TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ DIŞ ENTEGRASYONUNUN YENİ ÜRÜN GELİŞTİRME ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE İÇ ENTEGRASYONUN ARACILIK ROLÜ

Öz

Yoğun rekabetin yaşandığı günümüzde işletmeler yeni ürün geliştirme çalışmalarına gittikçe daha fazla önem vermektedir. Tedarik zinciri entegrasyonunun yeni ürün geliştirmeye etkisini inceleyen henüz az sayıda çalışma bulunmaktadır. Bu nedenle çalışmada tedarik zinciri entegrasyonu ve yeni ürün geliştirme arasındaki ilişki irdelenmektedir. Çalışmada tedarik zinciri entegrasyonu; dış ve iç entegrasyon olmak üzere iki başlık altında incelenmektedir. Dış entegrasyon ise tedarikçi ve müşteri entegrasyonu olarak iki alt başlığa ayrılmaktadır. Ayrı ayrı tedarikçi entegrasyonunun ve müşteri entegrasyonunun yeni ürün geliştirme üzerindeki etkisinde iç entegrasyonun aracılık etkisi çalışma kapsamında incelenmiştir. Ankara ve İstanbul illerinde imalat sektöründe faaliyet gösteren 390 orta ve büyük ölçekli işletmeye uygulanan anketler ile veri toplanmıştır. Elde edilen verilere güvenirlik, geçerlik ve hipotez testleri uygulanmıştır. Çalışma bulgularına göre hem tedarikçi hem de müşteri entegrasyonunun yeni ürün geliştirme üzerindeki etkisinde iç entegrasyonun kısmi aracılık etkisi tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tedarik Zinciri Entegrasyonu
• Tedarikçi Entegrasyonu
• Müşteri Entegrasyonu
• İç Entegrasyon
• Yeni Ürün Geliştirme

THE MEDIATING ROLE OF INTERNAL INTEGRATION IN THE EFFECT OF SUPPLY CHAIN EXTERNAL INTEGRATION ON NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

Öz

In today's world of intense competition, businesses pay more and more attention to new product development efforts. There are still few studies examining the effect of supply chain integration on new product development. Therefore, the study examines the relationship between supply chain integration and new product development. In the study, supply chain integration is examined under two headings as external and internal integration. External integration is divided into two sub-categories as supplier and customer integration. The mediating effect of internal integration on the effect of individual supplier integration and customer integration on new product development was examined within the scope of the study. Data were collected through questionnaires applied to 390 medium and large-scale enterprises operating in the manufacturing sector in Ankara and Istanbul provinces. Reliability, validity and hypothesis tests were applied to the obtained data. According to the findings of the study, the partial mediating effect of internal integration on the effect of both supplier and customer integration on new product development was determined.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Supply Chain Integration
• Supplier Integration
• Customer Integration
• Internal Integration
• New Product Development

Kaynakça

1. Alfalla-Luque, R., Medina-Lopez, C., ve Dey, P. K. (2013). Supply Chain Integration Framework Using Literature Review. Production Planning & Control, 24(8–9), 800–817. http://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2012.666870
2. Baron, R., M., ve David A. K, (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6). 1173-1182.
3. Barney, J. B. (1986). Organizational Culture : Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? The Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 656–665.
4. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
5. Basnet, C. (2013). The Measurement of Internal Supply Chain Integration. Management Research Review, 36(2), 153–172. http://doi.org/10.1108/01409171311292252
6. Chavez, R., Yu, W., Gimenez, C., Fynes, B., ve Wiengarten, F. (2015). Customer İntegration And Operational Performance: The Mediating Role Of İnformation Quality. Decision Support Systems, 80, 83–95. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.10.001
7. Chen, H., Daugherty, P. J., ve Landry, T. D. (2009). Supply Chain Integration: A Theoretical Framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 30(2), 27–46. http://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2009.tb00110.x
8. Chin, T. A., Hamid, A. B. A., Rasli, A., ve Tat, H. H. (2014). A Literature Analysis on the Relationship between External Integration, Environmental Uncertainty and Firm Performance in Malaysian SMEs. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130(August 2016), 75–84. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.010

9. Clark, K. B. (1989). Project Scope and Project Performance: The Effect of Parts Strategy and Supplier Involvement on Product Development. Management Science, 35(10), 1247–1263. http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.10.1247
10. Cohen, L., Manion, L., ve Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education. Routledge Publisher, Oxford, 1-638 http://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2011.643130
11. Çelik, H.E., ve Yılmaz, V. (2016). Lisrel 9.1 ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi. Ankara. Anı Yayıncılık
12. Das, A., Narasimhan, R., ve Talluri, S. (2006). Supplier Integration—Finding An Optimal Configuration. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 563–582. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.09.003
13. Droge, C., Jayaram, J., ve Vickery, S. K. (2004). The Effects of Internal versus External Integration Practices on Time-Based Performance and Overall Firm Performance. Journal of Operations Management, 22(6), 557–573. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.08.001
14. Eisenhardt, K., ve Tabrizi, B. N. (1995). Accelerating Adaptive Processes : Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 84–110.
15. Emmer, M. (2018). 95 Percent of New Products Fail. https://www.inc.com/marc-emmer/95-percent-of-new-products-fail-here-are-6-steps-to-make-sure-yours dont.html#:~:text=According%20to%20Harvard%20Business%20School,is%2070%20to%2080%20percent. Erişim Tarihi:12.01.2021
16. Errassafi, M., Abbar, H., ve Benabbou, Z. (2019). The Mediating Effect of Internal Integration on the Relationship between Supply Chain Integration and Operational Performance: Evidence from Moraccon Manufacturing Companies. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 12(2). 254-273. Ettlie, J., ve Ernesto, R. (1992). Organizational Integration and Process Innovation. The Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 795–827.
17. Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., ve Zhao, X. (2010). The Impact Of Supply Chain Integration on Performance: A Contingency and Configuration Approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 58–71. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.06.001
18. Frohlich, M. T., ve Westbrook, R. (2001). Arcs of Integration: an International Study of Supply Chain Strategies. Journal of Operations Management, 19(2), 185–200. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00055-3
19. Germain, R., ve Iyer, K. N. S. (2006). The Interaction of Internal and Downstream Integration and Its Association with Performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 27(2), 29–52.
20. Gomes, J. F. ., de Weerd-Nederhof, P. ., Pearson, a. ., ve Cunha, M. . (2003). Is More Always Better? An Exploration of The Differential Effects of Functional Integration on Performance in New Product Development. Technovation, 23(3), 185–191. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00107-9
21. Griffin, A. (1996). Integrating R&D and Marketing: A Review and Analysis of the Literature. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 191–215.
22. Griffin, A. (1997). PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14, 429–458.
23. Gupta, A. K., Raj, S. P., ve Wilemon, D. (1986). A Model for Studying R&D Marketing Interface in the Product Innovation Process. Journal of Marketing, 50(2), 7-17. http://doi.org/10.2307/1251596
24. He, Y., Keung Lai, K., Sun, H., ve Chen, Y. (2014). The Impact of Supplier Integration on Customer Integration and New Product Performance: The Mediating Role of Manufacturing Flexibility Under Trust Theory. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 260–270. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.04.044
25. Homburg, C., ve Stock, R. M. (2004). The Link Between Salespeople’s Job Satisfaction and Customer Satisfaction in a Business-to-Business Context: A Dyadic Analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(2), 144–158. http://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303261415
26. Horn, P., Scheffler, P., ve Schiele, H. (2014). Internal Integration as a Pre-Condition for External Integration in Global Sourcing: A Social Capital Perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 153, 54–65. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.03.020
27. İlhan, M. ve Çetin, B. (2014). LISREL Ve AMOS Programları Kullanılarak Gerçekleştirilen Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli (Yem) Analizlerine İlişkin Sonuçların Karşılaştırılması. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 5(2), 26-42.
28. James Lin, M.-J., ve Huang, C.-H. (2013). Industrial Marketing The impact of Customer Participation on NPD Performance: The Mediating Role of Inter-Organisation Relationship. Journal of Business ve Industrial Marketing, 28(3), 3–15. http://doi.org/10.1108/08858621311285679
29. Kessler, E. H., Bierly, P. E., ve Gopalakrishnan, S. (2000). Internal Vs. External Learning in New Product Development: Effects on Speed, Costs and Competitive Advantage. R&D Management, 30(3), 213–224. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00172
30. Koç, E., Ulaş, D., ve Çalıpınar, H. (2018). The Impact of Supply Chain Integration on New Product Development Performance: Evidence from Turkish Manufacturing Industry. International Journal of Supply Chain Management. 7(6). 365-374.
31. Kristensson, P., Gustafsson, A., ve Witell, L. (2011). Collaboration with Customers-Understanding the Effect of Customer-Company Interaction in New Product Development. Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 1-9.
32. La Rocca, A., Moscatelli, P., Perna, A., ve Snehota, I. (2015). Customer Involvement in New Product Development in B2B: The Role of Sales. Industrial Marketing Management, 58, 45–57. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.014
33. Lagrosen, S. (2005). Customer Involvement in New Product Development: A Relationship Marketing Perspective. European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(4), 424–436. http://doi.org/10.1108/14601060510627803
34. Lambert, D. M., Cooper, M. C., ve Pagh, J. D. (1998). Supply Chain Management: Implementation Issues and Research Opportunities. International Journal of Logistics Management. 9(2). 1-20. http://doi.org/10.1108/09574099810805807
35. Lee, Y.-H., ve Wang, K.-J. (2012). Performance Impact of New Product Development Processes for Distinct Scenarios Under Different Supplier–Manufacturer Relationships. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 82(11), 2096–2108. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2012.04.008
36. Lotfi, Z., Sahran, S., Mukhtar, M., ve Zadeh, A. T. (2013). The Relationships between Supply Chain Integration and Product Quality. Procedia Technology, 11, 471–478. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.217
37. Nadeau, J., ve Casselman, R. M. (2008). Competitive Advantage with New Product Development: Implications for Life Cycle Theory. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 16(5), 401–411. http://doi.org/10.1080/09652540802480894
38. Narasimhan, R., ve Kim, S. W. (2002). Effect of Supply Chain Integration on the Relationship Between Diversification and Performance: Evidence from Japanese and Korean Firms. Journal of Operations Management, 20(3), 303–323. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00008-6
39. Narasimhan, R., Swink, M., ve Viswanathan, S. (2010). On Decisions for Integration Implementation: An Examination of Complementarities Between Product-Process Technology Integration and Supply Chain Integration. Decision Sciences, 41(2), 355–372. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00267.x
40. Olson, E. M., , Walker Orville C., J., ve Ruekert, R. W. (1995). Organizing for Effective New Product Development: The Moderating Role of Product Innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 59(1), 48-62. http://doi.org/10.2307/1252014
41. Parker, D. B., Zsidisin, G. a., ve Ragatz, G. L. (2008). Timing and Extent of Supplier Integration in New Product Development: A Contingency Approach. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44(1), 71–83. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2008.00046.x
42. Pagell, M. (2004). Understanding the Factors That Enable and Inhibit the Integration of Operations, Purchasing and Logistics. Journal of Operations Management, 22(5), 459–487. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.05.008
43. Parente, R. C., Baack, D. W., ve Hahn, E. D. (2011). The Effect of Supply Chain Integration, Modular Production, and Cultural Distance on New Product Development: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach. Journal of International Management, 17(4), 278–290. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2011.08.001
44. Petersen, K. J., Handfield, R. B., ve Ragatz, G. L. (2003). A Model of Supplier Integration into New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(4), 284–299. http://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.00028
45. Ragatz, G. L., Handfield, R. B., ve Scannell, T. V. (1997). Success Factors for Integrating Suppliers into New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 14(3), 190-202 http://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1430190
46. Stank, T. P., Keller, S. B., ve Closs, D. J. (2001). Performance Benefits of Supply Chain Integration. Transportation Journal, 41(2). 31-46
47. Steenkamp, J.B.E.M.. ve Trijp, H.C.M. (1991). The Use of LISREL in Validating Marketing Constructs. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 8(4), 283-299.
48. Sweeney, E. (2012). Innovation for Competing in Highly Competitive Markets In Supply Chain Innovation for Competing in Highly Competitive Markets: Challenges and Solutions " (eds. Evangelista, P., McKinnon, A., Sweeney, E. and Exposito E.) Chapter. Business Science. 1-26
49. Thomas, E. (2013). Supplier Integration in New Product Development: Computer Mediated Communication, Knowledge Exchange and Buyer Performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(6), 890–899. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.05.018
50. Tsai, K. H., ve Hsu, T. T. (2014). Cross-Functional Collaboration, Competitive Intensity, Knowledge Integration Mechanisms, and New Product Performance: A Mediated Moderation Model. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 293–303. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.08.012
51. Turkulainen, V., ve Ketokive, M. (2012). Cross Functional Integration and Performance: What are the Real Benefits? International Journal of Operations ve Production Management, 32(4), 447–467. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443571211223095
52. Ulrich, K.T. ve Eppinger, S.D., (2004). Product Design and Development. Third edition. New York. McGraw Hill
53. Verhoef, P. C., Franses, P. H., ve Hoekstra, J. C. (2002). The Effect of Relational Constructs on Customer Referrals and Number of Services Purchased from a Multiservice Provider: Does Age of Relationship Matter? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), 202–216. http://doi.org/10.1177/0092070302303002
54. Wang, G., ve Netemeyer, R. (2004). Salesperson Creative Performance : Conceptualization , Measurement , and Nomological Validity. Journal of Business Research, 57, 805–812. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00483-6
55. Zhao, Y., Cavusgil, E., ve Cavusgil, S. T. (2014). An Investigation of the Black-box Supplier Integration in New Product Development. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1058–1064. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.06.006
56. Zhang, M., Lettice, F., Chan, H. K., ve Nguyen, H. T. (2018) Supplier Integration and Firm Performance: the Moderating Effects of Internal Integration and Trust, Production Planning & Control, 29:10, 802-813. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1474394