ENERJİ TÜKETİMİ VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: EŞ BÜTÜNLEŞME VE NEDENSELLİK YAKLAŞIMLARI

Öz

Artan nüfus ve büyüyen ekonomisiyle Türkiye'nin enerji tüketimine olan talebi hızla artmaktadır. Bu çalışma, reel gayri safi yurtiçi hasıla ile elektrik tüketimi arasındaki ilişkiyi emek ve sermaye gibi Türkiye'deki üretim fonksiyonunun belirleyicilerini ekleyerek ve 1988-2019 döneminin yıllık verilerini kullanarak, enerji-ekonomik büyüme literatürüne katkıda bulunmaktır. Uzun ve kısa vadede enerji tüketimi (EC), ekonomik büyüme (EG), emek ve sermaye arasındaki ilişkiyi değerlendirmek için Gecikmesi Dağıtılmış Otoregresif Sınır Testi, Hata Düzeltme Mekanizması ve Granger-Nedensellik Testi kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar, EG ile EC arasında eşbütünleşme ilişkisi olduğu göstermektedir. Hata düzeltme katsayısı anlamlıdır ve kısa vadeli bir sapma 2,5 yıllık bir süre içinde düzelerek uzun vadeli dengeye kavuşur. EC'den EG'ye doğru bir nedensellik ilişkisi tespit edilmiştir. Bu, Türkiye'nin EG paradigmasında EC’nin önemli bir rol oynadığını ve büyüme hipotezini desteklediğini ortaya koymaktadır. İstikrarlı ekonomik büyümeyi teşvik etmek için politikaların Türkiye'de artan enerji yatırımlarını önceliklendirmesi önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ekonomik Büyüme
• Enerji Tüketimi
• ARDL
• ECM
• Granger Nedensellik

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: COINTEGRATION AND CAUSALITY APPROACHES

Öz

With its increasing population and growing economy, Türkiye's demand for energy consumption is increasing rapidly. This study contributes to the energy-economic growth literature by examining the relationship between real gross domestic product and electricity consumption by adding the determinants of the production function in Türkiye, such as labor and capital, and using annual data for the period 1988-2019. Autoregressive Distributed Lag Bounds Test, Error Correction Mechanism and Granger Causality Test were used to evaluate the relationship between energy consumption (EC), economic growth (EG), labor, and capital in the long and short term. The results show that there is a cointegration relationship between EG and EC. The error correction coefficient is significant, and a short-term deviation recovers within a period of 2.5 years and reaches the long-term balance. Moreover, a causal relationship from EC to EG was determined. This reveals that EC plays an important role in Türkiye's EG paradigm and supports the growth hypothesis. It is suggested that policies should prioritize increasing energy investments in Türkiye in order to promote stable economic growth.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Economic Growth
• Energy Consumption
• ARDL
• ECM
• Granger Causality

Kaynakça

1. Alam, M. S. (2006). “Economic Growth With Energy”, Munich Personal RePEc Archive 2006, Working Paper No: 1260, 1-25.
2. Alam, I., & Quazi, R. (2003). “Determinants of Capital Flight: An Econometric Case Study of Bangladesh”, International Review of Applied Economics, 17(1), 85-103.
3. Altinay, G., & Karagol, E. (2005). “Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth: Evidence from Turkey”, Energy Economics, 27, 849-856.
4. Altinay, G., & Karagol, E. (2004). “Structural Break, Unit Root, and The Causality between Energy Consumption and GDP in Turkey”, Energy Economics, 26(6), 985-994.
5. Ang, J. B. (2007). “CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, and Output in France”, Energy Policy, 35(10), 4772-4778.
6. Antunano, A. C., & Alonso, A. Z. (2007). “Electricity consumption and economic growth: Evidence from Spain”. Documentos de Trabajo BILTOKI, (1), 1.
7. Ayres, R. U., Van den Bergh, J. C., Lindenberger, D., & Warr, B. (2013). “The underestimated contribution of energy to economic growth”. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 79-88.
8. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. M., & Goswami, G. G. (2003). “A Disaggregated Approach to Test the J-Curve Phenomenon: Japan Versus Her Major Trading Partners”, Journal of Economics and Finance, 27(1), 102-113.

9. Banerjee, A., Dolado, J., & Mestre, R. (1998). “Error‐correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single‐equation framework”. Journal of time series analysis, 19(3), 267-283.
10. Bowden, N., & Payne, J. E. (2009). “The Causal Relationship between US Energy Consumption and Real Output: A Disaggregated Analysis”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 31(2), 180-188.
11. Brown, R. L., Durbin, J., & Evans, J. M. (1975). “Techniques for Testing the Constancy of Regression Relationships Over Time”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 37(2), 149-163.
12. Bulut, Ö. U., Aykırı, M., & Balcı, Ö. (2022). “Elektrik Tüketiminin Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerindeki Asimetrik Etkisi: NARDL ve Toda-Yamamoto Yöntemlerinden Kanıtlar”. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi, 8(2), 99-119.
13. Cheng, B. S., & Andrews, D. R. (1998). “Energy and economic activity in the United States: Evidence from 1900 to 1945”. Energy sources, 20(1), 25-33.
14. Cheng, B. S. (1995). “An Investigation of Cointegration and Causality between Energy Consumption and Economic Growth”, The journal of energy and development, 21(1), 73-84.
15. Cleveland, G., Schroeder, R. G., & Anderson, J. C. (1989). “A theory of production competence”. Decision sciences, 20(4), 655-668. Cottrell, A. (2019). “The cobb-douglas production function”. Economics, 207, 1-4.
16. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). “Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root”. Journal of the American statistical association, 74 (366a), 427-431.
17. Douglas, P. H. (1976). “The Cobb-Douglas production function once again: its history, its testing, and some new empirical values”. Journal of political economy, 84(5), 903-915.
18. Ekonomou, G., & Halkos, G. (2023). “Exploring the impact of economic growth on the environment: An overview of trends and developments”. Energies, 16(11), 4497.
19. Eriçok, R. E. & V. Yılancı (2013). “Education Expenditures and Economic Growth Relationship: Bounds Test Approach”, Journal of Knowlede Economy and Knowledge Management, 8(1), 87-101.
20. Gupta, G., & Sahu, N. C. (2009). “Causality between Electricity Consumption & Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from India”. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Paper No. 22942.
21. Gurgul, H., & Lach, Ł. (2012). “The Electricity Consumption Versus Economic Growth of the Polish Economy”, Energy Economics, 34(2), 500-510.
22. Gujarati, D. N. (2004). “Basic Econometrics”, Forth Edition, 814-818.
23. Ghosh, S. (2002). “Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth in India”, Energy policy, 30(2), 125-129.
24. Granger, C. W. (1969). “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods”, Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 424-438.
25. Granger, C. W. J. & Newbold, P. (1974). “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics”, Journal Of Econometrics, 2, 111-120.
26. Ho, C. Y., & Siu, K. W. (2007). “A Dynamic Equilibrium of Electricity Consumption and GDP in Hong Kong: An Empirical Investigation”, Energy Policy, 35(4), 2507-2513.
27. Houthakker, H. S. (1955). “The Pareto distribution and the Cobb-Douglas production function in activity analysis”. The Review of Economic Studies, 23(1), 27-31.
28. Ikegami, M., & Wang, Z. (2016). “The Long-Run Causal Relationship between Electricity Consumption and Real GDP: Evidence from Japan and Germany”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 38(5), 767-784.
29. Jobert, T., & Karanfil, F. (2007). “Sectoral Energy Consumption by Source and Economic Growth in Turkey”, Energy Policy, 35(11), 5447-5456.
30. Johansen, S. & K. Juselius (1990), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration With Applications to The Demand for Money”, Oxford Bulletin Of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169-210.
31. Karaagac, G. E., & Ceylan, R. (2018). “The Analysis of The Relationship Between Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Selected OECD Countries: Evidences From Cointegration Technique with Structural Break”, Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 5(2), 204-222.
32. Kızılkaya, F. (2023). “Türkiye’de Temiz Enerji Tüketiminin Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkileri: Uzun ve Kısa Dönem Analizi”. Uluslararası Akademik Birikim Dergisi, 6(ÖZEL SAYI).
33. Kraft, J., & Kraft, A. (1978). “On the relationship between energy and GNP”. Journal of Energy and Development, 3(2), 401-403.
34. Kyophilavong, P., Shahbaz, M., Anwar, S., & Masood, S. (2015). “The Energy-Growth Nexus in Thailand: Does Trade Openness Boost Up Energy Consumption?”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 46, 265-274.
35. Lise, W., & Van Montfort, K. (2007). “Energy Consumption and GDP in Turkey: Is There A Co‐İntegration Relationship?”, Energy Economics, 29(6), 1166-1178.
36. Lu, W. C. (2017). “Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth: Evidence From 17 Taiwanese Industries”, Sustainability, 9(1), 50.
37. Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). “A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407-437.
38. Menegaki, A. N., & Tugcu, C. T. (2016). “The sensitivity of growth, conservation, feedback & neutrality hypotheses to sustainability accounting”. Energy for Sustainable Development, 34, 77-87.
39. Narayan, P. K., & Smyth, R. (2005). “Electricity Consumption, Employment and Real Income in Australia Evidence from Multivariate Granger Causality Tests”, Energy Policy, 33(9), 1109-1116.
40. Narayan, P. K. & R. Smyth (2005). “Trade Liberalization and Economic Growth in Fiji. An Empirical Assessment Using the ARDL Approach”, Journal of The Asia Pacific Economy, 10(1), 96-115.
41. Narayan, P. K. (2005). “The Saving and Investment Nexus for China: Evidence from Cointegration Tests”, Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979-1990.
42. Narayan, P. K. & S. Narayan (2005). “Estimating Income and Price Elasticities of Imports For Fiji in a Cointegration Framework”, Economic Modelling, 22, 423-438.
43. Narayan, P. K. & R. Smyth (2006). “What Determines Migration Flows from Low-Income to High-Income Countries? An Empirical İnvestigation of Fiji-U.S. Migration 1972-2001”, Contemporary Economic Policy, 24(2), 332-342.
44. Özgün, F. (2024). “Türkiye’de Enerji Tüketimi, Yaşam Beklentisi ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: ARDL Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı”. Nişantaşı Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(Özel Sayı), 123-143.
45. Park, S. Y., & Yoo, S. H. (2014). “The Dynamics of Oil Consumption and Economic Growth İn Malaysia”, Energy Policy, 66, 218-223.
46. Park, J.Y. (1992). “Canonical Cointegrating Regressions”, Econometrica, 60(1), 119-143.
47. Payne, J. E. (2010). “A Survey of The Electricity Consumption-Growth Literature”, Applied Energy, 87(3), 723-731.
48. Perron, P. (1989). “The Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock, and The Unit Root Hypothesis”, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1361-1401.
49. Pesaran, M. H., Y. Shin & R. J. Smith (2001). “Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289-326.
50. Phillips, P. C. B. (1988). “Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression”, Biometrika. Salahuddin, M., & Alam, K. (2015). “Internet Usage, Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth in Australia: A Time Series Evidence”, Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 862-878.
51. Sefer, U., & Usupbeyli, A. (2015). “The Causality Relationship Between Oil Consumption and Economic Growth in Turkey”. Ankara University SBF Journal, 70(3), 769-787.
52. Soytas, U., & Sari, R. (2003). “Energy Consumption and GDP: Causality Relationship in G-7 Countries and Emerging Markets”, Energy Economics, 25(1), 33-37.
53. Shahbaz, M., Khan, S., & Tahir, M. I. (2013). “The Dynamic Links between Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, Financial Development and Trade in China: Fresh Evidence from Multivariate Framework Analysis”, Energy Economics, 40, 8-21.
54. Shiu, A., &Lam, P.-L. (2004). “Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth in China”, Energy Policy, 32, 47-54.
55. Stern, D. I. (2000). “A Multivariate Cointegration Analysis of the Role of Energy in the US Macroeconomy”, Energy Economics, 22(2), 267-283.
56. Stern, D. I. (1993). “Energy and Economic Growth in The USA”, Energy Economics, 15(2), 137–150.
57. Stern, D. I. (2011). “The role of energy in economic growth”. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1219(1), 26-51.
58. Tang, C. F., Shahbaz, M., & Arouri, M. (2013). “Re-Investigating the Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth Nexus in Portugal”, Energy Policy, 62, 1515-1524.
59. Tang, C. F., Tan, B. W., & Ozturk, I. (2016). “Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Vietnam”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 1506-1514.
60. Tari, R. &D. Ç. Yildirim (2009). “The Effect of Exchange Rate on Export: An Analysis for Turkey”, Journal of Management and Economics, 16(2), 95- 105.
61. Uçak, S., & Usupbeyli, A. (2015). “Türkiye'de petrol tüketimi ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi”. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 70(3), 769-787.
62. Uslu, H. (2022). “Türkiye’de finansal gelişme ve enerji tüketiminin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi: Yapısal kırılmalı bir analiz”. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(1), 188-217.
63. Van Zon, A., & Yetkiner, I. H. (2003). “An endogenous growth model with embodied energy-saving technical change”. Resource and energy economics, 25(1), 81-103.
64. Vecchione, G. (2011). “Economic Growth, Electricity Consumption and Foreign Dependence in Italy between 1963–2007”, Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 6(3), 304-313.
65. Yang, H. Y. (2000). “A Note on the Causal Relationship between Energy and GDP in Taiwan”, Energy Economics, 22(3), 309-317.
66. Yapraklı, S. (2013). “Enerjiye Dayalı Büyüme Türk Sanayi Sektörü Üzerine Uygulamalar”, İstanbul: BETA Yayıncılık, 80-91.
67. Yaprakli, S., & Yurttancikmaz Z. C. (2012). “Causality Between Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth: An Econometric Analysis on Turkey”. Cumhuriyet University Journal of Economics & Administrative Sciences Journal, 13(2).
68. Zou, G., & Chau, K. W. (2006). “Short-and Long-Run Effects between Oil Consumption and Economic Growth in China”, Energy Policy, 34(18), 3644-3655.