The Relationship between Theory of Mind and Pragmatic Language Skills in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Children with Typical Development

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1, 33 - 49, 01.03.2024

Gamze Ünözkan Aksu , Mehmet Emrah Cangi

https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.1099297

Öz

Introduction: An outstanding research question is whether the interaction between theory of mind (ToM) and pragmatic language skills differs in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and typical development. This study investigated the relationship between ToM and pragmatics in individuals with ASD and children with typical development (CTD) and between these skills and Test of Language Development (TOLD-TR) scores which were determined as a participant criterion.
Method: Sixteen individuals with ASD with TOLD-TR test equivalent age 7;0-8;11 and 46 CTD aged 6;0-8;11 were included. Child Form of Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), Strange Stories Test, and Pragmatic Language Skills Inventory (PLSI) were used.
Findings: PLSI and RMET scores as well as PLSI and Strange Stories scores did not significantly correlate in the ASD group. Nevertheless, in CTD, there were many weak-to-moderate level significant relationships between Strange Stories and PLSI subtest scores. In both groups, there were significant relationships between all TOLD-TR subtest scores and Strange Stories scores, except for TOLD-TR Syntactic Understanding in the ASD group. Numerous weak-to-strong correlations between TOLD-TR and PLSI scores as well as between TOLD-TR and ToM scores were found in the CTD group. In the ASD group, however, moderate-to-strong relationships between Strange Stories and the TODIL composite, between Sentence Comprehension and Morpheme Completion, and between RMET and Morpheme Completion.
Discussion: It emerged that groups could have different patterns of interaction between these variables. The lack of correlation between ToM and pragmatics in ASD may be explained by the relatively small sample size and the fact that the norm group of the PLSI was largely composed of CTD. Additionally, the importance of sentence and syntax comprehension in ToM was revealed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Individuals with autism spectrum disorder, children with typical development, theory of mind, pragmatic language skills

Otizm Spektrum Bozukluğu Olan Bireylerde ve Tipik Gelişen Çocuklarda Zihin Kuramı ve Pragmatik Dil Becerileri Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Giriş: Otizm spektrum bozukluğu (OSB) ve tipik gelişimde zihin kuramı (ZK) ve pragmatik beceriler arasındaki etkileşimin farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığı önemli bir araştırma sorusudur. Çalışmada OSB olan ve tipik gelişen grupta ZK ve pragmatik beceriler arasındaki ilişki incelenmiş ve bu beceriler ile bir katılımcı dahil etme kriteri olan Türkçe Okul Çağı Dil Gelişim Testi (TODİL) puanlarının ilişkisi araştırılmıştır.
Yöntem: Çalışmaya TODİL dil eşdeğer yaşı 6;0-8;11 olan 16 OSB’li ve 7;0-8;11 yaş aralığında tipik gelişim gösteren 46 katılımcı dahil edilmiştir. Çalışmada Çocuklar İçin Gözlerden ZK testi (Gözlerden ZK), Garip Hikayeler ve Pragmatik Dil Becerileri Envanteri (PDBE) kullanılmıştır.
Bulgular: OSB’li grupta PDBE testleri (toplam puan ve alt testler) ile Gözlerden ZK ve Garip Hikayeler arasında anlamlı ilişki bulunmamıştır. Oysa tipik gelişen grupta Garip Hikayeler ile PDBE testleri arasında zayıf veya orta düzeyde anlamlı ilişkiler vardır. İki grupta, OSB’de Cümle Anlama hariç, TODİL alt testleri ile Garip Hikayeler arasındaki ilişkiler anlamlı bulunmuştur. Tipik gelişen grupta TODİL Dilbilgisi bileşke ve alt test puanları ile, PDBE testleri ve ZK testleri arasında çok sayıda zayıf ile güçlü arasında değişen anlamlı ilişki bulunmuştur. Oysa OSB’de yalnızca Garip Hikayeler ile TODİL bileşke, Cümle Anlama ve Biçimbirim Tamamlama arasında ve Gözlerden ZK ile Biçimbirim Tamamlama arasında orta ile güçlü arasında değişen ilişki vardır.
Tartışma: İki grup arasında ZK ve pragmatik becerilerin etkileşiminde farklı bir örüntü olabileceği görülmüştür. OSB’de ZK ile pragmatik beceriler arasında ilişki olmaması katılımcı grubunun görece küçük olması ve PDBE’nin adaptasyon çalışmasının büyük ölçüde tipik gelişen çocuklardan oluşmasıyla açıklanabilir. Ayrıca ZK becerilerinde cümle ve ek anlamanın önemi ortaya çıkmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Otizm spektrum bozukluğu olan çocuklar, tipik gelişen çocuklar, zihin kuramı, pragmatik dil becerileri

Kaynakça

• Alev, G., Diken, I. H., Ardıç, A., Diken, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Gilliam, J. (2014). Adaptation and Examining Psychometrical Properties of Pragmatic Language Skills Inventory (PLSI) in Turkey. Ilkogretim Online, 13(1).
• Ahmed, F. S., & Miller, L. S. (2011). Executive function mechanisms of theory of mind. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 41(5), 667-678.
• American Psychiatric Association. From the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). Diagnostic criteria handbook.
• Astington, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory- of-mind development. Developmental psychology, 35(5), 1311.
• Baixauli-Fortea, I., Miranda Casas, A., Berenguer-Forner, C., Colomer-Diago, C., & Roselló-Miranda, B. (2019). Pragmatic competence of children with autism spectrum disorder. Impact of theory of mind, verbal working memory, ADHD symptoms, and structural language. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 8(2), 101-112.
• Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?. Cognition, 21(1), 37-46.
• Baron-Cohen, S. (1988). Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive or affective?. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 18(3), 379-402.
• Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high- functioning autism. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42(2), 241- 251.
• Berenguer, C., Miranda, A., Colomer, C., Baixauli, I., & Roselló, B. (2018). Contribution of theory of mind, executive functioning, and pragmatics to socialization behaviors of children with high- functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(2), 430-441.
• Brent, E., Rios, P., Happé, F., & Charman, T. (2004). Performance of children with autism spectrum disorder on advanced theory of mind tasks. Autism, 8(3), 283-299.
• Çinbay, G. (2019). Zihin kuramı hikayeleri (Tuhaf hikayeler) testinin Türkçeye uyralanması ve 7-12 yaş çocuklarında zihin kuramı becerilerinin incelenmesi (Master's thesis, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü).
• Devine, R. T., & Hughes, C. (2016). Measuring theory of mind across middle childhood: Reliability and validity of the silent films and strange stories tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 149, 23-40.
• Doherty, M. (2008). Theory of mind: How children understand others' thoughts and feelings. psychology press.
• Eisenmajer, R., & Prior, M. (1991). Cognitive linguistic correlates of ‘theory of mind’ability in autistic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 351-364.
• Estrada, T. (2019). The Roles of Pragmatic Language and Theory of Mind in the Adaptive Communication Skills of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.
• Fernández, C. (2013). Mindful storytellers: Emerging pragmatics and theory of mind development. First Language, 33(1), 20-46.
• Filipe, M. G., Veloso, A., Frota, S., & Vicente, S. G. (2020). Executive functions and pragmatics in children with high-functioning autism. Reading and Writing, 33(4), 859-875.
• Frith, U., & Happé, F. (1994). Autism: Beyond “theory of mind”. Cognition, 50(1-3), 115-132.
• Girli, A. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Turkish child and adult form of “Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test”. Psychology, 2014.
• Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (1992). Why the child's theory of mind really is a theory.
• Gürleyik, S., & Gözün Kahraman, Ö. (2019). Okul öncesi dönem çocuklarında zihin kuramı ve akran ilişkileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi.
• Güven, O. S. (2015). İki dil testinin (tedil ve todil) tipik ve atipik dil gelişimi gösteren çocuklarda ayırt ediciliğinin incelenmesi (Doctoral dissertation, Anadolu University (Turkey)).
• Güven, Y., Ayvaz, E., & Göktaş, İ. (2019). Okul öncesi dönem çocuklarının zihin kuramı ve sosyal problem çözme becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi.
• Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 36(1), 5-25.
• Happé, F. G. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of autism and Developmental disorders, 24(2), 129-154.
• Kaland, N., Callesen, K., Møller-Nielsen, A., Mortensen, E. L., & Smith, L. (2008). Performance of children and adolescents with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism on advanced theory of mind tasks. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 38(6), 1112-1123.
• Kanner, L. (1949). Problems of nosology and psychodynamics of early infantile autism. American journal of Orthopsychiatry, 19(3), 416.
• Karakelle, S., & Ertuğrul, Z. (2012). Zihin kuramı ile çalışma belleği, dil becerisi ve yönetici işlevler arasındaki bağlantılar küçük (36-48 ay) ve büyük (53-72 ay) çocuklarda farklılık gösterebilir mi?. Turk Psikoloji Dergisi, 27(70).
• Karasar, N. (2007). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Lam, Y. G., & Yeung, S. S. S. (2012). Towards a convergent account of pragmatic language deficits in children with high-functioning autism: depicting the phenotype using the pragmatic rating scale. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(2), 792-797.
• Lee, S. B., Song, S. H., Ham, J. H., Song, D. H., & Cheon, K. A. (2015). Idiom comprehension deficits in high-functioning autism spectrum disorder using a Korean autism social language task. Yonsei Medical Journal, 56(6), 1613-1618.
• Lerner, M. D., Hutchins, T. L., & Prelock, P. A. (2011). Brief report: Preliminary evaluation of the theory of mind inventory and its relationship to measures of social skills. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 41(4), 512-517.
• Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of" theory of mind.". Psychological review, 94(4), 412.
• Lopez, B. R., Lincoln, A. J., Ozonoff, S., & Lai, Z. (2005). Examining the relationship between executive functions and restricted, repetitive symptoms of autistic disorder. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 35(4), 445-460.
• Mathersul, D., McDonald, S., & Rushby, J. A. (2013). Understanding advanced theory of mind and empathy in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 35(6), 655-668.
• Miller, C. A. (2006). Developmental relationships between language and theory of mind.
• Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of social research methodology, 11(4), 327-344.
• O’Hare, A. E., Bremner, L., Nash, M., Happé, F., & Pettigrew, L. M. (2009). A clinical assessment tool for advanced theory of mind performance in 5 to 12 year olds. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 39(6), 916-928.
• Pedreño, C., Pousa, E., Navarro, J. B., Pàmias, M., & Obiols, J. E. (2017). Exploring the components of advanced theory of mind in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(8), 2401-2409.
• Rajendran, G., & Mitchell, P. (2007). Cognitive theories of autism. Developmental review, 27(2), 224-260.
• Scholl, B. J., & Leslie, A. M. (1999). Modularity, development and ‘theory of mind’. Mind & language, 14(1), 131-153.
• Schull, C. P., La Croix, L., Miller, S. E., Austin, K. S., & Kidd, J. K. (2021). 7. Language Development: Promoting Speaking, Listening & Communicating. Early Childhood Literacy: Engaging and Empowering Emergent Readers and Writers, Birth-Age 5.
• Szumski, G., Smogorzewska, J., Grygiel, P., & Orlando, A. M. (2019). Examining the effectiveness of naturalistic social skills training in developing social skills and theory of mind in preschoolers with ASD. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 49(7), 2822-2837.
• Tager-Flusberg, H. (2000). Language and understanding minds: Connections in autism. Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2, 124-149.
• Topbaş, S. (2007). Dil ve kavram gelişimi. Kök Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Volden, J., Coolican, J., Garon, N., White, J., & Bryson, S. (2009). Brief report: pragmatic language in autism spectrum disorder: relationships to measures of ability and disability. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(2), 388-393.
• Wang, Z., Devine, R. T., Wong, K. K., & Hughes, C. (2016). Theory of mind and executive function during middle childhood across cultures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 149, 6-22.
• White, S., Hill, E., Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2009). Revisiting the strange stories: Revealing mentalizing impairments in autism. Child development, 80(4), 1097-1117.
• White, S. J. (2013). The triple I hypothesis: Taking another (’s) perspective on executive dysfunction in autism. Journal of Autism and developmental disorders, 43(1), 114-121.
• Whyte, E. M., Nelson, K. E., & Scherf, K. S. (2014). Idiom, syntax, and advanced theory of mind abilities in children with autism spectrum disorders.
• Whyte, E. M., & Nelson, K. E. (2015). Trajectories of pragmatic and nonliteral language development in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of communication disorders, 54, 2-14.