PSİKOLOJİK GÜÇLENDİRMENİN YENİLİKÇİ İŞ DAVRANIŞI ÜZERİNE ETKİSİNDE ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞMENİN ARACI ROLÜ

Öz

Bu çalışmada örgüt çalışanlarının psikolojik güçlendirme algılarının yenilikçi iş davranışına yönelik doğrudan etkileri ile örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerinden dolaylı etkileri incelenmiştir. Araştırma modeli, Sosyal Bilişsel Teori ile Sosyal Kimlik Teorisi temelinde oluşturulmuştur. Psikolojik güçlendirmenin yenilikçi iş davranışı üzerindeki etkisi hem doğrudan hem de örgütsel özdeşleşme aracılığıyla dolaylı olarak test edilmiştir. Veriler, İstanbul’da faaliyet gösteren İstanbul Teknopark ve Yıldız Teknopark bünyesindeki firmalarda görev yapan 278 alt kademeli yönetici ile bu yöneticilere bağlı 278 çalışan olmak üzere toplam 556 kişiden yüz yüze anket yoluyla toplanmıştır. Psikolojik güçlendirme Spreitzer (1995), örgütsel özdeşleşme Mael ve Ashforth (1992) ve yenilikçi iş davranışı Scott ve Bruce (1994) ölçekleriyle ölçülmüştür. Yapılan analizler, psikolojik güçlendirmenin örgütsel özdeşleşme ve yenilikçi iş davranışı üzerinde anlamlı doğrudan etkileri olduğunu; ancak örgütsel özdeşleşme aracılığıyla yenilikçi iş davranışı üzerinde anlamlı dolaylı bir etki oluşturmadığını göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Psikolojik güçlendirme
• Örgütsel özdeşleşme
• Yenilikçi iş davranışı

THE MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION IN THE EFFECT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT ON INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR

Öz

This study examines the direct effect of employees’ perceptions of psychological empowerment on innovative work behavior, as well as its indirect impact through organizational identification. The research model is grounded in Social Cognitive Theory and Social Identity Theory. Both the direct effect of psychological empowerment on innovative work behavior and its indirect effect through organizational identification were empirically tested. Data were gathered through face-to-face questionnaires from 556 respondents—278 first-line managers and their 278 subordinates—working in firms located within İstanbul Technopark and Yıldız Technopark. Psychological empowerment was measured with Spreitzer’s (1995) scale, organizational identification with Mael and Ashforth’s (1992) scale, and innovative work behavior with Scott and Bruce’s (1994) scale. The analyses reveal that psychological empowerment has a significant direct effect on both organizational identification and innovative work behavior; however, the indirect effect of psychological empowerment on innovative work behavior through organizational identification is not statistically significant.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Psychological empowerment
• Organizational identification
• Innovative work behavior

Kaynakça

1. Abbasi, S. G., Shabbir, M. S., Abbas, M., & Tahir, M. S. (2021). HPWS and knowledge sharing behavior: The role of psychological empowerment and organizational identification in public sector banks. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(3), e2512. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2512
2. Abuzaid, A. N., Ghadi, M. Y., Madadha, S.-a. M., & Alateeq, M. M. (2024). The effect of ethical leadership on innovative work behaviors: A mediating–moderating model of psychological empowerment, job crafting, proactive personality, and person–organization fit. Administrative Sciences, 14(9), 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14090191
3. Afsar, B., Bibi, A., & Umrani, W. A. (2020). Ethical leadership and service innovative behaviour of hotel employees: The role of organisational identification and proactive personality. International Journal of Management Practice, 13(5), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMP.2020.110003
4. Ahmad, H., & Halim, H. (2017). Determining sample size for research activities: The case of organizational research. Selangor Business Review, 2(1), 20–34.
5. Akar, V. (2025). Narsisist liderlik ve yenilikçi iş davranışı ilişkisi: İş becerikliliğinin aracı ve örgütsel özdeşleşmenin düzenleyici rolü. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, 40(3), 689–713. https://doi.org/10.24988/ije.1496060
6. Akbulut, F. N., & Yiğit, İ. (2025). Örgütsel desteğin yenilikçi iş davranışına etkisinde psikolojik güçlendirmenin düzenleyici rolü: Sağlık sektöründe çalışanlar üzerine bir araştırma. Biga İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 128–149. https://doi.org/10.70754/biibfd.1740693
7. Akkoç, İ. (2012). Gelişim kültürü ve etik iklimin yenilikçiliğe etkisinde dağıtım adaletinin rolü. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(3), 45–60.
8. Akyüz, B. (2015). Örgütsel sessizlik ve bireysel yaratıcılık performansı ilişkisi: Örgütsel özdeşleşmenin aracılık rolü. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (44), 207–216.

9. Al Nahyan, M. T., Al Suwaidi, M. S., Al Zaabi, N., Al Qubaisi, F., & Jabeen, F. (2024). Managerial coaching and innovative work behavior: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of task interdependence. Evidence-based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 13(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-12-2022-0293
10. Ali, H., Li, M., & Qiu, X. (2022). Employee engagement and innovative work behavior among Chinese millennials: Mediating and moderating role of work-life balance and psychological empowerment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 942580. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.942580
11. Alwali, J. (2024). Innovative work behavior and psychological empowerment: The importance of inclusive leadership on faculty members in Iraqi higher education institutions. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 37(2), 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-03-2023-0084
12. Amırlı, H., & Bakan, İ. (2024). İşyeri maneviyatı, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve psikolojik güçlendirmenin yenilikçi iş davranışı üzerindeki etkisi: Bir alan araştırması. International Journal of Disciplines in Economics & Administrative Sciences Studies, 10(5), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13995829
13. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
14. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
15. Barattucci, M., Teresi, M., Di Berardino, C., Di Crescenzo, A., & Pagliaro, S. (2025). The relationship between psychological empowerment and organisational identification: A network analysis based approach. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 10, Article 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-025-00229-x
16. Bose, S., & Patnaik, B. (2015). A theoretical model of transformational leadership and organizational identification of employees: The role of organizational learning, organizational justice and psychological empowerment. International Journal of Management & Information Technology, 10(5), 2199–2207. https://doi.org/10.24297/ijmit.v10i5.623
17. Canbek, M., & İpek, M. A. (2021). Psikolojik güçlendirmenin yenilikçi iş davranışı üzerindeki etkisinde işle bütünleşmenin aracı etkisi: Öğretmenler üzerinde ampirik bir araştırma. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(4), 3417–3427. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2021.1331
18. Chen, G., Kirkman, B. L., Kanfer, R., Allen, D., & Rosen, B. (2007). A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.331
19. Cindiloğlu Demirer, M. (2020). Yapısal ve psikolojik güçlendirmenin kariyer tatmini ve yenilikçi iş davranışı üzerine etkisi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 15(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.573761
20. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
21. Cohen-Meitar, R., Carmeli, A., & Waldman, D. A. (2009). Linking meaningfulness in the workplace to employee creativity: The intervening role of organizational identification and positive psychological experiences. Creativity Research Journal, 21(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410902969910
22. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
23. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306983
24. Çalışkan, A., Akkoç, İ., & Turunç, Ö. (2019). Yenilikçi davranış: Bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 5(1), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.29131/uiibd.562196
25. Çavuş, D. M. F. (2008). Personel güçlendirme: İmalat sanayii işletmelerinde bir araştırma. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 3(10), 1287–1300. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.50232
26. Çekmecelioğlu, H. G., & Özbağ, G. K. (2014). Linking psychological empowerment, individual creativity and firm innovativeness: A research on Turkish manufacturing industry. Business Management Dynamics, 3(10), 1–13.
27. Çevik Tekin, İ., & Akgemci, T. (2019). Psikolojik güçlendirmenin yenilikçi iş davranışına etkisi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(3), 1674–1692. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2019.698
28. Dedahanov, A. T., Bozorov, F., & Sung, S. (2019). Paternalistic leadership and innovative behavior: Psychological empowerment as a mediator. Sustainability, 11(6), 1770. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061770
29. Demirci, E. (2021). Örgütsel özdeşleşme, yenilikçi davranış ve kariyer hedefi ilişkisi üzerinde bir araştırma [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü.
30. Demirel, E. (2023). Psikolojik güçlendirme ve yenilikçi iş davranışı ilişkisi. Toplum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Dergisi, 4(Özel), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.58702/teyd.1345999
31. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393235
32. Ertürk, A. (2010). Exploring predictors of organizational identification: Moderating role of trust on the associations between empowerment, organizational support, and identification. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(4), 409–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320902834149
33. Erer, B. (2021). Psikolojik güçlendirme algısının örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerindeki etkisinde kariyer memnuniyetinin aracılık rolü. Business and Economics Research Journal, 12(2), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.20409/berj.2021.331
34. Ghani, N. A., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Stimulating lecturers’ innovative behaviour in Malaysian polytechnics. Academic Leadership: The Online Journal, 7(4), Article 29. https://doi.org/10.58809/YFYB3175
35. Gray, P. H. (2000). The effects of knowledge management systems on emergent teams: Towards a research model. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2–3), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00040-8
36. Gün, F., & Turabik, T. (2017). Öğretim elemanlarının algılarına göre psikolojik güçlendirme ile örgütsel özdeşleşme arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(3), 886–905. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.297669
37. İmamoğlu, S. Z., Erat, S., & Ayber, E. D. (2021). Öz yeterlilik ve örgütsel özdeşleşmenin yenilikçi davranış ve görev performansı üzerindeki etkisi: Eğitim sektöründe bir araştırma. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD), 13(24), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.878657
38. Kanbur, E. (2017). Psikolojik güçlendirme ve örgütsel özdeşleşme arasında birey-örgüt uyumunun aracı rolü. Uluslararası Sosyal ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(7), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.20860/ijoses.315710
39. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books.
40. Kaplan, M., & Canal, B. (2018). Örgütsel özdeşleşmenin bireysel yaratıcılık üzerindeki etkisi: Bankacılık sektöründe bir araştırma. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 8(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.376138
41. Khan, M. M., Mubarik, M. S., Islam, T., Rehman, A., Ahmed, S. S., Khan, E., & Sohail, F. (2022). How servant leadership triggers innovative work behavior: Exploring the sequential mediating role of psychological empowerment and job crafting. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(4), 1037–1055. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2020-0367
42. Kocakaya, Y., & İrge, N. T. (2024). Psikolojik güçlendirme ve örgütsel özdeşleşme ilişkisinde birey-örgüt uyumunun aracı rolü. Eurasian Academy of Sciences Social Sciences Journal, (53), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.17740/eas.soc.2024.V53.02
43. Knol, J., & Van Linge, R. (2009). Innovative behaviour: The effect of structural and psychological empowerment on nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(2), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04876.x
44. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
45. Le Hoang, L. N., Nguyen Thi Thu, H., & Ho, V.-A. (2021). Fostering innovative behavior in the aviation industry: The role of perceived supervisor support and work group diversity. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(1), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(1).2021.14
46. Leonard, D., & Sensiper, S. (1998). The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Review, 40(3), 112–132. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165946
47. Llorente-Alonso, M., García-Ael, C., & Topa, G. (2024). A meta-analysis of psychological empowerment: Antecedents, organizational outcomes, and moderating variables. Current Psychology, 43, 1759–1784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04369-8
48. Mael, F. A., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202
49. Moriano, J. A., Molero, F., Topa, G., & Lévy Mangin, J.-P. (2014). The influence of transformational leadership and organizational identification on intrapreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-011-0196-x
50. Monje-Amor, A., Xanthopoulou, D., Calvo, N., & Abeal Vázquez, J. P. (2021). Structural empowerment, psychological empowerment, and work engagement: A cross-country study. European Management Journal, 39(6), 779–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.01.005
51. Moon, K. K., & Lim, J. (2025). Exploring the impact of organizational identification on innovative work behavior in the Korean public sector: The moderating role of charismatic leadership. Behavioral Sciences, 15(9), 1218. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15091218
52. Muneer, S., Singh, A., Choudhary, M. H., & Alshammari, A. S. (2025). The mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relationship between digital transformation, innovative work behavior, and organizational financial performance. Behavioral Sciences, 15(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15010005
53. Nanyangwe, C. N., Wang, H., & Cui, Z. (2025). The end justifies the means: The role of organizational identification on bootleg innovation behavior. Journal of Management & Organization, 31(2), 929–944. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2022.92
54. Nederveen Pieterse, A. N., van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M., & Stam, D. (2010). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 609–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.650
55. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
56. Polat, M., Meydan, C. H., & Tokmak, İ. (2010). Personel güçlendirme, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel sinizm ilişkisi üzerine bir araştırma. Kara Harp Okulu Bilim Dergisi, 20(2), 41–62.
57. Prati, G., & Zani, B. (2013). The relationship between psychological empowerment and organizational identification. Journal of Community Psychology, 41(7), 851–866. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21578
58. Schweisfurth, T. G., & Raasch, C. (2020). Caught between the users and the firm: How does identity conflict affect employees’ innovative behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(3), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12380
59. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.5465/256701
60. Seo, J. (2023). Why does the impact of psychological empowerment increase employees’ knowledge-sharing intention? A moderated mediation model of belonging and perceived organizational support. Behavioral Sciences, 13(5), 387. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13050387
61. Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.5465/256865
62. Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M. A., & Nason, S. W. (1997). A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness, satisfaction, and strain. Journal of Management, 23(5), 679–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300504
63. Spreitzer, G. M., De Janasz, S. C., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Empowered to lead: The role of psychological empowerment in leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(4), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199907)20:4<511::AID-JOB900>3.0.CO;2-L
64. Suifan, T. S., Diab, H., Alhyari, S., & Sweis, R. J. (2020). Does ethical leadership reduce turnover intention? The mediating effects of psychological empowerment and organizational identification. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 30(4), 410–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1690611
65. Sürgevil, O., Tolay, E., & Topoyan, M. (2013). Yapısal güçlendirme ve psikolojik güçlendirme ölçeklerinin geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik analizleri. Journal of Yaşar University, 8(31), 5371–5391. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.47361
66. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
67. Tak, B., & Aydemir, B. A. (2004, Mayıs 27–29). Örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerine iki görgül çalışma. 12. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı içinde (ss. 59–63). Uludağ Üniversitesi Basımevi.
68. Tang, X., Mai, S., Wang, L., & Na, M. (2025). The influence of organizational fairness, identity and empowerment on employee creativity: Mediating role of corporate social responsibility. SAGE Open, 15(1), 21582440251328475. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251328475
69. Tarsuslu, S., & Baş, M. (2024). Does psychological empowerment of healthcare workers trigger innovative work behaviors? A moderated mediation study. Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 10(2), 272–289. https://doi.org/10.30855/gjeb.2024.10.2.006
70. Taştan, S. B., & Güçel, C. (2014). Explaining intrapreneurial behaviors of employees with perceived organizational climate and testing the mediating role of organizational identification: A research study among employees of Turkish innovative firms. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 862–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.095
71. Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310926
72. Turunç, Ö., Altay, M., & Bilgin, N. (2011). Hiyerarşik plato ve kendini işletmeden hissetme durumunun performans hedefine yönelim ve yenilikçi davranışa etkisinde örgütsel özdeşleşmenin rolü. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(1), 133–157.
73. Türkiye Teknoloji Geliştirme Bölgeleri Derneği. (t.y.). Teknopark tanımı. https://www.tgbd.org.tr/teknopark-tanimi-icerik-20
74. Ugwu, F. O., Onyishi, I. E., & Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. M. (2014). Linking organizational trust with employee engagement: The role of psychological empowerment. Personnel Review, 43(3), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2012-0198
75. Xenikou, A. (2017). Transformational leadership, transactional contingent reward, and organizational identification: The mediating effect of perceived innovation and goal culture orientations. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1754. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01754
76. Zerenler, M., Türker, N., & Şahin, E. (2007). Küresel teknoloji, araştırma-geliştirme (Ar-Ge) ve yenilik ilişkisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (17), 653–667.
77. Zhu, W., Sosik, J. J., Riggio, R. E., & Yang, B. (2012). Relationships between transformational and active transactional leadership and followers’ organizational identification: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 13(3), 168–212. https://doi.org/10.21818/001c.17899
78. Zia, M. Q., Huning, T. M., Ramish, M. S., Naveed, M., & Ahmed, S. (2024). The impact of psychological empowerment on innovative work behavior: A moderated mediation model of informal learning and proactive behavior. Review of Managerial Science, 18(12), 3695–3716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00717-x