TÜRKİYE’DE CİNSİYET ROLLERİ, DİN, VE EŞCİNSELLİK VE EVLİLİK ÖNCESİ CİNSEL İLİŞKİYE KARŞI TUTUMLAR

Öz

Daha önce yapılmış çalışmalar, geleneksel cinsiyet inançlarının ve dindarlığın batı toplumlarında liberal cinsiyet ilişkiler üzerinde olumsuz bir etkisi olduğunu göstermiştir. Bu çalışma, 2011 Dünya Değer Araştırmasından (World Value Survey) (N=1,605) elde edilen verileri kullanarak, Türkiye’de geleneksel cinsiyet inançlarının ve dini faktörlerin bireylerin eşcinselliğe ve evlilik öncesi ilişkilere yönelik tutumlar üzerindeki etkisini incelemektedir. Bunun için daha önce yapılmış çalışmalar ve teorilere dayandırarak çeşitli hipotezler oluşturulmuştur. Regresyon analiz modellerinden elde edilen sonuçlar hem geleneksel cinsiyet inançlarının hem de dindarlığı belirleyen faktörlerin Türkiye’de eşcinselliğe ve evlilik öncesi ilişkilere yönelik negatif tutumları arttırdığını göstermektedir. Dahası, özellikle geleneksel cinsiyet rolleri liberal cinsel ilişkilere yönelik muhafazakâr tutumların en güçlü faktörü olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır. Çalışmanın sonuçları ve teorik çıkarımları gelecekteki daha kapsamlı çalışmalar için tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Din
• Eşcinsellik
• Evlilik Öncesi Cinsel İlişki
• Cinsiyet Rolleri
• İslam
• Türkiye

GENDER ROLES, RELIGION, AND ATTITUDES TOWARDS HOMOSEXUALITY AND PREMARITAL SEX IN TURKEY

Öz

Previous studies have indicated that traditional gender beliefs and religiosity have a negative impact on liberal sexual relations in Western societies. The present research utilized data from the 2011 World Value Survey (WVS) of Turkey (N=1,605) to examine the relationship between traditional gender roles, religion, and attitudes toward homosexuality and pre-marital sex, representatives of liberal sexual morality. Guided by a theoretical framework that synthesizes traditional gender roles and religious perspectives, several hypotheses were created and tested. Results from logistic regression models reveal that even though both the gender roles and religiosity are significant factors that play an important role in negative attitudes toward homosexuality and pre-marital sex in Turkey, traditional gender roles seem to be the strongest factor of conservative attitudes toward sexual relations. The theoretical implications of the current research were discussed for future studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Religion
• Homosexuality
• Premarital Sex
• Gender Roles
• Islam
• Turkey

Kaynakça

1. Alden, H. L., & Karen F. Parker. (2005). Gender role ideology, homophobia and hate crime: Linking attitudes to macro-level anti-gay and lesbian hate crimes. Deviant behavior, 26(4), 321- 343. doi.org/10.1080/016396290931614
2. Arat, Y. (2008). Religion, politics and gender equality in Turkey: implications of democratic paradox? Third World Quarterly, 31(6), 869-884. doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2010.502712
3. Acevedo, G. A., Christopher G. E., & Yilmaz, M. (2015). Religion and child-rearing values in Turkey. Journal of Family Issues, 36(12), 1595–1623. doi.org/10.1177/0192513X13504921
4. Adamczyk, A., & Hayes B. E. (2012). Religion and sexual behaviors: Understanding the influence of Islamic cultures and religious affiliation for explaining sex outside of marriage. American Sociological Review, 77(5), 723-746. doi.org/10.1177/0003122412458672
5. Barringer, M. N., Gay, D. A., & Lynxwiler, J. P. (2013). Gender, religiosity, spirituality, and attitudes toward homosexuality. Sociological Spectrum, 33(3), 240-257. doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2013.732903
6. Bello, A. H. (2011). The punishment for adultery in Islamic law and its application in Nigeria. Journal of Islamic Law and Culture, 13(2-3), 166-182. doi.org/10.1080/1528817x.2012.733132
7. Cannon, K. L., & Long, R. (1971). Premarital sexual behavior in the sixties. Journal Of Marriage And Family, 33(1), 36-49. doi.org/10.2307/350156
8. Chadee, D., Joseph, C., Peters, C., Sankar, V. S., Nair, N., & Philip, J. (2013). Religiosity, and attitudes towards homosexuals in a Caribbean environment. Social and Economic Studies, 62(1), 1-28.

9. Cochran, J. K., & Beeghley, L. (1991). The influence of religion on attitudes toward nonmarital sexuality: A preliminary assessment of reference group theory. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30(1), 45-62. doi.org/10.2307/1387148
10. Cochran, J. K., Chamlin, M. B., Beeghley, L., & Fenwick, M. (2004). Religion, religiosity, and nonmarital sexual conduct: An application of reference group theory. Sociological Inquiry, 74(1), 70-101. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682x.2004.00081.x
11. Cotten-Huston, A. L., & Waite, B. M. (1999). Anti-homosexual attitudes in college students: Predictors and classroom interventions. Journal of homosexuality, 38(3), 117-133. doi.org/10.1300/J082v38n03_07
12. Davies, M. (2004). Correlates of negative attitudes toward gay men: Sexism, male role norms, and male sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 41(3), 259-266. doi.org/10.1080/00224490409552233
13. DeLamater, J. (1981). The social control of sexuality. Annual Review of Sociology, 7(1), 263-290. doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.07.080181.001403
14. Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94(3), 369. doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.369
15. Diamond, M. (2002). Sex and gender are different: Sexual identity and gender identity are different. Clinical child psychology and psychiatry, 7(3), 320-334. doi.org/10.1177/1359104502007003002
16. Duck, R. J., & Hunsberger, B. (1999). Religious orientation and prejudice: The role of religious proscription, right-wing. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 9(3), 157-179. doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0903_1
17. Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of personality and social psychology, 46(4), 735. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.735
18. Engin, C., & Pals, H. (2018). Patriarchal attitudes in Turkey 1990–2011: The influence of religion and political conservatism. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 25(3), 383-409. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxx021
19. Ergun, M. A. (2007). Social determinants of attitudes towards women’s premarital sexuality among female Turkish university students. Sexuality and Culture, 11(3), 1-10. doi.org/10.1007/s12119-007-9005-7
20. Finlay, B., & Walther, C. S. (2003). The relation of religious affiliation, service attendance, and other factors to homophobic attitudes among university students. Review of Religious Research, 44(4), 370–93. doi.org/10.2307/3512216
21. Harding, D. J., & Jencks, C. (2003). Changing attitudes toward premarital sex: Cohort, period, and aging effects. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(2), 211-226.
22. Harbaugh, E., & Lindsey, E. W. (2015). Attitudes toward homosexuality among young adults: Connections to gender role identity, gender-typed activities, and religiosity. Journal of homosexuality, 62(8), 1098 -1125. doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2015.1021635
23. Herek, G. M. (1986). On heterosexual masculinity: Some psychical consequences of the social construction of gender and sexuality. American behavioral scientist, 29(5), 563-577.doi.org/10.1177/000276486029005005
24. Herek, G. M. (1988). Heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. Journal of sex research, 25(4), 451-477. doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551476
25. Herek, G. M. (1992). Psychological heterosexism and anti-gay violence: The social psychology of bigotry and bashing. In G. M. Herek & K. T. Berrill (Eds.), Hate crimes: Confronting violence against lesbians and gay men (pp. 149–169). New York: Sage Publications.
26. Herek, G. M. (2009). Sexual stigma and sexual prejudice in the United States: A conceptual framework. In Debra A. Hope (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities (pp. 65-111). New York: Springer.
27. Hunsberger, B., & Jackson, L. M. (2005). Religion, meaning, and prejudice. Journal of social issues, 61(4), 807-826. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00433.x
28. Jackson, L. A., & Cash, T. F. (1985). Components of gender stereotypes: Their implications for inferences on stereotypic and nonstereotypic dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(3), 326-344. doi.org/10.1177/0146167285113008
29. Jäckle, S., & Wenzelburger, G. (2015). Religion, religiosity, and the attitudes toward homosexuality—A multilevel analysis of 79 countries. Journal of homosexuality, 62(2), 207-241. doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2014.969071
30. Ichwan, J. (2014). The Influence of Religion on the Development of Heterosexism in Indonesia. Religion e incidencia publica, 2(1), 192-223. Ilkkaracan, P. (2001). Islam and women’s sexuality: A research report from Turkey. In M. Hunt, P. B. Jung and R. Balakrishnan (Eds.), Good sex: Feminist perspectives from the world’s religions (pp.1-11). New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
31. Islamweb. (2019). Fornication and adultery: Major sins in Islam. Accessed December 1 2020 https://www.islamweb.org/en/article/186409/fornication-and-adultery-major-sins-in-islam
32. Jung, J. H. (2016). A cross-national analysis of religion and attitudes toward premarital sex: Do economic contexts matter?. Sociological Perspectives, 59(4), 798-817.doi.org/10.1177/0731121415595428
33. Kite, M. E., & Deaux, K. (1987). Gender belief systems: Homosexuality and the implicit inversion theory. Psychology of women quarterly, 11(1), 83-96. doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00776.x
34. Kite, M. E., & Whitley Jr, B. E. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights a meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(4), 336-353. doi.org/10.1177/0146167296224002
35. Laner, M. R., & Laner, R. H. (1980). Sexual preference or personal style? Why lesbians are disliked. Journal of homosexuality, 5(4), 339-356. doi.org/10.1300/J082v05n04_01
36. Lefkowitz, E. S., Shearer, C. L., Gillen, M. M., & Espinosa-Hernandez, G. (2014). How gendered attitudes relate to women’s and men’s sexual behaviors and beliefs. Sexuality & Culture, 18(4), 833-846. doi.org/10.1007/s12119-014-9225-6
37. Maher, M. J. (2013). Homophobic Bullying in Catholic High Schools: Five US Studies in Heterosexism, Authority, Masculinity, and Religion. In Z. Gross, L. Davies, A. Diab (Eds.), Gender, Religion and Education in a Chaotic Postmodern World (pp. 271–84). New York: Springer.
38. McCreary, D. R. (1994). The Male Role and Avoiding Femininity. Sex Roles, 31(10), 517–531Ç doi:10.1007/BF01544277.
39. MacDonald, A. P., Huggins J., Young S., & Swanson R. A. (1973). Attitudes toward homosexuality: Preservation of sex morality or the double standard? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 40(1), 161. doi.org/10.1037/h0033943
40. MacDonald, Jr, A. Po, & Games R. G. (1974). Some characteristics of those who hold positive and negative attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 1(1), 9-27. doi.org/10.1300/J082v01n01_02
41. Newman, B. S. (1989). The relative importance of gender role attitudes to male and female attitudes toward lesbians. Sex Roles, 21(7-8), 451-465.
42. Oksal, A. (2008). Turkish family members’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Sex Roles, 58(1), 514–525. doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9370-6
43. Parla, A. (2001). The “honor" of the state: Virginity examinations in Turkey. Feminist studies, 27(1), 65-88. doi.org/10.2307/3178449
44. Petersen, L. R., & Donnenwerth G. V. (1998). Religion and declining support for traditional beliefs about gender roles and homosexual rights. Sociology of Religion, 59(4), 353-371. doi.org/10.2307/3712122
45. Reiss, I. L. (1964). The scaling of premarital sexual permissiveness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 26(2), 188-198. doi.org/10.2307/349726
46. Reiss, I. L. (2001). Sexual attitudes and behavior. In N. J. Smelser & B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 21-13969). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
47. Roggemans, L., Spruyt, B., Droogenbroeck, F. V., & Keppens, G. (2015). Religion and negative attitudes towards homosexuals: An analysis of urban young people and their attitudes towards homosexuality. Young, 23(3), 254-276. doi.org/10.1177/1103308815586903
48. Sakalli, N. (2002). The relationship between sexism and attitudes toward homosexuality in a sample of Turkish college students. Journal of homosexuality, 42(3), 53-64.doi.org/10.1300/J082v42n03_04
49. Sakalli, N., & Ugurlu, O. (2002). Effects of social contact with homosexuals on heterosexual Turkish university students' attitudes towards homosexuality. Journal of homosexuality, 42(1), 53-62. doi.org/10.1300/J082v42n01_03
50. Sakalli‐Uğurlu, N., & Glick, P. (2003). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward women who engage in premarital sex in Turkey. Journal of Sex Research, 40(3), 296-302. doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552194
51. Scott, J. (1998). Changing attitudes to sexual morality: A cross-national comparison. Sociology, 32(4), 815-845.. doi.org/10.1177/0038038598032004010
52. Sprecher, S., Treger, S., & Sakaluk, J. K. (2013). Premarital sexual standards and sociosexuality: Gender, ethnicity, and cohort differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(8), 1395-1405. doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0145-6
53. Smerecnik, C., Schaalma, H., Gerjo, K., Meijer, S., & Poelman, J. (2010). An exploratory study of Muslim adolescents' views on sexuality: Implications for sex education and prevention. BMC public health, 10(1), 1-10. doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-533
54. Smith, A. D., Resick, P. A., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (1980). Relationships among gender, sex-role attitudes, sexual attitudes, thoughts, and behaviors. Psychological Reports, 46(2), 359-367. doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1980.46.2.359
55. Stefurak, T., Taylor, C., & Mehta, S. (2010). Gender-specific models of homosexual prejudice: Religiosity, authoritarianism, and gender roles. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2(4), 247.-261. doi.org/10.1037/a0021538
56. The Quran. (2020). Retrieved from: https://quran.com/7 and https://quran.com/11
57. Weinberger, L. E., & Millham, J. (1979). Attitudinal homophobia and support of traditional sex roles. Journal of Homosexuality, 4(3), 237-246.doi.org/10.1300/J082v04n03_02
58. Weishut, D. J. (2000). Attitudes toward homosexuality: An overview. Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences, 37(4), 308-319.
59. Whitehead, A. L. (2010). Sacred rites and civil rights: Religion's effect on attitudes toward same‐sex unions and the perceived cause of homosexuality. Social science quarterly, 91(1), 63-79. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00681.x
60. Whitley, B. E., & Ægisdóttir, S. (2000). The gender belief system, authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Sex Roles, 42(11), 947-967. doi.org/10.1023/A:1007026016001
61. Whitley, B. E. 2001. Gender-role variables and attitudes toward homosexuality. Sex roles, 45(11), 691-721. doi.org/10.1023/A:1015640318045
62. Whitley Jr, B. E. (2009). Religiosity and attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A meta-analysis. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19(1), 21-38. doi.org/10.1080/10508610802471104
63. Widmer, E. D., Treas, J., & Newcomb, R. (1998). Attitudes toward nonmarital sex in 24 countries. Journal of sex research, 35(4), 349-358. doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551953
64. Wight, D. (2014). Premarital Sex, Young People’s. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, 5036–5039. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3413
65. Wong, F. Y., McCreary, D. R., Carpenter, K. M., Engle, A., & Korchynsky, R. (1999). Gender-related factors influencing perceptions of homosexuality. Journal of Homosexuality, 37(3), 19-31. doi.org/10.1300/J082v37n03_02
66. Vincent, W., Parrott, D. J., & Peterson, J. L. (2011). Effects of traditional gender role norms and religious fundamentalism on self-identified heterosexual men's attitudes, anger, and aggression toward gay men and lesbians. Psychology of men & masculinity, 12(4), 383. doi.org/10.1037/a0023807
67. Yüksel-Kaptanoğlu, İ., & Bernhardt, E. (2018). Education, religious practice, and gender ideology in Turkey. Stockholm Research Reports in Demography 16(1): 3-31. doi.org/10.17045/sthlmuni.6281342.v1
68. Zhou, X. (1989). Virginity and premarital sex in contemporary China. Feminist Studies, 15(2), 279-288. doi.org/10.2307/3177788