Görme engelli öğrencilerin okuma etkinliğinde dikkatini sürdürme becerileri üzerine kendini izleme tekniğinin etkililiği

Yıl 2012, , 25 - 47, 01.03.2012

TÜLAY Haytabay Sosun Tülay Haytabay Sosun Selda Özdemir

https://doi.org/10.1501/Ozlegt_0000000169

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Görme Engelli Öğrencilerin Okuma Etkinliğinde Dikkatini Sürdürme Becerileri Üzerine Kendini İzleme Tekniğinin Etkililiği

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı görme yetersizliğinden etkilenmiş öğrencilerin sessiz okuma etkinliğinde dikkatini sürdürme becerileri üzerine kendini izleme tekniğinin etkililiğini incelemektir. Araştırmanın denekleri Ankara ilinde Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı’na bağlı bir Görme Engelliler İlköğretim Okulu’na devam eden, yaşları 7 ile 8 arasında değişen 3 görme engelli öğrencidir. Araştırma deneklerinden ikisi 1. sınıfa, diğeri ise 2. sınıfa gitmektedir. Öğrencilerden ikisi Braille yazı okuyan, biri ise gören yazı okuyan görme engelli öğrencilerdir. Araştırma tek denekli desenlerden çoklu yoklama deseni uygulanarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonuçları kendini izleme tekniğinin araştırmaya katılan üç öğrencinin de dikkatini sürdürme becerilerini yüksek düzeyde artırdığını göstermiştir. Bulgular deneklerin dikkatini sürdürme becerilerinin araştırma tamamlandıktan 2 hafta sonra da sürdürdüğünü göstermiştir. Araştırmaya katılan öğretmenler kendini izleme tekniği hakkındaki görüşlerini uygulanması kolay ve etkili bir teknik olarak ifade etmişlerdir. Araştırma bulguları tartışılmış ve ileride yapılacak araştırmalara yönelik önerilere yer verilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Görme Yetersizliği, Az Gören, Kendini İzleme, Dikkatini Sürdürme Becerisi, Sessiz Okuma

Kaynakça

• Ackerman, A. M., & Shapiro, E.S. (1984). Self-monitoring and work productivity with mentally retarded adults. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 403-407.
• Agran M., Alper, S., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2002). Access to the general curriculum for students with significant disabilities: What it means for teachers. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 123-133.
• Agran, M., King-Sears, M. E., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Copeland, S. R. (2003). Student Directed Learning, Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc.
• Agran, M., Hong, S., & Blankenship, K. (2007). Promoting the self-determination of students with visual impairments: Reducing the gap between knowledge and practice. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 101 (8), 453-464.
• Amato-Zech, N. A., Hoff, K. E., & Doepke, K. J. (2006). Increasing on-task behavior in the classroom: Extension of self-monitoring strategies. Psychology in the Schools, 43 (2), 211-221.
• Barkley, R. A. (2006). Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Handbook for Diagnosis and Treatment (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
• Bray, M. A., Kehle, T. J., Spackman, V. S., & Hintze, J. M. (1998). An intervention program to increase reading fluency. Special Services in the Schools, 14, 105-125.
• Blick, D.W., & Test, D. W. (1987). Effects of self-recording on high school students' on-task behavior. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 203-213.
• Carr, S. C., & Punzo, R. P. (1993). The effects of self-monitoring of academic accuracy and productivity on the performance of students with behavioral disorders. Behavior Disorders, 18, 241–250.
• Crum, C. F. (2004) Using a cognitive-behavioral modification strategy to increase on-task behavior of a student with a behavior disorder. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39 (2), 305-309.
• Cole, C. L., & Bambara, L. M. (2000). Self-monitoring theory and practice. İçinde: S. E. Shapiro & T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Behavioral Assesment in Schools (pp. 202-232). London, The Guilford.
• Cooper, O. J., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied Behavior Analysis. (2nd) Columbus, OH: Pearson/Merill-Prentice Hall.
• DiGangi, S. A., Maag, J. W., & Rutherford, R. B. (1991). Self-graphing of on-task behavior: Enhancing the reactive effects of self-monitoring on on-task behavior and academic performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 221-230. Dodson, K. L. (2008). Self-monitoring to increase time on-task and its impact on accuracy: Is the motivaider necessary. Doctor of philosophy, Department of Educational Psychology The University of Utah.
• Dunlap, G., Clarke, S., Jackson, M., Wright, S., Ramos, E., & Brinson, S. (1995). Self-monitoring of classroom behaviors with students exhibiting emotional and behavioral challenges. School Psychology Quarterly, 10 (2), 165–177.
• Dunlap, L. K., & Dunlap, G. (1989). A self-monitoring package for teaching subtraction with regrouping to students with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 309–314.
• Edwards, L., Salant, V., Howard, V.F., Brougher, J., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1995). Effectiveness of self- management on attentional behavior and reading comprehension for children with attention deficit disorder. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 17 (2),1–17.
• Ganz, J. B. (2008) Self-monitoring across age and ability levels: Teaching students to ımplement their own positive behavioral interventions. Preventing School Failure, 53 (1), 39-49.
• Hallahan, D. P., Marshall, K. J. & Lloyd, J. W. (1981). Self-recording during group instruction: Effects on attention-to-task. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 407-413.
• Hallahan, D. P., & Sapona, R. (1983). Self-monitoring of attention with learning-disabled children: Past research and current issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 616-620.
• Harris, K. R. (1986). Self-monitoring of attentional behavior versus self-monitoring of productivity: Effects on on-task behavior and academic response rate among learning disabled children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 417-423.
• Harris, K. R., Friedlander, B. D., Saddler, B., Frizzelle, R., & Graham, S. (2005). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of academic performance: Effects among students with ADHD in the general education classroom. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 145–156.
• Hughes, C. A., & Hendrickson, J. M. (1987). Self-monitoring with at-risk students in the regular class setting. Education and Treatment of Children, 10 (3), 225-236.
• Johnson, J. E. (2008). The effects of a self-monitoring package using a tactile cueing device on student on-task behavior in special education and general education settings. Unpublished master’s thesis, Utah State University, Logan, Utah.
• Joseph L. M., & Eveleigh E. L. (2011) A review of the effects of self-monitoring on reading performance of students with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 45 (1 ), 43-53.
• Lannie A.L., & Martens B. K. (2008). Targeting performance dimensions in sequence according to the instructional hierarchy: Effects on children’s math work within a self-monitoring program. Journal Behavioral Education, 17, 356–375.
• Lam, A. L., Cole, C. L., Shapiro, E. S., & Bambara, L. M. (1994). Relative effects of self-monitoring on-task behavior, academic accuracy, and disruptive behavior in students with behavior disorders. School Psychology Review, 23 (1), 44-58.
• Levondeski, L. S., & Cartledge, G. (2000). Self-monitoring for elementary school children with serious emotional disturbances: Classroom applications for increased academic responding. Behavior Disorders, 25, 211–224.
• Lipinski, D. P., Black, J. L., Nelson, R.O., & Ciminero, A. R. (1975). Influence of motivational variables on the reactivity and reliability of self-recording. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43 (5), 637-646.
• Maag, J. W., Rutherford, R. B., & DiGangi, S. A. (1992). Effects of self-monitoring and contingent reinforcement on on-task behavior and academic productivity of learning-disabled students: A social validation study. Psychology in the Schools, 29,157-172.
• Maag, J. W., Reid, R., & DiGangi, S. A. (1993). Differential effects of self-monitoring attention, accuracy, and productivity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 329–344.
• Mace, F. C., Belfiore, P. J., & Hutchinson, J. M. (2001). Operant theory and research on self- regulation. İçinde: B. J. Zimmerman &e D. H. Schunk (Ed.), Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 39-65). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Malone, L.D., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1992). Reading comprehension instruction: Summarization and self- monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 3, 270-279.
• Mathes, M. Y., & Bender, W. N. (1997). The effects of self-monitoring on children with attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder who are receiving pharmacological interventions. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 121–128.
• McDougall, D., & Brady, M. P. (1998). Initiating and fading self-management interventions to increase math fluency in general education classes. Exceptional Children, 64, 151–166.
• Olympia, D. E., Sheridan, S. M., Jenson, W. R., & Andrews, D. (1994). Using student-managed interventions to increase homework completion and accuracy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 85-99.
• Ozdemir, S. (2011). The Effects of the First Step to Success Program on academic engagement behaviors of Turkish students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13 (16), 168-177.
• Piersel, W.C. (1985). Self-observation and completion of school assignments: The influence of a physical recording device and expectancy characteristics. Psychology in the Schools, 22, 331-336.
• Palmer, S. B., Wehmeyer, M. L., Gipson K., & Agran, M. (2004). Promoting access to the general curriculum by teaching self-determination skills. Exceptional Children,70 (4), 427- 439.
• Prater, M. A„ Joy, R., Chilman, B., Temple, J., & Miller, S. R. (1991). Self-monitoring of on-task behavior by adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 164-177.
• Prater, M. A., Hogan, S., & Miller, S. R. (1992). Using self-monitoring to improve on-task behavior and academic skills of an adolescent with mild handicaps across special and regular education settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 35, 43-55.
• Rafferty, L. A., & Raimondi, S. (2009). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of performance: Examining the differential effects among students with emotional disturbance engaged in independent math practice. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18 (4), 279-299.
• Reid, R. (1996). Research in self-monitoring with students with learning disabilities: The present, the prospects, the pitfalls. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 317–331.
• Rock, M. L. (2005). Use of strategic self-monitoring to enhance academic engagement, productivity, and accuracy of students with and without disabilities. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 7, 3–17.
• Rock, M. L., & Thead, B.K. (2007) The effects of fading a strategic self-monitoring intervention on students’ academic engagement, accuracy, and productivity. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16 ( 4), 389-412.
• Rooney, K., Polloway, E.A., & Hallahan, D.P. (1985). The use of self-monitoring procedures with low IQ learning disabled students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 384-389.
• Sacks, S., Lueck, A., Corn, A., & Erin, J. (2006). Position paper on low vision. Part 2: Supporting the social and emotional needs of students with low vision to promote academic and social success. Arlington, VA: Division of Visual Impairments.
• Schmitt, R. C. O. (2009). The effects of a self-monitoring and video self-modeling intervention to increase on- task behavıor for children with attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Unpublished PhD thesis, Indiana University.
• Scozzari, J. (1997). Self-monitoring academic performance versus self-monitoring on-task behavior. Unpublished master’s thesis, California State University, Fresno.
• Shapiro, E. S., & Cole, C. L. (1994). Behavior change ın the classroom: Self-management interventions. New York: Guilford Press.
• Shimabukuro, S. M., Prater, M. A., Jenkins, A., Edelen-Smith, P. (1999). The effects of self-monitoring of academic performance on students with learning disabilities and ADD/ADHD. Education & Treatment of Children, 22 (4), 397-414.
• Stahr, B., Cushing, D., Lane, K., & Fox, J. (2006). Efficacy of a function-based intervention in decreasing off- task behavior exhibited by a student with AD/HD. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 201-211.
• Stahmer, A.C., & Schreibman, L. (1992). Teaching children with autism appropriate play in unsupervised environments using a self-management treatment package. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25 (2), 47-59.
• Trammel, D. L., Schloss, P.J., & Alper, S. (1994). Using self-recording, evaluation, and graphing to increase completion of homework assignments. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 75-81.
• Webber, J., Scheuermann, B., McCall, C., & Coleman, M. (1993). Research on self- monitoring as a behavior management technique in special education classrooms: A descriptive review. Remedial and Special Education, 14, 38-56.
• Wehmeyer M. L., Yeager D., Bolding N., Agran M., & Hughes C. (2003). The effects of self-regulation strategies on goal attainment for students with developmental disabilities in general education classrooms. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 15 (1), 79-96.
• Wolfe L.H., Heron T.E., & Goddard Y.L. (2000). Effects of self-monitoring on the on-task behavior and written language performance of elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education,10 (1), 49–73.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. İçinde: B. J. Zimmerman ve D. H. Schunk (Ed.), Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives (pp.1-39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.