Polietilen ve kalsiyum karbonat bileşiği modifiyeli bitümlü bağlayıcıların sıcaklık duyarlılığı ve depolama stabilitesinin incelenmesi

Öz

Bu çalışmada, polietilen ve kalsiyum karnonat bileşiği (PEC) modifiyeli bitümünün sıcaklık duyarlılığı ve depolama stabilitesi incelenmiştir. PEC bitüm ağırlığınca %3, %6, %9, %12 ve %15 oranlarında kullanılmıştır. PEC modifiyeli bağlayıcıların özellikleri, %4 styrenebutadiene-styrene (SBS) modifiyeli bağlayıcı ile kıyaslanmıştır. Bağlayıcıların sıcaklık hassasiyetini belirlemek için penetrasyon, yumuşama noktası ve dönel viskozimetre deneyleri uygulanmıştır. Bağlayıcılara depolama sonrası yumuşama noktası ve dinamik kayma reometresi deneyleri uygulanmıştır. Ayrıca bağlayıcıların yaklaşık maliyetleri yardımıyla performans/maliyet ilişkisi belirlenmiştir. Deney sonuçlarına göre; %15 PEC içeren bağlayıcı düşük sıcaklık hassasiyeti ile ön plana çıkmıştır. PEC modifiyeli bağlayıcılarda %6’dan daha fazla katkı içeriğinde depolama sonrası önemli derecede faz ayrımı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bağlayıcıların performans ve maliyetleri birlikte değerlendirildiğinde %6 PEC içeren bağlayıcının %4 SBS modifikasyonu ile sıcaklık hassasiyeti, depolama stabilitesi ve ekonomik bakımdan benzer performansa sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Polietilen ve kalsiyum karbonat bileşiği
• bitüm
• depolama stabilitesi
• sıcaklık duyarlılığı
• SBS

Investigation of temperature sensitivity and storage stability of polyethylene and calcium carbonate compound modified bituminous

Abstract

In this study, temperature sensitivity and storage stability of polyethylene and calcium carnonate compound (PEC) modified bitumen were investigated. PEC was used at the rates of 3%, 6%, 9%, 12% and 15% by weight of bitumen. The characteristics of PEC additived binders were confronted with 4% styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) additived binder. Penetration, rotational viscometer and softening point experiments were applied to determine the temperature sensitivity of the binders. After the storage process, dynamic shear rheometry and softening point experiments were applied to the binders. Moreover, their performance/cost relations were determined with the help of the approximate costs of the binders. According to the test results; The binder containing 15% PEC stands out with its low temperature sensitivity It has been appeared that there was a important phase separation after storage with an additive content of more than 6% in PEC modified binders. When the performance and costs of the binders are evaluated together, it has been determined that the binder containing 6% PEC has similar performance with 4% SBS modification in terms of temperature sensitivity, storage stability and economy.

Keywords

• Polyethylene and calcium carbonate compound
• Bitumen
• Storage stability
• Temperature sensitivity
• SBS

Kaynakça

1. [1] Kök BV, Yılmaz M, Geçkil A. “Çimento stabilizasyonlu zeminin esnek üstyapı maliyetine etkisi”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(3), 165-172, 2012.
2. [2] Cai L, Shi X, Xue J. “Laboratory evaluation of composed modified asphalt binder and mixture containing nanosilica/rock asphalt/SBS”. Construction and Building Materials, 172, 204-211, 2018.
3. [3] Kök BV, Yilmaz M, Erkus Y. “Effects of graphite on mechanical properties of stone mastic asphalt pavement”. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 23(8), 1013-1020, 2017.
4. [4] Kaya D, Topal A, Gupta J, McNally T. “Aging effects on the composition and thermal properties of styrenebutadiene-styrene (SBS) modified bitumen”. Construction and Building Materials, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117450.
5. [5] Erkuş Y, Kök BV, Yilmaz M. “Evaluation of performance and productivity of bitumen modified by three different additives”. Construction and Building Materials, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120553.
6. [6] Aghazadeh Dokandari P, Oner J, Topal A, Sengoz B. “A laboratory study of an organic warm mix asphalt additive on aging characteristics of bituminous mixtures”. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 20(9), 332-337, 2014.
7. [7] Almusawi A, Abdulrahman HS, Shakhan MR, Doğaroğlu B. “Effects of crumb rubber size and concentration on Marshall parameters of rubberized asphalt mixture”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 26(6), 1048-1052, 2020.
8. [8] Zhu J, Lu X, Kringos N. “Experimental investigation on storage stability and phase separation behaviour of polymer-modified bitumen”. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19(9), 832-841, 2018.

9. [9] Ali SIA, Ismail A, AlMansob RA, Alhmali DI. “Evaluation of elevated temperature properties of asphalt cement modified with aluminum oxide and calcium carbonate nanoparticles”. Transport Infrastructure 2017, Prague, Czech Republic, 21–22 September 2017.
10. [10] Liu DL, Yao HB, Bao SY. “Performance of nano-calcium carbonate and SBS compound modified asphalt”. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 38, 579-582, 2007.
11. [11] Hao XH, Zhang AQ, Yang W. “Study on the performance of nano calcium carbonate modified asphalt concrete AC13”. Advanced Materials Research, 450, 503-507, 2012.
12. [12] Haider S, Hafeez I, Zaidi SBA, Nasir MA, Rizwan M. “A pure case study on moisture sensitivity assessment using tests on both loose and compacted asphalt mixture”. Construction and Building Materials, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117817.
13. [13] Moghadas Nejad F, Geraee E, Azarhoosh AR. “The effect of nano calcium carbonate on the dynamic behaviour of asphalt concrete mixture”. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 24(8), 1219-1228, 2020.
14. [14] Kebritchi A, Jalali-Arani A, Roghanizad AA. “Rheological behavior and properties of bitumen modified with polymeric coated precipitated calcium carbonate”. Construction and Building Materials, 25(6), 2875-2882, 2011.
15. [15] Khan IM, Kabir S, Alhussain MA, Almansoor FF. “Asphalt design using recycled plastic and crumb-rubber waste for sustainable pavement construction”. Procedia Engineering, 145, 1557-1564, 2016.
16. [16] Punith VS, Veeraragavan A. “Behavior of reclaimed polyethylene modified asphalt cement for paving purposes”. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 23(6), 833-845, 2011.
17. [17] Costa LM, Silva HMRD, Oliveira JR, Fernandes SR. “Incorporation of waste plastic in asphalt binders to improve their performance in the pavement”. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 6(4), 457-464, 2013.
18. [18] Fang C, Yu R, Li Y, Zhang M, Hu J, Zhang M. “Preparation and characterization of an asphalt-modifying agent with waste packaging polyethylene and organic montmorillonite”. Polymer Testing, 32(5), 953-960, 2013.
19. [19] Amirkhanian S. “Utilization of scrap plastics in asphalt binders”. Eco-Efficient Pavement Construction Materials, 13-32, 2020.
20. [20] Al-Hadidy AI, Tan YQ. “Evaluation of Pyrolisis LDPE modified asphalt paving materials”. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 21(10), 618-623, 2009.
21. [21] Liu S, Zhou SB, Peng A, Xuan W, Li W. “Analysis of the performance and mechanism of desulfurized rubber and low‐density polyethylene compound‐modified asphalt”. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.48194.
22. [22] Ho S, Church R, Klassen K, Law B, MacLeod D, Zanzotto L. “Study of recycled polyethylene materials as asphalt modifiers”. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 33(8), 968-981, 2006.
23. [23] Padhan RK, Sreeram A. “Enhancement of storage stability and rheological properties of polyethylene (PE) modified asphalt using cross linking and reactive polymer based additives”. Construction and Building Materials, 188, 772-780, 2018.
24. [24] Zhang HL, Su MM, Zhao SF, Zhang YP, Zhang ZP. “High and low temperature properties of nano-particles/polymer modified asphalt”. Construction and Building Materials, 114, 323-332, 2016.
25. [25] Zhang W, Qiu L, Liu J, Hu K, Zou L, Chen Y, Zang J. “Modification mechanism of C9 petroleum resin and its influence on SBS modified asphalt”. Construction and Building Materials, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124740.
26. [26] Shan L, Xie R, Wagner NJ, He H, Liu Y. “Microstructure of neat and SBS modified asphalt binder by small-angle neutron scattering”. Fuel, 253, 1589-1596, 2019.
27. [27] Padhan RK, Leng Z, Sreeram A, Xu X. “Compound modification of asphalt with styrene-butadiene-styrene and waste polyethylene terephthalate functionalized additives”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124286.
28. [28] Cao Z, Huang X, Yu J, Han X, Wang R, Li Y. “Laboratory evaluation of the effect of rejuvenators on the interface performance of rejuvenated SBS modified bitumen mixture by surface free energy method”. Construction and Building Materials, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121866.
29. [29] Mojabi SA, Mirbaha B. “Laboratory investigation of stone matrix asphalt modified with SBS polymer and C25 fiber in using the semi-circular bend geometry (SCB) and moisture susceptibility”. Construction and Building Materials, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120511.
30. [30] Cuadri AA, Roman C, García-Morales M, Guisado F, Moreno E, Partal P. “Formulation and processing of recycled-lowdensity-polyethylene-modified bitumen emulsions for reduced-temperature asphalt technologies”. Chemical Engineering Science, 156, 197-205, 2016.
31. [31] Arabani M, Pedram M. “Laboratory investigation of rutting and fatigue in glassphalt containing waste plastic bottles”. Construction and Building Materials, 116, 378-383, 2016.
32. [32] Fang C, Wu C, Hu J, Yu R, Zhang Z, Nie L, Mi X. “Pavement properties of asphalt modified with packaging‐waste polyethylene”. Journal of Vinyl and Additive Technology, 20(1), 31-35, 2014.
33. [33] Wang L, Shan M, Li C. “The cracking characteristics of the polymer-modified asphalt mixture before and after aging based on the digital image correlation technology”. Construction and Building Materials, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119802.
34. [34] Ameri M, Nasr D. “Properties of asphalt modified with devulcanized polyethylene terephthalate”. Petroleum Science and Technology, 34(16), 1424-1430, 2016.
35. [35] Jun L, Yuxia Z, Yuzhen Z. “The research of GMA-g-LDPE modified Qinhuangdao bitumen”. Construction and Building Materials, 22(6), 1067-1073, 2008.
36. [36] Rasmussen RO, Lytton RL, Chang GK. “Method to predict temperature susceptibility of an asphalt binder”. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 14(3), 246-252, 2002.
37. [37] Raouf MA, Williams RC. “Temperature and shear susceptibility of a nonpetroleum binder as a pavement material”. Transportation Research Record, 2180(1), 9-18, 2010.
38. [38] Yamaç ÖE, Yılmaz M, Kök BV. “Effects of the combined use of styrene-butadiene-styrene and gilsonite in bitumen modification on the stiffness and thermal sensitivity of bitumens”. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology, 13(1), 77-85, 2018.
39. [39] Hong Z, Yan K, Ge D, Wang M, Li G, Li H. “Effect of styrenebutadiene-styrene (SBS) on laboratory properties of lowdensity polyethylene (LDPE)/ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) compound modified asphalt”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130677.
40. [40] Yu R, Fang C, Liu P, Liu X, Li Y. “Storage stability and rheological properties of asphalt modified with waste packaging polyethylene and organic montmorillonite”. Applied Clay Science, 104, 1-7, 2015.
41. [41] Galooyak SS, Dabir B, Nazarbeygi AE, Moeini A. “Rheological properties and storage stability of bitumen/SBS/montmorillonite composites”. Construction and Building Materials, 24(3), 300-307, 2010.