The U.S. and Saudi Arabia Relations from the 1970s to 1990s: A Theoretical Debate

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 64 - 84, 01.06.2019

Özdemir Akbal

Öz

There is an important view that the political events in the 1970s brought about a new political dimension in the debates on international political theories. From this period, the nature of the role of state in international politics, the importance of political economy practices and the impact of international institutions on international politics have been taken into consideration. The result of the discussions that began in the 1970s influenced a process that continued until the 1990s. In this period many scholars such as Alexander Wendt and Robert Cox, have focused on the decreasing importance of the social power and economic data and its impact on the governments. The question of how individuals affect the state and how the state affects the international politics have been questioned more frequently in the light of these discussions. The view that the individual as a subjectivity influenced the state behavior and international politics by cognitive means gained more attention during this period against the mainstream international political theory. The debate on international political theory in this period suggests that the role of the individual increases and the role of the state decreases in the international political arena. In contrast, Systemic International Political Theory SIPT states that the role of the state continues to be an important element in the international political arena after taking the succession of the individual. In the context of these discussions, this article focuses on the U.S.Saudi Arabia relations. The main reason of this is the reflection of Saudi Arabia’s use of oil as a weapon in the 1970s on global policies. The first sign of the changing of the political climate in the U.S. and Saudi Arabia relations is the 1973 Arab-Israeli War. Meanwhile, the oil crisis led by Saudi Arabia also affected the U.S. and Saudi Arabia relations in the 1970s. These events have been evaluated in the context of the discussion of policy theories

Anahtar Kelimeler

International System, Subjectivity, Saudi Arabia, U.S., Oil Crisis, Systemic International Political Theory, Critical Theories.

1970’lerden 1990’lara ABD ve Suudi Arabistan İlişkileri: Bir Teorik Tartışma

Öz

1970’lerde yaşanan siyasi olayların uluslararası siyaset teorisi tartışmalarına yeni bir politik boyut getirdiğine dair önemli bir görüş mevcuttur. Bu dönemden itibaren devletin uluslararası politikadaki rolünün şekli, ekonomi-politik uygulamalarının önemi ve uluslararası kurumların uluslararası politika üzerindeki etkisi göz önünde bulundurulmuştur. Bu tartışmaların 1970’lerde başlattığı süreç 1990’lara da tesir etmiştir. Bu dönemde Alexander Wendt ve Robert Cox gibi pek çok yazar, sosyal güçlerin ve ekonomik verilerin artan önemine ve bu durumun devletler üzerine olan etkisine yoğunlaşmıştır. Bireylerin devlet yapısını nasıl etkilediği ve devlet yapısının uluslararası politika ortamını nasıl etkilediği sorusu bu tartışmalar ışığında daha fazla sorulmuştur. Subjektivite olarak bireyin devleti ve uluslararası politikayı bilişsel araçlarla etkilediği görüşü, bu dönemde ana akım uluslararası politika teorisine karşı güç kazanmıştır. Bu dönemde uluslararası politika teorileri üzerine yapılan tartışmalar, bireyin rolünün arttığını ve devletin rolünün uluslararası siyasi ortamda azaldığını göstermektedir. Buna karşılık, Sistemik Uluslararası Politika Teorisi SUPT , bireyin vekaletini aldıktan sonra devletin rolünün uluslararası politika ortamında devam ettiğini ifade etmektedir. Bu tartışmalar bağlamında, bu makale ABD-Suudi Arabistan ilişkilerine odaklanmaktadır. Bunun temel nedeni, Suudi Arabistan’ın petrolü bir silah olarak kullanmasının 1970’lerde küresel politikalara yansımasıdır. ABD ile Suudi Arabistan ilişkilerinin değişmesinin ilk işareti 1973 Arapİsrail Savaşıdır. Bununla birlikte, Suudi Arabistan’ın yol açtığı petrol krizi, 1970’lerde ABD ve Suudi Arabistan ilişkilerini de etkilemiştir. Bu olaylar uluslararası politika teorileri tartışması bağlamında değerlendirilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Uluslararası Sistem, Sübjektivite, Suudi Arabistan, ABD, Petrol Krizi, Sistemik Uluslararası Politika Teorisi, Eleştirel Teoriler.

Kaynakça

• Abdul Rahman Embong, “Globalization and Transnational Class Relations: Some Problems of Conceptualization”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 21, No.6, (December, 2000).
• Abraham Rabinovich, The Yom Kippur War: The Epic Encounter That Transformed the Middle East, (New York: Schocken Books, 2005).
• Alexander Wendt, “Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics”, International Organization, Vol 46, No.2, (Spring, 1992).
• Andrew Hartman, “‘The Red Template’: US Policy in Soviet-occupied Afghanistan”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 23, No.3, (June, 2002).
• Anthony Giddens, The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, (Cambridge: Polity, 1986).
• Charles Kupchan, “After Pax Americana Benign Power, Regional Integration, and the Sources of a Stable Multipolarity”, International Security, Vol.23, No.2, (Fall, 1998).
• Daniel Yergin, Petrol Para ve Güç Çatışmasının Epik Öyküsü, (İstanbul: İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2003).
• David Frum, How We Got Here: The ‘70s, (New York: Basic Book, 2000).
• David Painter, “Oil and Geopolitics: The Oil Crises of the 1970s and the Cold War”,Historical Social Research ,Vol. 39, No.4, (2014).
• Enayatollah Yazdani and Rizwan Hussain, “United States’ Policy towards Iran after the Islamic Revolution: An Iranian Perspective”. International Studies, Vol. 43, No.3, (April, 2006).
• George Kennan (X), “The sources of Soviet conduct”, Foreign Affairs, Vol.25, No.4, (July, 1947).
• George Lenczowski, American Presidents and the Middle East, (Durham: Duke University Press, 1990).
• Gilles Dorronsoro, “Pakistan and the Taliban: State Policy, Religious Networks and Political Connections”, Christophe Jaffrelot, “Pakistan: Nationalism Without A Nation?”, (New York: Zed Books, 2004).
• Greg Bruno, “Saudi Arabia and Future of Afghanistan”, Council on Foreign Relations, 11 September 2008, http://www.cfr.org/afghanistan/saudi-arabia-future-afghanis- tan/p17964, (20 January 2015).
• Harold James, International Monetary Cooperation Since Bretton Woods, (Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1996).
• Ilana Dimant-Kass, “The Soviet Military and Soviet Policy in the Middle East 1970- 73”, Soviet Studies, Vol.26, No.4, (October,1974).
• Jutta Weldes, “Constructing National Interests”, European Journal of International Relations, Vol.2 No.3, (September, 1996).
• Karen Dawisha, “The U.S.S.R. in the Middle East: Superpower in Eclipse?”, Foreign Affairs, Vol.61, No.2, (Winter, 1982).
• Kenneth N. Waltz, Man, the State and War A Theoretical Analysis, (New York: Columbia University Press, 2001).
• Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics, (Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1979).
• Majid Behestani and Mehdi Hedayati Shahidani, “Twin Pillars Policy: Engagement of US-Iran Foreign Affairs During the Last Two Decades of Pahlavi Dynasty”, Asian Social Science, Vol. 11, No.2, (December, 2014).
• Michael G. Nehme, “Saudi Arabia 1950–1980: Between Nationalism and Religion”, Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 30, No.4, (October,1994).
• Morris A. Adelman, The First Oil Price Explosion 1971-1974, (Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology,1990).
• Peter Allen, The Yom Kippur War, (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1982).
• Peter Bechtold, “New Attempts at Arab Cooperation: The Federation of Arab Republics, 1971-?”, Middle East Journal, Vol. 27, No.2, (Spring, 1973).
• Peter Bergen, Holy War Inc.: Inside the Secret World bin Laden (New York: Free Press, 2002).
• Randy B. Bell, “Expansion of American Persian Gulf Policy by Three President”, http:// www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1990/BRB.htm, (13.01.2015).
• Richard Nixon, “Addresses to the Nation on the War on the Vietnam”, Nixon Library, 3 October 1969,http://www.nixonlibrary.gov/forkids/speechesforkids/silentmajo- rity/silentmajority_transcript.pdf (30.08.2015).
• Robert Cox, “Civil Society at the Turn of the Millennium: Prospects for an Alternative World Order”, Review of International Studies, Vol.25, No.1, (January, 1999).
• Robert Gilpin, War and Change in World Politics, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999).
• Robert Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1984).
• Robert R. Cox, “Beyond Empire and Terror: Critical Reflections on the Political Economy of World Order”, New Political Economy, Vol. 9, No.3, (September, 2004).
• Robert R. Cox, Production, Power, And World Order Social Forces in the Making of History, New York: Columbia University Press, 1987).
• Shah M. Tarzi, “Politics of the Afghan Resistance Movement: Cleavages, Disunity, and Fragmentation”, Asian Survey, Vol.31, No.6, (June, 1991).
• Simon Dunstan, The Yom Kippur War the Arab Israeli War of 1973, (New York: Osprey Publishing, 2007).
• Timur Kuran, “Now Out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European of 1989”, World Politics, Vol.44, No.1, (October, 1991).
• Toby C. Jones, “America, Oil, and War in the Middle East”, Journal of American History, Vol. 99, No.1, (June, 2012).
• US Department of State Office of the Historian. Oil Embargo, October 31, 2013, htt- ps://history.state.gov/milestones/1969-1976/oil-embargo (20 January 2015).
• USS Little Rock Association, (07 April 2011), http://www.usslittlerock.org/Historic%20 Events/LittleRockYomKippur.html (25 November 2014).