A RETROSPECTIVE LOOK AT THE EVOLUTION OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION : HALLMARK OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY

Yıl 2021, , 451 - 466, 02.09.2021

Şahin Eray Kırdım

https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.835405

Öz

The acceleration of globalization in the nineteenth century increased the number of actors in international relations and deeply affected the relations between these actors. In this century, international organizations have been permanently integrated into the single-actor and state-centered system with their institutional structures and have started to provide important inputs to the system that has been maturing since the Peace of Westphalia. This study explains why we have waited hundreds of years for the emergence of permanent international organizations. For this purpose, the development process of the modern nation-state and international relations system are investigated since the sixteenth century, the system of congresses, which played an important role in the development of permanent international organizations and accepted to have started with the Congress of Vienna in 1815, and its contributions to the development of international organizations are emphasized, modern international organizations and the reasons for their emergence are discussed in detail, and finally, it is explained why these organizations are mainly products of the nineteenth century. The study explains this situation with material (need oriented), intellectual, strategic and systemic factors and argues that the nineteenth century is the magic century of international organizations because of these factors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Nation-State, Congress System, Development of International Organizations, Nineteenth Century

ULUSLARARASI ÖRGÜTLENMENİN GELİŞİMİNE RETROSPEKTİF BİR BAKIŞ: ON DOKUZUNCU YÜZYILIN ALAMETİFARİKASI

Öz

On dokuzuncu yüzyılda küreselleşmenin hız kazanması, uluslararası ilişkilerdeki aktör sayısını arttırırken, bu aktörler arasındaki ilişki biçimlerini de derinden etkilemiştir. Bu yüzyılda, tek aktörlü ve devlet merkezli sisteme uluslararası örgütler de kurumsal yapılarıyla kalıcı şekilde dahil olmuş ve Westphalia Barışı’ndan itibaren olgunlaşmakta olan sisteme önemli girdiler sağlamaya başlamışlardır. Bu çalışma, daimî uluslararası örgütlerin ortaya çıkışı için neden yüzlerce yıl beklenildiğini açıklamaktadır. Bu amaç için, önce modern ulus-devletin ve uluslararası ilişkiler sisteminin gelişim süreci XVI. yüzyıldan itibaren ele alınmış, daimî uluslararası kuruluşlarının gelişiminde önemli rol oynayan ve 1815 Viyana Kongresi ile başladığı kabul edilen kongreler sistemi ve bunun uluslararası örgütlerin gelişimine katkıları üzerinde durulmuş, modern uluslararası örgütler ve bunların ortaya çıkış nedenleri detaylı şekilde ele alınırken, nihayet bu örgütlerin neden esas olarak XIX. yüzyıl ürünü oldukları açıklanmıştır. Çalışma bu durumu maddi (ihtiyaca yönelik), düşünsel, stratejik ve sistemsel faktörler ile açıklamakta ve bu faktörler nedeniyle XIX. yüzyılın uluslararası örgütlerin sihirli yüzyılı olduğunu ileri sürmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ulus-Devlet, Kongreler Sistemi, Uluslararası Örgütlerin Gelişimi, On Dokuzuncu Yüzyıl

Kaynakça

• Anderson, A. D. (1999). On the Verge of War: International Relations and the Jülich-Kleve Succession Crises (1609-1614), Humanities Press, Boston.
• Anderson, F. (2001). Crucible of War: The Seven Years’ War and the Fate of Empire in British North America, 1754-1766, Vintage, New York.
• Anderson, F. M. (1904). The Constitutions and Other Select Documents Illustrative of The History of France 1789-1901, H.W. Wilson, Minneapolis.
• Angus-Leppan, P. V. (1984). “A Note on the history of the International Association of Geodesy”, Bulletin Géodésique, 58/3, 224-229.
• Archer, C. (2001). International Organizations, Routhledge, London and New York.
• Arrighi, G. (2000). Uzun Yirminci Yüzyıl, (Çev: R. Boztemur), İmge, Ankara.
• Ataman, M. (2003). “The Impact of Non-State Actors on World Politics: A Challenge to Nation-States”, Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, 2/1, 42-66.
• Ataöv, T. (1960). “1815 - 1865 Arasında Devletler Tarafından Kurulan Milletlerarası Teşekküller”, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15/3, 29-48.
• Ateş, D. (2016). Uluslararası Örgütler: Devletlerin Örgütlenme Mantığı, Dora Yayıncılık, Bursa.
• Baker, B. (2017). “Hague Peace Conferences (1899 and 1907)”, The Law of Armed Conflict and the Use of Force: The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Ed: F. Lachenmann ve R. Wolfrum.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 434-442.
• Barker, J. C. (2000). International Law and International Relations, Continuum, New York.
• Becker, S. O., Pfaff, S. ve Rubin, J. (2016). “Causes and consequences of the Protestant Reformation”, Explorations in Economic History, 62, 1-25.
• Bedouelle, G. (2003). The History of the Church, Continuum, London.
• Bennett, A. L. (1995). International Organizations: Principles and Issues, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
• Best, A., Hanhimaki, J., Maiolo, J. A. ve Schulze, K. E. (2015). International History of the Twentieth Century and Beyond, Routledge, London.
• Boisson de Chazournes, L. (2013). Fresh Water in International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Brendebach, J., Herzer, M. ve Tworek, H. (2018). “Introduction”, International Organizations and the Media in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (Ed. J. Brendebach, M. Herzer ve H. Tworek (Eds.), Routledge, Oxon 1-16.
• Butler, G. G. ve Maccoby, S. (2001). The Development of International Law: New Jersey, Exchange, The Lawbook.
• Buzan, B. ve Lawson, G. (2013). “The Global Transformation: The Nineteenth Century and the Making of Modern International Relations”, International Studies Quarterly, 57/3, 620-634.
• Buzan, B. ve Little, R. (2001). “Why International Relations Has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to Do About It”, Millennium, 30/1, 19-39.
• Carvalho, D., Leira, H. ve Hobson, J. (2011). “The Big Bangs of IR: The Myths That Your Teachers Still Tell You about 1648 and 1919”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 39/3, 735-758.
• Chapman, T. (1998). The Congress of Vienna Origins, Processes and Result, Routledge, New York.
• Claude, I. L. (1971). Swords into Plowshares: The Problems and Progess of International Organization, Random House, New York.
• Cox, R. W. (2007). “The International in Evolution”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 35/3, 513-527.
• Croxton, D. (1999). “The Peace of Westphalia of 1648 and the Origins of Sovereignty”, The International History Review, 21/3, 569-591.
• Cueto M., Brown, T. M. ve Fee, E. (2019). The World Health Organization: A History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• D’Souza, R. (2006). Interstate Disputes Over Krishna Waters: Law, Science and Imperialism, Orient Longman, New Delhi.
• Daudet, Y. (2008). Topicality of the 1907 Hague Conference, the Second Peace Conference, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden.
• Davies, M. & Woodward, R. (2014). International Organizations: A Companio, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
• Dembinski-Goumard, D. (2008). International Geneva Yearbook: Organization and Activities of International Institutions in Geneva Volume XX, Eco’Diagnostic, Geneva.
• Drake, W. J. (2008). “Introduction: The Distributed Architecture of Network Global Governance”,. Governing Global Electronic Networks: International Perspectives on Policy and Power (Ed. William J. Drake & Ernest J. Wilson III), the MIT Press, London, 1-80.
• Dwyer, P. G. (2013). “Violence and the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars: Massacre, Conquest and the Imperial Enterprise”, Journal of Genocide Research, 15/2, 117–131.
• Einaudi, L. L. (2000). From the Franc to the ‘Europe’: The Attempted Transformation of the Latin Monetary Union into a European Monetary Union, 1865-1873. The Economic History Review, 53(2), 284-308.
• Englund, S. (2004). Napoleon: A Political Life, Scribner, New York.
• Engström, V. (2012). Constructing the Powers of International Institutions, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden.
• Ertürk, E. (2015). “Intergovernmental Organizations (IGOs) and Their Roles and Activities in Security, Economy, Health, and Environment”, Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8/8, 333-340.
• Esaile, C. (2001). The French Wars 1792-1815, Routlegde, London.
• Fakhri, M. (2018). “Sugar”, International Law’s Objects (Ed. J. Hohmann & D. Joyce), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 478-490.
• Falk, R. A. (1969). “The Interplay of Westphalia and Charter Conceptions of International Legal Order”, The Future of the International Legal Order (Ed. C. E. Black & R. A. Falk ), Princeton University Press, Princeton, 32-70.
• Falkner, J. (2015). The War of the Spanish Succession 1701-1714, Pen & Sword Military, South Yorkshire.
• Fendel, R. ve Maurer, D. (2015). “Does European History Repeat Itself?: Lessons from the Latin Monetary Union for the European Monetary Union”, Journal of Economic Integration, 30/1, 93-120.
• Gabriela, S. M. (2013). “The Role of International Organizations in the Global Economic Governance-An Assessment”, Romanian Economic and Business Review, Special Issue, 308-316.
• Giraud, C. (1847). The Treaty of Utrecht, James Ridgway Piccadilly, London.
• Goldstein, J. L., Rivers, D. ve Tomz, M. (2007). “Institutions in International Relations: Understanding the Effects of the GATT and the WTO on World Trade”, International Organization, 61, 37-67.
• Gönlübol, M. (1975). Milletlerarası Siyasi Teşkilatlanma, Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara.
• Götz, N. (2009). “Epilogue: The ‘Alpine System’: Creating Space for Regional Cooperation”, Regional Cooperation and International Organizations: The Nordic Model in Transnational Alignment, (Ed. Norbert Götz & Heidi Haggrén), Routledge, Oxon, 248-268.
• Grant, J. P. ve Barker, J. C. (2009). Parry and Grant Encyclopaedic Dictionary of International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Gross, L. (1948). “The Peace of Westphalia 1648-1948”, The American Journal of International Law, 42/1, 20-41.
• Gutmann, M. P. (1988). “The Origins of the Thirty Years’ War”, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18/4, 749-770.
• Haas, E. B. (1964). Beyond the Nation State: Functionalism and International Organization, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
• Hameeuw, H. (2013). “Mesopotamian Clay Cones in the ancient Near East Collections of the Royal Museums of Art and History”, Bulletin des Musées royaux d’Art et d’Histoire, Bruxelles, 48, 5-48.
• Hampton, B. C. (1940). “Development of the National Maritime Quarantine System of the United States”, Public Health Reports (1896-1970), 55/28, 1241-1257.
• Hanrieder, W. F. (1966). “International Organizations and International Systems”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 10/3, 297-313.
• Hardy, A. (1993). “Cholera, Quarantine and the English Preventive System 1850-1895”, Medical History, 37, 250-269.
• Hasgüler, M. ve Uludağ, M. B. (2017). Devletlerarası ve Hükümetler Dışı Uluslararası Örgütler, Tarihçe-Organlar-Belgeler-Politikalar, Alfa Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
• Hastings, D. (2018). Nationalism in Modern Europe: Political, Identity, and Belonging since the French Revolution, Bloomsbury, London.
• Hatton, T. J. ve Williamson, J. G. (1994). “What Drove the Mass Migrations from Europe in the Late Nineteenth Century”, Population and Development Review, 20/3, 533-559.
• Henderson, E. O. (2018). The Zollverein, Routledge, Oxon.
• Hernandez, G. (2014). The International Court of Justice and the Judicial Function, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Higgins, A. R. (2017). “Writing for Peace: Reconsidering the British Public Peace Petitioning Movement’s Hisrotical Legacies After 1898”. War, Peace and International Order?: The Legacies of the Hague Conferences of 1899 and 1907 (Ed. Maartje A., C. E. Barber ve A. R. Higgins), Routledge, New York, 138-154.
• Hillerbrand, H. J. (2012). A New History of Christianity, Abingdon Press, Nashville.
• Hirsch, M. (1995). The Responsibility of International Organizations Toward Third Parties: Some Basic Principles, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht.
• Hughes, M. (1992). Early Modern Germany, 1477-1804, MacMillan Press and University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
• Ingrao, C. W. (2000). The Habsburg Monarchy, 1618-1815, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Jackson, R. H. (1992). “Pluralism in International Political Theory”, Review of International Studies, 18/3, 271-281.
• Kaplan, B. J. (2007). Divided by Faith: Religious Conflict and the Practice of Toleration in Early Modern Europe, The Belknap Press of Harward University Press, London.
• Kayaoğlu, T. (2010). Legal Imperialism: Sovereignty and Extraterritoriality in Japan, the Ottoman, and China, Cambridge University Press, New York.
• Kaygusuz, Ö. (2014). “Egemenlik ve Vestfalyan Düzen”, Küresel Siyasete Giriş: Uluslararası İlişkilerde Kavramlar, Teoriler, Süreçler (Ed. Evren Balta), İletişim, İstanbul, 25-49.
• Kohn, G. C. (2007). Dictionary of Wars, Facts On File, New York.
• Konnert, M. (2006). Early Modern Europe: The Age of Religious War, 1559–1715, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
• Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
• Kuanpoth, J. (2010). Patent Rights in Pharmaceuticals in Developing Countries: Major Challenges for the Future, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
• Kuokkanen, T. (2002). International Law and the Environment: Variations on a Theme, Kluwer Law International, The Hague.
• Leonard, L. (1951). International Organization, McGraw-Hill, New York.
• Lindsay, J. O. (1970). The New Cambridge Modern History, Volume II, The Old Regime 1713-63, the University Press, Cambridge.
• Little, R. (1996). The Growing Relevance of Pluralism. Steve Smith (Ed.), in International Theory: Positivism & Beyond (ss. 66-86), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Lorca, A. B. (2014). Mestizo International Law: A Global Intellectual History 1842-1933, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Lyall, F. (2016). International Communications: The International Telecommunication Union and the Universal Postal Union, Routledge, New York.
• Mangone, G. J. (1954). A Short History of International Organization, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
• McGeary, T. (2013). The Politics of Opera in Handel’s Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Mogami, T. (2014). On the Concept of International Organization: Centralization, Hegemonism, and Constitutionalism, Networking the International System Global Histories of International Organizations (Ed. Madeleine Herren), Springer, Basel, 43-52.
• Moore, J. N., Roberts, B. ve Turner, R. F. (1990). National Security Law, Carolina Academic Press, Durham.
• Morgenthau, H. J. (1946). “Diplomacy”, Yale Law Journal, 55/5, 1067-1080.
• Murphy, J. F. (1983). The United Nations and the Control of International Violence: A Legal and Political Analysis, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
• Nau, H. R. (1974). National Politics and International Technology: Nuclear Reactor Development in Western Europe, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
• Osiander, A (2001). “Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth”, International Organization, 55/2, 251-287.
• Özdal, B. ve Jane, M. (2014). “La Der Des Ders”in Uluslararası Sistemin Yapısına Etkileri”, Akademik Bakış, 7/14, 215-245.
• Partington, C. F. (1836). The British Cyclopædia of Literature, History, Geography, Law, and Politics, Volume I, Orr and Smith, London.
• Peasleess, A. J. (1956). International Governmental Organizations: Constitutional Documents Volume II, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
• Peter, S. (2005). “The Westphalian Model, Sovereignty and Law in Fin-de-siècle German International Theory”, International Relations, 19/2, 153-172.
• Peters, A. Ve Peter, S. (2012). “International Organization: Between Technocracy and Democracy”, The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law (Ed. Bardo Fassbender & Anne Peters), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 170-197.
• Philpott, D. (1999). “Westphalia, Authority, and International Society”, Political Studies, 47, 566-589.
• Potyemkin, V. (1977). Uluslararası İlişkiler Tarihi (Diplomasi Tarihi), (Çev: A. Tokatlı), May Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Reading, M. (2009). The Complete Prophecies of Nostradamus, Watkins Publishing, London.
• Reinalda, B. (2009). Routledge History of International Organizations From 1815 to the Present Day, Routledge, London.
• Richardson, L. (2006). “Strategic and Military Planning, 1815-56” The Fog of Peace and War Planning: Military and Strategic Planning under Uncertainty (Ed. T. C. Imlay & M. D. Toft), Routledge, New York, 11-25.
• Schiavone, G. (1986). International Organizations: A Dictionary and Directory, Mcmillian Reference Books, London.
• Shapiro, F. R. (2006). The Yale Book of Quotations, Yale University Press, New Heaven ve London.
• Simpson, G. (2004). Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Orders, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Smith, R. (2009). Military Economics: The Interaction of Power and Money, Palgrave Macmillan, . New York.
• Smith, W. (1982). European Imperialism in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, Wadsworth Publishing, Chicago.
• Steans, J., Pettiford, L., Diez, T. Ve El-Anis, I. (2010). An Introduction to International Relations Theory: Perspectives and Themes, Pearson, Essex.
• Stephens, H. M. (1896). Revolutionary Europe, 1789-1815, Rivingtons, London.
• Stevens, A. (2016). “Tell el-Amarna”, Encyclopedia of Egyptology (Ed. Willeke Wendrich), UCLA, Los Angeles, 1-37.
• Stolleis, M. (2001). Public Law in Germany 1800-1914, Berghahn Books, New York.
• Straumann, B. (2008). “The Peace of Westphalia as a Secular Constitution”, Constellations, 15, 173-188.
• Sud, U. (1983). Decolonization to World Order: International Organizations and the Emerging Pattern of Global Interdependence, National, New Delhi.
• Szabo, F. A. J. (2013). The Seven Years War in Europe: 1756-1763, Routledge, New York.
• The Religious Peace of Augsburg (September 25, 1555), § 24, http://ghdi.ghi-dc.org/docpage.cfm?docpage_id=5367, (Erişim Tarihi 28 Haziran 2019).
• Tuncer, H. (2009). Osmanlı ve Büyük Güçler (1815-1878), Kaynak Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Turk, E. L. (1999). The History of Germany, Greenwood Press, London.
• Ungern-Sternberg, A. (2012). “Religion and Religious Intervention”, The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law (Ed. B. Fassbender & A. Peters), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 294-316.
• Viotti, P. R. (2014). The Dollar and National Security: The Monetary Component of Hard Power, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
• Viotti, P. R. & Kauppi, M. V. (1987). International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond, Allyn & Bacon, Massachusetts.
• Williams, A. J. (2012). International History and International Relations, Routledge, London.
• Wilson, P. H. (2009). The Thirty Years War: Europe's Tragedy, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
• Yalvaç, F. (2012). “Devlet”, Devlet ve Ötesi: Uluslararası İlişkilerde Temel Kavramlar (Ed. Atilla Eralp ), İletişim, İstanbul, 15-52.
• Yalvaç, F. (2013). “Tarihsel Sosyoloji ve Uluslararası İlişkiler: Jeopolitik, Kapitalizm ve Devletler Sistemi”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 10/38, 3-28.
• Yılmaz, Ö. (2017). “1847-1848 Kolera Salgını ve Osmanlı Coğrafyasındaki Etkileri”, Avrasya İncelemeleri Dergisi, 6/1, 23-55.
• Zouche, R. (1911). An Exposition of Fecial Law and Procedure, or of Law Between Nations, and Questions Concerning the Same, (Çev: J. L. Brierly), Carnegie Institution, Washington.