Firmaların Endüstri 4.0 yatkınlık düzeylerini etkileyen faktörlerin analizi

Öz

Endüstri 4.0 dönüşümü, firmalardaki her birim ve bileşenin birbirlerine entegre olmasını gerektirmektedir. Dönüşüm sürecinin daha iyi anlaşılabilmesi ve firmaların Endüstri 4.0 teknolojisindeki mevcut durumlarının incelenmesi amacıyla pek çok olgunluk ve yatkınlık modelleri geliştirilmiştir. Bu çalışmada amaç, Manisa ve İzmir Organize Sanayi Bölgelerinde faaliyet gösteren orta ve büyük ölçekli firmaların Endüstri 4.0 yatkınlık düzeylerinin belirlenmesi ve yatkınlık düzeylerini etkileyen faktörlerin Sıralı Logit model ile incelenmesidir. Bu amaçla IMPULS Endüstri 4.0 Yatkınlık Modeli kapsamında elde edilen sonuçlara göre, firmaların önemli bir bölümünün daha çok 2. ve 3. seviyede bulundukları ve büyük ölçekli firmaların daha yüksek yatkınlık düzeyine sahip oldukları görülmüştür. Bununla birlikte, Sıralı Logit model sonucuna göre Endüstri 4.0 yatkınlığını belirleyen en önemli değişkenin firmanın Endüstri 4.0 teknolojisini kullanma eğilimini gösteren Niyet olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Endüstri 4.0
• Dijitalleşme
• Endüstri 4.0 yatkınlık modeli
• Sıralı logit mode

Analysis of the factors affecting firms’ Industry 4.0 readiness levels

Öz

Industry 4.0 transformation requires each unit and component in firms to be integrated with each other. Many maturity and readiness models have been developed in order to examine the current status of firms in Industry 4.0 technology and to better understand the process of transformation. The aim of this study is to determine the readiness levels of medium and large-scale firms operating in Manisa and Izmir Organized Industrial Zones for Industry 4.0 and to examine the factors affecting the readiness levels of firms with the Ordered Logit model. For this purpose, according to the results obtained within the scope of IMPULS Industry 4.0 Readiness Model, it has been observed that a significant part of the firms is mostly at the 2nd and 3rd level and largescale firms have a higher level of readiness. However, according to the result of the Ordered Logit model, it has been revealed that the most important variable determining the level of readiness for Industry 4.0 is Intention, which indicates the tendency of the firms to use Industry 4.0 technology.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Industry 4.0
• Digitalization
• Industry 4.0 readiness model
• Ordered logit model

Kaynakça

1. [1] Yıldız A. “Endüstri 4.0 ve akıllı fabrikalar”. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(2), 546-556, 2018.
2. [2] Kagermann H, Wahlster W, Helbig J. “Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative Industrie 4.0: Final Report of the Industrie 4.0”. National Academy of Science and Engineering, Forschungsunion: Berlin, Germany, Scientific Report, 82, 2013.
3. [3] Kılıç S, Alkan RM. “Dördüncü sanayi devrimi Endüstri 4.0: Dünya ve Türkiye değerlendirmeleri”. Girişimcilik, İnovasyon ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(3), 29-49, 2018.
4. [4] Doğru BN, Meçik O. “Türkiye’de Endüstri 4.0’in işgücü piyasasına etkileri: firma beklentileri”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 1581-1606, 2018.
5. [5] Türkiye Bilim Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı. “Türkiye’nin Sanayi Devrimi: Dijital Türkiye Yol Haritası”. https://www.sanayi.gov.tr/tsddtyh.pdf, (11.07.2020).
6. [6] Hermann M, Pentek T, Otto B. “Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios”. 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA, 5-8 January, 2016.
7. [7] Baysal İ. “Endüstri 4.0, Dijital Dönüşümü Anlamak”. https://www.okul.pwc.com.tr/images/uploadfile/conten t/635863141496551266.pdf, (23.07.2019).
8. [8] Selek A. “Endüstri Tarihinde Kısa Bir Yolculuk”. http://www.endustri40.com/endustri-tarihine-kisa-biryolculuk/ (01.01.2021).

9. [9] Soylu A. “Endüstri 4.0 ve girişimcilikte yeni yaklaşımlar”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 32, 43-57, 2018.
10. [10] TÜSİAD, Samsung, Deloitte, GfK. “Türkiye’deki Dijital Değişime CEO Bakışı”. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/tr/D ocuments/technology-mediatelecommunications/turkiyedeki-dijital-degisime-CEObakisi.pdf (18.03.2020).
11. [11] Backlund F, Chronéer D, Sundqvist E. “Project management maturity models-a critical review”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 837-846, 2014.
12. [12] Canetta L, Barni A, Montini E. “Development of a digitalization maturity model for the manufacturing sector”. IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, Stuttgart, Germany, 17-20 June 2018.
13. [13] De Carolis A, Macchi M, Negri E, Terzi S. “A maturity model for assessing the digital readiness of manufacturing companies”. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 513, 13-20, 2017.
14. [14] Duffy J. “Maturity models”. Strategy & Leadership, 29(6), 19-26, 2001.
15. [15] Leyh C, Schäffer T, Bley K, Forstenhäusler S. Assessing the IT and Software Landscapes of Industry 4.0-enterprises: the maturity model SIMMI 4.0. Editor: Ewa Ziemba. Information Technology for Management: New Ideas and Real Solutions, Springer International Publishing, 2017.
16. [16] Lichtblau K, Stich V, Bertenrath R, Blum M, Bleider M, Millack A, Schröter M. “IMPULS-Industrie 4.0-Readiness”. VDMA's IMPULS Foundation Report, Germany, AachenKöln, 78, 2015.
17. [17] Mettler T. “Maturity assessment models: a design science research approach”. International Journal of Society Systems Science, 3(1/2), 81-98, 2011.
18. [18] Nikkhou S, Taghizadeh K, Hajiyakhchali S. “Designing a portfolio management maturity model (Elena)”. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 226, 318-325, 2016.
19. [19] Proença D, Borbinha J. “Maturity models for information systems- a state of the art”. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 1042-1049, 2016.
20. [20] Schumacher A, Erol S, Sihn W. “A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises”. Procedia CIRP, 52, 161-166, 2016.
21. [21] Tarhan A, Turetken O, Reijers HA. “Business process maturity models: a systematic literature review”. Information and Software Technology, 75, 122-134, 2016.
22. [22] Gill M, VanBoskirk S. “The Digital Maturity Model 4.0. Benchmarks: Digital Transformation Playbook”. Cambridge, USA, Scientific Report, 17, 2016.
23. [23] Geissbauer R, Vedso J, Schrauf S. “Industry 4.0: Building the Digital Enterprise, Industrial Manufacturing Key Findings”. https://www. pwc. com/gx/en/industries/industries-4.0/landingpage/industry-4.0-building-your-digital-enterprise-april2016. pdf, (18.01.2019).
24. [24] Akdil KY, Üstündağ A, Cevikcan E. Maturity and Readiness Model for Industry 4.0 Strategy. Editors: Ustundag A, Cevikcan E. Industry 4.0: Managing the Digital Transformation, 61-94, Switzerland, Springer International Publishing, 2018.
25. [25] Colli M, Madsen O, Berger U, Møller C, Wæhrens BV, Bockholt M. “Contextualizing the outcome of a maturity assessment for Industry 4.0”. IFAC-Papers Online, 51(11), 1347-1352, 2018.
26. [26] Basl J, Doucek P. “A metamodel for evaluating enterprise readiness in the context of Industry 4.0”. Information, 10(3), 89-102, 2019.
27. [27] Felch V, Asdecker B, Sucky E. “Maturity models in the age of Industry 4.0 – Do the available models correspond to the needs of business practice?”. 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA, 8-11 January, 2019.
28. [28] Kiraz A, Canpolat O, Erkan EF, Uygun Ö. “IMPULS kriterleri ile Endüstri 4.0 eğiliminin değerlendirilmesi: bir bulanık bilişsel harita uygulaması”. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Science, 7(1), 14-23, 2019.
29. [29] Hatipoğlu C, Tunacan T. “Bilecik Organize Sanayi Bölgesi’nde bulunan işletmelerin Endüstri 4.0 açısından durum değerlendirmesi”. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(4), 3689-3701, 2020.
30. [30] Mckelvey RD, Zavoina W. “A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables”. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 4, 103-20, 1975.
31. [31] Long JS. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications, 1997.
32. [32] Borooah VK. “How much happiness is there in the world? a cross-country study”. Applied Economics Letters, 13, 483-88, 2006.
33. [33] Liao TF. Interpreting Probability Models: Logit, Probit, and Other Generalized Linear Models. 1st ed. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA, Sage, 1994.
34. [34] Fu V. “Estimating generalized ordered logit models”. Stata Technical Bulletin, 8(44), 160-164, 1998.
35. [35] Arı E, Yıldız Z. “Bireylerin yaşam memnuniyetini etkileyen faktörlerin sıralı lojistik regresyon analizi ile incelenmesi”. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(42), 1362-1374, 2016.
36. [36] Fullerton AS, Xu J. “The proportional odds with partial proportionality constraints model for ordinal response variables”. Social Science Research, 41(1), 182-198, 2012.
37. [37] Maddala GS. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics 1st ed. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 1983.
38. [38] Williams R. “Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables”. Stata Journal, 6(1), 58-82, 2006.
39. [39] Pacchini APT, Lucato WC, Facchini F, Mummolo G. “The degree of readiness for the implementation of Industry 4.0”. Computers in Industry, 113, 1-8, 2019.
40. [40] Top S. Girişimcilik Niyeti. 1. Baskı. İstanbul, Türkiye, Beta, 2017.
41. [41] Miranda FJ, Chamero-Mera A, Rubio S. “Academic entrepreneurship in spanish universities: an analysis of the determinants of entrepreneurial intention”. European Resarch on Business Economics, (23), 113-122, 2017.
42. [42] İlhan İ. “Tekstil üretim süreçleri açısından Endüstri 4.0 kavramı”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 25(7), 810-823, 2019.
43. [43] Yu F, Schweisfurth T. “Industry 4.0 technology implementation in smes-a survey in the Danish-German border region”. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 4(3), 76-84, 2020.
44. [44] Kuan KKY, Chau PYK. “A perception-based model for ADI adoption in small businesses using a technology– organization–environment frameworké. Information & Management, 38(8), 507-521, 2001.
45. [45] Stentoft J, Rajkumar C. “The relevance of Industry 4.0 and its relationship with moving manufacturing out, back and staying at home, International Journal of Production Research, 58(10), 2953-2973, 2020.