Preference of Contraceptive Methods of Married Women Between 18-49 and Reasons for Quitting

Yıl 2021, , 29 - 38, 18.04.2021

Zehra Kaya Nevin Hotun Şahin , Fatma Nur Demirci

https://doi.org/10.38108/ouhcd.851213

Cited By: 4

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, 18-49 yaş arası evli kadınların kontraseptif yöntem kullanma tercihleri ve bırakma nedenlerinin belirlenmesidir.
Yöntem: Araştırma Mart-Temmuz 2019 tarihleri arasında bir Aile Sağlığı Merkezine başvuran 200 evli kadın ile tanımlayıcı tipte yürütülmüştür. Araştırma verileri araştırmacılar tarafından oluşturulan katılımcı tanıtım formu ile elde edilmiştir.
Bulgular: Kadınların yaş ortalamasının 35.80±7.35 olduğu, %93’ünün (modern yöntem: %63.9, geleneksel yöntem: %36.02) bir yöntem kullandığı belirlendi. Geri çekme ve kondom yöntemlerinin kullanım kolaylığı nedeniyle (%46.2-%37.5), RİA'nın ise yüksek koruyuculuk nedeniyle (%62.5) kadınlar tarafından en sık tercih edilen kontraseptif yöntemler oldukları saptandı. Kadınların %22.5'inin kullandığı yöntemden memnun olmadığı, %56.5'inin yöntem kullanımını bıraktığı bulundu. En sık bırakılan yöntemlerden kondomun partner isteği (rahatsızlık) nedeniyle (%82.5), kombine oral kontraseptif ve RİA'nın sağlık sorunları nedeniyle (%48.5-%70), geri çekmenin ise istenmeyen gebelik nedeniyle (%60) bırakıldığı belirlendi. Yöntem kullanma durumu ile ekonomik durum, istenmeyen gebelik öyküsü ve danışmanlık alma öyküsü arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulundu (p<0.05).
Sonuç: Kadınların yöntem tercih etme nedenleri arasında çoğunlukla; kullanım kolaylığı ve yüksek koruyuculuğun yer aldığı saptandı. Kadınların kullandığı kontraseptif yöntemi veya yöntemleri gelişen sağlık sorunları, istenmeyen gebelik durumu ve gebe kalma isteği gibi nedenlerle birçok kez bıraktığı belirlendi. Bu nedenle sağlık profesyonelleri tarafından kontraseptif yöntemlerin etkin kullanımının artırılması amacıyla çiftlere kontrasepsiyon danışmanlığı verilmelidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kontrasepsiyon, kontraseptif yöntemler, kadın sağlığı, üreme sağlığı, evli kadın

18-49 Yaş Arası Evli Kadınların Kontraseptif Yöntem Kullanma Tercihleri ve Bırakma Nedenleri

Öz

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the contraceptive preferences of married women between the ages of 18-49 and the causes of contraceptive discontinuation.
Methods: The research was conducted descriptive type with 200 married women who applied to a Family Health Service between March-July 2019. The data were collected through the participant introduction form created by the researchers.
Results: It was determined that the mean age of the women was 35.80 ± 7.35, 93% of them used a contraceptive (modern method: 63.9%, traditional method: 36.02. It was found that the withdrawal and condom were the most preferred contraceptives by women due to the ease of use (46.2% -37.5%) and the IUD because of high protection (62.5%). It was found that 22.5% of the women were not satisfied with the contraceptive they used, and 56.5% of them discontinued using contraceptive. It was determined that condom was discontinued due to partner request (discomfort) (82.5%), combined oral contraceptive and IUD due to health problems (48.5% -70%), and withdrawal due to unwanted pregnancy (60%). A statistically significant relationship was found between the use of the method and economic status, unwanted pregnancy, and counseling (p <0.05).
Conclusion: Among the reasons for women to prefer a contraceptive are mostly; ease of use and high protection. Women discontinued using the contraceptive method or methods they used many times due to health problems, unwanted pregnancy, and desire to become pregnant. Therefore, contraception counseling should be provided to couples by health professionals in order to increase the effective use of contraceptive methods.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Contraception, contraceptive, women health, reproductive health, married women

Kaynakça

• Ay S, Yanıkkerem E, Mutlu S. (2012). İstenmeyen gebelik yaşayan kadınların özellikleri ve kontraseptif yöntemleri bırakma nedenleri: Kırsal alan örneği. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 11(3), 315-324.
• Bamufleh RA, Al-Zahrani AE, Yousuf SA. (2017). Systematic review: contraceptive knowledge and use in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 5, 69-77.
• Cavallaro FL, Benova L, Owolabi OO, Ali M. (2019). A systematic review of the effectiveness of counselling strategies for modern contraceptive methods: What works and what doesn’t?. BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health, 1-16.
• Family Planning 2020 Contraceptive Discontinuation; 2016. Access date: 25 February 2021, http://2015-2016progress.familyplanning2020.org/page/measurement/contraceptive-discontinuation
• Gavas E, İnal S. (2019). Türkiye’de kadınların aile planlaması yöntemleri kullanma durumları ve tutumları: Sistematik derleme. Sağlık ve Yaşam Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(2), 37-43.
• Johnson S, Pion C, Jennings V. (2013). Current methods and attitudes of women towards contraception in Europe and America. Reproductive Health, 10(1), 1-9.
• Jones RK, Lindberg LD, Higgins JA. (2014). Pull and pray or extra protection? Contraceptive strategies involving withdrawal among US adult women. Contraception, 90(4), 416-421.
• Kantorová V, Wheldon MC, Ueffing P, Dasgupta ANZ. (2020). Estimating progress towards meeting women’s contraceptive needs in 185 countries: A Bayesian hierarchical modelling study. PLoS Medicine, 17(2), e1003026.
• Karacali M, Özdemir R. (2018). Karabük ilinde 15-49 yaş grubu evli kadınların aile planlaması hizmetlerine erişimini etkileyen faktörler. Turkish Journal Public Health, 16(2), 131-145.
• Kirici P, Kaplan S, Karacor T, Nacar MC. (2020). Aile planlaması danışmanlık hizmetinin kadınların kontraseptif yöntem tercihine etkisi: Bir tersiyer merkez deneyimi. Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi, 17(3), 425 – 430.
• Kutlu R, Sayın S, Uçar M, Demirbaş O. (2014). Kadınların sosyodemografik özelliklerine göre kontraseptif yöntem kullanma durumları ve bu yöntemleri tercih nedenleri. Türkiye Aile Hekimliği Dergisi, 18(3), 134-141.
• Marshall C, Guendelman S, Mauldon J, Nuru‐Jeter A. (2016). Young women's contraceptive decision making: do preferences for contraceptive attributes align with method choice?. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 48(3), 119-127.
• Barden-O’Fallon J, Speizer IS, Calhoun LM, Corroon M. (2018). Women’s contraceptive discontinuation and switching behavior in urban Senegal, 2010–2015. BMC Women's Health, 18(1), 1-9.
• Ortayli N, Bulut A, Ozugurlu M, Çokar M. (2005). Why withdrawal? Why not withdrawal? Men's perspectives. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 13(25), 164-173.
• Pazol K, Zapata LB, Tregear SJ, Mautone-Smith N, Gavin, LE. (2015). Impact of contraceptive education on contraceptive knowledge and decision making: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(2), 46-56.
• Rahnama P, Hidarnia A, Shokravi FA, Kazemnejad A, Ghazanfari Z, Montazeri A. (2010). Withdrawal users' experiences of and attitudes to contraceptive methods: A study from Eastern district of Tehran, Iran. BMC Public Health, 10(1), 779.
• Sarvestani K, Khoo S. (2019). Determinants of withdrawal use as a contraception method and its ımpact on sexual satisfaction: Case study of Shiraz county-Iran. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 7(2), 1621-1629.
• Sarvestani KA, Ahmadi A, Enayat H, Movahed M. (2017). Level and factors related to unintended pregnancy with a brief review of new population policies in Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 46(7), 973-981.
• Sato R, Elewonibi B, Msuya S, Manongi R, Canning D, Shah I. (2020). Why do women discontinue contraception and what are the post-discontinuation outcomes? Evidence from the Arusha Region, Tanzania. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 28(1), 1723321.
• Turkey Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS) 2018. Access date: 22 July 2020, http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/eng/tdhs2018/
• Turk R, Terzioğlu F. (2012). Geri çekme yöntemi ve kullanımını etkileyen faktörler. Ankara Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(3), 67-80.
• United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) 2020. Access date: 22 July 2020, https://www.unfpa.org/family-planning United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: Family Planning and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; 2019. Access date: 22 July 2020, https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/family/familyPlanning_DataBooklet_2019.pdf
• World Health Organization (WHO): Causes and consequences of contraceptive discontinuation: evidence from 60 Demographic and Health Surveys; 2012. Access date: 25 February 2021, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/75429/9789241504058_eng.pdf?sequence=1
• World Health Organization (WHO): Contraception, Evidence brief; 2018. Access date: 22 July 2020, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329884/WHO-RHR-19.18-eng.pdf?ua=1WHO
• World Health Organization (WHO): Sustainable development goal; 2018. Access date: 20 July 2020, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg3
• World Health Organization and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Family planning: a global handbook for providers. Baltimore and Geneva: CCP and WHO; 2018. Access date: 22 July 2020, http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260156/9780999203705eng.pdf?sequence=1
• World Health Organization. Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. Access date: 22 July 2020, http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/252267/1/9789241565400-eng.pdf 14
• Worldbank: Contraceptive prevalence, any methods (% of women ages 15-49); 2020. Access date: 22 July 2020, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.CONU.ZS
• Yanikkerem E, Acar H, Elem E. (2006). Withdrawal users’ perceptions of and experience with contraceptive methods in Manisa, Turkey. Midwifery, 22(3), 274-284.
• Zapata LB, Tregear SJ, Curtis KM, Tiller M, Pazol K, Mautone-Smith N, et al. (2015). Impact of contraceptive counseling in clinical settings: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(2), 31-45.