MERKEZİ İKTİDAR NEDEN VE NASIL BÜYÜR: JOUVENELCİ BİR BAKIŞ AÇISI

Öz

Bu çalışmada Bertrand de Jouvenel'in siyaset kuramına odaklanılmıştır. İlk olarak, Jouvenelci kurama temel teşkil eden kavramlar olan özgürlük, otorite, egemenlik ve merkezi iktidar (İktidar) incelenmiştir. Jouvenelci toplum modelinin temelinde "otorite" kavramının olduğu görülmüştür. görülmüştür. Her toplum, farklı birey grupları üzerinde elde ettikleri otoritelerinden temel alan güç merkezlerine ve İktidar olarak isimlendirilen merkezi bir otoriteye sahiptir. İktidar doğal olarak genişlemek istemekte ve diğer güçlerle çatışarak sürekli çatışma yaratmakt adır. Jouvenelci paradigmaya göre İktidarın neden ve hangi yöntemle büyüdüğü araştırılmıştır. Bu çalışma Jouvenel'in eserlerinin detaylı bir analizini yapmakta ve bunu literatürdeki Jouvenel hakkındaki güncel çalışmalarla desteklemektedir. Çalışma Jouvenel hakkındaki daha sonraki çalışmalara kaynaklık etmeyi amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bertrand de Jouvenel
• otorite
• egemenlik
• İktidar
• Üst-Alt Orta Mekanizması

WHY AND HOW CENTRAL POWER GROWS: A JOUVENELLIAN PERSPECTIVE

Öz

In this study, Bertrand de Jouvenel’s political theory has been focused upon. Firstly, Jouvenellian concepts that constitute a basis for his theory, liberty, authority, sovereignty, and central power (Power), have been investigated. It was seen that the concept “authority” is the basis of the Jouvenellian model of society. Every society has different power centers based on their respective authorities on individual groups and a central authority: Power. Power naturally wants to expand and clashes with lesser powers, creating constant conflict. The reasons why and with which method Power grows, according to the Jouvenellian paradigm, have been investigated. This study constitutes a detailed analysis of Jouvenel’s work and supplements it with recent literature on Jouvenel. The study aims to provide a basis for further studies on Jouvenel.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bertrand de Jouvenel
• authority
• sovereignty
• Power
• High-Low Middle Mechanism

Kaynakça

1. Bond, C.A. (2019). Nemesis: The Jouvenelian vs. the Liberal Model of Human Orders, Imperium Press, Perth.
2. Burnham, J. (1941). The Managerial Revolution, Putnam, London.
3. Canavan, F. (1960). The Political Reason of Edmund Burke, Duke University Press, North Carolina.
4. Canavan, F. & Payne, E.J. (1999). Select Works of Edmund Burke: A New Imprint of the Payne Edition, Liberty Fund, Indiana.
5. Carlyle, T. (2017). On Heroes, Hero Worship, & the Heroic in History, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
6. Ciampini, G. (2013a). “The Elitism of Bertrand de Jouvenel. A Reinterpretation of Jouvenel’s Political Theory through the Elite Theory”, Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(11), 15-23.
7. Ciampini, G. (2013b). “Is Bertrand de Jouvenel Only a Liberal Philosopher? The Relations between His Political Thought with the Twentieth Century Sociological Thought”, International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 3(5), 448-452.
8. Hayek, F.A. (2011). The Constitution of Liberty: The Definitive Edition, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

9. Hoppe, H.H. (2001). Democracy: The God that Failed, Transaction Publishers, New Jersey.
10. Jorge, P.A. (2021). “Power and Legitimacy–The works of Guglielmo Ferrero and Bertrand de Jouvenel”. Available at SSRN 4175541.
11. Jouvenel, B.D. (1962). On Power: The Natural History of Its Growth, (Trans. J.F. Huntington), Beacon Press, Boston.
12. Jouvenel, B.D. (1963). The Pure Theory of Politics, Yale University Press, New Haven.
13. Jouvenel, B.D. (1972). Sovereignty: An Inquiry into the Political Good, (Trans. J.F. Huntington), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
14. Jouvenel, B.D., Hale, D & Landy, M. (Ed.) (1992). The Nature of Politics, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick.
15. Mahoney, D.J. (2005). Bertrand de Jouvenel: The Conservative Liberal and the Illusions of Modernity, ISI Books, Wilmington.
16. Maistre, J.D. (2017). The Generative Principle of Political Constitutions: Studies on Sovereignty, Religion and Enlightenment, Routledge, London.
17. Parvini, N. (2012). Shakespeare and Contemporary Theory: New Historicism and Cultural Materialism, Bloomsbury Academic, London.
18. Parvini, N. (2022). The Populist Delusion, Imperium Press, Perth.
19. Rosenberg, D. (2016a). “Taming the Minotaur: Bertrand de Jouvenel on Liberty and Authority”, Perspectives on Political Science, 46(2), 118-126.
20. Rosenberg, D. (2016b). “Bertrand de Jouvenel on Power, Authority, and Trust, Социологическое обозрение, 15(4), 130-145.
21. Slevin, C. (1971). “Social Change and Human Values: A Study of the Thought of Bertrand de Jouvenel”, Political Studies, 19(1), 49-62.
22. Sowell, T. (2007). A Conflict of Visions: Ideological Origins of Political Struggles, Basic Books, New York.
23. Spandrell (2017). “Biological Leninism”, (01.02.2024) https://archive.org/details/spandrell-biological-lenninism
24. Vico, G. (2020). The New Science, (Trans. J. Taylor & R. Miner), Yale University Press, New Haven.