Does Geopolitical Risk Affect Inflation? Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Palestine Events on Türkiye

Öz

Geopolitical risk stemming from negative events such as war, terrorist acts and tensions, together with economic and political uncertainty, has a negative impact on economic activity. Therefore, this study aims to examine the impact of geopolitical concerns originating from Russia and Israel on the inflation level in Türkiye in the time period from January 2003 to January 2024. To achieve this objective, the series undergoes wavelet transformation and an analysis is conducted to determine if there are variations in the short-term, medium-term, and long-term effects. To account for structural discontinuities in the series, the Fourier quantile causality test was initially conducted. However, as the Fourier function did not yield significant results, the quantile causality test was then done. The data indicate that in the original series, unidirectional causation occurs only at the 0.1 quantile. However, in the converted series, causality is detected at the 0.8 quantile in the short run and at the 0.1 and 0.6 quantiles in the long run. This indicates that the long-term effect of geopolitical risk and other factors on inflation has become more significant in Türkiye. In line with the findings, recommendations were presented to policy makers and researchers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Geopolitical risk
• ınflation
• Quantile causality
• russia
• Türkiye

Jeopolitik Risk Enflasyonu Etkiler mi? Rusya-Ukrayna ve İsrail-Filistin Olaylarının Türkiye Üzerindeki Etkisinin Ampirik Analizi

Öz

Savaş, terör eylemleri ve gerginlikler gibi olumsuz olaylardan kaynaklanan jeopolitik risk ekonomik ve politik belirsizlikle birlikte, ekonomik aktivite üzerinde olumsuz bir etkiye sahip olmaktadır. Dolayısıyla bu çalışmada, Ocak 2003'ten Ocak 2024'e kadar olan zaman diliminde Rusya ve İsrail kaynaklı jeopolitik endişelerin Türkiye'deki enflasyon düzeyi üzerindeki etkisini incelemek amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaca ulaşmak için seriler dalgacık dönüşümüne tabi tutulmuş ve kısa vadeli, orta vadeli ve uzun vadeli etkilerde farklılıklar olup olmadığını belirlemek için bir analiz yapılmıştır. Serideki yapısal kesintileri hesaba katmak için öncelikle Fourier kantil nedensellik testi yapılmıştır. Ancak Fourier fonksiyonu anlamlı sonuçlar vermediğinden daha sonra kantil nedensellik testi yapılmıştır. Veriler, orijinal seride tek yönlü nedenselliğin yalnızca 0,1 kantilinde meydana geldiğini göstermektedir. Ancak dönüştürülen seride kısa vadede 0,8 kantilinde, uzun vadede ise 0,1 ve 0,6 kantillerinde nedensellik tespit edilmiştir. Bu durum, jeopolitik riskin ve diğer faktörlerin enflasyon üzerindeki uzun vadeli etkisinin Türkiye'de daha anlamlı hale geldiğini göstermektedir. Elde edilen bulgular doğrultusunda politika yapıcılara ve araştırmacılara öneriler sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Jeopolitik risk
• Enflasyon
• Kantil nedensellik
• rusya
• Türkiye

Kaynakça

1. Andersson, F. N. (2016). Identifying and modelling cycles and long waves in economic time series. In J. Ljunberg (Eds.), Structural analysis and the process of economic development, 54-75, UK: Routledge.
2. Balcilar, M., Bathia, D., Demirer, R. & Gupta, R. (2021). Credit ratings and predictability of stock return dynamics of the BRICS and the PIIGS: Evidence from a nonparametric causality-in-quantiles approach. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 79, 290-302.
3. Balcilar, M., Gupta, R., Nguyen, D. K. & Wohar, M. E. (2018). Causal effects of the United States and Japan on Pacific-Rim stock markets: nonparametric quantile causality approach. Appl. Econ. 50(53), 5712-5727.
4. Balli, F., Balli, H. O., Hasan, M., & Gregory-Allen, R. (2022). Geopolitical risk spillovers and its determinants. The Annals of Regional Science, 68(2), 463-500.
5. BBC (2022). Rusya'nın Ukrayna'yı İşgal Küresel Gıda Zincir İçin Felaket Olabilir. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberlerdunya-60643229, (Erişim Tarihi: 13.05.2022).
6. Będowska-Sójka, B., Demir, E., & Zaremba, A. (2022). Hedging geopolitical risks with different asset classes: A focus on the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Finance Research Letters, 50, 103192.
7. Bhardwaj, M., Kumar, P., Kumar, S., Dagar, V. & Kumar, A. (2022). A district-level analysis for measuring the effects of climate change on production of agricultural crops, ie, wheat and paddy: evidence from India, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(21), 31861-31885
8. Bouri, E., Gabauer, D., Gupta, R., & Kinateder, H. (2023). Global geopolitical risk and inflation spillovers across European and North American economies. Research in International Business and Finance, 66, 102048.

9. Caldara, D., & Iacoviello, M. (2022). Measuring geopolitical risk. American Economic Review, 112(4), 1194-1225.
10. Caldara, D., Conlisk, S., Iacoviello, M., & Penn, M. (2022). Do geopolitical risks raise or lower inflation. Federal Reserve Board of Governors.
11. Chortane, S.G., & Pandey, D.K. (2022). Does the Russia-Ukraine war lead to currency asymmetries? A US dollar tale. J. Econ. Asymmetries, 26, e00265.
12. Demirtaş, C. (2023). Does Inflation Instability Cause Environmental Pollution in Turkiye? Evidence from the Fourier-Wavelet Causality Test. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(4), 622-642.
13. ECB (2022). Financial Stability Review, https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/financialstability/fsr/html/ecb.fsr202205~f207f46ea0.en.html#toc4
14. Enders, W. & Jones, P. (2016). Grain prices, oil prices, and multiple smooth breaks in a VAR. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 20(4), 399-419. https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2014-0101
15. Engle, R.F. & Campos-Martins, S. (2020). Measuring and hedging geopolitical risk”, NYU Stern School of Business Forthcoming, SSRN, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract53685213 or doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3685213.
16. Gençay, R., Gradojevic, N., Selçuk, F. & Whitcher, B. (2010). Asymmetry of information flow between volatilities across time scales. Quantitative Finance, 10(8), 895-915. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697680903460143
17. Gorus, M. S., Yilanci, V. & Kongkuah, M. (2023). FDI inflows-economic globalization nexus in ASEAN countries: The panel bootstrap causality test based on wavelet decomposition. AsiaPacific Financial Markets, 30(2), 339-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-022-09377-5
18. Ha, J., Tan, P. P. & Goh, K. L. (2018). Linear and nonlinear causal relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in China: New evidence based on wavelet analysis. PLoS One, 13(5), e0197785. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197785
19. Hossain, A. T., & Masum, A. A. (2022). Russian invasion of Ukraine, geopolitical risk, and global financial markets. Available at SSRN.
20. Hossain, A. T., Masum, A. A., & Saadi, S. (2024). The impact of geopolitical risks on foreign exchange markets: Evidence from the Russia–Ukraine war. Finance Research Letters, 59, 104750.
21. Khurshid, A., Khan, K., Rauf, A., & Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2024). Effect of geopolitical risk on resources prices in the global and Russian-Ukrainian context: A novel Bayesian structural model. Resources Policy, 88, 104536.
22. Lee, C. C., Olasehinde-Williams, G., & Özkan, O. (2023). Geopolitical oil price uncertainty transmission into core inflation: evidence from two of the biggest global players. Energy Economics, 126, 106983.
23. Ohikhuare, O. M. (2023). How geopolitical risk drives spillover interconnectedness between crude oil and exchange rate markets: Evidence from the Russia-Ukraine war. Resources Policy, 86, 104282.
24. Özçelik, O. (2023). Rusya-Ukrayna Savaşı Gölgesinde Dünyadaki Gıda Fiyatlarının Belirleyicileri: Fourier Bootstrap Ardl ve Fourier Bootstrap Toda-Yamamoto Yaklaşımlarından Kanıtlar. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 29(1), 29-47.
25. Özer, Ç. (2023). Uluslararası politika açısından Filistin sorunu. Külliye, [Türkiye Cumhuriyeti'nin 100. Yılı Özel Sayısı], 582-605. https://doi.org/10.48139/aybukulliye.1360984
26. Pata, U. K., Kartal, M. T., Erdogan, S. & Sarkodie, S. A. (2023). The role of renewable and nuclear energy R&D expenditures and income on environmental quality in Germany: Scrutinizing the EKC and LCC hypotheses with smooth structural changes. Applied Energy, 342, 121138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121138
27. Pata, U. K., Yilanci, V., Zhang, Q. & Shah, S. A. R. (2022). Does financial development promote renewable energy consumption in the USA? Evidence from the Fourier-wavelet quantile causality test. Renewable Energy, 196, 432-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.008
28. Saâdaoui, F., Jabeur, S. B., & Goodell, J. W. (2022). Causality of geopolitical risk on food prices: Considering the Russo–Ukrainian conflict. Finance Research Letters, 49, 103103.
29. Shahzad, U., Mohammed, K. S., Tiwari, S., Nakonieczny, J., & Nesterowicz, R. (2023). Connectedness between geopolitical risk, financial instability indices and precious metals markets: Novel findings from Russia Ukraine conflict perspective. Resources Policy, 80, 103190.
30. Shen, L., & Hong, Y. (2023). Can geopolitical risks excite Germany economic policy uncertainty: Rethinking in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Finance Research Letters, 51, 103420.
31. Sohag, K., Islam, M.M., Tomas Žiković, I., & Mansour, H. (2023). Food inflation and geopolitical risks: Analyzing European regions amid the Russia-Ukraine war. British Food Journal, 125(7), 2368-2391.
32. Sun, T.T. & Su, C.W. (2024). How is geopolitical risk associated with food prices?. International Journal of Emerging Markets.
33. Vidya, C.T. & Prabheesh, K.P. (2020). Implications of COVID-19 pandemic on the global trade networks. Emerg. Mark. Finance Trade, 56(10), 2408–2421.
34. Walden, A.T. (2001). Wavelet analysis of discrete time series. In C. Casacuberta, R.M. Miró-Roig, J. Verdera and S. Xambó-Descamps (Eds.), Progress in mathematics (627-641). Papers presented at the European Congress of Mathematics, Basel: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-0348-8266-8_56