İşsizliğin Sosyo-Ekonomik Belirleyicileri: Karma Yöntemli Nedensel Analiz ve Politika Sonuçları

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4, 1614 - 1632, 23.12.2025

Sergen Gürsoy

https://doi.org/10.30586/pek.1665490

Öz

Araştırmanın amacı, işsizlik oranına etki eden sosyo-ekonomik değişkenlerin hem tekil hem de bütünsel anlamda nedensel ilişkilerini ortaya koymaktır. Ayrıca ülkelere özgü sonuçlar ile geleceğe dönük politik öneriler ortaya çıkarmayı hedeflemektedir. Bu amaçlara yönelik olarak işsizlik oranına etki eden faktörleri hem simetrik (korelasyon analizi, yapısal eşitlik modellemesi) hem de asimetrik (fsQCA) yöntemlerle analiz etmektedir. OECD ve ILO gibi uluslararası kuruluşlardan 2023 yılı verileri kullanılarak yapılan analizde, çalışılan saat sayısı (HW), serbest meslek oranı (SER), genç kadın işsizlik oranı (UYF), insan hakları endeksi (HRI), eğitim seviyesine göre istihdam (EEL) ve işgücü gelir payı (LIS) değişkenleri incelenmiştir. Korelasyon analizleri sonucunda, UYF ile UER, HRI ile LIS ve SER ile HW arasında güçlü ve pozitif ilişkiler belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, HW ile EEL, SER ile EEL ve HRI ile SER arasındaki ilişkilerin negatif yönlü olduğu görülmüştür. Yapısal model sonuçlarına göre modelin p=0.030 ve R2 değerinin 0.761 olduğu tespit edilmiş, bu sonuç modelin anlamlı olduğu ve yüksek açıklayabilirleğe sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. FsQCA analizine göre, tüm değişkenler işsizlik oranı açısından tekil olarak yeterli bulunmuş, UYF'nin yokluğu ise gerekli değişken olarak belirlenmiştir. Konfigürasyon analizleri, işsizlik dinamiklerinin ülkeler bazında farklılaştığını ortaya koymuş, bu farklılıklar politika yapıcılar için sürdürülebilir gelişim adına yönerge önerisini ortaya çıkarmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

İşsizlik , İşgücü piyasası , Sosyal Politika , Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli , fsQCA

Socio-Economic Determinants of Unemployment: A Mixed-Method Causal Analysis and Policy Implications

Öz

The aim of the research is to reveal the causal relationships of socio-economic variables affecting the unemployment rate both individually and holistically. It also aims to reveal country-specific results and future policy recommendations. For these purposes, it analyzes the factors affecting the unemployment rate with both symmetric (correlation analysis, structural equation modeling) and asymmetric (fsQCA) methods. In the analysis using data from international organizations such as OECD and ILO for 2023, the number of hours worked (HW), self-employment rate (SER), young female unemployment rate (UYF), human rights index (HRI), employment by education level (EEL) and labor income share (LIS) variables are examined. As a result of correlation analyses, strong and positive correlations were found between the IIP and UER, HRI and LIS, and SER and HW. Moreover, the relationships between HW and EEL, SER and EEL, and HRI and SER are found to be negative. According to the results of the structural model, p=0.030 and R2 value of the model is 0.761, which shows that the model is significant and has a high explanatory power. According to the FsQCA analysis, all variables were found to be individually sufficient for the unemployment rate, while the absence of the NIF was determined as a necessary variable. Configuration analysis reveals that unemployment dynamics differ across countries, and these differences suggest guidelines for policymakers for sustainable development.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Unemployment , Labor Market , Social Policy , Structural Equation Modeling , fsQCA

Teşekkür

Araştırma felsefesi ve nitel araştırma yöntemlerinde katkısı yadsınamaz olan Prof. Dr. İlhan GÜNBAYI hocama teşekkürü borç bilirim.

Kaynakça

• Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. In Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 4, pp. 1043-1171). Elsevier.
• Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 4B, pp. 1043–1171). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
• Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Currency.
• Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Evans, D. S. (1992). The determinants of variations in selfemployment rates across countries and over time. WZB, Forschungsschwerpunkt Marktprozess und Unternehmensentwicklung.
• Articona, H. V., & Torres, R. C. (2024). Sustainable Digital Communication (SDC) from a Systems Perspective of Mediated Communication Processes in Business Organizations: A Basis for a Mathematical Model. In 2024 8th International Conference on Business and Information Management (ICBIM) (pp. 132-136). IEEE.
• Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of economic perspectives, 29(3), 3-30.
• Bassanini, A., & Duval, R. (2006). Employment Patterns in OECD Countries: Reassessing the Role of Policies and Institutions. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 486. OECD Publishing (NJ1).
• Becker, G. S. (1971). The economics of discrimination. (2d ed.)–chicago. IL: University of.
• Beveridge, W. H. B. (1944). Full employment in a free society: A summary. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London.
• Bhalotra, S., & Umana-Aponte, M. (2010). The dynamics of women's labour supply in developing countries (No. 4879). IZA Discussion Papers.
• Blanchflower, D. G. (2000). Self-employment in OECD countries. Labour economics, 7(5), 471-505.
• Böckerman, P., & Ilmakunnas, P. (2006). Do job disamenities raise wages or ruin job satisfaction?. International Journal of Manpower, 27(3), 290-302.
• Buvinic, M., Furst-Nichols, R., & Pryor, E. C. (2013). A roadmap for promoting women’s economic empowerment. UN Foundation and ExxonMobil.
• Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming (multivariate applications series) New York, NY: Routledge.
• Cahuc, P., & Carcillo, S. (2011). Is short-time work a good method to keep unemployment down?. Nordic Economic Policy Review, 1(1), 133-165.
• Caliendo, M., & Kritikos, A. S. (2010). Start-ups by the unemployed: characteristics, survival and direct employment effects. Small Business Economics, 35(1), 71-92.
• Cantillon, R. (1997). Essai sur la nature du commerce en général. INEd. ISBN 2-73-32-1018-1
• Canton, H. (2021). United nations educational, scientific and cultural organization—UNESCO. In The Europa Directory of International Organizations 2021 (pp. 359-365). Routledge.
• Checchi, D., & García‐Peñalosa, C. (2010). Labour market institutions and the personal distribution of income in the OECD. Economica, 77(307), 413-450.
• Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
• Constant, A. F., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2014). Self-employment against employment or unemployment: Markov transitions across the business cycle. Eurasian Business Review, 4, 51-87.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
• Crimmann, A., Wieβner, F., & Bellmann, L. (2010). The German work-sharing scheme: An instrument for the crisis (No. 994576373402676). International Labour Organization.
• Danermark, B., Ekström, M., & Karlsson, J. C. (2019). Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences. Routledge.
• Estevão, M., & Sá, F. (2008). The 35-hour workweek in France: Straightjacket or welfare improvement?. Economic Policy, 23(55), 418-463.
• Fairlie, R. W. (2013). Entrepreneurship, economic conditions, and the great recession. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 22(2), 207-231.
• Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of management journal, 54(2), 393-420.
• Golden, L. (2012). The effects of working time on productivity and firm performance, research synthesis paper. International Labor Organization (ILO) Conditions of Work and Employment Series, (33).
• Goodwin, B.R. (1967). A Growth Cycle, in Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth. Feinstein, C.H., Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Günbayi, I., & Sorm, S. (2018). Social paradigms in guiding social research design: The functional, interpretive, radical humanist and radical structural paradigms. Online Submission, 9(2), 57-76. ISSN-1309-6249
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., & Babin, B. j., & Anderson, RE (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Hanushek, E. A., Schwerdt, G., Wiederhold, S., & Woessmann, L. (2017). Coping with change: International differences in the returns to skills. Economics Letters, 153, 15-19.
• Hunt, J. (1999). Has work-sharing worked in Germany?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 117-148.
• Ianchovichina, E., Mottaghi, L., & Devarajan, S. (2015). Middle East and North Africa Economic Monitor, October 2015: Inequality, Uprisings, and Conflict in the Arab World.
• ILO & OECD (2015). The Labour Share in G20 Economies. Report prepared for the G20 Employment Working Group.
• ILO (2017). World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2017. International Labour Organization.
• ILO (2020). World Employment and Social Outlook 2020: Trends. International Labour Organization.
• ILO (2023). World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends for Youth 2023. International Labour Organization.
• ILO. (2020). Global employment trends for youth 2020: Technology and the future of jobs. International Labour Organisation (ILO).
• IMF (International Monetary Fund. Research Dept.). (2018). World economic outlook, April 2017: Gaining momentum?. International Monetary Fund.
• Jaumotte, F., & Buitron, C. (2015). Inequality and Labor Market Institutions. IMF staff discussion note. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
• Kabeer, N (2012). Women’s economic empowerment and inclusive growth: labour markets and enterprise development. Discussion Paper No. 29. Centre for Development Policy & Research, School of Oriental & African Studies, University of London.
• Kaldor, N. (1955). Alternative theories of distribution. The review of economic studies, 23(2), 83-100.
• Kalecki, M. (2021). Political aspects of full employment. In The Political Economy: Readings in the Politics and Economics of American Public Policy (pp. 27-31). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315495811
• Keynes, J. M. (1937). The general theory of employment. The quarterly journal of economics, 51(2), 209-223.
• Klasen, S., & Pieters, J. (2015). What explains the stagnation of female labor force participation in urban India?. The World Bank Economic Review, 29(3), 449-478.
• Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications. ISBN 978-1-4625-5191-0
• Kolev, A., & Saget, C. (2005). Towards a better understanding of the nature, causes and consequences of youth labor market disadvantage: Evidence for south-east Europe. World Bank.
• Kudoh, N., & Sasaki, M. (2011). Employment and hours of work. European Economic Review, 55(2), 176-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.04.002
• Landman, T. (2004). Measuring human rights: Principle, practice and policy. Human Rights Quarterly, 26(4), 906-931.
• Layard, P. R. G., Layard, R., Nickell, S. J., & Jackman, R. (2005). Unemployment: macroeconomic performance and the labour market. Oxford University Press, USA.
• Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School.
• Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics, 8th edn (1920). London, Mcmillan.
• Marx, K. (1976). Capital: A critique of political economy, Volume One. Penguin Books Ltd, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England
• Mincer, J. (1962). Labor force participation of married women: A study of labor supply. In Aspects of labor economics (pp. 63-105). Princeton University Press.
• Nickell, S. (1997). Unemployment and labor market rigidities: Europe versus North America. Journal of Economic perspectives, 11(3), 55-74.
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University.
• OECD (2018), Good Jobs for All in a Changing World of Work: The OECD Jobs Strategy, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264308817-en.
• OECD (2020), OECD Employment Outlook 2020: Worker Security and the COVID-19 Crisis, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/1686c758-en.
• OECD (2021). Education at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2025). Data Indicators, Unemployment rate forecast. OECD Data Explorer. https://www.oecd.org/en/data/indicators/unemployment-rate-forecast.html?oecdcontrol-6d464da75a-var3=2023&oecdcontrol-6d464da75a-var5=A
• Parker, S. C. (2004). The economics of self-employment and entrepreneurship. Cambridge university press.
• Pasinetti, L. L. (1962). Rate of profit and income distribution in relation to the rate of economic growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(4), 267-279.
• Peerenboom, R. (2004). Human rights and rule of law: What's the relationship. Geo. J. Int'l L., 36, 809.
• Pigou, A. C. (2013). Theory of unemployment. Routledge. eBook ISBN 9780203041536. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203041536
• Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.
• Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos, H. A. (2018). Returns to investment in education: a decennial review of the global literature. Education Economics, 26(5), 445-458.
• Ragin, C. C. (2009). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
• Ricardo, D. (1821). On the principles of political economy. London: J. Murray.
• Şahin, M., & Aybek, E. (2019). Jamovi: an easy to use statistical software for the social scientists. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 6(4), 670-692.
• Saridakis, G., Mendoza, M. A., Muñoz Torres, R. I., & Glover, J. (2016). The relationship between self-employment and unemployment in the long-run: A panel cointegration approach allowing for breaks. Journal of Economic Studies, 43(3), 358-379.
• Say, J. B. (1836). A treatise on political economy: or the production, distribution, and consumption of wealth. Grigg & Elliot.
• Scarpetta, S., Sonnet, A., & Manfredi, T. (2010). Rising youth unemployment during the crisis: how to prevent negative long-term consequences on a generation?
• Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press.
• Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American economic review, 51(1), 1-17.
• Sedita, S. R., Blasi, S., & Yang, J. (2022). The cultural dimensions of sustainable development: A cross‐country configurational analysis. Sustainable Development, 30(6), 1838-1849.
• Sen, A. (2014). Development as freedom (1999). The globalization and development reader: Perspectives on development and global change, 525.
• Smith, A. D. (1922). An Inquiry into the Nature and Cause of the Wealth of Nations (Vol. 2).
• Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355, 374.
• Stockhammer, E. (2013). Why have wage shares fallen? An analysis of the determinants of functional income distribution. In Wage-led growth: An equitable strategy for economic recovery (pp. 40-70). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
• Stockhammer, E. (2017). Determinants of the wage share: A panel analysis of advanced and developing economies. British journal of industrial relations, 55(1), 3-33.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using Multivariate Statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Thurik, A. R., Carree, M. A., Van Stel, A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2008). Does self-employment reduce unemployment?. Journal of business venturing, 23(6), 673-686.
• UNDP. (2022). Human Development Report 2021-22: Uncertain Times, Unsettled Lives: Shaping our Future in a Transforming World. New York.
• Verick, S. (2014). Female labor force participation in developing countries. IZA World of Labor.
• Walker, T. (2007). Why economists dislike a lump of labor. Review of Social Economy, 65(3), 279-291.
• Whittaker, T. A., & Schumacker, R. E. (2022). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Routledge.
• World Bank (2019). World Development Report 2019: The Changing Nature of Work. World Bank Group.
• World Bank Group. (2018). Women, business and the law 2018. World Bank Publications.
• https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/human-rights-index-vdem?tab=table#sources-and-processing (Erişim Tarihi: 15.02.2025).
• https://rshiny.ilo.org/dataexplorer1/?lang=en&id=SDG_0131_SEX_SOC_RT_A (Erişim Tarihi: 15.02.2025).
• https://rshiny.ilo.org/dataexplorer23/?lang=en&segment=indicator&id=UNE_2EAP_SEX_AGE_RT_A (Erişim Tarihi: 15.02.2025).
• https://www.oecd.org/en/data/indicators/employment-by-education-level.html?oecdcontrol-00b22b2429-var3=2024 (Erişim Tarihi: 15.02.2025).
• https://www.oecd.org/en/data/indicators/hours-worked.html?oecdcontrol-d7f68dbeee-var3=2023 (Erişim Tarihi: 13.02.2025).
• https://www.oecd.org/en/data/indicators/self-employment-rate.html?oecdcontrol-d7f68dbeee-var3=2023 (Erişim Tarihi: 15.02.2025).