The comparison of İmmediate Effects of Mulligan’s Bent Leg Raise Technique and Kinesiotape on Hamstring Tightness
Yıl 2018,
Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3, 135 - 144, 30.09.2018
Tahir Keskin
,
Ferdi Başkurt
,
Zeliha Başkurt
,
Tuba İnce Parpucu
Öz
The aim of this study is to investigate the immediate and 24- hours effects
of Mulligan’s bent leg raise (BLR) technique and kinesio tape (KT) on hamstring
tightness. 54 subjects with hamstring tightness participated in the study and
and the subjects were randomly divided into two groups (group 1= BLR, group 2=
KT group). To assess hamstring tightness, sit and reach test was performed and
the active knee extension grade was measured with a halo goniometer.
Measurements were taken pre- intervention, 30 minutes after intervention and 24
hours after intervention. After the analyses of the measurements, statistically
significant increase were found in both groups on active knee extension and sit
and reach test (p=0,000). In comparison of the groups; after 30 min.
measurements BLR results showed statistically significant improvement than KT
(p=0,01), however after 24 hours measurements; statistically significant
improvement was detected in KT than BLR (p=0,032) on sit and reach test. On
active knee extension test BLR showed greater improvement than KT at
measurements taken after 30 minutes (p=0,00).
There were no statistically significant differences on the other test
parameters. Both KT application and BLR technique are effective on increasing
hamstring muscle’s flexibility. It has been determined that the BLR technique
is more effective in the need of immediate effect on hamstring shortness and
the KT application is more effective when the longer effect is required.
Kaynakça
- Referans1. Patni O, M Saravanan, Shaikh A, Juneja A, Shaikh N, Patel R. Effect of single bout of passive stretching and Mulligan's Bent Leg Raise (BLR) on Hamstring flexibility in young adults with asymptomatic bilateral Hamstring tightness. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2013; 9: 3.
- Referans2. Hopper D, Deacon S, Das S, Jain A, Riddell D, Hall T, Briffa K. Dynamic soft tissue mobilisation increases hamstring flexibility in healthy male subjects. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 594–598.
- Referans3. Khuman P R, Surbala L, Patel P, Chavda D. Immediate Effects of Single Session Post Isometric Relaxation Muscle Energy Technique Versus Mulligan’s Bent Leg Raise. International Journal of Scientific Research. 2014; 3; 9.
- Referans4. Singh B K, Pattnaik M, Mohanty P. A Comparative Study of Mulligan Traction Straight Leg Raising and Dynamic Soft Tissue Mobilization to Increase Hamstrings’ s Flexibility. 2016; 5; 4.
- Referans5. Ozmen T, Gunes GY, Dogan H, Ucar I, Willems M. The effect of kinesio taping versus stretching techniques on muscle soreness, and flexibility during recovery from nordic hamstring exercise. Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies. 2017; 21: 41- 47
- Referans6. Hall T, Hardt S, Schafer A, Wallin l. Mulligan bent leg raise technique—a preliminary randomized trial of immediate effects after a single intervention. Manual Therapy. 2006; 11: 130–135.
- Referans7. Medeni ÖÇ, Baltacı G, Vayvay GD. Acute effect of kinesiotape muscle technique on hamstring flexibility and pain during stretching. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2015; 26(2): 73-77
- Referans8. Phansopkar P A, Kage V. Efficacy of mulligan’s two leg rotation and bent leg raise techniques in hamstring flexibility in subjects with acute non-specific low back pain: randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Physiotherapy and Research. 2014; 2(5): 733-41.
- Referans9. Kage V, Ratnam R. Immediate effect of active release technique versus mulligan bent leg raise in subjects with hamstring tightness: A randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Physiotherapy and Research. 2014; 2(1): 301-04.
- Referans10. Patel, G. To compare the effectiveness of mulligan bent leg raising and slump stretching in patient with low back pain. Indian J. Physiother. Occup. Ther. An Int. 2014. J. 8: 24–28.
- Referans11. Ayala F, Baranda P.S, Santonja F. Comparison of active stretching technique in males with normal and limited hamstring flexibility. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2013; 14(2): 98-104
- Referans12. Dixon JK, Keating JL. Variability in straight leg raise measurements: review. Physiotherapy. 2000; 86(7): 361–70.13. Farquharson C, Greig M. Temporal efficacy of kinesiology tape vs. traditional stretching methods on hamstring extensibility. The International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2015; 10: 1.
- Referans14. Marban MR, Rodrıguez FE, Fernandez IL, Vega DM. The acute effect of kinesio taping on hamstring extensibility in university students. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2011; 11(2): 23-27
- Referans15. Lumbroso D, Ziv E, Vered E, Kalichman L. The effect of kinesio tape application on hamstring and gastrocnemius muscles in healthy young adults. Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies. 2014; 18: 130-138
- Referans16. Chen CH, Tsun-Shun Huang TS, Chai HM, Jan MH, Lin JJ. Two Stretching Treatments for the Hamstrings: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Versus Kinesio Taping. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2013; 22: 59-66
- Referans17. Halseth T, McChesney JW, DeBeliso M, Vaughn R, Lien J. The effects of kinesiotape on proprioception at the ankle. J Sports Sci Med. 2004; 3: 1-7.18. Tsai HJ, Hung HC, Yang JL, Huang CS, Tsauo JY. Could Kinesio tape replace the bandage in decongestive lymphatic therapy for breast-cancer-related lymphedema? A pilot study. Support Care Cancer. 2009; 17(11): 1353-60.
- Referans19. Kase K, Wallis J, Kase T. Clinical Therapeutic Applications of the Kinesio Taping Method. Tokyo. Ken Ikai Co. Ltd. 2003.
- Referans20. Hamid MS, Mohamed Ali MR, Yusof A. Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Active Knee Extension (AKE) Test among Healthy Adults. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2013; 25: 957–961
- Referans21. Baltaci G, Un N, Tunay V, Besler A, Gerçeker S. Comparison of three different sit and reach tests for measurement of hamstring flexibility in female university students. Br J Sports Med. 2003; 37: 59–61
Mulligan bent leg raise tekniği ve kinesiotape’nin hamstring kası kısalığına anlık etkilerinin karşılaştırılması
Yıl 2018,
Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3, 135 - 144, 30.09.2018
Tahir Keskin
,
Ferdi Başkurt
,
Zeliha Başkurt
,
Tuba İnce Parpucu
Öz
Çalışmamızın amacı hamstring kası kısalığına
mulligan bent leg raise (BLR) tekniği ve
kinezyoteyp (KT) uygulamasının anlık ve 24 saatlik etkisini ve belirlemektir.
Çalışmaya hamstring kısalığı olan 54 kişi katılmış ve randomize olarak iki
gruba ayrılmıştır. (grup 1= BLR grubu, grup 2= KT grubu). Hamstring kısalığını
değerlendirmek amacıyla otur-uzan testi yapılmış ve aktif diz ekstensiyon
derecesi halo gonyometre ile ölçülmüştür.
Değerlendirmeler uygulamadan önce, 30 dakika sonra ve 24 saat sonra
yapılmıştır. Değerlendirmelerin analizi sonucunda her iki grupta da otur- uzan
testi ve aktif diz ekstensiyon derecesinde anlamlı artış gözlenmiştir
(p=0,000). Gruplar kendi aralarında karşılaştırıldığında, otur- uzan testinde
30 dakika sonra yapılan ölçümlerde BLR tekniğinin (p=0,010); 24 saat sonra
yapılan ölçümlerde ise KT uygulamasının (0.032) etkinliğinin istatistiksel
olarak daha anlamlı olduğu bulunmuştur. Aktif diz ekstensiyon derecesinde ise
30 dakika sonra yapılan ölçümlerde BLR tekniğinin (0,00) etkinliği
istatistiksel olarak daha anlamlı bulunmuştur. Diğer test parametrelerinde
istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmamıştır. Hem KT uygulaması hem
de BLR tekniği hamstring kası esnekliğinin artırılmasında etkilidir. Hamstring
kısalığına yönelik anlık etki istendiğinde BLR tekniğinin, daha uzun süreli
etki istendiğinde ise KT uygulamasının daha etkili olduğu belirlenmiştir.
Kaynakça
- Referans1. Patni O, M Saravanan, Shaikh A, Juneja A, Shaikh N, Patel R. Effect of single bout of passive stretching and Mulligan's Bent Leg Raise (BLR) on Hamstring flexibility in young adults with asymptomatic bilateral Hamstring tightness. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2013; 9: 3.
- Referans2. Hopper D, Deacon S, Das S, Jain A, Riddell D, Hall T, Briffa K. Dynamic soft tissue mobilisation increases hamstring flexibility in healthy male subjects. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 594–598.
- Referans3. Khuman P R, Surbala L, Patel P, Chavda D. Immediate Effects of Single Session Post Isometric Relaxation Muscle Energy Technique Versus Mulligan’s Bent Leg Raise. International Journal of Scientific Research. 2014; 3; 9.
- Referans4. Singh B K, Pattnaik M, Mohanty P. A Comparative Study of Mulligan Traction Straight Leg Raising and Dynamic Soft Tissue Mobilization to Increase Hamstrings’ s Flexibility. 2016; 5; 4.
- Referans5. Ozmen T, Gunes GY, Dogan H, Ucar I, Willems M. The effect of kinesio taping versus stretching techniques on muscle soreness, and flexibility during recovery from nordic hamstring exercise. Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies. 2017; 21: 41- 47
- Referans6. Hall T, Hardt S, Schafer A, Wallin l. Mulligan bent leg raise technique—a preliminary randomized trial of immediate effects after a single intervention. Manual Therapy. 2006; 11: 130–135.
- Referans7. Medeni ÖÇ, Baltacı G, Vayvay GD. Acute effect of kinesiotape muscle technique on hamstring flexibility and pain during stretching. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2015; 26(2): 73-77
- Referans8. Phansopkar P A, Kage V. Efficacy of mulligan’s two leg rotation and bent leg raise techniques in hamstring flexibility in subjects with acute non-specific low back pain: randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Physiotherapy and Research. 2014; 2(5): 733-41.
- Referans9. Kage V, Ratnam R. Immediate effect of active release technique versus mulligan bent leg raise in subjects with hamstring tightness: A randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Physiotherapy and Research. 2014; 2(1): 301-04.
- Referans10. Patel, G. To compare the effectiveness of mulligan bent leg raising and slump stretching in patient with low back pain. Indian J. Physiother. Occup. Ther. An Int. 2014. J. 8: 24–28.
- Referans11. Ayala F, Baranda P.S, Santonja F. Comparison of active stretching technique in males with normal and limited hamstring flexibility. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2013; 14(2): 98-104
- Referans12. Dixon JK, Keating JL. Variability in straight leg raise measurements: review. Physiotherapy. 2000; 86(7): 361–70.13. Farquharson C, Greig M. Temporal efficacy of kinesiology tape vs. traditional stretching methods on hamstring extensibility. The International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2015; 10: 1.
- Referans14. Marban MR, Rodrıguez FE, Fernandez IL, Vega DM. The acute effect of kinesio taping on hamstring extensibility in university students. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2011; 11(2): 23-27
- Referans15. Lumbroso D, Ziv E, Vered E, Kalichman L. The effect of kinesio tape application on hamstring and gastrocnemius muscles in healthy young adults. Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies. 2014; 18: 130-138
- Referans16. Chen CH, Tsun-Shun Huang TS, Chai HM, Jan MH, Lin JJ. Two Stretching Treatments for the Hamstrings: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Versus Kinesio Taping. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2013; 22: 59-66
- Referans17. Halseth T, McChesney JW, DeBeliso M, Vaughn R, Lien J. The effects of kinesiotape on proprioception at the ankle. J Sports Sci Med. 2004; 3: 1-7.18. Tsai HJ, Hung HC, Yang JL, Huang CS, Tsauo JY. Could Kinesio tape replace the bandage in decongestive lymphatic therapy for breast-cancer-related lymphedema? A pilot study. Support Care Cancer. 2009; 17(11): 1353-60.
- Referans19. Kase K, Wallis J, Kase T. Clinical Therapeutic Applications of the Kinesio Taping Method. Tokyo. Ken Ikai Co. Ltd. 2003.
- Referans20. Hamid MS, Mohamed Ali MR, Yusof A. Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Active Knee Extension (AKE) Test among Healthy Adults. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2013; 25: 957–961
- Referans21. Baltaci G, Un N, Tunay V, Besler A, Gerçeker S. Comparison of three different sit and reach tests for measurement of hamstring flexibility in female university students. Br J Sports Med. 2003; 37: 59–61