A Systematic Review: Preferred Approaches of First-hand Smoking Intervention

Öz

Tobacco use creates a serious public health risk. Increased efforts in smoking cessation could aid in the reduction of health risks associated with smoking in the country. In this study, systematic review using PRISMA framework and electronic database searching of published paper from 2007 until 2017 in Cinahl, Proquest, and Scopus related to selected first-hand smoking cessation interventions that has been done world widely. Twenty-two studies consist of four interventions which pictorial health are warning sign label, mass media, quit line and internet intervention have been compared and accessed after thorough screening. The selected articles were assessed with the use of Mixed Method Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 by trained reviewers. Study findings to be synthesized thematically. This evidence review focused on the characteristics and preferences of first-hand stop smoking intervention programs. As a result, the research is useful for proper budget allocation and planning.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Internet intervention
• mass media
• pictorial health warning labels
• quit line
• smoking cessation

Sistematik Bir Derleme: Birinci El Sigara Bırakma Müdahalesinde Tercih Edilen Yaklaşımlar

Öz

Tütün kullanımı ciddi bir halk sağlığı riski oluşturmaktadır. Sigarayı bırakma konusundaki çabaların artması, ülkede sigara içmeyle ilişkili sağlık risklerinin azaltılmasına yardımcı olabilir. Bu çalışmada, dünya çapında yapılan seçilmiş sigara bırakma müdahaleleriyle ilgili Cinahl, Proquest ve Scopus'ta 2007'den 2017'ye kadar yayınlanmış makalerin elektronik veritabanları kullanılarak PRISMA çerçevesinde sistematik bir incelemesi yapılmıştır. Resimli sağlık uyarı levhası, kitle iletişim araçları, bırakma hattı ve internet müdahalesi olmak üzere dört müdahaleden oluşan 22 çalışmaya kapsamlı bir taramadan sonra ulaşılmıştır. Seçilen makaleler, eğitimli hakemler tarafından Karma Yöntem Değerlendirme Aracı (KYDA) 2018 sürümü kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışma bulguları tematik olarak sentezlenmiştir. Bu sistematik derleme sigarayı bırakma müdahale programlarının özellikleri ve tercihlerine odaklandı. Sonuç olarak, araştırma uygun bütçe tahsisi ve planlaması için faydalıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bırakma hattı
• internet müdahalesi
• kitle iletişim araçları
• resimli sağlık uyarı etiketleri
• sigarayı bırakma

Kaynakça

1. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic [online] Luxembourg: World Health Organization 2013, pp.15-17. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/85380/1/9789241505871_eng.pdf. Accessed 2019 July 25.
2. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2019: offer help to quit tobacco use: executive summary. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2019  Available at : https://www.who.int/teams/health-promotion/tobacco-control/who-report-on-the-global-tobacco-epidemic-2019. Accessed 2019 July 25.
3. World Health Organization. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2017 . Geneva: World Health Organization, 2017.  Available at: https://www.who.int/tobacco/global_report/2017/en/. Accessed 2019 Jan 31.
4. World Health Organization. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2011  Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011 . Available at: https://www.who.int/tobacco/global_report/2011/en/. Accessed 2018 Feb 22.
5. Hong YH, Soh P, Khan N, Abdullah MM, Tan B. The Effectiveness of anti smoking advertising : The roles of Message and Media. Int. J. Bus. Manag . 201; 8( 19):55-62. doi:10.5539/ijbm.v8n19p55
6. Sierra-Correa PC., Cantera Kintz J R. Ecosystem-based adaptation for improving coastal planning for sea-level rise: A systematic review for mangrove coasts. Mar. Policy 2015;51:385-393. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2014.09.013
7. Dobbie F, Angus K, Littlecott H. et al. Facilitators and barriers to the delivery of school-based smoking prevention interventions for children and young people: a protocol for a systematic review of qualitative studies. Syst Rev. 2018;56 (7):1-6. doi:10.1186/s13643-018-0715-8
8. Hong QN, Pluye P, Fàbregues S, et al. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Educ Inf. 2018. 31(4):285-291. doi:10.3233/EFI-180221

9. Wu XV, Chan YS, Tan KHS, Wang W. A systematic review of online learning programs for nurse preceptors. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;60:11-22. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.09.010
10. Haider LJ, Boonstra WJ, Peterson GD, Schluter M. Traps and Sustainable Development in Rural Areas: A Review. World Dev. 2018;101: 311-321. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.038
11. Shaikh AA, Karjaluoto H. Making the most of information technology & systems usage: A literature review, framework and future research agenda. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015; 49:541–566. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.059
12. Nagelhout GE, Willemsen MC, de Vries H, et al. Educational differences in the impact of pictorial cigarette warning labels on smokers: Findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) Europe surveys. Tobacco Control. 2016;25(3):325-332. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051971
13. Kowitt SD, Noar SM, Ranney LM, Goldstein AO. Public attitudes toward larger cigarette pack warnings: Results from a nationally representative U.S. sample. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(3):1–14. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171496
14. Cantrell J, Vallone DM, Thrasher JF, et al. Impact of Tobacco-Related Health Warning Labels across Socioeconomic, Race and Ethnic Groups: Results from a Randomized Web-Based Experiment. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e52206. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052206
15. Guillaumier A, Bonevski B, Paul C, d’Este C, Durkin S, Doran C. Which Type of Antismoking Advertisement Is Perceived as More Effective? An Experimental Study With a Sample of Australian Socially Disadvantaged Welfare Recipients. Am J Health Promot. 2017:31(3):209-216. doi:10.4278/ajhp.141125-QUAN-593
16. Mead EL, Cohen JE, Kennedy CE, Gallo J, Latkin CA. The role of theory-driven graphic warning labels in motivation to quit: a qualitative study on perceptions from low-income, urban smokers. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:92. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1438-6
17. Evans AT, Peters E, Strasser AA, Emery LF, Sheerin KM, Romer D. Graphic warning labels elicit affective and thoughtful responses from smokers: Results of a randomized clinical trial. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(12):1-23. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142879
18. Cho YJ, Thrasher JF, Swayampakala K, et al. Does Reactance against Cigarette Warning Labels Matter? Warning Label Responses and Downstream Smoking Cessation amongst Adult Smokers in Australia, Canada, Mexico and the United States. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0159245. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159245
19. Thrasher JF, Rousu MC, Hammond D, Navarro A, Corrigan JR. Estimating the impact of pictorial health warnings and "plain" cigarette packaging: evidence from experimental auctions among adult smokers in the United States. Health Policy. 2011;102(1):41-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.06.003. Epub 2011
20. Richardson S, Langley T, Szatkowski L, et al. How does the emotive content of televised anti-smoking mass media campaigns influence monthly calls to the NHS Stop Smoking helpline in England?. Prev Med. 2014;69:43-48. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.030
21. Nonnemaker JM, Allen JA, Davis KC, Kamyab K, Duke JC, Farrelly MC. The influence of antismoking television advertisements on cessation by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and mental health status. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e102943. Published 2014 Jul 17. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102943
22. Baskerville NB, Hayward L, Brown K, Hammond D, Kennedy RD, Campbell HS. Impact of Canadian tobacco packaging policy on quitline reach and reach equity. Preventive Medicine. 2015;81:243-250. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.09.010
23. Griffin E, Moon G, Barnet R. Examining the significance of urban-rural context in tobacco quitline use: does rurality matter? Int J Public Health. 2015;60(3):327-33. doi: 10.1007/s00038-014-0634-y
24. Grunseit AC, Gwizd M, Lyons C, Anderson C, O'Hara BJ. Polite, professional, practical: What drives caller 'satisfaction' with the New South Wales Quitline, Australia. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018;37(Suppl 1):S223-S234. doi: 10.1111/dar.12593
25. Zhu SH, Cummins SE, Wong S, Gamst AC, Tedeschi GJ, Reyes-Nocon J. The effects of a multilingual telephone quitline for Asian smokers: a randomized controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(4):299-310. doi:10.1093/jnci/djr530
26. Guy MC, Seltzer RG, Cameron M, Pugmire J, Michael S, Leischow SJ. Relationship between smokers' modes of entry into quitlines and treatment outcomes. Am J Health Behav. 2012;36(1):3-11. doi:10.5993/ajhb.36.1.1
27. Lal A, Mihalopoulos C, Wallace A, Vos T. The cost-effectiveness of call-back counselling for smoking cessation. Tob Control. 2014;23:437-442. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050907.
28. Local Government Association. Health and wellbeing in rural areas 2017; 1–47. Available at: https://www.local.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/1.39_Health in rural areas_WEB.pdf. Accessed 2019 July 25.
29. Nohlert E, Ohrvik J, Helgason AR. Effectiveness of proactive and reactive services at the Swedish National Tobacco Quitline in a randomized trial. Tob Induc Dis. 2014;12(1):9. doi:10.1186/1617-9625-12-9
30. Vallone DM, Duke JC, Cullen J, McCausland KL, Allen JA. Evaluation of EX: a national mass media smoking cessation campaign. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(2):302-309. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.190454
31. Harakeh Z, Engels RC, Vohs K, van Baaren RB, Sargent J. Exposure to movie smoking, antismoking ads and smoking intensity: an experimental study with a factorial design. Tob Control. 2010;19(3):185-90. doi:10.1136/tc.2009.030684
32. Hasson U, Landesman O, Knappmeyer B, Vallines I, Rubin N, Heeger D. Neurocinematics: The Neuroscience of Film. Projections. 2008;2:1-26. doi:10.3167/proj.2008.020101
33. Ramo DE, Rodriguez TM, Chavez K, Sommer MJ, Prochaska JJ. Facebook Recruitment of Young Adult Smokers for a Cessation Trial: Methods, Metrics, and Lessons Learned. Internet Interv. 2014;1(2):58-64. doi:10.1016/j.invent.2014.05.001
34. Brown J, Michie S, Geraghty AW, et al. Internet-based intervention for smoking cessation (StopAdvisor) in people with low and high socioeconomic status: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(12):997-1006. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70195-X
35. Saul JE, Amato MS, Cha S, Graham AL. Engagement and attrition in Internet smoking cessation interventions: Insights from a cross-sectional survey of “one-hit-wonders.” Internet Interv 2016;5:23-29. doi:10.1016/j.invent.2016.07.001