Ruh Sağlığı Profesyonellerinin Paylaşılan Travmatik Gerçeklik ve Baş Etme Deneyimleri: Nitel Bir Çalışma

Öz

Toplumsal travmaya maruz kalan ruh sağlığı profesyonellerinin deneyimleri yeterince araştırılmamış bir konudur. Bu çalışmanın amacı toplumsal travmaya maruz kalmış ruh sağlığı profesyonellerinin paylaşılan travmatik gerçeklik ve baş etme deneyimlerini incelemektir. Bu çalışma tümevarımsal nitel yaklaşım kullanılarak Türkiye’de 6 Şubat 2023 tarihinde gerçekleşen depremi doğrudan yaşayan ve deprem bölgesinde ruh sağlığı hizmeti veren 18 ruh sağlığı profesyoneli ile derinlemesine görüşme yolu ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Görüşmeden elde edilen veriler 5 kategori ve 16 alt kategori altında toplanmıştır. Katılımcılar toplumsal travmaya karşı paylaşılan travmatik gerçeklik, özdeşim, çifte maruziyet ve travmatik karşı aktarım yaşadıklarından bahsetmişlerdir. Travmaya karşı çaresizlik, üzüntü, yetersizlik ve suçluluk gibi duyguları daha yoğun yaşadıklarını, aşırı uyarılma ve kaçınma davranışı sergilediklerini ifade etmişlerdir. Katılımcılar afet bölgesinde temel ihtiyaçlarını karşılama noktasında zorlandıklarını ve gerek fiziksel alt yapı yetersizliği gerek çok fazla travma hastasının kliniğe başvurması sonucunda iş yüklerinin arttığını bildirmişlerdir. Yaşadıkları travmatik süreç ile sosyal destek sistemlerini kullanarak baş etmeye çalıştıklarını ve travmanın yıkıcı etkilerini azaltmak için ilaç kullanımına yöneldiklerini belirtmişlerdir. Yaşadıkları travma deneyimlerinden sonra öğrenerek güçlendiklerini ve travma sonrası büyüme yaşadıklarını belirtmişlerdir. Ruh sağlığı profesyonellerinin toplumsal travmalar karşısında olumsuz etkilenmemesi adına etkin baş etme ve güçlenme noktasında desteklenmeleri ruh sağlıkları ve mesleki profesyonellikleri üzerinde koruyucu etki yapabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Toplumsal travma
• paylaşılan travmatik gerçeklik
• deprem
• ruh sağlığı profesyonelleri.

Shared Traumatic Reality And Coping Experiences Of Mental Health Professionals: A Qualitative Study

Öz

The experiences of mental health professionals exposed to social trauma is an under-researched topic. The aim of this study is to examine the shared traumatic reality and coping experiences of mental health professionals exposed to social trauma. Using an inductive qualitative approach, this study was conducted through in-depth interviews with 18 mental health professionals who directly experienced the earthquake in Turkey on February 6, 2023 and provided mental health services in the earthquake zone. The data obtained from the interview were collected under 5 categories and 16 subcategories. Since the participants experienced shared traumatic reality, identification, double exposure and traumatic countertransference against social trauma, they stated that they experienced feelings such as helplessness, sadness, inadequacy and guilt more intensely, and exhibited hyperarousal and avoidance behaviors against trauma. The participants reported that they struggled to meet their basic needs in the disaster area and that their workload increased due to both the inadequacy of physical infrastructure and the high number of trauma patients visiting the clinic. They stated that they tried to cope with the traumatic process they experienced by using social support systems and that they turned to drug use to reduce the destructive effects of trauma. They stated that they became stronger by learning after their traumatic experiences and experienced posttraumatic growth. Supporting mental health professionals in developing effective coping strategies and resilience in the face of societal traumas can have a protective impact on both their mental well-being and their professional competence.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Collective trauma
• shared traumatic reality
• earthquake
• mental health professionals.

Kaynakça

1. 1. Hoffman MA, Kruczek TA. Bioecological model of mass trauma: Individual, community, and societal effects. The Counseling Psychologist. 2011;39(8):1087-1127.
2. 2. Bilewicz M, Witkowska M, Pantazi M, Gkinopoulos T, Klein O. Traumatic rift: How conspiracy beliefs undermine cohesion after societal trauma? Europe's Journal of Psychology. 2019;15(1):82.
3. 3. Liu H, Tatano H, Pflug G, Hochrainer-Stigler S. Post-disaster recovery in industrial sectors: A Markov process analysis of multiple lifeline disruptions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2021;206:107299.
4. 4. Yang Y, Tatano H, Huang Q, Liu H, Yoshizawa G, Wang K. Evaluating the societal impact of disaster-driven infrastructure disruptions: A water analysis perspective. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2021;52:101988.
5. 5. Karatay G. Tarihsel/toplumsal travmalar ve kuşaklararası aktarımı biçimleri üzerine. Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi. 2020;29(5):373-379.
6. 6. Figley CR, Beder J. (Edited by). The cost of caring requires self care. In Advances in social work practice with the military. Routledge, 2012: 278-286.
7. 7. García FE, Cova F, Rincón P, Vázquez C. Trauma or growth after a natural disaster? The mediating role of rumination processes. European Journal of Psychotraumatology. 2015;6(1):26557.
8. 8. Işıkhan V. Afetlere müdahale eden yardım personelini güçlendirme. Doğal Afetler ve Çevre Dergisi. 2021;7(2):399-406.

9. 9. Kanno H. Supporting indirectly traumatized populations: The need to assess secondary traumatic stress for helping professionals in DSM-V. Health and Social Work. 2010;35(3): 225-228.
10. 10. Lerias D, Byrne MK. Vicarious traumatization symptoms and predictors. Stress Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 2003;19(3):129–138.
11. 11. Tosone C, Nuttman-Shwartz O, Stephens T. Shared trauma: When the professional is personal. Clinical Social Work Journal. 2012;40(2):231–239.
12. 12. Baum N. Shared traumatic reality in communal disasters: Toward a conceptualization. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2010;47(2):249–259.
13. 13. Finklestein M, Stein E, Greene T, Bronstein I, Solomon Z. Posttraumatic stress disorder and vicarious trauma in mental health professionals. Health & Social Work. 2015;40(2):e25-e31.
14. 14. Freedman SA, Tuval Mashiach R. Shared trauma reality in war: Mental health therapists’ experience. PloS one. 2,08;13(2):e0191949.
15. 15. Dekel R, Nuttman-Shwartz O, Lavi T. Shared traumatic reality and boundary theory: How mental health professionals cope with the home/work conflict during continuous security threats. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy. 2016;15(2):121-134. doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2015.1068251
16. 16. Ludick M, Figley CR. Toward a mechanism for secondary trauma induction and reduction: Reimagining a theory of secondary traumatic stress. Traumatology. 2017;23(1):112.
17. 17. Naushad VA, Bierens JJ, Nishan KP, Firjeeth CP, Mohammad OH, Maliyakkal AM, ..., Schreiber MD. A systematic review of the impact of disaster on the mental health of medical responders. Prehospital and disaster medicine. 2019;34(6):632-643.
18. 18. Calhoun CD, Stone KJ, Cobb AR, Patterson MW, Danielson C K, Bendezú JJ. The role of social support in coping with psychological trauma: An integrated biopsychosocial model for posttraumatic stress recovery. Psychiatric Quarterly. 2022;93(4):949-970.
19. 19. Day KW, Lawson G, Burge P. Clinicians' experiences of shared trauma after the shootings at Virginia Tech. Journal of Counseling & Development. 2017;95(3):269-278.
20. 20. Dursun P, Söylemez İ. Travma sonrası büyüme: Gözden geçirilmiş son model ile kapsamlı bir değerlendirme. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2020;31(1):57-68.
21. 21. De Ruiter MC, Couasnon A, van den Homberg MJ, Daniell JE, Gill JC, Ward PJ. Why we can no longer ignore consecutive disasters. Earth's Future. 2020;8(3):e2019EF001425.
22. 22. Dinçer İ, Akın MK, Akın M, Orhan A, Ozan O, Varol MB, Benlioğlu TB. 6 Şubat 2023 Kahramanmaraş depremleri. Konuralp Medical Journal. 2023;14(1):1-16.
23. 23. Sağıroğlu AZ, Ünsal R, Özenci F. Deprem sonrası göç ve insan hareketlilikleri: durum değerlendirme raporu (AYBÜ-GPM, 2023). Güncellenmiş 2. Baskı, 2023;1-44:5.
24. 24. Yıldız Mİ, Başterzi AD, Yıldırım EA, Yüksel Ş, Aker AT, Semerci B, ..., Hacıoğlu Yıldırım M. Preventive and therapeutic mental health care after the earthquake- expert opinion from the psychiatric association of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry. 2023;34(1):39-49.
25. 25. Sehlikoğlu Ş, Yilmaz Karaman IG, Yastıbaş Kaçar C, Canakci ME. Earthquake and mental health of healthcare workers: A systematic review. Turkısh Journal Clınıcal Psychıatry. 2023;26(4):309-318.
26. 26. Baltacı A. Nitel araştırma süreci: Nitel bir araştırma nasıl yapılır? Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2019; 5(2): 368-388.
27. 27. Demirtepe-Saygılı D. Refleksivite ve etkileşim açılarından nitel araştırmacı olmanın fırsatları ve zorlukları. AYNA Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi. 2021;8(1):1-16.
28. 28. Borrego M, Douglas EP, Amelink CT. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education. 2009;98(1):53-66.
29. 29. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
30. 30. Braun V, Clarke V. Novel insights into patients’ life-worlds: the value of qualitative research. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6(9):720–1. doi.org/10.1016/
31. 31. Dereli AB. MAXQDA: Technıcal note on creatıve data analysıs. Journal of Karadeniz Communication Studies. 2023;13(1):149-152.
32. 32. Baltacı A. Nitel araştırmalarda örnekleme yöntemleri ve örnek hacmi sorunsalı üzerine kavramsal bir inceleme. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2018;7(1):231-274.
33. 33. Kretsch R, Benyakar M, Baruch E, Roth M. A shared reality of therapists and survivors in a national crisis as illustrated by the Gulf War. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 1997;34(1):28.
34. 34. Saakvitne KW. Shared trauma: The therapist's increased vulnerability. Psychoanalytic Dialogues. 2002;12(3):443-449.
35. 35. Şad SN, Özer N, Atli A. Psikolojide tematik analizin kullanımı. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi. 2019;7(2):873-898.
36. 36. Tekindal M, Arsu ŞU. Nitel araştırma yöntemi olarak fenomenolojik yaklaşımın kapsamı ve sürecine yönelik bir derleme. Ufkun Ötesi Bilim Dergisi. 2020;20(1), 153-172.
37. 37. Tong A, Saınsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2007;19(6):349-357.
38. 38. Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):1609406917733847.
39. 39. Yaşar M. Nitel araştırmalarda nitelik sorunu. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018;5(2):55-73.
40. 40. Ali DA, Figley CR, Tedeschi RG, Galarneau D, Amara S. Shared trauma, resilience, and growth: A roadmap toward transcultural conceptualization. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. 2023;15(1):45.
41. 41. Asakura K, Gheorghe RM, Rieger D, Tarshis S, Borgen S, D’Angiulli A. Exploring shared trauma in the time of COVID: A simulation-based survey study of mental health clinicians. Clinical Social Work Journal. 2023;51(2):163-174.
42. 42. Holmes MR, Rentrope CR, Korsch-Williams A, King JA. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on posttraumatic stress, grief, burnout, and secondary trauma of social workers in the United States. Clinical Social Work Journal. 2021;49(4):495–504.
43. 43. Tosone C, McTighe JP, Bauwens J. Shared traumatic stress among social workers in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. British Journal of Social Work. 2015;45(4):1313-1329.
44. 44. Dekel R, Baum N. Intervention in a shared traumatic reality: A new challenge for social workers. British Journal of Social Work. 2010;40(6):1927-1944.
45. 45. Splevins KA, Cohen K, Joseph S, Murray C, Bowley J. Vicarious posttraumatic growth among interpreters. Qualitative health research. 2010;20(12):1705-1716.
46. 46. Figley CR, Ludick M. Secondary traumatization and compassion fatigue. In S. N. Gold (Edited by), APA handbook of trauma psychology: Foundations in knowledge. American Psychological Association. 2017:573-593.
47. 47. Baum N. Professionals' double exposure in the shared traumatic reality of wartime: Contributions to professional growth and stress. The British Journal of Social Work. 2014;44(8):2113-2134.
48. 48. Cohen M, Gagin R, Peled-Avram M. Multiple terrorist attacks: Compassion fatigue in Israeli social workers. Traumatology. 2006;12(4):293-301.
49. 49. Kurşun GŞ, Uygun E, Dikeç G. The experiences of mental health professionals providing online psychological support to refugees during the COVID-19: A qualitative study. J Cogn Behav Psychother Res. 2023;12(3):264-278.
50. 50. Duman N. Travma sonrasi büyüme ve gelişim. Uluslararası Afro-Avrasya Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2019;4(7):178-184.
51. 51. Kanno H, Giddings MM. Hidden trauma victims: Understanding and preventing traumatic stress in mental health professionals. Social Work in Mental Health. 2017;15(3):331-353.
52. 52. Gören AB. Postdisaster secondary traumatic stress and religious coping: The case of Kahramanmaraş Earthquake. Turkish Journal of Religious Studies. 2023;23(1):80-100.
53. 53. Chen R, Sun C, Chen JJ, Jen HJ, Kang XL, Kao CC, Chou KR. A large‐scale survey on trauma, burnout, and posttraumatic growth among nurses during the COVID‐19 pandemic. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 2021;30(1):102-116.
54. 54. Vazquez C, Valiente C, García FE, Contreras A, Peinado V, Trucharte A, Bentall RP. Posttraumatic growth and stress-related responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in a national representative sample: The role of positive core beliefs about the world and others. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2021;22 (1):2915–2935.
55. 55. McCann IL, Pearlman LA. Vicarious traumatization: A framework for understanding the psychological effects of working with victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 1990;3:131-149.