Araştırma Makalesi

Prevelance and associated factors of pinguecula in western Turkey

Cilt: 13 Sayı: 3 18 Eylül 2020
PDF İndir
EN TR

Prevelance and associated factors of pinguecula in western Turkey

Abstract

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to describe the prevalence and factors associated with pinguecula in the western part of Turkey.

 

Methods: The study included 1443 participants over the age of 20 between January 2018 and October 2019. The presence of pinguecula on slit lamp examination was recorded. A structured questionnaire which includes basic demographic data, occupational activity, educational level, alcohol consumption and smoking, dry eye questionnaire and systemic disorders such as diabetes or hypertension was applied.

 

Results: The prevalence of pinguecula was 52.5%.Pinguecula prevalence was higher in males (58.4%) than females (46.8%).The prevalence of pinguecula significantly increased with age (p<0.001). Outdoor working, more than 2 hours of sun exposure and decreased tear break-up time (TBUT) values increase the prevalence rate of pinguecula. The pinguecula prevalence decreases as the level of education increases.

 

Conclusion: The prevalence of pinguecula varies highly around the world according to the previous studies. This is the first study which investigates the prevalence of pinguecula in Turkey.Our prevalence rate falls in the mid range. Age, gender, duration of sun exposure, TBUT values and education level are found to be related to the pinguecula prevalence.

Keywords

Destekleyen Kurum

yok

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Taub MB. Ocular effects of ultraviolet radiation. Optometry Today. 2004;44:34–38.
  2. 2. Mimura T, Usui T, Obata H, Yamagami S, Mori M, Funatsu H, Noma H, Dou K, Amano S. Severity and determinants of pinguecula in a hospital-based population. Eye Contact Lens. 2011;37:31-35.
  3. 3. Oguz H, Karadede S, Bitiren M, Gürler B, Çakmak M.Tear functions in patients with pinguecula. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001;79:262-265.
  4. 4. Soliman W, Mohamed TA. Spectral domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography assessment of pterygium and pinguecula. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90:461-465.
  5. 5. Dong N, Li W, Lin H, et al. Abnormal epithelial differentiation and tear film alteration in pinguecula. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:2710-2715. 6. Jaros PA, DeLuise VP. Pingueculae and pterygia. Surv Ophthalmol. 1988;33:41-49.
  6. 7. Panchapakesan J, Hourihan F, Mitchell P. Prevalence of pterygium and pinguecula: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1998;26: 2–5.
  7. 8. Pham TQ, Wang JJ, Rochtchina E, Mitchell P. Pterygium/ pinguecula and the five-year incidence of age-related maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139: 536–537.
  8. 9.Viso E, Gude F, Rodríguez-Ares MT. Prevalence of pinguecula and pterygium in a general population in Spain.Eye (Lond). 2011;25:350-357.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Göz Hastalıkları

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

18 Eylül 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

16 Mart 2020

Kabul Tarihi

1 Eylül 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

AMA
1.Dundar H, Kocasarac C. Prevelance and associated factors of pinguecula in western Turkey. Pam Tıp Derg. 2020;13(3):795-802. doi:10.31362/patd.704119
Creative Commons Lisansı
Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi, Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır