Voice Use, Voice Disorders, and Awareness Levels in Healthcare Providers

Öz

Objective: This study aimed to examine occupational voice use characteristics, the prevalence of voice disorders, and the level of vocal hygiene awareness among healthcare providers. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted with 100 healthcare professionals working in a tertiary hospital. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire and the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10). Statistical analyses examined the associations between voice-related symptoms, occupational factors, and awareness levels. Results: A total of 100 healthcare providers participated (76% female; median age: 30 years). Physicians (49%) and nurses (42%) comprised the majority of the sample, with a median professional experience of 6 years. Most (73%) worked in non-ENT clinics. Voice-related symptoms were highly prevalent: 85% reported at least one in the past year—most commonly throat dryness (74%), dysphonia (26%) and vocal fatigue (22%). Only 14.1% sought medical consultation. Smoking and reflux were reported by 44% and 42%, respectively. The median VHI-10 score was 10 (range: 0–29). Participants who frequently or always spoke loudly and those reporting vocal fatigue were significantly more likely to have VHI-10 >7 (p=0.045 and p=0.046, respectively). No significant differences were found by self-reported or tested vocal hygiene knowledge (p>0.05). Overall, 70% had no prior knowledge of vocal hygiene, and 85% had not received formal training. Conclusions: Voice problems are highly prevalent among healthcare providers, mainly associated with loud speaking and vocal fatigue. Despite frequent symptoms, awareness and care-seeking remain low. Preventive education and workplace strategies are essential to safeguard vocal health in this professional group.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dysphonia
• occupational health
• voice disorders

Hastane Çalışanlarında Ses Kullanımı, Ses Sorunları ve Farkındalık Düzeyi

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, hastane çalışanlarında mesleki ses kullanım özelliklerini, ses bozukluklarının prevalansını ve vokal hijyen farkındalık düzeyini incelemeyi amaçlamıştır. Materyal ve Metot: Kesitsel tanımlayıcı tasarımla yürütülen çalışmaya, üçüncü basamak bir hastanede görev yapan 100 sağlık çalışanı dahil edilmiştir. Veriler, yapılandırılmış bir anket formu ve Ses Handikap Endeksi-10 (SHE-10) kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Sesle ilişkili semptomlar, mesleki risk faktörleri ve farkındalık düzeyi arasındaki ilişkiler istatistiksel olarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular: Çalışmaya toplam 100 sağlık çalışanı katılmıştır (%76 kadın; ortanca yaş: 30 yıl). Katılımcıların %49’u hekim, %42’si hemşiredir ve ortanca mesleki deneyim süresi 6 yıldır. Çoğu (%73) KBB dışı kliniklerde çalışmaktadır. Sesle ilişkili semptomlar yaygındır; katılımcıların %85’i son bir yılda en az bir semptom bildirmiştir. En sık boğaz kuruluğu (%74), disfoni (%26) ve vokal yorgunluk (%22) görülmüştür. Yalnızca %14,1 tıbbi yardım almıştır. Katılımcıların %44’ü sigara kullanmakta, %42’sinde reflü öyküsü bulunmaktadır. SHE-10 ortanca skoru 10 (0–29)'dur. İşte sık veya sürekli yüksek sesle konuşanlarda (p=0,045) ve vokal yorgunluk yaşayanlarda (p=0,046) yüksek SHE-10 skoru anlamlı olarak daha fazladır. Vokal hijyen bilgisi veya eğitimi ile skorlar arasında fark saptanmamıştır (p>0,05). Katılımcıların %70’i vokal hijyen hakkında bilgi sahibi olmadığını, %85’i bu konuda hiç eğitim almadığını belirtmiştir. Sonuç: Sağlık çalışanlarında ses sorunları oldukça yaygındır. Özellikle sık yüksek sesle konuşma ve vokal yorgunluk önemli risk faktörleridir. Düşük farkındalık ve düşük başvuru oranı, ses sağlığının korunması için eğitim ve önleyici stratejilerin gerekliliğini göstermektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Disfoni
• mesleki sağlık
• ses bozuklukları

Kaynakça

1. Naunheim MR, Devore EK, Huston MN, Song PC, Franco RA Jr, Bhattacharyya N. Increasing prevalence of voice disorders in the USA: updates in the COVID era. Laryngoscope. 2024;134(8):3713-3718. doi:10.1002/lary.31409
2. Belete AK, Yenealem DG, Azanaw J. Self-reported prevalence and associated factors of work related voice disorders among school teachers in Sekota town, Wag Himra zone, North Ethiopia, 2021: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):2639. doi:10.1186/s12889-025-23850-6
3. Alhefdhi H, Aldukain M, Aldukain A, et al. Assessing prevalence, risk factors, and occupational impact of voice disorders among teachers: a population-based survey in Aseer region, Saudi Arabia. Egypt J Otolaryngol. 2025;41(1):84. doi:10.1186/s43163-025-00834-2
4. Mota AF, Giannini SP, Oliveira IB, Paparelli R, Dornelas R, Ferreira LP. Voice disorder and burnout syndrome in teachers. J Voice. 2019;33(4):581.e7-581.e16. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.01.022
5. Phyland D, Miles A. Occupational voice is a work in progress: active risk management, habilitation and rehabilitation.Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;27(6):439-447. doi:10.1097/MOO.0000000000000584
6. Gonzalez AD, Almeida Lopes AC, Andrade SM, et al. Schoolteachers with voice handicap are twice as likely to report depressive symptoms. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;279(8):4043-4051. doi:10.1007/s00405-022-07376-w
7. Moayedfar S, Khoddami SM, Aghdak P, Ansari NN, Dabirmoghaddam P. Anxiety and self-perceived voice assessments in patients with primary muscle tension dysphonia and healthy speakers: a comparative and correlative study. J Voice. Published online September 12, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.07.041
8. Queiroz Coutinho AT, Lima Silva V, Silva ME, et al. Anxiety, depression and other factors associated with voice handicaps in active older people during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Voice. Published online June 9, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.05.016

9. Koufman JA, Isaacson G. The spectrum of vocal dysfunction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1991;24(5):985-988. doi:10.1016/S0030-6665(20)31062-8
10. Song Z, Lee PJ, Jung H. Prevalence of voice handicap among nurses in intensive care units due to occupational noise during pandemic. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1250512. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1250512
11. Yesilyurt M, Yelken K. Ses problemi yaşayan çağrı merkezi çalışanlarında ses terapisinin etkililiği. J Acad Res Med. Published online August 30, 2020. doi:10.4274/jarem.galenos.2020.3600
12. Subasi B, Guclu E, Guclu D, Tasli H. Objective and subjective voice examination in Turkish imams. J Voice. 2023;37(1):141.e9-141.e12. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.11.016
13. Hashemnia M, Jafari M, Mohammadi E, et al. Effects of intensive laryngeal manual therapy on voice quality in patients with muscle tension dysphonia. J Voice. 2025;Online ahead of print. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.05.012
14. Zhou Z, Lyu Y, Yang M, Yan M, Ke Z. Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward vocal fatigue among occupational voice users: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):73. doi:10.1186/s12889-024-21218-w
15. Fujiki RB, Thibeault SL. Voice disorder prevalence and vocal health characteristics in adolescents. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024;150(9):800-810. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2024.2081
16. Marchese MR, Longobardi Y, Di Cesare T, Cugini G, Marrocco V, Ottaviani F. Gender-related differences in the prevalence of voice disorders and awareness of dysphonia. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2022;42(5):458-464. doi:10.14639/0392-100X-N2018
17. Baraka MA, Alhanafy HM, Shoeib RM, Khodeir MS. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in voice disorders: screening and correlating symptoms and signs in 100 Egyptian voice patients. Egypt J Otolaryngol. 2025;41(1):83. doi:10.1186/s43163-025-00824-4
18. Alotaibi FZ, Alanazi MM, Alshaibani SK, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients attending an outpatient otolaryngology clinic: a cross-sectional study. J Nat Sci Med. 2023;6(4):210-215. doi:10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_143_22
19. Castillo-Allendes A, Cantor-Cutiva LC, Fuentes-Lopez E, Hunter EJ. Behind the headset: predictive accuracy of patient-reported outcome measures for voice symptoms in call centers. Rev Investig Innov Cienc Salud. 2024;6(1):44-72. doi:10.46634/riics.240
20. Martins LKG, Mendes ALF, Oliveira P, Almeida AA. Voice disorder and risk factors in spoken voice professionals: an integrative review. Audiol Commun Res. 2024;29:e2809. doi:10.1590/2317-6431-2024-2809
21. Weston Z, Schneider SL. Demystifying vocal hygiene: considerations for professional voice users. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2023;11(4):387-394. doi:10.1007/s40136-023-00494-x
22. Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, et al. The voice handicap index (VHI): development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1997;6(3):66-70. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0603.66
23. Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, Zullo T, Murry T. Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(9):1549-1556. doi:10.1097/00005537-200409000-00009
24. Kilic MA, Okur E, Yildirim I, et al. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the voice handicap index. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2008;18(3):139-147.
25. Tahir E, Yasar OC, Erensoy I, Kemal O. Voice handicap index-10 and voice-related quality of life: determination of cutoff points in Turkish language for screening of voice disorders. J Voice. 2025:S0892-1997(25):00112-2. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.03.019