A Research on the Environmental Identities and Environmental Risk Perceptions of Classroom and Science Teachers According to Different Variables

Abstract

Environmental identity in human environmental behaviour expresses the extent to which the person relates to the environment while defining himself or herself. The relationship between human and the environment is mutual, and human's understanding of environment is essential to the environment. Perception of environmental risk is subjective because it is about personal view of environmental risk. The purpose of this study is to evaluate classroom teachers' and science teachers' perceptions of environmental risks based on several variables. For this purpose, a total of 309 classroom and science teachers participated in the study. The instruments used for data collection were the Environmental Identity Scale and the Environmental Risk Perception Scale. Both descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted on the data obtained. The analyses conducted revealed that environmental identity and environmental risk perception were high among teachers, there were no differences between subjects, and there was a positive relationship between environmental identity and environmental risk perception.

Keywords

• Environmental identity
• environmental behavior
• environmental risk perception
• nature connectedness

Kaynakça

1. Altunoğlu, B. D., & Atav, E. S. (2009). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin çevre risk algısı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36, 1–11.
2. Bailey, K. D. (1994). Methods of social research (4. Ed.). The Free Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
3. Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices. In Pure and Applied Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198961091657
4. Blatt, E. N. (2013). Exploring environmental identity and behavioral change in an Environmental Science course. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8(2), 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9459-2
5. Bonan, J., Cattaneo, C., D’Adda, G., & Tavoni, M. (2021). Can social information programs be more effective? The role of environmental identity for energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 102467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102467
6. Böhm, G., & Tanner, C. (2019). Environmental risk perception. In L. Steg & J. I. M. De Groot (Ed.), Environmental Psychology: An Introduction (ss. 40–53). John Wiley & Sons.
7. Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. (4. Ed.). Oxford University Press Inc.
8. Carducci, A., Fiore, M., Azara, A., Bonaccorsi, G., Bortoletto, M., Caggiano, G., Calamusa, A., De Donno, A., De Giglio, O., Dettori, M., Di Giovanni, P., Di Pietro, A., Facciolà, A., Federigi, I., Grappasonni, I., Izzotti, A., Libralato, G., Lorini, C., Montagna, M. T., … Ferrante, M. (2019). Environment and health: Risk perception and its determinants among Italian university students. Science of the Total Environment, 691, 1162–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.201

9. Clayton, S. & Kilinç, A. (2013). Proenvironmental concern and behavior in Turkey: The role of national and environmental identity. PsyEcology, 4(3), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1174/217119713807749850
10. Clayton, S. & Opotow, S. (2004). Introduction: Identity and the natural environment. In Clayton, S. & Opotow, S. (Ed.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature. The MIT Press.
11. Clayton, S. (2003a). Environmental Identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature. (pp. 45–65). MIT Press.
12. Clayton, S. (2003b). Environmental Identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature. (pp. 45–65). MIT Press.
13. Clayton, S., Fraser, J., & Burgess, C. (2011). The role of zoos in fostering environmental identity. Ecopsychology, 3(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2010.0079
14. De Dominicis, S., Fornara, F., Ganucci Cancellieri, U., Twigger-Ross, C., & Bonaiuto, M. (2015). We are at risk, and so what? Place attachment, environmental risk perceptions and preventive coping behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.010
15. Devine-Wright, P., & Clayton, S. (2010). Introduction to the special issue: Place, identity and environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 267–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(10)00078-2
16. Durmuş-Özdemir, E. & Şener, S. (2016). The Impact of higher education on environmental risk perceptions. China-USA Business Review, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.17265/1537-1514/2016.09.005
17. Hernández Bernardo, B., Martín, A. M., Ruiz, C., & Hidalgo, M. del C. (2010). The role of place identity and place attachment in breaking environmental protection laws. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.009
18. Howitt, D. (2016). Introduction to qualitative methods in psychology (3th baskı). Pearson.
19. Kahyaoğlu, M. (2012). The relationship between teacher candidates’ environmental risk perceptions and problem solving skills. Içinde Journal of Education and Future (C. 2).
20. Kaya, M. F., Kahyaoğlu, M., & Birel, G. F. (2012). An evaluation of elementary teacher candidates’ environmental approaches, environmental risk perceptions and environmental behaviours. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 1098–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.602
21. Kızılay, E., & Tanık Önal, N. (2019). From the environmental identity to the behavior: The status of pre-service science teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 8(2), 271. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i2.19581
22. Lalot, F., Quiamzade, A., Falomir-Pichastor, J. M., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2019). When does self-identity predict intention to act green? A self-completion account relying on past behaviour and majority-minority support for pro-environmental values. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.002
23. Lavrakas, P. (Ed.). (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Sage.
24. Liu, T., Zhang, H., Li, X., & Zhang, H. (2020). Individual factors influencing risk perceptions of hazardous chemicals in China. Environmental Research, 186, 109523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109523
25. McDaniels, T. L., Axelrod, L. J., Cavanagh, N. S., & Slovic, P. (1997). Perception of ecological risk to water environments. Risk Analysis, 17(3), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00872.x
26. Öztarakçı, D. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının çevre dostu davranışları ve çevre kimlikleri. Balıkesir Üniversitesi.
27. Palancı, E., & Sarıkaya, M. (2019). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin çevre risk algı puanları ile fen bilimleri dersi akademik başarıları arasındaki ilişkinin araştırılması 1. Anadolu Kültürel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(1), 15–25.
28. Quinn, T., Bousquet, F., & Guerbois, C. (2019). Changing places: The role of sense of place in perceptions of social, environmental and overdevelopment risks. Global Environmental Change, 57, 101930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101930
29. Sam, N., Gürsakal, S., & Sam, R. (2010). Üniversite öğrencilerinin çevresel risk algısı ve çevresel tutumlarının belirlenmesi. Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 20, 1–16.
30. Sayan, B., & Kaya, H. (2016). Assessment of the environmental risk perceptions and environmental attitudes of nursing students. Contemporary Nurse, 52(6), 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2016.1254051
31. Schmitt, M. T., Mackay, C. M. L., Droogendyk, L. M., & Payne, D. (2018). What predicts environmental activism? The roles of identification with nature and politicized environmental identity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.11.003
32. Slimak, M. W., & Dietz, T. (2006). Personal values, beliefs, and ecological risk perception. Risk Analysis, 26(6), 1689–1705. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00832.x
33. Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x
34. Stapleton, S. R. (2015). Environmental ıdentity development through social ınteractions, action, and recognition. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(2), 94–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2014.1000813
35. Tanık Önal, N., Kılınç, A., & Saraçoğlu, S. (2020). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının çevre kimliklerinin ve çevre dostu davranışlarının incelenmesi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(3), 749–777. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.660668
36. Tümer, A., & Sümen, A. (2020). Ergenlerde çevresel risk algısının belirlenmesi (determining the environmental risk perception of adolescents). Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 142-150.
37. Yapici, G., Ögenler, O., Kurt, A. Ö., Koçaş, F. & Şaşmaz, T. (2017). Assessment of environmental attitudes and risk perceptions among university students in Mersin, Turkey. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5650926
38. Yaşaroğlu, C. (2012). İlköğretim birinci kademe öğrencilerinin çevreye yönelik tutum ve davranışlarının değerlendirilmesi [Doktora Tezi]. İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya.
39. Yaşaroğlu, C. (2020). Çevre psikolojisine giriş (C. Yaşaroğlu (Ed.)). Nobel.