Vertebroplasti uygulanan hastalarin değerlendirilmesi: tek merkez deneyimi

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı kliniğimizde vertebra kırıkları nedeniyle vertebroplasti ve kifoplasti uygulanan hastaların demografik, klinik ve radyolojik özelliklerini değerlendirmek ve sonuçlarımızı literatürle karşılaştırmalı olarak sunmaktır.
Gereç ve yöntem: 2013-2024 yılları arasında vertebra kırığı nedeniyle vertebroplasti (n=92) veya kifoplasti (n=49) uygulanan toplam 141 hasta retrospektif olarak incelendi. Yaş, cinsiyet, tedavi edilen seviye, patoloji türü, eşlik eden hastalıklar, travma öyküsü, başvuru semptomları ve takip süresince radyolojik olarak boy kısalması gibi parametreler değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: Toplam 141 hastanın %65,2'sine vertebroplasti, %34,8'ine kifoplasti uygulandı. Hastaların yaş ortalaması 64,91±14,07 yıl (aralık: 20-92 yıl) olarak belirlenmiştir. Kadın hastaların oranı %56,7 (n=80), erkek hastaların oranı ise %43,3 (n=61) olarak saptanmıştır. Patolojik tanı, kırıkların %79,4'ünün osteoporotik veya kemik kaynaklı olduğunu ortaya koydu. Hastaların %41,8'inde travma öyküsü mevcuttu. En sık etkilenen vertebra seviyesi, vakaların %23,4'ünde gözlenen L1 seviyesiydi. Hastaların %86,4'ünde tek seviyeli kırıklar mevcuttu. Tüm hastalardaki temel şikayet ağrıydı. Ayrıca, hastaların %71,6'sında en az bir eşlik eden hastalık vardı. Travma öyküsü osteoporotik (kemik kaynaklı) kırıklarda anlamlı olarak daha yaygındı (p<0,001), ancak tümör grubunda daha az sıklıkta görüldü.
Sonuç: Tedavi seçimi, altta yatan patoloji ve radyolojik bulgulara göre kişiselleştirilmelidir. Etkili ağrı kontrolü ve ağrı kesici kullanımının azaltılması, yaşam kalitesini önemli ölçüde iyileştirmek ve günlük aktivitelere daha erken dönüşü sağlamak için çok önemlidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Vertebroplasti
• kifoplasti
• kompresyon kırığı
• travma

Etik Beyan

26.12.2024 , 24-MOBAEK-058

Evaluation of patients undergoing vertebroplasty: a single-center experience

Öz

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the demographic, clinical and radiological characteristics of patients who underwent vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty due to vertebral fractures in our clinic and to present our results in comparison with the literature.
Materials and methods: A total of 141 patients who underwent vertebroplasty (n=92) or kyphoplasty (n=49) due to vertebral fractures between 2013 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Parameters such as age, sex, number of fractures, treated level, type of pathology, comorbidities, history of trauma, presenting symptoms, and radiological height loss during follow-up were evaluated.
Results: Of the total 141 patients, 65.2% underwent vertebroplasty and 34.8% underwent kyphoplasty. The mean age of the patients was 64.91±14.07 years (range: 20-92 years). The proportion of female patients was 56.7% (n=80), while male patients accounted for 43.3% (n=61). Pathological diagnosis revealed that 79.4% of the fractures were osteoporotic or bone- related in origin. A history of trauma was present in 41.8% of the patients. The most frequently affected vertebral level was L1, observed in 23.4% of cases. Single-level fractures were present in 86.4% of the patients. The main complaint in all patients was pain. Additionally, 71.6% of the patients had at least one comorbidity. A history of trauma was significantly more common in osteoporotic (bone-related) fractures (p<0.001), whereas it was less frequently observed in the tumor group.
Conclusion: The choice of treatment should be individualized based on the underlying pathology and radiological findings. Effective pain control and reduction in the use of analgesics are crucial for significantly improving quality of life and enabling an earlier return to daily activities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Vertebroplasty
• kyphoplasty
• compression fracture
• trauma

Etik Beyan

26.12.2024 , 24-MOBAEK-058

Kaynakça

1. Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, Le Gars D. Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty. Neurochirurgie. 1987;33(2):166-168.
2. Deramond H, Wright NT, Belkoff SM. Temperature elevation caused by bone cement polymerization during vertebroplasty. Bone. 1999;25(2 Suppl):17S-21S. doi:10.1016/s8756-3282(99)00127-1
3. McKiernan FE. Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty: how good is the evidence?. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2007;9(1):57-65. doi:10.1007/s11926-007-0023-0
4. Boonen S, Van Meirhaeghe J, Bastian L, et al. Balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of acute vertebral compression fractures: 2-year results from a randomized trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(7):1627-1637. doi:10.1002/jbmr.364
5. Chen LX, Li YL, Ning GZ, et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of three treatments in old people with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a network meta-analysis and systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0123153. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123153
6. Longo UG, Loppini M, Denaro L, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Conservative management of patients with an osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(2):152-157. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.94B2.26894
7. Old JL, Calvert M. Vertebral compression fractures in the elderly. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69(1):111-116.
8. Atik OS, Gunal I, Korkusuz F. Burden of osteoporosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;443:19-24. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000200248.34876.fe

9. Boss S, Srivastava V, Anitescu M. Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2022;33(2):425-453. doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2022.01.008
10. Coughlan T, Dockery F. Osteoporosis and fracture risk in older people. Clin Med (Lond). 2014;14(2):187-191. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.14-2-187
11. Zhang X, Wang Z, Zhang D, et al. The prevalence and treatment rate trends of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. PLoS One. 2023;18(9):e0290289. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0290289
12. Johnell O, Kanis J. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16 Suppl 2:S3-S7. doi:10.1007/s00198-004-1702-6
13. Burton AW, Rhines LD, Mendel E. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a comprehensive review. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;18(3):e1. doi:10.3171/foc.2005.18.3.2
14. Santiago FR, Chinchilla AS, Álvarez LG, Abela ALP, García MDMC, López MP. Comparative review of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. World J Radiol. 2014;6(6):329-343. doi:10.4329/wjr.v6.i6.329
15. Garfin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA. New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(14):1511-1515. doi:10.1097/00007632-200107150-00002
16. Vaccaro AR, Kim DH, Brodke DS, et al., Diagnosis and management of thoracolumbar spine fractures. The JBJS. 2003;85(12):2456-2470. doi:10.2106/00004623-200312000-00029
17. Rajasekaran S, Kanna RM, Schnake KJ, et al. Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Fractures-How Are They Different?-Classification and Treatment Algorithm. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(Suppl 4):S49-S56. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000949
18. Backhauß JC, Jansen O, Kauczor HU, Sedaghat S. Fatty degeneration of the autochthonous muscles is significantly associated with incidental non-traumatic vertebral body fractures of the lower thoracic spine in elderly patients. J Clin Med. 2023;12(14):4565. doi:10.3390/jcm12144565
19. Baur Melnyk A, Geith T. Differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures. Semantıc Scholar. 2012:145-174. doi:10.1007/174_2011_493
20. Shapiro CL. Estrogen deficiency and bone loss in women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123(3):815-818. doi:10.1007/s10549-010-1099-1
21. Dai C, Wang S, Zheng L, Wang K, Yu H, Chen Y. Unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture with distant lumbosacral pain: a single-center retrospective analysis. World Neurosurg. 2025;195:123687. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123687
22. Yuntao L, Haibier A, Kayierhan A, et al. Clinical effect analysis of unilateral percutaneous vertebral cement distribution in the repair of osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures. BMC Surg. 2025;25(1):90. doi:10.1186/s12893-025-02820-0
23. Tang B, Chen X, Cui L, et al. Predictors for vertebral height deterioration in fractured vertebrae operated by percutaneous vertebroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025;26(1):327. doi:10.1186/s12891-025-08574-3
24. Yang K, Zhu X, Sun X, Shi H, Sun L, Ding H. Bone cement distribution patterns in vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025;20(1):568. doi:10.1186/s13018-025-05868-z
25. Zheng HL, Liu CH, Jiang LS, Zheng XF, Jiang SD. Unilateral Dual-Plane Puncture Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Reduces Re-Collapse in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures by Advancing Cement Delivery. Orthop Surg. 2025;17(5):1322-1331. doi:10.1111/os.70004
26. Dontas IA, Yiannakopoulos CK. Risk factors and prevention of osteoporosis-related fractures. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2007;7(3):268-272.
27. Lix LM, Azimaee M, Osman BA, et al. Osteoporosis-related fracture case definitions for population-based administrative data. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:301. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-301