SİYASET BİLİMİ ÇALIŞMALARINDA VAKA ANALİZİ VE ELİT MÜLAKAT YÖNTEMİ

Yıl 2022, Sayı: 51, 13 - 21, 09.08.2022

Çağlar Ezikoğlu

https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1082089

Öz

Bu makale özellikle siyaset bilimine dair yapılan çalışmalarda bir nitel araştırma yöntemi olarak kullanılan vaka analizini incelenmekte olup, bu vaka analizi yönteminde bir veri toplama metodu olarak kullanılan elit mülakat yöntemini irdelemektedir. Nitel yöntemler ele alınan sorunun doğasını gösteren 'vaka analizlerini' ortaya koymaktadır. Araştırmaların ana araştırma sorusu ‘neden’ ve ‘nasıl’ sorularıyla ilgilidir, bu nedenle nitel veri yöntemleri daha fazla derinlik kazanır ve tutum ve davranışların ‘neden’ ve ‘nasıl’ olduğu hakkında fikir verir. İncelenen vaka için kurulmuş olan nedensel mekanizmayı keşfederken veri toplamak için kullanılan yaygın yöntemlerden birisi de elit mülakat yöntemidir. Vaka analizi ile elit mülakat yöntemi arasındaki bağlantıyı tüm detaylarıyla keşfedebilmek bu çalışmanın temel amacıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Vaka Analizi, Elit Mülakat, Nedensel Mekanizma, Nitel Araştırma

CASE STUDY ANALYSİS AND ELITE INTERVIEW IN POLITICAL SCIENCE

Öz

This article examines the case study analysis, which is used as a qualitative research method especially in studies on political science, and examines the elite interview method, which is used as a data collection method in this case analysis method. Qualitative methods reveal 'case studies' that show the nature of the problem being addressed. The main research question of studies is about 'why' and 'how', so qualitative data methods gain more depth and provide insight into the 'why' and 'how' of attitudes and behaviors. One of the common methods used to collect data while exploring the causal mechanism established for the case under investigation is the elite interview method. The main purpose of this study is to explore the connection between case analysis and elite interview method in all details.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Case Study Analysis, Elite Interview, Causal Mechanism, Qualitative Research

Kaynakça

• Ayer, A.J. (2000) Hume: A Very Short Introduction. Chapter 4, OUP Oxford.
• Beach, D. ve Rasmus Brun P. (2012). "Case selection techniques in Process-tracing and the implications of taking the study of causal mechanisms seriously." APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper.
• Beamer, G. (2002). ‘Elite interviews and state politics research’. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, Cilt 2, Sayı 1, s. 86-96.
• Becker, C. (1934). ‘Progress’. Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences: s. 495-499.
• Bennett A. ve George, L. (2005).Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Mit Press.
• Campbell, Donald T. (1975). “Degrees of freedom” and the case study." Comparative political studies, Cilt 8, Sayı 2, s. 178-193.
• Cohen, Morris R. ve Ernest N. (1934). Introduction to logic scientific method. Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York.
• Cottrell, Leonard S. (1941). ‘The case-study method in prediction’. Sociometry, Cilt 4, Sayı 4, s.358-370.
• Cousin, G. (2005). ‘Case study research’. Journal of geography in higher education, Cilt 29, Sayı 3, s. 421-427.
• Creswell, J. (2013). ‘Steps in conducting a scholarly mixed methods study’.
• Duke, K. (2002). ‘Getting beyond the ‘official line’: Reflections on dilemmas of access, knowledge and power in researching policy networks’. 2002. Journal of Social Policy, Cilt 31, Sayı 1, s. 39-59.
• Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. ve Graebner, M. (2007). ‘Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges’. Academy of management journal, Cilt 50, Sayı 1, s. 25-32.
• Ezikoğlu, Ç. (2021). The Logic of Political Survival in Turkey: The Case of Akp. Lexington Books, Maryland.
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). "Five misunderstandings about case-study research." Qualitative inquiry, Cilt 12, Sayı 2, s. 219-245.
• Foreman, Paul B. (1948). "The theory of case studies." Social Forces, s. 408-419.
• Garrett, D. (2009). “Hume”, The Oxford Handbook of Causation, OUP, Oxford, s.73-92.
• Gerring, J. (2008) ‘The mechanismic worldview: Thinking inside the box’. British Journal of Political Science, Sayı 38, s. 161-179.
• Gerring, J. (2010), ‘Causal Mechanisms: Yes, But….’. Comparative Political Studies, Cilt 43, Sayı 11, s. 1499-1526.
• Glaser, G. ve Strauss A. (1967). "The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research." New York, Adline de Gruyter.
• Harvey, William S. (2011). ‘Strategies for conducting elite interviews’. Qualitative research, Cilt 11, Sayı 4, s. 431-441.
• Hedstrom, P. (2005). Dissecting the social: On the principles of analytical sociology, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Hertz, R. ve Imber B. (1995). Studying elites using qualitative methods. Vol. 175. Sage Publications
• Honore, T. (2014) ‘Causation in the Law’, Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy.
• Mahoney, J. (2015). Process tracing and historical explanation. Security Studies, Cilt 24, Sayı 2, s. 200-218.
• Mayntz, R. (2004), Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Sayı 34, s.237-254.
• Mikecz, Robert. 2012. ‘Interviewing elites: Addressing methodological issues’. Qualitative inquiry 18(6): 482-493.
• Mumford, S. (2012) Metaphysics: A Very Short Introduction, Chapter 5, Oxford.
• Park, Robert E. (1930). "Murder and the case study method." American journal of sociology Cilt 36, Sayı 3, s. 447-454.
• Richards, D. (1996). "Elite interviewing: Approaches and pitfalls." Politics, Cilt 16, Sayı 3, s. 199-204.
• Seldon, A. (1988). Contemporary history: practice and method. B. Blackwell,
• Skocpol, T. ve Somers, M. (1980). "The uses of comparative history in macrosocial inquiry." Comparative studies in society and history, Cilt 22, Sayı 2, s. 174-197.
• Smith, Katherine E. (2006). ‘Problematising power relations in ‘elite’interviews’. Geoforum Cilt 37, Sayı 4, s. 643-653.
• Solberg Søilen, K. ve Huber, S. (2006). 20 svenska fallstudier för små och medelstora företag: pedagogik och vetenskaplig metod. Studentlitteratur.
• Tansey, O. (2007). "Process tracing and elite interviewing: a case for non-probability sampling." PS: Political Science and Politics Cilt 40, Sayı 4, s. 765-772.
• Teune, H. ve Przeworski, A. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
• Thomas, G. (2011). "A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure." Qualitative inquiry, Cilt 17, Sayı 6, s. 511-521.
• Van Evera, S. (1997). Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
• Yin, Robert K. 2012. “Case study methods”.