Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinde Delici ve Kesici Alet Yaralanmaları Tahmin Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 145 - 155, 17.04.2023

Kürşat Yurdakoş

https://doi.org/10.38108/ouhcd.1111540

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, hemşirelik öğrencilerinde delici ve kesici alet yaralanmaları tahmin ölçeği (HÖD-KAYTÖ) Türkçe formunun geçerlilik ve güvenilirliğinin doğrulanması amaçlanmıştır.
Yöntem: Metodolojik tipteki araştırmanın evreni, 3 ve 4’üncü sınıflardaki 398 öğrencidir. Ölçekteki 18 maddenin 10 katı alınarak 180 öğrenci örneklem olarak belirlenmiştir. Araştırma, Şubat-Mart 2021 tarihlerinde Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Hemşirelik Bölümü’nde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler; Öğrenci Bilgi Formu, HÖD-KAYTÖ ve Psikolojik Güçlendirme Ölçeği (PG) ile Şubat-Mart 2021 tarihleri arasında “Google Forms” üzerinden online olarak toplanmıştır. Ölçekte yer alacak maddelerin kapsam geçerliğinin tespiti için, uzman görüşleri doğrultusunda elde edilen nitel veriler Kapsam Geçerlik Oranı ve Kapsam Geçerlik İndeksi hesaplanarak nicel verilere dönüştürülmüştür. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliliği doğrulayıcı faktör analiziyle, iç tutarlılığı Cronbach alfa katsayısıyla ve test-tekrar test güvenilirliği Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) ile ölçülmüştür. HÖD-KAYTÖ ve Psikolojik Güçlendirme arasındaki doğrusal ilişki, Pearson’un korelasyon katsayısı ile ölçülmüştür.
Bulgular: Ölçeğin, Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi CMIN/DF değeri 2.012 olup, uygun bir modeldir. Model uyum indeksleri; RMSEA=0.075, CFI=0.92, TLI=0.94, NFI=0.93, GFI=0.92, AGFI=0.90’dır. Ölçeğin Cronbach alfa değeri 0.83 ve ICC değeri 0.93’tür. HÖD-KAYTÖ ile Psikolojik güçlendirme arasındaki ilişki pozitif yöndedir (r=0.75, p<0.001).
Sonuç: Türkçeye uyarlanan ölçek pratikte uygulanacak yeterli psikometrik özelliklere sahiptir. Hemşirelik öğrencilerinde delici ve kesici alet yaralanmalarının belirlenmesine önemli katkı sağlayacak olan HÖD-KAYTÖ’nün uygulanması önerilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hemşirelik öğrencileri, delici- kesici alet, yaralanma, ölçek uyarlama

Destekleyen Kurum

Yok

Proje Numarası

Yok

Teşekkür

Araştırmaya katılan hemşirelik bölümü öğrencilerine teşekkür ederiz.

The Adaptation of the Student Nurse Needlestick Injury Prediction Scale into Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study

Öz

Objective: It is aimed in this study to confirm the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the student nurse needlestick injury prediction scale (SNNIP).
Methods: The population of this methodological study includes 398 students at the 3rd and 4th grades. 180 students were determined as the sample by taking 10 times of the 18 items in the scale. The research was conducted in the Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sivas Cumhuriyet University between the dates of February-March 2021. The data were collected online through “Google Forms” by Student Information Form, SNNIP and Psychological Empowerment Scale (PES) between the dates of February-March 2021. For the determination of the content validity of the items to be included in the scale, Content Validity Rate and Content Validity Index was calculated and transformed to quantitative data. The construct validity of the scale was measured by factor analysis, internal consistency by Cronbach alpha coefficient and test-retest reliability by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The linear correlation between SNNIP and Psychological Strengthening was measured by Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
Results: The Confirmatory Factor Analysis CMIN/DF value of the scale is 2.012, and the scale is fit. Model fit indices are RMSEA=0.075, CFI=0.92, TLI=0.94, NFI=0.93, GFI=0.92, AGFI=0.90. The Cronbach alpha value of the scale is 0.83 and ICC value is 0.93. The correlation between SNNIP and Psychological Strengthening is in a positive way (r=0.75, p<0.001).
Conclusion: The Turkish version of the scale has adequate psychometric characteristics to be practiced. It was recommended SNNIP to be applied.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Student nurses, sharp object, injury, scale adaptation

Proje Numarası

Yok

Kaynakça

• Angadi N, Davalgi S, Vanitha SS. (2016). Needlestick injuries and awareness towards post exposure prophylaxis for HIV among private general practitioners of Davangere city. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 3(1), 335-339. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph2015 1587
• Auta A, Adewuyi EO, Tor-Anyiin A, Edor JP, Kureh GT, Khanal V et al. (2018). Global prevalence of percutaneous injuries among healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology, 47(6), 1972-1980. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy208
• Ayre C, Scally AJ. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808.
• Bagnasco A, Zanini M, Catania G, Watson R, Hayter M, Dasso N et al. (2020). Predicting needlestick and sharps injuries in nursing students: Development of the SNNIP scale. Nursing Open, 7, 1578–1587. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.540
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of selfreport measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191.
• Choi LY, Torres R, Syed S, Boyle S, Ata A, Beyer TD et al. (2017). Sharps and needlestick injuries among medical students, surgical residents, faculty, and operating room staff at a single academic institution. Journal of Surgical Education, 74(1), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.06.003
• Cooke CE, Stephens JM. (2017). Clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of needlestick injuries in healthcare workers. Medical Devices, 10, 225-235. https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S140846
• Crocker L, Algina J. (2006). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. 1st edition, Ohio (ABD): Cengage Learning press, p. 287-477.
• de Vet HCW, Mokkink LB, Mosmuller DG, Terwee VB. (2017). Spearman-Brown prophecy formula and Cronbach’s alpha: Different faces of reliability and opportunities for new applications. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 85(1), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jclinepi.2017.01.013
• Elseviers MM, Arias-Guillén M, Gorke A, Arens HJ. (2014). Sharps injuries amongst healthcare workers: Review of incidence, transmissions and costs. Journal of Renal Care, 40, 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jorc.12050
• Elshaer M, Elsayed E, El-Gilany AH, El-Mashad N, Mansour M. (2021). Adherence and effectiveness of HBV vaccination among healthcare workers in Egypt. Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 25(2), 91-95. https://doi.org/10.4103/ ijoem.IJOEM _139_20
• Floyd FJ, Widaman KF. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 286-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286
• Hair Jr JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. 8th edition, Nova Jersey: Cengage Learning, p.834
• Hambridge K, Nichols A, Endacott R. (2016). The impact of sharps injuries on student nurses: A systematic review. British Journal of Nursing, 25(19), 1064–1071. https://doi.org/10.12968 /bjon.2016.25.19.1064
• Harris AM. (2020). Hepatitis B. In: CDC yellow book: Health ınformation for ınternational travel. 1st edition, Brunette, GW, editör, New York: Oxford University Press, s. 223-9.
• Karabela ŞN, Durdu Y, Şimşekoğlu N, Baydili KN. (2020). Öğrencilerin iş kazası geçirme durumlarına göre kesici-delici tıbbi aletleri güvenli kullanmalarına yönelik tutumlarının değerlendirilmesi: bir meslek yüksekokulu örneği. Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Dergisi, 2(3), 151-158. https://doi.org/ 10.48071/sbuhemsirelik.799346
• Karataş B, Çelik SS, Koç A. (2016). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin kesici-delici aletlerle yaralanmaya ilişkin bilgi düzeylerinin ve tutumlarının incelenmesi. Bozok Tıp Dergisi, 6(4), 21-9
• Kaya Ş, Baysal B, Eşkazan AE, Çolak H. (2012). Diyarbakır Eğitim Araştırma Hastanesi sağlık çalışanlarında kesici delici alet yaralanmalarının değerlendirilmesi. Viral Hepatit Dergisi, 18(3), 107-110. https://doi.org/10.4274/Vhd.08370
• Kline RB. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th Ed. New York, London, The Guilford Press, s.188-336.
• Kurttekin A, Taçgın E. (2019). Sağlık hizmetlerinde iş kazaları ve kesici-delici alet yaralanma araştırmaları üzerine bir değerlendirme. Sağlıkta Performans ve Kalite Dergisi, 17(2), 135-182.
• Lawshe CH. (1975). A Quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
• Mutay Suntur B, Uğurbekler A. (2020). Üçüncü basamak bir hastanede sağlık çalışanlarında kesici-delici alet yaralanmalarının değerlendirilmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.26559/mersinsbd.652274
• Ouyang B, Dxli L, Mount J, Jamal AJ, Berry L, Simone C et al. (2017). Incidence and characteristics of needlestick injuries among medical trainees at a community teaching hospital: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Occupational Health, 59(1), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.15-0253-FS
• Panlilio AL, Orelien JG, Srivastava PU, Jagger J, Cohn RD, Cardo DM. (2004). Estimate of the annual number of percutaneous injuries among hospital-based healthcare workers in the United States, 1997–1998. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 25(7), 556-562. https://doi.org/10.1086/502439
• Papadopoli R, Bianco A, Pepe D, Pileggi C, Pavia M. (2019). Sharps and needle-stick injuries among medical residents and healthcare professional students: Pattern and reporting in Italy—a cross-sectional analytical study. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 76(10), 739–745. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2019- 105873
• Petrucci C, Alvaro R, Cicolini G, Cerone MP, Lancia L. (2009). Percutaneous and mucocutaneous exposures in nursing students: An Italian observational study. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 41(4), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01301.x
• Rubbi I, Cremonini V, Butuc A, Cortini C, Artioli G, Bonacaro A et al. (2018). Incidence and type of health care associated injuries among nursing students: An experience in northern Italy. Acta Biomedica, 89(7-S), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.23750 /abm.v89i7-S.7812
• Schmitz E, Figueira S, Lampron J. (2019). Injury prevention in medical education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Surgical Education, 76(3), 700–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2018 .10.009
• Spreitzer GM. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
• Tavakol M, Dennick R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–5. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb .8dfd
• Uner S, Turan S. (2010). The construct validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Spreitzer's psychological empowerment scale. BMC Public Health, 10, 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-117
• Uzunbayır Akel N, Esen A. (2011). Sağlık çalışanlarının kesici-delici tıbbi aletleri güvenli kullanımına yönelik tutum ölçeği. 3. EKMUD Bilimsel Platformu (1-5 Mart İstanbul) Kitabı, 3. Baskı, Ankara, Bilimsel Tıp Yayınevi, s. 337.
• Vaske JJ, Beaman J, Sponarski CC. (2017). Rethinking internal consistency in Cronbach’s alpha. Leisure Sciences, 39(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01490400. 2015.1127189
• Veronesi L, Giudice L, Agodi A. (2018). A multicentre study on epidemiology and prevention of needle stick injuries among students of nursing schools. Annali di Igiene: Medicina Preventiva edi Comunità, 30(5 Supple 2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.7416/ai.2018 .2254
• Vural Doğru B, Akyol A. (2018). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinde kesici ve delici alet yaralanmalarının değerlendirilmesi. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 59-66
• Yousafzai MT, Siddiqui AR, Janjua NZ. (2013). Health belief model to predict sharps injuries among health care workers at first level care facilities in rural Pakistan. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 56(4), 479-487. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22117
• Wicker S, Jung J, Allwinn R, Gottschalk R, Rabenau HF. (2008). Prevalence and prevention of needlestick injuries among health care workers in a German university hospital. International Archives Occupational Environmental Health, 81(3), 347-54.
• World Health Organization (WHO). (2000). Nursing matters fact sheets, ICN on preventing needlestick ınjuries. Erişim Tarihi: 05.02.2021 https://www. who.int/occupational_health/activities/2icnneed.pdf