Muğla İlinde Erişkin Acil Sağlık Hizmetleri Kullanım Epidemiyolojisi

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, acil servise başvuran erişkinlerde Acil Sağlık Hizmetleri (ASH) kullanımının epidemiyolojik özelliklerini araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Yöntemler: Temmuz 2019-Ocak 2022 tarihleri arasında Muğla, Türkiye'de bir üniversiteye bağlı eğitim ve araştırma hastanesinin acil servisinde tek merkezli, kesitsel ve gözlemsel bir çalışma retrospektif olarak gerçekleştirildi. Bulgular: Çalışma süresi boyunca, hastanenin elektronik sağlık veri sistemine toplam 280.691 yetişkin acil servis ziyareti kaydedildi ve 31.671 (%11.3) kritik hasta veya yaralı hasta ambulanslarla geldi. Çalışmaya alınan hastaların ortalama yaşı 57,1±21,8 (18-112 yıl) ve %56,4'ü erkekti. Bu hastaların %41'i (n=13.014) hastaneye yatırıldı (%30,4'ü servise, %10,6'sı yoğun bakıma) ve tüm nedenlere bağlı acil servis içi ölüm oranı %0,7 (n=223) idi. Vakaların %97,6'sında kamunun ambulans servisi, kalan %2,4'ünde ise özel ambulans hizmetleri kullanıldı. Kritik hastalık, trafik kazası ve iş kazası için ASH kullanım yüzdeleri sırasıyla %91,8, %6,5 ve %1,7 idi. Triyaj kodları sarı (%87,6), kırmızı (%12), siyah (%0,2) ve yeşil (%0,2) olarak kategorize edildi. Sonuçlar: Yetişkin ASH kullanımının operasyonel, eğitim ve halk sağlığı üzerindeki etkilerini daha iyi anlamak için daha fazla araştırma gereklidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• acil servis
• hastane öncesi yaklaşım
• acil sağlık hizmetleri
• erişkin
• epidemiyoloji

The Epidemiology of Adult Emergency Medical Services Use in Muğla

Öz

Objective: This study aims to investigate the epidemiological characteristics and patterns of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) use among adults who presented to the emergency department (ED). Methods: A single-center, cross-sectional, and observational study was retrospectively conducted at the ED of a university-affiliated training and research hospital in Muğla, Turkey from July 2019 to January 2022. Results: During the study period, a total of 280,691 adult ED visits were recorded in the hospital's electronic health data system, with 31,671 (11.3%) consecutive critically ill or injured patients arriving via ambulances. The mean age of enrolled patients was 57.1±21.8 years (range, 18-112 years) and 56.4% of them were male. Of these, 41% (n=13,014) were admitted to the hospital (30.4% to wards and 10.6% to the intensive care unit), and the all-cause in-ED mortality rate was 0.7% (n=223). Public EMS was used in 97.6% of the cases, with the remaining 2.4% utilizing private ambulance services. EMS use percentages for critical illness, traffic accidents, and occupational accidents were 91.8%, 6.5%, and 1.7%, respectively. The triage codes were categorized as yellow (87.6%), red (12%), black (0.2%), and green (0.2%). Conclusions: Further investigation is necessary to better understand the operational, training, and public health implications of adult EMS use.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• emergency medical services
• prehospital care
• emergency department
• epidemiology
• adult

Kaynakça

1. Andrew E, Nehme Z, Cameron P, Smith K. Drivers of Increasing Emergency Ambulance Demand. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2020/05/03 2020;24(3):385-393. Clark MJ, FitzGerald G. Older people's use of ambulance services: a population based analysis. Emergency Medicine Journal. 1999;16(2):108-111.
2. Dale J, Williams S, Foster T, et al. Safety of telephone consultation for "non-serious" emergency ambulance service patients. Quality & safety in health care. Oct 2004;13(5):363-373.
3. Dejean D, Giacomini M, Welsford M, Schwartz L, Decicca P. Inappropriate Ambulance Use: A Qualitative Study of Paramedics' Views. Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante. Feb 2016;11(3):67-79.
4. Evans CS, Platts-Mills TF, Fernandez AR, et al. Repeated Emergency Medical Services Use by Older Adults: Analysis of a Comprehensive Statewide Database. Annals of emergency medicine. Oct 2017;70(4):506-515.e503.
5. Huabbangyang T, Klaiaungthong R, Jansanga D, et al. Survival Rates and Factors Related to the Survival of Traffic Accident Patients Transported by Emergency Medical Services. Open access emergency medicine 2021: OAE, 13, 575–586.
6. Karakoyun Ö. F. GY. Acil Servis Hekimlerinin COVID-19 Pandemisi Döneminde Karşılaştıkları Curbside Konsültasyonların Değerlendirilmesi. Anatolian J Emerg Med. 2022;5(4):5.
7. Keskinoglu P, Sofuoglu T, Özmen O, Gündüz M, Ozkan M. Older people's use of pre-hospital emergency medical services in Izmir, Turkey. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. 2010;50(3):356-360.
8. Ministry of Health. Health Statistics Yearbook. Ministry of Health (Turkey); 2017.

9. Özata M, Toygar ŞA, Yorulmaz M. Comparative Analysis of 112 Emergency Ambulance Services on the example of Turkey–Konya. European Journal of General Medicine. 2011;8(4):262-267.
10. Park SJ, Kim JY, Yoon YH, et al. Analysis of the Adequacy of Prehospital Emergency Medical Services Use of Patients Who Visited Emergency Departments in Korea from 2016 to 2018: Data from the National Emergency Department Information System. Emergency medicine international. 2021;2021:6647149.
11. Park JM, Sohn, A. Predictors Affecting the Elderly's Use of Emergency Medical Services. Osong Public Health And Research Perspectives, 2020 11(4), 209–215.
12. Platts-Mills TF, Leacock B, Cabañas JG, Shofer FS, McLean SA. Emergency medical services use by the elderly: analysis of a statewide database. Prehosp Emerg Care. Jul-Sep 2010;14(3):329-333.
13. Saberian, P., Farhoud, A. R., Hasani-Sharamin, P., Moghaddami, M., & Keshvari, F. Epidemiological Features of Injured Patients Examined by Tehran Emergency Medical Service Technicians. Advanced Journal Of Emergency Medicine, 2019; 3(4), e40.
14. Van Milligan MM, JP; Tucker, J ; Arkedis, J ; Caravalho, D An Analysis of Prehospital Emergency Medical Services as an Essential Service and as a Public Good in Economic Theory. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration;2014.