Teacher Perceptions on the Concepts of Principal and Deputy Principal

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4, 39 - 54, 31.10.2021

Ramazan Ertürk Nuri Akgün

Öz

When the literature is examined, in some studies where the school administrator is considered a variable, only the school principal is considered the school administrator. In some studies, the views of the manager and assistant managers are evaluated together under the manager variable. This study aimed to reveal the metaphorical perceptions of teachers towards the principal and deputy principal to determine whether there is a difference between them and shed light on the scientific studies to be conducted. The research is qualitative, designed as a case study. The study group was formed by 289 teachers working in 9 public primary schools, 9 secondary schools and 7 high schools. The data of the study was collected by interview method and analysed by content analysis. According to the research results, there is a high level and significant difference between the concepts of principal and deputy principal according to the teachers' opinions. For this reason, these two concepts should be evaluated as two separate variables in scientific studies where the school administrator is taken as a variable.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Principal, deputy principal, teacher, metaphor

Kaynakça

• Akbaşlı, S. (2018). School administrator and school administrator's competencies. N. Cemaloğlu and M. G. Gülcan (Eds.), From theory to practice in school administration in (pp. 147-186). Pegem.
• Akçadağ, T. (2014). The school administrator’s viewpoints about training, assignment, and transposition; problems and solutions. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 1(29), 135-150.
• Aküzüm, C. (2017). Basic administrative problems and solution suggestions that founding administrators come across in the context of school management. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 16(60), 161-185.
• Altın, F., & Vatanartıran, S. (2014). A model proposal for the preparation, selection and professional development of school principals in Turkey. Journal of Ahi Evran University Kırşehir Faculty of Education, 15(2), 17-35.
• Aslanargun, E., & Bozkurt, S. (2012). Problems that principals face in school administration. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 11(2), 349-368.
• Aydoğdu, E. (2008). Analysis of school perceptions and ideal school perceptions of students and teachers in primary schools through metaphors [Unpublished master's thesis]. Osmangazi University, Eskişehir.
• Balcı, A. (2008). Organizational metaphors. Pegem.
• Balcı, A. (2014). Effective school and school development. Pegem.
• Balcı, A. (2015). Research methods, techniques, and principles in social sciences. Pegem.
• Balcı, A., Demirkasımoğlu, N., Erdoğan, Ç., & Akın, U. (2011). Turkish teachers’ and supervisors’ metaphorical perceptions about supervisors. International Research Journals, 2(10), 1602-1610.
• Balcı, A., & Pehlivan-Aydın, İ. (2003). Educational management for anatolian teacher high schools. National Education Press.
• Briggs, A R. (2005). Middle managers in english further edueation eolleges. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 33(1), 27-50.
• Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2003). Becoming a principal: role conception, initial socialization, role-identity transformation, purposeful engagement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(4), 468-503.
• Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2012). New structure and behavior in school management. Pegem.
• Büte, M., & Balcı, A. F. (2010). Preschool principals’ views on school management processes and related problems. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 16(4), 485-509.
• Cerit, Y. (2008). Students, teachers, and administrators' views on metaphors with respect to the concept of principal. Education and Science, 33(147), 3-13.
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design-choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Çelikten, M. (2006). Culture and teacher metaphors used in educational system. Erciyes University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 21, 269-283.
• Dogani, O. (2010). Management awareness and motivation. Karma.
• Dönmez, Ö. (2008). Manager metaphors used in Turkish education system (Kayseri Province Example). [Unpublished master's thesis]. Erciyes University Institute of Social Sciences, Kayseri.
• Döş, İ. (2010). Metaphoric perceptions of candidate teachers to the concept of inspectors. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 9(3), 607-629.
• Draaisma, D. (2007). Memory metaphors (G. Koca, trans.). Metis.
• Ekiz, D. (2009). Scientific research methods (2nd ed.). Anı.
• Ertürk, R., & Argon T. (2019). According to the teacher teamwork and social cop-out in schools. In 28th International Educational Sciences Congress Full Text Proceedings in (pp. 491-513). Hacettepe University Faculty of Education.
• George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (2008). Understanding and managing organizational behaviour. Pearson Prentice Hall.
• Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2010). Educational administration theory, research, and application (Translation Ed: S. Turan). Nobel.
• Jacobs, C., & Heracleous, L. T. (2006). Constructing shared understanding: the role of embodied metaphors in organization development. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42, 207-226.
• Koç, E. S. (2014). Metaphoric perceptions of classroom teacher candidates regarding teacher and teaching profession concepts. Inonu University Journal of Education, 15(1), 47-72.
• Korkmaz, M. (2005). Training school managers: problems, solutions, and suggestions. Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 25(3), 237-252.
• Köse, A. (2018). School vice-principals’ opinions about their profession: a self-evaluation study. Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research, 5(16), 191-211
• Kösterelioğlu, M. A. (2014). Metaphoric perception of preservice teachers towards the concept of school administrator. Journal of World of Turks, 6(3), 115-133.
• Linn, G. B., Sherman, R., & Gill, P. B. (2007). Making meaning of educational leadership: the principalship in metaphor. NASSP Bulletin, 91(2), 161-171.
• Loder, T. L., & Spil1ane, I. P. (2005). Is a principal stil a teacher? Us women administrators’ account of role conflict and role discontinuity. School Leadership and Management, 25(3), 263-279.
• Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (1996). Educational administration concepts and practice. Wadsworth.
• Memduhoğlu, H. B., & Meriç, E. (2014). Basic problems that school administrators cope with in the process of administration in the context of educational administration’s function. The Journal of International Social Research, 7(33), 653-666.
• Merriam, S. B. (2013). Qualitative research: a guide for design and practice (S. Turan, Trans.). Nobel.
• Mestry, R., & Grabler, B. R (2004). The training and development of principals to manage schools effectively using competence approach. International Studies in Educational Administration, 32(3), 2-19.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis. Sage.
• Monroe, C. E. (2003). An analysis of principalship metaphors at the beginning of the new millennium [Unpublished master thesis]. The University of North Carolina, Greensboro.
• Özyılmaz, Ö. (2013). Problems of turkish national education system and search for solutions. Pegem.
• Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (M. Bütün and S. B. Demir, Trans. Ed.).Pegem.
• Pipen, T. (2001). Metaphors and organizational identity in the Italian public services. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 16, 391-409.
• Saban, A. (2004). Entry level prospective classroom teachers’ metaphors about the concept of teacher. Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 131-155.
• Saban, A. (2009). Prospective teachers’ mental images about the concept of student. Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(2), 281-326.
• Schermerhorn, J. R., Hunt, J. G., & Osborn, R. N. (2011). Organizational behaviour (11th ed.). Wiley.
• Semerci, Ç. (2007). A view to the new primary school curricula with the metaphors relating to curriculum development. Cumhuriyet University Journal of Social Sciences, 31(1), 139-154.
• Sezgin, F. (2016). School administrator and leadership. S. Özdemir (Ed.), The structure, tendencies, and problems of the Turkish Education System. Within the Turkish Education System and school administration (pp. 129- 169). Pegem Academy.
• Şişman, M. (2012). The Quest for excellence in education: Effective Schools (3.bs.). Pegem.
• Yalçın, M., & Erginer, A. (2012). Metaphoric perception of principals in primary schools. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 1(2), 229-256.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in social sciences (9th ed.). Seçkin.
• Yıldız, K., & Ertürk, R. (2019). Teachers' views on the administrator and leadership concept: A metaphor study. Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University Faculty of Education Journal, 19(4), 1190-1216.
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Sage.