Indigenous urological research in Türkiye: a bibliometric and thematic analysis of the Web of Science Core Collection (2015-2025)

Öz

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the specific characteristics, development, and scientific impact of indigenous urological research originating from Türkiye through bibliometric and thematic analysis.
Materials and methods: We analyzed 1.924 original urology research articles with a Turkish corresponding author indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection (2015-2025) using the Bibliometrix R-package (Biblioshiny) and VOSviewer.
Results: Our findings reveal an overall upward trend in national scientific production, although this was not statistically significant (p=0.1972), characterized by a remarkably high single-country publication rate (94.6%). The analysis highlights the dominance of the University of Health Sciences as the central institutional hub. Thematically, endourology and stone disease (e.g., percutaneous nephrolithotomy, retrograde intrarenal surgery) emerged as the primary "motor themes," contrasting with global oncology-driven trends, while uro-oncology and andrology formed foundational basic themes.
Conclusion: This study provides researchers and policymakers with a clearer understanding of the influential authors, institutions, and thematic hotspots driving Turkish urology. The findings underscore Türkiye's pioneering role and surgical mastery in endourology, offering strategic insights for future collaborations and research directions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Urology
• bibliometric analysis
• Web of Science
• urolithiasis
• scientific mapping

Türkiye'de üroloji araştırmaları: Web of Science Core Collection'da dizine alınan makalelerin bibliyometrik ve tematik analizi (2015-2025)

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye kaynaklı yerli üroloji araştırmalarının spesifik özelliklerini, gelişimini ve bilimsel etkisini bibliyometrik ve tematik analiz yöntemleriyle değerlendirmektir.
Gereç ve yöntem: Web of Science Core Collection'da (2015-2025) dizine alınan ve sorumlu yazarının Türkiye'den olduğu 1,924 özgün üroloji araştırma makalesini Bibliometrix R-paketi (Biblioshiny) ve VOSviewer kullanarak analiz ettik.
Bulgular: Bulgularımız, istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmamakla birlikte (p=0.1972) tek ülkeli yayın oranının (%94,6) oldukça yüksek olduğu ulusal bilimsel üretimde genel bir artış eğilimi olduğunu göstermektedir. Analiz, Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi'nin (SBÜ) en büyük kurumsal merkez olarak hakimiyetini vurgulamaktadır. Tematik olarak, endoüroloji ve taş hastalığı (örn. perkütan nefrolitotomi, retrograd intrarenal cerrahi), küresel onkoloji ağırlıklı eğilimlerin aksine birincil "motor temalar" olarak öne çıkarken, üroonkoloji ve androloji temel (basic) temaları oluşturmuştur.
Sonuç: Bu çalışma, araştırmacılara ve politika yapıcılara Türk ürolojisine yön veren etkili yazarlar, kurumlar ve tematik sıcak noktalar hakkında daha net bir anlayış sunmaktadır. Bulgular, Türkiye'nin endoürolojideki öncü rolünün ve cerrahi ustalığının altını çizerek, gelecekteki iş birlikleri ve araştırma yönelimleri için stratejik içgörüler sağlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Üroloji
• bibliyometrik analiz
• Web of Science
• urolitiyazis
• bilimsel haritalama

Kaynakça

1. Pritchard A. Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation. 1969;25(4):348-349. doi:10.1108/eb026482
2. Salari MA, Baghi Keshtan S, Mohammadi G, Faryabi A, Aazami H, Dehghanbanadaki H. Global Trends in Urological Evidence Synthesis: A Bibliometric Analysis of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2025;39:76. doi:10.47176/mjiri.39.76
3. Aria M, Cuccurullo C. Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr. 2017;11:959-975. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
4. Moral Muñoz JA, Herrera Viedma E, Santisteban Espejo A, Cobo MJ. Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: an up-to-date review. El Profesional de la Información. 2020;29. doi:10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
5. Ates T, Sukur IH, Ok F, Arikan MG, Akdogan N. Global research trends in minimally invasive treatments for kidney stones: A bibliometric analysis (2015-2024). Urolithiasis. 2025;53(1):116. doi:10.1007/s00240-025-01785-2
6. Ma L, Hu B, Ma H, Huang X, Li B. Global research trends and hotspots in single-port robotic surgery in urology: a bibliometric analysis. J Robot Surg. 2026;20(1):467. doi:10.1007/s11701-026-03422-5
7. Caglayan A, Horsanalı MO. Web-Based Bibliometric Evaluation of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer: Analysis of Turkey Data. Med Records. 2022;4(3):473-478. doi:10.37990/medr.1160518
8. Siber V, Öktem Ç. Global Research Trends and Collaboration Networks in Paraphimosis: A Bibliometric Analysis of Web of Science Publications (2000-2024). Acta Medica Young Doctors [Internet]. 2025;2(1):13-26. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17155973

9. Özsoy Ç, Gelmiş M, Ateş E. Chatbots in Urology: A Bibliometric and Trend Analysis of the Emerging Landscape (2023-2025). Grand J Urology. 2026;6(1):13-20. doi:10.5505/GJU.2026.86570
10. İpekçi T, Asfuroğlu A, Yıldız A, et al. How did The COVID-19 pandemic affect urology publications? Grand J Urol. 2022;2(1):21-25. doi:10.5505/GJU.2022.36035
11. Untan I, Dadalı M, Erşekerci E, Bağbancı MŞ. Bibliometric analysis of researches on “Urology and Covid-19”; Web of Science Example. Ahi Evran Med J. 2024;8(1):62-68. doi:10.46332/aemj.1245720
12. Ozkan TA, Eruyar AT, Cebeci OO, Memik O, Ozcan L, Kuskonmaz I. Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer. Scand J Urol. 2016;50:420-424. doi:10.1080/21681805.2016.1206619
13. Koras O, Bozkurt IH, Yonguc T, Degirmenci T, Arslan B, Gunlusoy B, et al. Risk factors for postoperative infectious complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study. Urolithiasis. 2015;43:55-60. doi:10.1007/s00240-014-0730-8
14. Çayan S, Uğuz M, Saylam B, Akbay E. Effect of serum total testosterone and its relationship with other laboratory parameters on the prognosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in SARS-CoV-2 infected male patients: a cohort study. The Aging Male. 2020;23:1493-1503. doi:10.1080/13685538.2020.1807930
15. Zeng G, Wan S, Zhao Z, Zhu J, Tuerxun A, Song C, et al. Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP): a new concept in technique and instrumentation. BJU Int. 2016;117:655-661. doi:10.1111/bju.13242
16. Besiroglu H, Otunctemur A, Ozbek E. The Relationship Between Metabolic Syndrome, Its Components, and Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. J Sex Med. 2015;12:1309-1318. doi:10.1111/jsm.12885
17. Kadihasanoglu M, Aktas S, Yardimci E, Aral H, Kadioglu A. SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia Affects Male Reproductive Hormone Levels: A Prospective, Cohort Study. J Sex Med. 2021;18:256-264. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.11.007
18. Silay MS, Spinoit AF, Undre S, Fiala V, Tandogdu Z, Garmanova T, et al. Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12:229.e1-229.e7. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.007
19. Coskun B, Ocakoglu G, Yetemen M, Kaygisiz O. Can ChatGPT, an Artificial Intelligence Language Model, Provide Accurate and High-quality Patient Information on Prostate Cancer? Urology. 2023;180:35-58. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2023.05.040
20. Karagöz MA, Gül A, Borg C, Erihan İB, Uslu M, Ezer M, et al. Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on sexuality: a cross-sectional study among couples in Turkey. Int J Impot Res. 2021;33:815-823. doi:10.1038/s41443-020-00378-4
21. Baş O, Tuygun C, Dede O, Sarı S, Çakıcı MÇ, Öztürk U, et al. Factors affecting complication rates of retrograde flexible ureterorenoscopy: analysis of 1571 procedures—a single-center experience. World J Urol. 2017;35:819-826. doi:10.1007/s00345-016-1930-3