Development of a care plan recommendation system for physical therapy patients
Öz
Physical therapy includes many different treatment methods for patients' musculoskeletal problems. However, each patient has different complaints, lifestyles, and recovery rates. The importance of personalized care in physical therapy practices has therefore increased. The aim of this study is to develop a personalized recommendation system for patients' physical therapy processes. A dataset of 12,393 patients was collected from a private hospital and analyzed using machine learning and deep learning algorithms. Prediction was performed with Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) Classifier, Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and Feedforward Neural Network (FNN) models using 5-fold cross-validation. Among single models, the ANN achieved the best performance with Precision, Recall, F1-Score, and Accuracy values of 0.8733, 0.8666, 0.8600, and 0.8666, respectively. In the ensemble stage, a Voting Classifier combining Random Forest and LightGBM achieved 96% accuracy for predicting treatment session numbers, while the stacked-ensemble pipeline integrating ANN and CNN achieved 86% success in personalized treatment plan recommendation. The novelty of this study lies in the design of a stacked ensemble pipeline that integrates treatment session prediction with personalized care plan recommendation, enhancing both effectiveness and patient-centeredness in physical therapy. Each patient can thus receive the most appropriate treatment for their health status and needs. Personalized care can lead to faster recovery, greater participation in treatment processes, and more positive long-term outcomes. This study contributes to making physical therapy more effective and patient-centered by emphasizing the importance of personalized care in healthcare.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- [1] Secinaro S, Calandra D, Secinaro A, Muthurangu V, Biancone P. “The role of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a structured literature review”. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21(1), 125, 2021.
- [2] Bi Q, Goodman KE, Kaminsky J, Lessler J. “What is machine learning? A primer for the epidemiologist”. The American Journal of Epidemiology,188 (12), 2222-2239, 2019.
- [3] Collins GS, Moons KGM. “Reporting of artificial intelligence prediction models”. Lancet, 393, (10181), 1577-1579, 2019.
- [4] Mahmoud H, Aljaldi F, El-Fiky A, Battecha K, Thabet A, Alayat M, Abd Elkafy E, Ebid A, Ibrahim A. “Artificial Intelligence machine learning and conventional physical therapy for upper limb outcome in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 27(11), 4812-4827, 2023.
- [5] Puyuelo-Quintana, G, Cano-De-La-Cuerda, R, Plaza-Flores A, Garces-Castellote E, Sanz-Merodio D, Goni-Arana A. “A new lower limb portable exoskeleton for gait assistance in neurological patients: a proof of concept study”. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 17, 1-16, 2020.
- [6] Lyu M, Chen WH, Ding X, Wang J. “Knee exoskeleton enhanced with artificial intelligence to provide assistance-as-needed”. Review of Scientific Instruments, 90(9), 1-10, 2019.
- [7] Lopez-Meyer P, Fulk GD, Sazonov ES. "Automatic detection of temporal gait parameters in poststroke individuals". IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 15(4), 594-601, 2011.
- [8] Khera P, Kumar N. “Role of machine learning in gait analysis: a review”. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 44(8), 441-467, 2020.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Yapay Zeka (Diğer)
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Erken Görünüm Tarihi
6 Ocak 2026
Yayımlanma Tarihi
6 Ocak 2026
Gönderilme Tarihi
13 Mart 2025
Kabul Tarihi
6 Aralık 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2026 Cilt: 32 Sayı: 5