Öz
Online interviewing has increasingly begun to be preferred in qualitative research in recent years. Here, we aim to discuss our methodological experiences based on e-field of the PhD thesis designed with a qualitative approach on poverty measurement. For this, we narrate our strategies improved for in-depth interviews and synchronous focus group discussions conducted in a 5-month-process through Zoom, categorizing them as before, during and after interviews. Scrutinizing our strategies, we discuss situationally prominent key characteristics of the e-field. Within this scope, we find out that the quality of infrastructure, keeping the duration of the interview short and the number of the questions and participants less than the traditional interviewing are significant factors. Last, we find it crucial to indicate that some outcomes of the e-field can have ambivalent characteristics and obligate the researchers to make selections.
Anahtar Kelimeler
qualitative research online interviewing focus group in-depth interview
Destekleyen Kurum
Yok
Proje Numarası
Yok
Teşekkür
We would like to thank Dr. Hilal Arslan for her technical support during our fieldwork.
Kaynakça
- American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). (2020). Covid-19 Workshop Series: Covid-19 Changes to Research Practices. https://www.aapor.org/Conference-Events/COVID-19-Workshop-Series.aspx
- Adalı, T., Koyuncu, Y. & Türkyılmaz, A. S. (2021). Surveys in Covid-19 and Post Covid-19 Days. UNFPA Turkey. Retrievable from https://turkey.unfpa.org/en/publications/surveys-covid-19-and-post-covid-19-days
- Beddows, E. (2008). The Methodological Issues Associated with Internet-Based Research. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 6(2): 124-139.
- Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M. & Robson, K. (2001). Focus Groups in Social Research. Sage Publications.
- Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
- Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (eds.). (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th Edition). Sage Publications, Inc.
- Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1998). Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. London: Sage Pub.
- Dogan, O. (2020). Are online researches scientific? Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 21 (6): 656-661.
- Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
- Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
- Glesne, C. & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction. New York: Longman.
- Haraway, D. (1991). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
- Hewson, C. M., Laurent, D. & Vogel, C. M. (1996). Proper methodologies for psychological and sociological studies conducted via the Internet. Behaviour Research Method, Instruments and Computers, 28: 186-191.
- Karakulakoğlu, S. E. (2014). Internet Araştırmalarında Yöntem Sorunu. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi “akademia”, 3(4):122-134.
- Lobe, B., Morgan, D. & Hoffman, K. A. (2020). Qualitative Data Collection in an Era of Social Distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Volume 19: 1–8.
- Lupton, D. (ed.). (2021). Doing fieldwork in a pandemic (crowd-sourced document), revised version. Available at: DOING FIELDWORK IN A PANDEMIC
- Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative Researching. Sage Publications, Inc.
- Mehda, R. & Sivadas, E. (1995). Comparing response rates and response content in mail versus electronic mail surveys. Journal of Market Research Society, 37: 429-439.
- Morgan, D. L. & Krueger, R.A. (1998). The Focus Group Kit. Sage Publications, Inc.
- Saldaña, J. (2010). Writing Ethnodrama: A sampler from educational research. In M. Savin-Baden and C. H. Major (eds), New Approaches to Qualitative Research: Wisdom and Uncertainty (pp. 61-70). London and New York: Routledge.
- Savin-Baden, M., Gourlay, L. & Tombs, C. (2010). Researching in immersive spaces. In M. Savin-Baden and C. H. Major (eds), New Approaches to Qualitative Research: Wisdom and Uncertainty (pp. 162-172). London and New York: Routledge.
- Savin-Baden, M. & Major, C. H. (eds.). (2010). New Approaches to Qualitative Research: Wisdom and Uncertainty (pp. 61-70). London and New York: Routledge.
- Schutz, A. (1976). The Phenomenology of the Social World. London: Heinemann.
- Stanley, L. & Wise, S. (1993). Breaking Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology. London: Routledge.
- Sociology Association. (2021). Salgında Sosyolojik Araştırma: Sınırlılıklar ve Yeni Tahayyüller [Sociological Research in the Pandemic: Limitations and New Imaginations]. Online Workshop. https://sosyolojidernegi.org.tr/salginda-sosyolojik-arastirma-sinirliliklar-ve-yeni-tahayyuller-cevrimici-atolye/
- Tates, K., Zwaanswijk, M., Otten, R. et al. (2009). Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology. BMC Med Res Methodol 9, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-15
- Wetherell, M., Taylor, S. & Yates, S. J. (2001). Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. London: Sage Pub.
- World Association for Public Opinion Research (WAPOR). (2020). WAPOR webinars: Changes in Survey Research in Times of Covid-19 (May 2020). https://wapor.org/resources/wapor-webinars/webinar-may-2020/
Öz
Çevrimiçi görüşmeler son zamanlarda giderek artan bir şekilde nitel araştırmalarda daha fazla tercih edilir hale geldi. Biz de bu çalışmada, yoksulluğun ölçülmesi konusunda nitel yaklaşımla yürüttüğümüz doktora tez çalışmasının çevrimiçi saha çalışmasına dayanan metodolojik deneyimlerimizi tartışmayı amaçlıyoruz. Bunun için, Zoom uygulaması aracılığıyla 5 aylık bir süre içinde gerçekleştirdiğimiz senkron odak grup görüşmeleri ve yarı-yapılandırılmış derinlemesine görüşmeler için geliştirdiğimiz stratejileri görüşmeler öncesi, esnası ve sonrasında olmak üzere gruplandırarak aktarmayı hedefliyoruz. Belirlediğimiz stratejileri ayrıntılandırarak çevrimiçi saha çalışmamızda durumsal olarak öne çıkan başlıca özgünlükleri tartışıyoruz. Bu bağlamda, teknik altyapının kalitesi, yüz yüze görüşmelere kıyasla görüşme süresinin kısalığı ile soru ve katılımcı sayılarının düşüklüğünün önemli etkenler olduğunu saptadık. Son olarak, çevrimiçi saha çalışmasının bazı sonuçlarının ikircikli bir doğaya sahip olduğunu ve araştırmacıları seçim yapmak durumunda bırakabileceğini paylaşmayı da önemli bulduğumuzu belirtmek isteriz.
Anahtar Kelimeler
nitel araştırma çevrimiçi görüşme odak grup derinlemesine görüşme
Proje Numarası
Yok
Kaynakça
- American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). (2020). Covid-19 Workshop Series: Covid-19 Changes to Research Practices. https://www.aapor.org/Conference-Events/COVID-19-Workshop-Series.aspx
- Adalı, T., Koyuncu, Y. & Türkyılmaz, A. S. (2021). Surveys in Covid-19 and Post Covid-19 Days. UNFPA Turkey. Retrievable from https://turkey.unfpa.org/en/publications/surveys-covid-19-and-post-covid-19-days
- Beddows, E. (2008). The Methodological Issues Associated with Internet-Based Research. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 6(2): 124-139.
- Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M. & Robson, K. (2001). Focus Groups in Social Research. Sage Publications.
- Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
- Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (eds.). (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th Edition). Sage Publications, Inc.
- Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1998). Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. London: Sage Pub.
- Dogan, O. (2020). Are online researches scientific? Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 21 (6): 656-661.
- Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
- Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
- Glesne, C. & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction. New York: Longman.
- Haraway, D. (1991). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
- Hewson, C. M., Laurent, D. & Vogel, C. M. (1996). Proper methodologies for psychological and sociological studies conducted via the Internet. Behaviour Research Method, Instruments and Computers, 28: 186-191.
- Karakulakoğlu, S. E. (2014). Internet Araştırmalarında Yöntem Sorunu. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi “akademia”, 3(4):122-134.
- Lobe, B., Morgan, D. & Hoffman, K. A. (2020). Qualitative Data Collection in an Era of Social Distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Volume 19: 1–8.
- Lupton, D. (ed.). (2021). Doing fieldwork in a pandemic (crowd-sourced document), revised version. Available at: DOING FIELDWORK IN A PANDEMIC
- Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative Researching. Sage Publications, Inc.
- Mehda, R. & Sivadas, E. (1995). Comparing response rates and response content in mail versus electronic mail surveys. Journal of Market Research Society, 37: 429-439.
- Morgan, D. L. & Krueger, R.A. (1998). The Focus Group Kit. Sage Publications, Inc.
- Saldaña, J. (2010). Writing Ethnodrama: A sampler from educational research. In M. Savin-Baden and C. H. Major (eds), New Approaches to Qualitative Research: Wisdom and Uncertainty (pp. 61-70). London and New York: Routledge.
- Savin-Baden, M., Gourlay, L. & Tombs, C. (2010). Researching in immersive spaces. In M. Savin-Baden and C. H. Major (eds), New Approaches to Qualitative Research: Wisdom and Uncertainty (pp. 162-172). London and New York: Routledge.
- Savin-Baden, M. & Major, C. H. (eds.). (2010). New Approaches to Qualitative Research: Wisdom and Uncertainty (pp. 61-70). London and New York: Routledge.
- Schutz, A. (1976). The Phenomenology of the Social World. London: Heinemann.
- Stanley, L. & Wise, S. (1993). Breaking Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology. London: Routledge.
- Sociology Association. (2021). Salgında Sosyolojik Araştırma: Sınırlılıklar ve Yeni Tahayyüller [Sociological Research in the Pandemic: Limitations and New Imaginations]. Online Workshop. https://sosyolojidernegi.org.tr/salginda-sosyolojik-arastirma-sinirliliklar-ve-yeni-tahayyuller-cevrimici-atolye/
- Tates, K., Zwaanswijk, M., Otten, R. et al. (2009). Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology. BMC Med Res Methodol 9, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-15
- Wetherell, M., Taylor, S. & Yates, S. J. (2001). Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. London: Sage Pub.
- World Association for Public Opinion Research (WAPOR). (2020). WAPOR webinars: Changes in Survey Research in Times of Covid-19 (May 2020). https://wapor.org/resources/wapor-webinars/webinar-may-2020/
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Sosyoloji |
| Bölüm | Makaleler |
| Yazarlar | |
| Proje Numarası | Yok |
| Erken Görünüm Tarihi | 15 Mart 2022 |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 2 Mart 2022 |
| Kabul Tarihi | 28 Ekim 2021 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2022 Sayı: 49 |
Kaynak Göster
- Makale Dosyaları