KAMU ÇALIŞANLARININ YAPAY ZEKÂ ALGILARININ ŞEKİLLENMESİ: DİJİTAL LİDERLİK VE YENİLİK İKLİMİNİN ROLLERİ

Öz

Bu çalışma, Sosyal Öğrenme Kuramı çerçevesinde yenilik ikliminin aracı mekanizma olarak modellenmesiyle, dijital liderliğin kamu çalışanlarının yapay zekâ (YZ) algılarını nasıl şekillendirdiğini incelemektedir. Türkiye’nin güneyinde görev yapan 314 kamu çalışanından anket yoluyla toplanan veriler yapısal eşitlik modellemesi ile analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, dijital liderliğin hem yenilik iklimini hem de YZ algılarını pozitif yönde yordadığını; ayrıca yenilik ikliminin de YZ algılarını güçlendirdiğini göstermektedir. Aracılık analizleri, dijital liderliğin YZ algıları üzerindeki etkisinin yenilik iklimi aracılığıyla kısmi dolaylı etki gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur. Çalışma, kamu sektöründe teknolojiye ilişkin algıları açıklamak için liderlik ve örgütsel iklim perspektiflerini bir araya getirmekte; dijital liderlik yetkinliklerinin güçlendirilmesi ve yenilik odaklı bir iklimin geliştirilmesinin, kamu yönetiminde YZ’nin etkili ve sürdürülebilir biçimde benimsenmesi için kritik olduğunu önermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dijital Liderlik
• Yenilik İklimi
• Yapay Zekâ Algısı
• Kamu Çalışanları
• Sosyal Öğrenme Kuramı
• Kamu yönetimi

SHAPING PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ AI PERCEPTIONS: THE ROLES OF DIGITAL LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION CLIMATE

Öz

This study examines how digital leadership shapes public employees’ perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI), with innovation climate modeled as a mediating mechanism under Social Learning Theory. Survey data from 314 public employees in southern Türkiye were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Results indicate that digital leadership positively predicts both innovation climate and AI perceptions, and that innovation climate itself enhances AI perceptions. Mediation analysis shows a partial indirect effect of digital leadership on AI perceptions through innovation climate. The study links leadership and organizational climate perspectives to explain technology-related perceptions in the public sector and suggests that strengthening digital leadership capabilities and cultivating an innovation-oriented climate are critical for effective and sustainable AI adoption in public administration.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Digital Leadership
• Innovation Climate
• Artificial Intelligence Perception
• Public Employees
• Social Learning Theory
• Public Administration

Kaynakça

1. Ahn, M. J., & Chen, Y. C. (2022). Digital transformation toward AI-augmented public administration: The perception of government employees and the willingness to use AI in government. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101664
2. Alayoğlu, A. H. (2019). Yenilik iklimi, yaratıcı öz yeterlilik ve değişime açıklık ilişkisi. Master's thesis, Marmara Universitesi, Türkiye.
3. AlMunthiri, O., Bani-Melhem, S., Mohd-Shamsudin, F., & Raziq, M. M. (2024). Fostering innovative behaviours of public sector employees: the potency of innovation-based HR practices, risk propensity and error tolerance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 37(2), 159-182. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-08-2023-0242
4. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. https://doi.org/10.2307/256995
5. Aoki, N., Tatsumi, T., Naruse, G., & Maeda, K. (2024). Explainable AI for government: Does the type of explanation matter to the accuracy, fairness, and trustworthiness of an algorithmic decision as perceived by those who are affected? Government Information Quarterly, 41(4), 101965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101965
6. Araujo, L. M., Priadana, S., Paramarta, V., & Sunarsi, D. (2021). Digital leadership in business organizations. International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership, 45-56. https://doi.org/10.51629/ijeamal.v2i1.18
7. Avolio, B. J., Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Baker, B. (2014). E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 105-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.003
8. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.

9. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
10. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
11. Banks, G. C., Dionne, S. D., Mast, M. S., & Sayama, H. (2022). Leadership in the digital era: A review of who, what, when, where, and why. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(5), 101634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101634
12. Baudner, J. (2025). From decentralization to recentralization–policy reversal and institutional change during the AKP government in Turkey. Regional & Federal Studies, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2025.2454415
13. Bellis, P., Cunial, M., & Trabucchi, D. (2024). Mastering hybrid worlds through digital leadership: The role of agility in fostering innovation. Business Horizons, 67(4), 369-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.04.002
14. Benitez, J., Arenas, A., Castillo, A., & Esteves, J. (2022). Impact of digital leadership capability on innovation performance: The role of platform digitization capability. Information & Management, 59(2), 103590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2022.103590
15. Berryhill, J., Heang, K. K., Clogher, R., & McBride, K. (2019). Hello, World: Artificial intelligence and its use in the public sector. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, (36), 1-184. https://doi.org/10.1787/726fd39d-en
16. Bindel Sibassaha, J. L., Pea-Assounga, J. B. B., & Bambi, P. D. R. (2025). Influence of digital transformation on employee innovative behavior: Roles of challenging appraisal, organizational culture support, and transformational leadership style. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1532977. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1532977
17. Bracci, E., & Tallaki, M. (2021). Resilience capacities and management control systems in public sector organisations. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 17(3), 332- 351. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-10-2019-0111
18. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative Ways of Addressing Model Fit. In Testing Structural Equation Models, edited by K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long, 136–162. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Büyükbeşe, T., Dikbaş, T., Klein, M., & Ünlü, S. B. (2022). A study on digital leadership scale (DLS) development. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(2), 740-760. https://doi.org/10.33437/ksusbd.1135540
20. Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757421
21. Capolupo, N. (2024, January). Assessing the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Public Organizations. Evidence from Italy. In Business Systems Laboratory International Symposium (pp. 187-208). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76406-6_10
22. Chen, L., Zhang, Z. D., & Jia, W. T. (2020). When and why leaders’ helping behavior promotes employees’ thriving: Exploring the role of voice behavior and perceived leader’s role overload. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.553512
23. Chilunjika, A., Intauno, K., & Chilunjika, S. R. (2022). Artificial intelligence and public sector human resource management in South Africa: Opportunities, challenges and prospects. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 1972.
24. Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E., & Zampieri, R. (2019). The role of leadership in a digitalized world: A review. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1938. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01938
25. David, S., Zinica, D., Bărbuță-Mișu, N., Savga, L., & Virlanuta, F. O. (2024). Public administration managers' and employees' perceptions of adaptability to change under “the future of work” paradigm. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 199, 123088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123088
26. Davison, A. C., & Hinkley, D. V. (1997). Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802843
27. Decius, J., Schaper, N., Klug, K., & Seifert, A. (2023). Active learning, active shaping, or both? A cross-lagged panel analysis of reciprocal effects between work design and informal workplace learning, and the mediating role of job crafting. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 144, 103893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103893
28. Decker, P. J. (1986). Social learning theory and leadership. Journal of Management Development, 5(3), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb051615
29. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994). An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429246593
30. Eggers, W. D., Fishman, T., & Kishnani, P. (2017). AI-augmented human services: Using cognitive technologies to transform program delivery. Deloitte Insights.
31. El Sawy, O. A., Kræmmergaard, P., Amsinck, H., & Vinther, A. L. (2020). How LEGO built the foundations and enterprise capabilities for digital leadership. In Strategic information management (pp. 174-201). Routledge.
32. Fischer, C., Siegel, J., Proeller, I., & Drathschmidt, N. (2023). Resilience through digitalisation: How individual and organisational resources affect public employees working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Management Review, 25(4), 808-835. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2037014
33. Fousiani, K., Michelakis, G., Minnigh, P. A., & De Jonge, K. M. (2024). Competitive organizational climate and artificial intelligence (AI) acceptance: the moderating role of leaders’ power construal. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1359164. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1359164
34. Gao, P., & Gao, Y. (2024). How does digital leadership foster employee innovative behavior: A cognitive- affective processing system perspective. Behavioral Sciences, 14(5), 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14050362
35. Gesk, T. S., & Leyer, M. (2022). Artificial intelligence in public services: When and why citizens accept its usage. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), 101704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101704
36. Gibson, S. K. (2004). Social learning (cognitive) theory and implications for human resource development. Advances in developing human resources, 6(2), 193- 210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422304263429
37. Gierlich-Joas, M., Hess, T., & Neuburger, R. (2020). More self-organization, more control—or even both? Inverse transparency as a digital leadership concept. Business Research, 13(3), 921-947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-020-00130-0
38. Giraldi, L., Rossi, L., & Rudawska, E. (2024). Evaluating public sector employee perceptions towards artificial intelligence and generative artificial intelligence integration. Journal of Information Science, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515241293775
39. Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of management annals, 14(2), 627-660. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0057
40. Güner, H. (2014). Türkiye’de kamu yönetimi ve kamu yönetiminin denetimi. Denetişim, (14), 65-72.
41. Hair Jr, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123.
42. Harman, H. H. (1967). Modern factor analysis (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press
43. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
44. Hossain, S., Fernando, M., & Akter, S. (2025). Digital leadership: Towards a dynamic managerial capability perspective of artificial intelligence-driven leader capabilities. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 32(2), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518251319624
45. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological methods, 3(4), 424. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
46. Ismail, M. (2005). Creative climate and learning organization factors: their contribution towards innovation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(8), 639- 654. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730510633719
47. Jaiswal, N. K., & Dhar, R. L. (2015). Transformational leadership, innovation climate, creative self-efficacy and employee creativity: A multilevel study. International journal of hospitality management, 51, 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.07.002
48. Junaidi, J. (2024). The role of ethical leadership to employees work engagement: A social learning theory perspective. International Journal of Social Economics, 51(7), 884- 898. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-03-2023-0218
49. Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (17. baskı). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
50. Khan, A. N., Wang, Y., Khan, N. A., & Ahmad, A. (2025). Digital leadership enhances employee empowerment, techno-work engagement, and sustainability: SEM analysis in public healthcare. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 62, 00469580251317653. https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580251317653
51. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. Guilford publications.
52. Köseoğlu, İ., & Gürcüoğlu, S. (2024). Kamu çalışanlarında yapay zekâ algısını ölçmeye yönelik ölçek geliştirme. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal Ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 26(47), 1009-1024. https://doi.org/10.18493/kmusekad.1461722
53. Kowalkiewicz, M., & Dootson, P. (2019). Government 5.0: The future of public services. QUT Chair in Digital Economy. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/133743/1/Report-Government-5.0.pdf
54. Li, W., Bhutto, T. A., Nasiri, A. R., Shaikh, H. A., & Samo, F. A. (2018). Organizational innovation: the role of leadership and organizational culture. International Journal of Public Leadership, 14(1), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-06-2017-0026
55. Lilly, J. D., & Durr, D. W. (2012). Technology changes at work and employee reactions: The role of leader behavior. Human Systems Management, 31(3-4), 193-201. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-2012-0769
56. Lin, M., Xie, M., & Li, Z. (2023). Organizational error tolerance and change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of public service motivation. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 4133- 4153. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S431373
57. Liu, Z., Li, G., Ma, L., & Zhao, J. (2026). The Relationship Between Organisational Innovation Climate and Nurses' Innovative Behaviour: Roles of Knowledge Sharing and Person‐Organisation Fit. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70473
58. MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of retailing, 88(4), 542- 555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2012.08.001
59. Mehmood, M. S., Jian, Z., & Waheed, A. (2019). The influence of entrepreneurial leadership on organisational innovation: Mediating role of innovation climate. International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, 11(1), 70- 89. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISCM.2019.101650
60. Mergel, I., Dickinson, H., Stenvall, J., & Gasco, M. (2024). Implementing AI in the public sector. Public Management Review, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2231950
61. Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., & Sleegers, P. J. (2010). Occupying the principal position: Examining relationships between transformational leadership, social network position, and schools’ innovative climate. Educational administration quarterly, 46(5), 623-670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10378689
62. Namatovu, A., & Kyambade, M. (2025). Assessing the impact of digital leadership on public sector performance: the mediation role of digital transformation in developing economies. Sage Open, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251367585
63. Ndemo, B., & Weiss, T. (2017). Making sense of Africa's emerging digital transformation and its many futures. Africa Journal of Management, 3(3-4), 328-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322373.2017.1400260
64. Neumann, O., Guirguis, K., & Steiner, R. (2024). Exploring artificial intelligence adoption in public organizations: a comparative case study. Public Management Review, 26(1), 114-141.
65. Newman, A., Round, H., Wang, S., & Mount, M. (2020). Innovation climate: A systematic review of the literature and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(1), 73-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12283
66. Ngo, J. C. (2015). The impact of innovation climate on organizational effectiveness. Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 11(6), 114.
67. Petrat, D. (2021). Attitude towards artificial intelligence in a leadership role. In Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (pp. 811-819). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74614-8_100
68. Porfírio, J. A., Carrilho, T., Felício, J. A., & Jardim, J. (2021). Leadership characteristics and digital transformation. Journal of Business Research, 124, 610-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.058
69. Porras, J. I., & Hargis, K. (1982). Precursors of individual change: Responses to a social learning theory based on organizational intervention. Human Relations, 35(11), 973-990. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678203501103
70. Putri, S. (2022). Menguji Pengaruh digital leadership dan perceived organizational support terhadap job satisfaction dan work engagement. Journal of business and applied management.
71. Radosevic, S., Kanellou, D., & Tsekouras, G. (2023). The experimentation–accountability trade-off in innovation and industrial policy: are learning networks the solution?. Science and Public Policy, 50(4), 655-669. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad013
72. Sacavém, A., de Bem Machado, A., dos Santos, J. R., Palma-Moreira, A., Belchior-Rocha, H., & Au-Yong-Oliveira, M. (2025). Leading in the digital age: The role of leadership in organizational digital transformation. Administrative Sciences, 15(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15020043
73. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 580- 607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
74. Sethibe, T., & Steyn, R. (2016). Organizational climate, innovation and performance: A systematic review. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, 2(2), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/2393957516646287
75. Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., Van der Heijden, B. I., & Farrell, M. (2017). Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of vocational behavior, 100, 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.02.004
76. Silva Filho, A. I. D., Carneiro, D. K. D. O., & Coelho, F. D. S. (2025). Unveiling Public Innovation Management: What Data Mining Reveals by Analyzing Brazilian Experiences?. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 22(02), e240077. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2025240077
77. Singh, A., & Hess, T. (2020). How chief digital officers promote the digital transformation of their companies. In Strategic information management (pp. 202-220). Routledge.
78. Sönmez, B., Eşkin Bacaksız, F., & Yıldırım, A. (2017). Yenilik iklimi ölçeğinin Türkçe'ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 20(2), 76–82.
79. Streukens, S., & Leroi-Werelds, S. (2016). Bootstrapping and PLS-SEM: A step-by-step guide to get more out of your bootstrap results. European management journal, 34(6), 618- 632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.06.003
80. Sun, T. Q., & Medaglia, R. (2019). Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare. Government information quarterly, 36(2), 368-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008
81. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Experimental Designs Using ANOVA. Duxbury.
82. Tran, M. N., Hoang, C. Y., & Le, A. P. (2025). Fostering organizational innovation capability through transformational leadership and creativity in public educational institutions: moderating roles of AI-enabled job complexity and innovation climate. International Journal of Educational Management, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2024-0851
83. Trenerry, B., Chng, S., Wang, Y., Suhaila, Z. S., Lim, S. S., Lu, H. Y., & Oh, P. H. (2021). Preparing workplaces for digital transformation: An integrative review and framework of multi-level factors. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 620766. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620766
84. Tursunbayeva, A., & Gal, H. C. B. (2024). Adoption of artificial intelligence: A TOP framework-based checklist for digital leaders. Business Horizons, 67(4), 357-368.
85. Ushaka Adie, B., Tate, M., & Valentine, E. (2024). Digital leadership in the public sector: a scoping review and outlook. International Review of Public Administration, 29(1), 42- 58. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2024.2323847
86. Van Noordt, C., & Misuraca, G. (2022). Artificial intelligence for the public sector: results of landscaping the use of AI in government across the European Union. Government information quarterly, 39(3), 101714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101714
87. Van Noordt, C., & Tangi, L. (2023). The dynamics of AI capability and its influence on public value creation of AI within public administration. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), 101860.
88. van Roekel, H., Branderhorst, M., Tummers, L., & Meijer, A. (2025). Digital transformation leadership: A public value-centered measurement scale. Government Information Quarterly, 42(4), 102091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102091
89. Vassallo, J. P., Banerjee, S., Zaman, H., & Prabhu, J. C. (2023). Design thinking and public sector innovation: The divergent effects of risk-taking, cognitive empathy and emotional empathy on individual performance. Research Policy, 52(6), 104768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104768
90. Vatamanu, A. F., & Tofan, M. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence into public administration: Challenges and vulnerabilities. Administrative Sciences, 15(4), 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15040149
91. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
92. Wang, T., Lin, X., & Sheng, F. (2022). Digital leadership and exploratory innovation: From the dual perspectives of strategic orientation and organizational culture. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 902693. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.902693
93. Weiner, B. J. (2020). A theory of organizational readiness for change. In Handbook on implementation science (pp. 215-232). Edward Elgar Publishing.
94. Wirtz, B. W., Langer, P. F., & Fenner, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the public sector-a research agenda. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(13), 1103-1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1947319
95. Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector—applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103
96. You, Y., Hu, Z., Li, J., Wang, Y., & Xu, M. (2022). The effect of organizational innovation climate on employee innovative behavior: The role of psychological ownership and task interdependence. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 856407. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.856407
97. Yu, X., Xu, S., & Ashton, M. (2023). Antecedents and outcomes of artificial intelligence adoption and application in the workplace: the socio-technical system theory perspective. Information Technology & People, 36(1), 454-474. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2021-0254
98. Zincirli, M. (2020). Yöneticilerin algılarına göre okullardaki örgütsel iklim. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 30(2), 231-246. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.722143