AN IMPORTANT PIONEER OF SOCIAL WORK: MARY ELLEN RICHMOND

Öz

This study aims to reveal Mary Ellen Richmond's contributions to the profession, field and discipline of social work. Mary Ellen Richmond, who is considered to be among the most important pioneers of social work, is assessed for her contributions to the construction of the knowledge, skills and value foundation of social work. Richmond, who had a childhood under the influence of poverty and war conditions, one of the important social problems of her time, met with social work in her young adulthood. With this new era, she devoted herself to the development and transformation of social work and reshaped the social work profession, field and discipline they put into their 67 years of life. As in the past, Mary Ellen Richmond’s huge heritage continues to contribute to the development of social work.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mary Ellen Richmond,pioneer of social work,history of social work

SOSYAL HİZMETİN ÖNEMLİ BİR ÖNCÜSÜ:MARY ELLEN RICHMOND

Öz

Bu çalışma, Mary Ellen Richmond’un sosyal hizmet meslek, alan ve disiplinine katkılarını ortaya koymayı amaçlanmaktadır. Sosyal hizmetin en önemli öncüleri arasında olduğu kabul edilen Mary Ellen Richmond’un sosyal hizmetin bilgi, beceri ve değer temelinin inşasına katkıları değerlendirilmektedir. Yaşadığı dönemin önemli sosyal sorunları arasında yer alan yoksulluğun ve savaş koşullarının etkileri altında bir çocukluk dönemi geçiren Richmond genç yetişkinlik döneminde sosyal hizmetle tanışmıştır. Bu yeni dönemle beraber kendisini sosyal hizmetin gelişimine ve dönüşümüne adamış, 67 yıllık yaşantısına sığdırdıkları sosyal hizmet meslek, alan ve disiplinini yeniden şekillendirmiştir. Geçmişte olduğu gibi günümüzde de Mary Ellen Richmond’un ardında bıraktıkları sosyal hizmetin gelişimine katkı sağlamayı sürdürmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Marry Ellen Richmond,sosyal hizmetin öncüsü,sosyal hizmet tarihi

Kaynakça

1. Agnew, E. N. (2004). From Charity to Social Work: Mary E. Richmond and the Creation of an American Profession. Urbana and Chicago: University Of Illinois Press.
2. Agnew, E. N. (2010, Şubat). Ekim 22, 2016 tarihinde American National Biography Online: http://www.anb.org/articles/14/14-01185.html adresinden alındı
3. American National Biography Online. (2000, Şubat). Ekim 30, 2016 tarihinde http://www.anb.org/articles/14/1401185. adresinden alındı
4. Beels, C. C. (2002). Notes For A Cultural History of Family Theraphy. Family Process, 67-82.
5. Deutch, J. A. (2008). Mary E. Richmond. Journal of Independent Social Work, 45-55.
6. Franklin, D. L. (1986). Mary Richmond and Jane Addams: From Moral Certainty to Rational Inquiry in Social Work Practice. Social Service Review, 504-525.
7. Friedlander, W. A. (1966). Sosyal Refah Hizmetine Başlangıç. Ankara: Sağlık ve Sosyal Yardım Bakanlığı.
8. Ishibashi, N. L. (2015). Mary Richmond and the Causal Ontological Status of Relatedness. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 90-105.

9. Learning To Give. (2012, Mart). https://www.learningtogive.org/resources/richmond-mary-ellen adresinden alınmıştır
10. Lederman, S. H. (2005). From Charity to Social Work: Mary E. Richmond and the Creation of an American Profession. The Journal of American History, 247-248.
11. McPhail, B. A. (2004). Setting the record straight:Social Work is not a female dominated profession. Social Work, 323-326.
12. Montalvo, F. F. (1982). The Third Dimension Of Social Casework:Mary E. Richmond's Contribution to family treatment. Clinical Social Work Journal, 2(10), 103-112.
13. Murdach, A. D. (2011). Mary Richmond and the Image of Social Work. Social Work, 92-94.
14. NASW. (2004). http://www.naswfoundation.org/pioneers/r/richmond.html adresinden alınmıştır
15. Rank, M. G., & Hutchison, W. S. (2000). An Analysis of Leadership Within the Social Work. Journal of Social Work Education, 487-502.
16. Richmond, M. (1915). The social case worker in a changing world. Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections. National Conference of Charities. Chicago,IL.
17. Richmond, M. (1917). Social Diagnosis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
18. Richmond, M. E. (1899). Friendly Visiting among the Poor. New York: The MacMillan Company.
19. Richmond, M. E. (1907). The Good Neighbor. Philadelphia ve London: Russel Sage Foundation.
20. Richmond, M. E. (1913). A Study Of Nine Hundred and Eighty Five Widows. New York City: Russel Sage Foundation.
21. Shoemaker, L. M. (1998). Early Conflicts in Social Work Education. Social Service Review, 182-191.
22. Soydan, H. (2011). Understanding Social Work in the History of Ideas. Shaping a science of social work (s. 1-41). Los Angeles: University of Southern California.
23. Stern, M. H. (2005). Reviewed Works: The Education of Jane Addams: Politics and Culture in Modern America by Victoria Bissell Brown; From Charity to Social Work: Mary E. Richmond and the Creation of an American Profession by Elizabeth N. Agnew. History of Education Quarterly, 118-122.
24. Steyaert, J. (2013, Nisan). History of Social Work. http://www.historyofsocialwork.org/eng/details.php?cps=6 adresinden alınmıştır
25. Toikko, T. (1998). Sociological and Psychological Discourses in Social Casework During the 1920s. Families in Society, 351-358.
26. USC School of Social Work. (2014, Mart 31). https://msw.usc.edu/mswusc-blog/9-most-influential-women-in-the-history-of-social-work/ adresinden alınmıştır
27. VCU. (2012, Ağustos 14). The Social Welfare History Project. Ekim 23, 2016 tarihinde http://socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu/social-work/richmond-mary/ adresinden alındı
28. Veale, F. C. (2012, Temmuz). Making a difference: Female Social Workers’ Lives And Identities. Doktora Tezi. University of Southampton.