A., Bošnjak, D., Todorčić Vekić, T., Teklić, T., Špoljarević, M., Štolfa, I., ... ve Lisjak, M. (2015). Induction of lateral shoots of sweet cherry on the Gisela 6 rootstock. Poljoprivreda, 21(1), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.18047/poljo.21.1.10
• Świerczyński, S. ve Stachowiak, A. (2012). Usefulness of ‘Frutana’interstock in the production of maiden sweet cherry trees in the nursery. Acta Scientarium Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 11(2), 263-273. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289629521
• Świerczyński, S., Borowiak, K., Bosiacki, M., Urbaniak, M. ve Malinowska, A. (2019). Estimation of the growth of ‘Vanda’ maiden sweet cherry trees on three rootstocks and after application of foliar fertilization in a nursery. Acta Scientarium Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 18(1), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2019.1.11
• Usenik, V., Fajt, N. ve Ătampar, F. (2006). Effects of rootstocks and training system on growth, precocity and productivity of sweet cherry. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 81(1), 153-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2006.11512042
• Usenik, V., Fajt, N., Mikulic-Petkovsek, M., Slatnar, A., Stampar, F. ve Veberic, R. (2010). Sweet cherry pomological and biochemical characteristics influenced by rootstock. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 58(8), 4928-4933. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf903755b
• Webster, A. D. ve Lucas, A. (1997). Sweet cherry rootstock studies: Comparisons of Prunus cerasus L. and Prunus hybrid clones as rootstocks for Van, Merton Glory and Merpet scions. Journal of Horticultural Science, 72(3), 469-481. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.1997.11515535
• Whiting, M. D. ve Lang, G. A. (2004). Bing'sweet cherry on the dwarfing rootstock Gisela 5: thinning affects fruit quality and vegetative growth but not net CO2 exchange. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 129(3), 407-415. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.129.3.0407
• Whiting, M. D., Lang, G., ve Ophardt, D. (2005). Rootstock and training system affect sweet cherry growth, yield, and fruit quality. HortScience, 40(3), 582-586. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.40.3.582
• Zec, G., Colovic, V., Milatovic, D., Colic, S., Vulic, T., Djordjevic, B. ve Djurovic, D. (2017). Rootstock influence on vigor and generative potential of young sweet cherry trees. Journal of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, 71(2), 137-141. https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/jafes/article/view/1229/1237