Araştırma Makalesi

CAROTID ARTERY STENTING WITHOUT ANTI-EMBOLIC DEVICE: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE

Cilt: 19 Sayı: 4 10 Ekim 2026
PDF İndir
EN TR

CAROTID ARTERY STENTING WITHOUT ANTI-EMBOLIC DEVICE: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE

Öz

Background Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a frequently used method in carotid artery stenosis. There are many publications in the literature regarding whether or not anti-embolic devices should be used during carotid stenting. In this study, we reported the short-term results of our patients in whom we did not use anti-embolic devices during carotid stenting procedure. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent carotid artery stenting between June 2022 and June 2025 in our clinic. The patient's clinical characteristics and procedural datas were obtained by scanning patient files. Results Sixty patients were included in the study. The average age of the patients was 70±9. Fifty five patients underwent stenting under local anesthesia and 5 under general anesthesia. Right carotid artery in 12 patients, left carotid artery in 40 patients, and bilateral carotid artery stenting was performed in 8 patients. Self-expandable stents were used in all patients. But, no anti-embolic devices were used in any of the procedures. Patients were followed up for 11± 5 (minimum 1-maximum 24) months for recurrent stroke and death. No recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) was detected in any patient during the follow-up period. Conclusion In experienced centers, CAS is successfully performed without the use of anti-embolic devices and the risk of complications is quite low.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

Authors have any direct or indirect funding relating to the subject of our report. This work did not receive any grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not for profit sectors.

Etik Beyan

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial or personal relationships that could be viewed as influencing the work reported in this paper.

Kaynakça

  1. Potter, T. B. H., Tannous, J., & Vahidy, F. S. (2022). A contemporary review of epidemiology, risk factors, etiology, and outcomes of premature stroke. Current Atherosclerosis Reports, 24(12), 939–948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-022-01067-x
  2. Arasu, R., Arasu, A., & Muller, J. (2021). Carotid artery stenosis: An approach to its diagnosis and management. Australian Journal of General Practice, 50(11), 821–825. https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-10-20-5664
  3. Mazurek, A., Malinowski, K., Sirignano, P., Kolvenbach, R., Capoccia, L., de Donato, G., Van Herzeele, I., Siddiqui, A. H., Castrucci, T., Tekieli, L., Stefanini, M., Wissgott, C., Kuczmik, W., Stabile, E., Knapik, M., Casana, R., Pieniazek, P., Schmidt, A., Grunwald, I. Q., ... Musialek, P. (2023). Carotid artery revascularization using second generation stents versus surgery: A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 64(6), 570–582. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.24.12933-3
  4. Bonati, L. H., Jansen, O., de Borst, G. J., & Brown, M. M. (2022). Management of atherosclerotic extracranial carotid artery stenosis. The Lancet Neurology, 21(3), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00359-8
  5. Hassani, S., & Fisher, M. (2022). Management of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: A brief overview and update. The American Journal of Medicine, 135(4), 430–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.09.027
  6. Kerber, C. W., Cromwell, L. D., & Loehden, O. L. (1980). Catheter dilatation of proximal carotid stenosis during distal bifurcation endarterectomy. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 1(4), 348–349.
  7. Gray, W. A., Hopkins, L. N., Yadav, S., Davis, T., Wholey, M., Atkinson, R., Cremonesi, A., Fairman, R., Walker, G., Verta, P., Popma, J., Virmani, R., & Cohen, D. J. (2006). Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: The ARCHeR results. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 44(2), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.044
  8. White, C. J., Iyer, S. S., Hopkins, L. N., Katzen, B. T., Russell, M. E., & BEACH Trial Investigators. (2006). Carotid stenting with distal protection in high surgical risk patients: The BEACH trial 30 day results. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 67(4), 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.20689

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Beyin ve Sinir Cerrahisi (Nöroşirurji)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

10 Ekim 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

16 Ekim 2025

Kabul Tarihi

23 Şubat 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kocaoğlu, M., Çeliker, Ö., & Aras Seyit, D. (2026). CAROTID ARTERY STENTING WITHOUT ANTI-EMBOLIC DEVICE: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE. Pamukkale Medical Journal, 19(4), 759-765. https://doi.org/10.31362/patd.1803884
AMA
1.Kocaoğlu M, Çeliker Ö, Aras Seyit D. CAROTID ARTERY STENTING WITHOUT ANTI-EMBOLIC DEVICE: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE. Pam Tıp Derg. 2026;19(4):759-765. doi:10.31362/patd.1803884
Chicago
Kocaoğlu, Murat, Özkan Çeliker, ve Duygu Aras Seyit. 2026. “CAROTID ARTERY STENTING WITHOUT ANTI-EMBOLIC DEVICE: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE”. Pamukkale Medical Journal 19 (4): 759-65. https://doi.org/10.31362/patd.1803884.
EndNote
Kocaoğlu M, Çeliker Ö, Aras Seyit D (01 Ekim 2026) CAROTID ARTERY STENTING WITHOUT ANTI-EMBOLIC DEVICE: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE. Pamukkale Medical Journal 19 4 759–765.
IEEE
[1]M. Kocaoğlu, Ö. Çeliker, ve D. Aras Seyit, “CAROTID ARTERY STENTING WITHOUT ANTI-EMBOLIC DEVICE: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE”, Pam Tıp Derg, c. 19, sy 4, ss. 759–765, Eki. 2026, doi: 10.31362/patd.1803884.
ISNAD
Kocaoğlu, Murat - Çeliker, Özkan - Aras Seyit, Duygu. “CAROTID ARTERY STENTING WITHOUT ANTI-EMBOLIC DEVICE: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE”. Pamukkale Medical Journal 19/4 (01 Ekim 2026): 759-765. https://doi.org/10.31362/patd.1803884.
JAMA
1.Kocaoğlu M, Çeliker Ö, Aras Seyit D. CAROTID ARTERY STENTING WITHOUT ANTI-EMBOLIC DEVICE: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE. Pam Tıp Derg. 2026;19:759–765.
MLA
Kocaoğlu, Murat, vd. “CAROTID ARTERY STENTING WITHOUT ANTI-EMBOLIC DEVICE: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE”. Pamukkale Medical Journal, c. 19, sy 4, Ekim 2026, ss. 759-65, doi:10.31362/patd.1803884.
Vancouver
1.Murat Kocaoğlu, Özkan Çeliker, Duygu Aras Seyit. CAROTID ARTERY STENTING WITHOUT ANTI-EMBOLIC DEVICE: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE. Pam Tıp Derg. 01 Ekim 2026;19(4):759-65. doi:10.31362/patd.1803884

Creative Commons Lisansı
Pamukkale Medical Journal Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.