Effect of lead rubber bearing on seismic response of regular and irregular frames in elevation

Abstract

Base isolations are acknowledged as an effective seismic protective system for structural systems of buildings. This study investigates the effectiveness of lead rubber bearing (LRB) on the nonlinear response of the steel moment resisting frames subjected to real ground motions. To this aim, 12-storey regular and irregular steel frames in elevation upgraded with LRB were studied by evaluating the local and global deformations. LRB was modeled by considering three key parameters of isolation period, effective damping ratio, and stiffness ratio. Two-dimensional model of the base isolated frames were created and a series of time-history analyses were carried out by different earthquake ground motions. The seismic behaviour of the bare and isolated frames was measured by the variation of isolator displacement, acceleration, interstorey drift ratio, relative displacement, roof drift ratio, normalized base shear, base moment, and hysteretic curve. The supremacy of the base-isolated frames over the bare frames was discussed accordingly. It was found that the seismic response of the regular and irregular frames in elevation could be improved up to a certain degree by implementing LRB.

Keywords

• Base isolation
• Frame
• Irregular in elevation
• Lead rubber bearing
• Seismic performance

Kaynakça

1. [1] Fujita T. “Seismic isolation of civil buildings in Japan”. Progress in Structrutal Engineering and Materials, 1(3), 295-300, 1998. [2] Matsagar VA, Jangid RS. “Influence of isolator characteristics on the response of base-isolated structures”. Engineering Structures, 26(12), 1735-1749, 2004.
2. [3] Dezfuli FH, Alam MS. “Performance-based assessment and design of FRP-based high damping rubber bearing incorporated with shape memory alloy wires”. Engineering Structures, 61, 166-183, 2014.
3. [4] Dezfuli FH, Alam MS. “Effect of different steel-reinforced elastomeric isolators on the seismic fragility of a highway bridge”. Structural Control and Healt Monitoring, 24(2), 1-15, 2017.
4. [5] Makris N, Chang S. “Effects of damping mechanisms on the response of seismically isolated structures”. PEER report 1998/06. Berkeley (CA): Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, 1998
5. [6] Kelly JM, Hodder SB. “Experimental study of lead and elastomeric dampers for base isolation system in laminated neoprene bearings”. Bulletin of New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 15, 53-67, 1982.
6. [7] Providakis CP. "Pushover analysis of base-isolated steel-concrete composite structures under near-fault excitations". Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 28(4), 293-304, 2008.
7. [8] ASCE. “Evaluation findings for skellerup base isolation elastomeric bearings”. Technical Evaluation Report, (CERF Report: HITEC 98-12), Prepared by the Highway Innovative Technology Evaluation Center, 1998.
8. [9] Hameed A, Koo MS, Jeong JH. “Effect of lead rubber bearing characteristics on the response of seismic-isolated bridges”. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 12(3), 187-196, 2008.

9. [10] Hashemi S, Aghashiri MH. “Seismic responses of base-isolated flexible rectangular fluid containers under horizontal ground motion”. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 100, 159-168, 2017
10. [11] Jangid RS. "Optimal lead-rubber isolation bearings for near-fault motions". Engineering Structures, 29(10), 2503-2513, 2007.
11. [12] Bhandari M, Bharti SD, Shrimali MK, Datta TK. “Assessment of proposed lateral load patterns in pushover analysis for base isolated frames”. Engineering Structures, 175, 531-548, 2018.
12. [13] Liang B, Shishu X, Jiaxiang T. "Wind effects on habitability of base-isolated buildings". Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 90(12-15), 1951-1958, 2002.
13. [14] Kulkarni JA, Jangid RS. "Effects of superstructure flexibility on the response of base-isolated structures". Shock and Vibration, 10, 1-13, 2003.
14. [15] Fragiacomo M, Rajgelj S, Cimadom F. "Design of bilinear hysteretic isolation systems". Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32(9), 1333-1352, 2003.
15. [16] Matsagar VA, Jangid RS. "Influence of isolator characteristics on the response of base-isolated structures". Engineering Structures, 26(12), 1735-1749, 2004.
16. [17] Alhan C, Şahin F. "Protecting vibration-sensitive contents: an investigation of floor accelerations in seismically isolated buildings". Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 9, 1203-1226, 2011.
17. [18] Özdemir G, Akyüz U. "Performance of a multi-story isolated building subjected to bidirectional excitations in protection of critical equipments from earthquake hazard". 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa, Protugal, 24-29 September 2012.
18. [19] Das S, Mishra SK. "Optimal performance of buildings isolated by shape-memory-alloy-rubber-bearing (smarb) under random earthquakes". International Journal for Computational Methods in Engineering Science and Mechanics, 15(3), 265-276, 2014.
19. [20] Bhagat S, Wijeyewickrema AC. “Seismic response evaluation of base-isolated reinforced concrete buildings under bidirectional excitation". Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 16(2), 365-382, 2017.
20. [21] Güneyisi EM, Deringöl AH. “Seismic response of friction damped and base-isolated frames considering serviceability limit state”. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 148, 639-657, 2018.
21. [22] Karavasilis TL, Bazeos N, Beskos DE. "Maximum displacement profiles for the performance based seismic design of plane steel moment resisting frames". Engineering Structures, 28(1), 9-22, 2006.
22. [23] ASCE 7-05. “Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures". American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, 2005.
23. [24] Eurocode, EN 1998-1 Eurocode 8. “Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, European Committee for Standardization“. CEN, Brussels, 2004.
24. [25] TSCB. “Turkish Seismic Code for Buildings“. The Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency of Turkey, Ankara, Turkey 2018.
25. [26] Naeim F, Kelly JM. Design of Seismic Isolated Structures, From Theory to Practice. 1st ed. New York, NY, USA, John Wiley and Sons, 1999.
26. [27] Ryan L, Chopra AK. "Estimation of seismic demands on isolators based on nonlinear analysis". Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 130(3), 392-402, 2004.
27. [28] Park Y, Wen JYK, Ang AH. "Random vibration of hysteretic systems under bi-directional ground motions". Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 14(4), 543-557, 1986.
28. [29] Computers and Structures, (CSI) Inc. “SAP2000 Advanced 14.0.0 Software. Structural Analysis Program”. Berkeley, California, 2011.
29. [30] PEER. “The Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, User’s Manual for the PEER Ground Motion Database Application”. University of California, Berkeley, 2011.
30. [31] American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE. “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures”. ASCE/SEI 7-10, Reston, VA, 2010.
31. [32] SEAOC Seismology Committee. “Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary”. Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, Uniform Building Code, 1999.
32. [33] FEMA P750. “NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures”. Washington, D.C., 2009.