Effects of crumb rubber size and concentration on Marshall parameters of rubberized asphalt mixture

Abstract

The depletion of natural aggregate sources which generally accounts for a huge percent of Hot Mixed Asphalts (HMAs) and the difficulty posed by disposal scrap tires are a major environmental concern for the future. The use of waste products like scrap tires in highway construction is considered a sustainable way of dealing with these issues. Crumb rubber is a material pulverized from waste polymer products like scrap tires which are then added to HMAs to improve their performance. This study focuses on the sensitivity of crumb rubber particle sizes (fine ≤1.18 mm), (coarse ≥1.18 mm and ≤3.35 mm) (and mix of 50% fine and 50% coarse) and partial replacement (1.5 and 2.5% of total weight) of aggregates on the Marshall test parameters of rubberized asphalt mixes. The Marshall test parameters: density, stability, VTM, VFB of both rubberized asphalt and conventional asphalt samples were compared and also the Asphalt Institute (AI) and National Asphalt Pavement Association (NAPA) methods were used to obtain the optimum bitumen content (OBC). From the results, it suggests that; the utilization of dry process methodology of adding crumb rubber additives in different sizes and percentages had a considerable effect on Marshal test parameters and also influences the optimum binder content estimates. The results of this study can be used as a reference point for the use of crumb rubber in HMAs.

Keywords

• Crumb rubber
• Marshall
• Optimum bitumen content
• Rubberized asphalt

Kaynakça

1. [1] Epps JA. “Uses of Recycled Rubber Tires in Highways”. Transportation Research Board, Washington, USA, 198, 1994.
2. [2] Abusharar SW. “Laboratory evaluation of rubberized asphalt using the dry process”. Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Science and Technology, 3(5), 4815-4820, 2016.
3. [3] Wulandari PS, Tjandra D. “Use of crumb rubber as an additive in asphalt concrete mixture”. Procedia engineering, 171, 1384-1389, 2017.
4. [4] Mehta Y, Jahan K, Laicovsky J, Miller L, Parikh D, Lozano, AL. “Evaluation of the effect of coarse and fine rubber particles on laboratory rutting performance of asphalt concrete mixtures. Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management, 30(2), 112-120, 2004.
5. [5] Airey GD, Singleton TM, Collop AC. “Properties of polymer modified bitumen after rubber-bitumen interaction”. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 14(4), 344-354, 2002.
6. [6] Summers CJ. “Modified Bitumen and Bituminous Materials. The Idiots Guide to Highways Maintenance, 2000”. https://docplayer.net/38177789-The-idiots-guide-to-highway-maintenance.html (12.01.2019).
7. [7] Amirkhanian SN. “Utilization of Crumb Rubber in Asphaltic Concrete Mixtures-South Carolina Experience”. South Carolina Department of Transportation, South Carolina, USA, 29634-0911, 2001.
8. [8] Fager GA. “Asphalt Rubber: A Summary of the use of crumb rubber in hot mixes”. Transportation Research Board, Washington, USA, FHWA-KS-01-1, 2001.

9. [9] Hunt L. “Crumb Rubber Modified Asphalt Concrete in Oregon”. Oregon Department of Transportation, Oregon, USA, FHWA-OR-RD-02-13, 2002.
10. [10] Malaysian PWD. “Standard specification for road works”. Jabatan Kerja Raya, Kuala Lumpur, 2008.
11. [11] Shen J, Li B, Xie Z. “Interaction between crumb rubber modifier (CRM) and asphalt binder in dry process”. Construction and Building Materials, 149, 202-206, 2017.
12. [12] Asphalt I. The Asphalt Handbook. 7th ed. Kentucky, USA, Asphalt Institute, Lexington, 2007.
13. [13] Roberts FL, Kandhal PS, Brown ER, Lee DY, Kennedy TW. Hot Mix Asphalt Materials, Mixture Design and Construction. 2nd ed. Maryland, USA, Lanham, 1996.