Stres Zihniyeti Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlamasının Psikometrik Özellikleri

Öz

Amaç: Bu araştırmada, Stres Zihniyeti Ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizleri yapılarak Türk kültürüne uyarlanması amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Tarama modeli ile yürütülen bu çalışmada kolay örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. 354 yetişkin bireyin katıldığı çalışmada veri toplama araçları olarak Stres Zihniyeti Ölçeği, Yaşam Doyumu Ölçeği ve Algılanan Stres Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Stres Zihniyeti Ölçeğinin güvenirliği için Cronbach Alfa ve iki yarı güvenirlik katsayısı kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonuçları iç tutarlılık katsayısının ,85 ve testi yarılama güvenirlik katsayısının ,76 olduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca katılımcılar arasında %27’lik alt üst gruplar arasındaki farkın istatiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu görülmüştür. Stres Zihniyeti ölçeğinin yapı geçerliliğini test etmek için Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Bulgular model uyum değerlerinin kabul edilebilir düzeyde olduğunu göstermiştir. Madde faktör yüklerinin .49 ve .78 arasında değiştiği ve ölçeğin tek faktörlü yapıya sahip olduğu görülmüştür. Bunun yanında ölçeğin yakınsak geçerliliğini sağlamak için yapılan analiz sonuçlarının istenen düzeyde olduğu görülmüştür. Ölçüt geçerliliği test etmek amacıyla algılanan stres ve yaşam doyumu kavramları kullanılmıştır. Sonuç: Türkçe uyarlaması yapılan Stres Zihniyeti Ölçeği geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Stres
• Zihniyet
• Stres Zihniyeti
• Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik

Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Adaptation of Stress Mindset Measure

Öz

Objective: This study aimed to adapt the Stress Mindset Measure to Turkish culture by conducting validity and reliability analyses. Method: Convenience sampling method was used in this study, which was conducted with the survey model. With 354 adult participants, Stress Mindset Measure, Life Satisfaction Scale and Perceived Stress Scale were used as data collection tools. Cronbach's alpha and two-half reliability coefficient were used for the reliability of the Stress Mindset Measur. The results of the analyses showed that the internal consistency coefficient was .85 and the split-half reliability coefficient was .76. Furthermore, the difference between the 27% lower and upper groups among the participants was statistically significant. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test the construct validity of the Stress Mindset Measure. Results: The model fit values were at an acceptable level. Item factor loadings ranged between .49 and .78 and the scale was found to have a single-factor structure. Besides, the results of the analyses conducted to ensure convergent validity were found to be at the desired level. The concepts of perceived stress and life satisfaction were used to test criterion validity. Conclusion: Turkish adaptation of the Stress Mindset Measures a valid and reliable measurement tool.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Stress
• Mindset
• Stress Mindset
• Validity and Reliability

Kaynakça

1. Brenman AM, Wegmann J, Zale EL, Mattson RE, Mastroleo NR (2024) The moderating role of stress mindset on the relationship between drinking to cope and alcohol consumption among undergraduate college student drinkers. Subst Use Misuse, 59:665-672.
2. Brislin RW, Lonner WJ, Thorndike, RM (1973) Cross-Cultural Research Methods. New York, Wiley.
3. Büyüköztürk Ş (2018) Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara, Pegem Akademi.
4. Büyüköztürk Ş, Kılıç Çakmak E, Akgün ÖE, Karadeniz Ş, Demirel F (2022) Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara, Pegem Akademi.
5. Casper A, Sonnentag S, Tremmel S (2017) Mindset matters: The role of employees’ stress mindset for day-specific reactions to workload anticipation. Eur J Work Organ Psy, 26:798-810.
6. Cheng Y, Jiang S, Chen J (2024) Academic expectation stress and online gaming disorder among Chinese adolescents: The mediating role of psychological distress and the moderating role of stress mindset. Child Youth Serv Rev, 158:107492.
7. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R (1983) A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav, 24:385-396.
8. Crum AJ, Salovey P, Achor S (2013) Rethinking stress: the role of mindsets in determining the stress response. J Pers Soc Psychol, 104:716-733.

9. Crum AJ, Akinola M, Martin A, Fath S (2017) The role of stress mindset in shaping cognitive, emotional, and physiological responses to challenging and threatening stress. Anxiety Stress Coping, 30:379-395.
10. Crum AJ, Jamieson JP, Akinola M (2020) Optimizing stress: An integrated intervention for regulating stress responses. Emotion, 20:120-125.
11. Dağlı A, Baysal N (2016) Yaşam doyumu ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanmasi: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15:1250-1263.
12. DeVellis RF (2017) Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
13. Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S (1985) The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess, 49:71-75.
14. Dweck CS, Chiu CY, Hong YY (1995) Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychol Inq, 6:267-285.
15. Doğan İ (2015) Farklı veri yapısı ve örneklem büyüklüklerinde yapısal eşitlik modellerinin geçerliği ve güvenirliğinin değerlendirilmesi. (Doktora tezi) Eskişehir, Osmangazi Üniversitesi.
16. Fornell C, Larcker D (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res, 18:39-50.
17. Gürbüz S, Şahin F (2018) Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara, Seçkin Yayıncılık.
18. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2014) Multivariate Data Analysis. New York, Pearson.
19. Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A (2010) The weirdest people in the world? Behav Brain Sci, 33:61-83.
20. Hecht CA, Gosling SD, Bryan CJ, Jamieson JP, Murray JS, Yeager DS (2023) When do the effects of single-session interventions persist? Testing the mindset + supportive context hypothesis in a longitudinal randomized trial. JCPP Adv, 3:e12191
21. Huebschmann NA, Sheets ES (2020) The right mindset: Stress mindset moderates the association between perceived stress and depressive symptoms. Anxiety Stress Coping, 33:248-255.
22. Ho R (2006) Handbook of Univariate and Multivariate Data Analysis and İnterpretation with SPSS. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press.
23. Iwamoto K, Takehashi H, Taka F (2020) Reliability and validity of a Japanese translation of the Stress Mindset Measure (SMM-J): e Japanese Journal of Psychology, 9:592-602.
24. Jamieson JP, Crum AJ, Goyer JP, Marotta ME, Akinola M (2018) Optimizing stress responses with reappraisal and mindset interventions: An integrated model. Anxiety Stress Coping, 31:245-261.
25. Jiang Y, Zhang J, Ming H, Huang S, Lin D (2019) Stressful life events and well-being among rural-to-urban migrant adolescents: The moderating role of the stress mindset and differences between genders. J Adolesc, 74:24-32.
26. Journault AA, Lupien SJ (2024) Stress mindsets matter: An overview of how individuals think about stress, its effect on biopsychosocial processes, and what we can do about it. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 160:106686.
27. Karampas K, Pezirkianidis C, Stalikas A (2020) Psychometric properties of the Stress Mindset Measure (SMM) in a Greek sample. Psychology, 11:1185-1199.
28. Karasar N (2018) Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi, 33.Basım. İstanbul, Nobel Yayıncılık
29. Kaya C, Tansey TN, Melekoglu M, Cakiroglu O, Chan F (2019) Psychometric evaluation of Turkish version of the Perceived Stress Scale with Turkish college students. J Ment Health, 28: 161-167.
30. Keech JJ, Hagger MS, O’Callaghan FV, Hamilton K (2018) The influence of university students’ stress mindsets on health and performance outcomes. Ann Behav Med, 52:1046-1059.
31. Keech JJ, Cole KL, Hagger MS, Hamilton K (2020) The association between stress mindset and physical and psychological wellbeing: Testing a stress beliefs model in police officers. Psychol Health, 35:1306-1325.
32. Kim J, Shin Y, Tsukayama E, Park D (2020) Stress mindset predicts job turnover among preschool teachers. J Sch Psychol, 78:13-22.
33. Kline RB (2011) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York, Guilford Press.
34. Klussman K, Huntoon Lindeman MI, Lee Nichols A, Langer J (2021) Stress mindset and well‐being: The indirect effect of self‐connection. J Theo Soc Psychol, 5:391-403.
35. Kuşci İ, Oğuz Duran N (2024) Yas Sürecinde Anlam Oluşturma Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 14:414-427.
36. Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984) Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, Springer.
37. Luu TT (2022) Family support and posttraumatic growth among tourism workers during the COVID-19 shutdown: The role of positive stress mindset. Tour Manage, 88:104399.
38. Mansell PC (2021) Stress mindset in athletes: Investigating the relationships between beliefs, challenge and threat with psychological wellbeing. Psychol Sport Exerc, 57:102020.
39. Meydan CM, Şeşen H (2015) Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi AMOS Uygulamaları. Ankara, Detay Yayıncılık.
40. Meyer HH, Stutts, LA (2024) The effect of mindset interventions on stress and academic motivation in college students. Innovative Hıgh Educ, 49: 783-798.
41. Mierzejewska-Floreani D, Banaszkiewicz M, Gruszczyńska E (2022) Psychometric properties of the Stress Mindset Measure (SMM) in the Polish population. Plos One, 17:e0264853.
42. Murphy ER (2021) Is this stress beneficial? Stress mindset beliefs for specific categories of stressors (Masters thesis). Washington DC, American University.
43. Ocak M (2020) AMOS ile Adım Adım Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli Uygulamaları. Bursa, Ekin Yayıncılık.
44. Quick JC, Bennett J, Blake Hargrove M (2014) Stress, health, and wellbeing in practice: Workplace leadership and leveraging stress for positive outcomes. In Work and wellbeing (Eds PY Chen, CL Cooper):175–204. New York, Wiley Blackwell.
45. Shrestha N (2021) Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. Am J Appl Math Statistics, 9:4-11.
46. Seong H, Lee S, Lee T, Jang GE, Lee SM (2023) Psychometric properties and validation of the Korean version of Stress Mindset Measure. Sage Open, 13:21582440231181434.
47. Shin I, Park S, Kim M, Hahm S (2024) The way to improve mental health and change stress mindset by using online education platform. International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology, 12:124-139.
48. Sümer N (2000), Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3:49-73.
49. Türk N, Gündoğdu S (2024) Stress mindset theory. International Scientific Compilation Research Congress, Ankara.
50. Ullman JB (2001) Structural equation modelling. In Using Multivariate Statistics. (Eds BG Tabachnick, LS Fidell). Boston, Pearson Education.
51. Walker KA, Jiang X (2022) An examination of the moderating role of growth mindset in the relation between social stress and externalizing behaviors among adolescents. J Adolesc, 94;69-80.
52. Wegmann JS (2018) The moderating effects of stress mindset on well-being (Doctoral dissertation). New York, State University of New York.
53. Williams SE, Ginty AT (2024) Improving stress mindset through education and imagery. Anxiety Stress Coping, 37:419-427.
54. Yaşlıoğlu MM (2017) Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46:74-85.
55. Yeager DS, Bryan CJ, Gross JJ, Murray JS, Krettek Cobb D, HF Santos P et al. (2022) A synergistic mindsets intervention protects adolescents from stress. Nature, 607:512-520.