Comparative Outcomes of Percutaneous Plantar Fascia Release, Calcaneal Drilling, and Calcaneal Spur Removal versus ESWT in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 47 Sayı: 3, 457 - 466, 02.05.2025

Hünkar Çağdaş Bayrak , Selen Topaktaş

https://doi.org/10.20515/otd.1634034

Cited By: 1

Öz

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of percutaneous plantar fascia release, calcaneal drilling, and calcaneal spur excision with extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in patients with plantar fasciitis resistant to conservative treatment. A total of 52 patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis and unresponsive to at least six months of conservative therapy between January 2021 and December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: minimally invasive surgery (n = 18) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) (n = 34). Demographic data, symptom duration, standing time at work, return-to-work time, complications, and clinical outcomes were compared using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and the Roles & Maudsley (RM) score. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), symptom duration, or standing time at work (p > 0.05). Return-to-work time was significantly longer in the minimally invasive surgery group (13.8 ± 4.5 vs. 4.3 ± 2.8 days, p = 0.001). While both groups showed comparable clinical improvement at the 6-month follow-up, VAS and AOFAS scores were better maintained in the surgical group at 12 months. In contrast, a decline was observed in the ESWT group (p = 0.001 and p = 0.012). Complication rates were similar between the groups (p = 0.99). Minimally invasive surgery provided more sustainable long-term clinical improvement. On the other hand, ESWT offered a predictable short-term cost advantage and enabled earlier return to work. Considering patient expectations and ease of application, ESWT appears to be an effective and practical treatment option that should be considered before proceeding with minimally invasive surgical interventions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ESWT , Minimal İnvaziv Surgery , Plantar Fasciitis

Perkütan Plantar Fasya Gevşetme , Kalkaneal Delik Açma ve Kalkaneal Spur Eksizyonu ile ESWT'nin Plantar Fasiit Tedavisindeki Karşılaştırmalı Sonuçları

Öz

Bu çalışma, konservatif tedaviye dirençli plantar fasiitli hastalarda, perkütan plantar fasya gevşetmesi, kalkaneal delik açma ve kalkaneal spur eksizyonu ile Ekstrakorporeal Şok Dalga Tedavisi (ESWT)’nin klinik sonuçlarını karşılaştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Ocak 2021 ile Aralık 2024 tarihleri arasında plantar fasiit tanısı almış ve en az altı ay konservatif tedaviye yanıt vermemiş 52 hasta, retrospektif olarak analiz edilmiştir. Hastalar iki gruba ayrılmıştır: minimal invaziv cerrahi (n=18) ve ESWT (n=34). Demografik veriler, semptom süresi, işte ayakta durma süresi, işe dönüş süresi, komplikasyonlar ve klinik sonuçlar, Görsel Analog Skala (VAS), Amerikan Ortopedik Ayak ve Ayak Bileği Derneği Skoru (AOFAS) ve Roles & Maudsley Skoru (RM) ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Gruplar arasında yaş, cinsiyet, Vücut Kitle İndeksi (BMI), semptom süresi veya işte ayakta durma süresi açısından anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır (p > 0.05). İşe dönüş süresi, minimal invaziv cerrahi grubunda daha uzun bulunmuştur (13.8 ± 4.5 vs. 4.3 ± 2.8 gün, p = 0.001). Altıncı ayda her iki grup da benzer klinik iyileşme göstermiştir; ancak 12. ayda VAS ve AOFAS skorları cerrahi grupta daha iyi kalmış, ESWT grubunda ise gerileme gözlenmiştir (p = 0.001 ve p = 0.012). Komplikasyon oranları karşılaştırılabilir bulunmuştur (p = 0.99). Minimal invaziv cerrahi, uzun vadede daha sürdürülebilir klinik iyileşme sağlamaktadır. Buna karşın, ESWT erken dönemde öngörülebilir bir maliyet avantajı sunmakta ve hastaların daha kısa sürede iş yaşamına dönebilmesine olanak tanımaktadır. Hasta beklentileri ve uygulama kolaylığı gibi faktörler göz önünde bulundurulduğunda, ESWT’nin etkili ve pratik bir tedavi seçeneği olarak minimal invaziv cerrahi yöntemlere geçilmeden önce değerlendirilmesi önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

eswt , Plantar Fasiit , Minimal İnvaziv Cerrahi

Kaynakça

• 1. Barrett SL, O'MALLEY RJAfp. Plantar fasciitis and other causes of heel pain. 1999;59(8):2200-6.
• 2. Johal K, Milner SJF, surgery a. Plantar fasciitis and the calcaneal spur: Fact or fiction? 2012;18(1):39-41.
• 3. Lim AT, How CH, Tan BJSmj. Management of plantar fasciitis in the outpatient setting. 2016;57(4):168.
• 4. Thomas JL, Christensen JC, Kravitz SR, Mendicino RW, Schuberth JM, Vanore JV, et al. The diagnosis and treatment of heel pain: a clinical practice guideline–revision 2010. 2010;49(3):S1-S19.
• 5. Latt LD, Jaffe DE, Tang Y, Taljanovic MSJF, orthopaedics a. Evaluation and treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis. 2020;5(1):2473011419896763.
• 6. Güloğlu SB, Yalçın ÜJTjopm, rehabilitation. Comparison of effects of low-level laser therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in calcaneal spur treatment: A prospective, randomized, clinical study. 2021;67(2):218.
• 7. Arıcan M, Turhan Y, Karaduman ZOJKMJ. Plantar Fasiitte Radyal Ekstrakorporeal Şok Dalga Tedavisinde İki Farklı Doz Uygulamasının Karşılaştırmalı Klinik ve Fonksiyonel Sonuçları. 2019;11(2):278-84.
• 8. Snider M, Clancy W, McBeath AJTAjosm. Plantar fascia release for chronic plantar fasciitis in runners. 1983;11(4):215-9.
• 9. Maaty M, Khalek MJCRFA. A New Minimal Invasive Technique in the Treatment of Resistant Plantar Fasciitis by Percutaneous Partial Plantar Fasciotomy, Drilling of the Calcaneus and Resection of Calcaneal Spur. 2018;6(256):2.
• 10. Karaytuğ K, Batıbay SG, Yıldız EJTMJOHNT, Hospital R. Early-Term Functional Results for Combined Technique of Calcaneal Spur Removal, Calcaneal Drilling, and Plantar Fascia Release in Painful Heel Syndrome. 2018;58(1):17-21.
• 11. Liabakh A, Turchin O, Pyatkovskyi VJT. Effectiveness of using H. Kitaoka (AOFAS) scale, FFI (Italian version), Roles and Maudsley score, VAS in patients with flatfoot. 2023;24(4):4-8.
• 12. Radwan YA, Mansour AMR, Badawy WSJIo. Resistant plantar fasciopathy: shock wave versus endoscopic plantar fascial release. 2012;36:2147-56.
• 13. Singh D, Angel J, Bentley G, Trevino SGJB. Fortnightly review: plantar fasciitis. 1997;315(7101):172-5.
• 14. Riddle DL, Pulisic M, Sparrow KJF, international a. Impact of demographic and impairment-related variables on disability associated with plantar fasciitis. 2004;25(5):311-7.
• 15. Cho BW, Choi JH, Han HS, Choi W-Y, Lee KMJCiOS. Age, body mass index, and spur size associated with patients’ symptoms in plantar fasciitis. 2022;14(3):458.
• 16. Khired Z, Najmi MH, Akkur AA, Mashhour MA, Bakri KAJC. The prevalence and risk factors of plantar fasciitis amongst the population of Jazan. 2022;14(9).
• 17. Theodore GH, Buch M, Amendola A, Bachmann C, Fleming LL, Zingas CJF, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. 2004;25(5):290-7.
• 18. Cinar E, Saxena S, Akkurt HE, Uygur FJTF. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: A randomized controlled trial. 2020;44:101679.
• 19. Kapusta J, Domżalski MJJocm. Long term effectiveness of ESWT in plantar fasciitis in amateur runners. 2022;11(23):6926.
• 20. Kudo P, Dainty K, Clarfield M, Coughlin L, Lavoie P, Lebrun CJJoor. Randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind clinical trial evaluating the treatment of plantar fasciitis with an extracoporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) device: A North American confirmatory study. 2006;24(2):115-23.
• 21. Roerdink R, Dietvorst M, Van der Zwaard B, Van der Worp H, Zwerver JJIJoS. Complications of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in plantar fasciitis: Systematic review. 2017;46:133-45.
• 22. Akkoyun Sert O, Yilmaz KJJoB, Rehabilitation M. Comparative retrospective analysis of magnetic field therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in pain management for heel spur. 2025:10538127241296347.
• 23. Hormozi J, Lee S, Hong DKJTJof, surgery a. Minimal invasive percutaneous bipolar radiofrequency for plantar fasciotomy: a retrospective study. 2011;50(3):283-6.
• 24. Neufeld SK, Cerrato RJJ-JotAAoOS. Plantar fasciitis: evaluation and treatment. 2008;16(6):338-46.
• 25. Barrett S, Day SJTJofs. Endoscopic plantar fasciotomy for chronic plantar fasciitis/heel spur syndrome: surgical technique--early clinical results. 1991;30(6):568-70.
• 26. El Shazly O, El Beltagy AJTF. Endoscopic plantar fascia release, calcaneal drilling and calcaneal spur removal for management of painful heel syndrome. 2010;20(4):121-5.
• 27. Barrett SL, Day SV, Pignetti TT, Robinson LBJTJof, surgery a. Endoscopic plantar fasciotomy: a multi-surgeon prospective analysis of 652 cases. 1995;34(4):400-6.
• 28. Sahu RLJCJoT. Percutaneous planter fasciitis release under local anesthesia: A prospective study. 2017;20(02):87-9.
• 29. Encinas R, Gauthier C, Cantrell AC, Zhang Y, Jackson III JB, Gross CE, et al. Minimally Invasive Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Fasciotomy for the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis. 2024;9(4):2473011424S00366.
• 30. Hasegawa M, Urits I, Orhurhu V, Orhurhu MS, Brinkman J, Giacomazzi S, et al. Current concepts of minimally invasive treatment options for plantar fasciitis: a comprehensive review. 2020;24:1-11.
• 31. Rizk AS, Kandel WA, Tabl EAE, Kandil MIJF, International A. Mid-sole release of the plantar fascia combined with percutaneous drilling of the calcaneus for treatment of resistant heel pain. 2017;38(11):1271-7.
• 32. Onwuanyi OJTf. Calcaneal spurs and plantar heel pad pain. 2000;10(4):182-5.
• 33. Bazaz R, Ferkel RDJF, international a. Results of endoscopic plantar fascia release. 2007;28(5):549-56.
• 34. Blanco CER, Leon HO, Guthrie TBJATJoA, Surgery R. Endoscopic treatment of calcaneal spur syndrome: A comprehensive technique. 2001;17(5):517-22.
• 35. Saxena A, Fournier M, Gerdesmeyer L, Gollwitzer HJM, ligaments, journal t. Comparison between extracorporeal shockwave therapy, placebo ESWT and endoscopic plantar fasciotomy for the treatment of chronic plantar heel pain in the athlete. 2013;2(4):312.
• 36. Othman AMA, Ragab EMJAoo, surgery t. Endoscopic plantar fasciotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy for treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis. 2010;130:1343-7.
• 37. Pandey S, Kumar N, Kumar A, Biswas A, Sinha U, Pandey J, et al. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy versus platelet Rich plasma injection in patients of chronic Plantar fasciitis: a Randomized Controlled Trial from a Tertiary Center of Eastern India. 2023;15(1).
• 38. Tung WS, Daher M, Covarrubias O, Herber A, Gianakos ALJF, Surgery A. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy shows comparative results with other modalities for the management of plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 2024.
• 39. Kesikburun S, Şan AU, Kesikburun B, Aras B, Yaşar E, Tan AKJTJoF, et al. Comparison of ultrasound-guided prolotherapy versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: A randomized clinical trial. 2022;61(1):48-52.
• 40. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Sağlık Bakanlığı. Kamu Sağlık Hizmetleri Fiyat Tarifesi 2024 Yılı. Sağlık Bilgi Sistemi [internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Apr 8]. Available from: https://shgmsgudb.saglik.gov.tr/TR-102010/kamu-saglik-hizmetleri-fiyat-tarifesi-2024-yili.html.