Derleme

Saldırganlık Türleri ile Yürütücü İşlevler Arasındaki İlişki: Meta-Analiz Çalışması

Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3 Erken Görünüm Tarihi: 12 Aralık 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

Relationship Between Types of Aggression and Executive Functions: A Meta-Analysis Study

Abstract

This meta-analysis systematically reviewed original research examining the relationship between executive function (EF) and different forms (physical and relational) and functions (reactive and proactive) of aggression. The primary aim was to clarify how cognitive control processes, such as inhibition, working memory, and cognitive flexibility, relate to distinct patterns of aggressive behavior. A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, Scopus, and PsycINFO, including studies that assessed EF using validated measures and reported correlation coefficients with aggression variables. After screening according to PRISMA guidelines, 24 studies involving 10,181 participants met the inclusion criteria. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled effect sizes, taking into account variability across studies. The results showed that the strongest average correlation was found between executive function and physical aggression (r = .14, p = .29), though this association did not reach statistical significance. The weakest correlation emerged between EF and reactive aggression (r = –.003, p = .97), suggesting virtually no relationship. Similarly, correlations between EF and proactive aggression (r = .14, p = .09) and relational aggression (r = .007, p = .93) were weak and non-significant. Considerable heterogeneity was observed across all models (I² > 95%), indicating that study differences in design, sample characteristics, and measurement tools may have influenced results. Overall, the findings reveal a complex and inconsistent pattern linking executive functioning and aggression.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Anderson CA, Bushman BJ (2002) Human aggression. Annu Rev Psychol, 53:27-51.
  2. Andreou E (2006) Social preference, perceived popularity and social intelligence: Relations to overt and relational aggression. Sch Psychol Int, 27:339-351.
  3. Baker ER, Jensen CJ, Tisak MS (2019) A closer examination of aggressive subtypes in early childhood: Contributions of executive function and single-parent status. Early Child Dev Care, 189:733-746.
  4. Barker ED, Séguin JR, White HR, Bates ME, Lacourse E, Carbonneau R et al. (2007) Developmental trajectories of male physical violence and theft: Relations to neurocognitive performance. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 64:592-599.
  5. Bergeron TK, Valliant PM (2001) Executive function and personality in adolescent and adult offenders vs non-offenders. J Offender Rehabil, 33:27-45.
  6. Best JR, Miller PH (2010) A developmental perspective on executive function. Child Dev, 81:1641-1660.
  7. Björkqvist K, Lagerspetz KM, Kaukiainen A (1992) Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggress Behav, 18:117-127.
  8. Borenstein M, Cooper H, Hedges L, Valentine J (2009) Effect sizes for continuous data. In The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis, 2nd ed. (Eds H Cooper, LV Hedges, JC Valentine):221-235. New York, Russell Sage Foundation.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Klinik Psikoloji

Bölüm

Derleme

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

12 Aralık 2025

Yayımlanma Tarihi

-

Gönderilme Tarihi

16 Haziran 2025

Kabul Tarihi

1 Kasım 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1970 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

JAMA
1.Halil G, Cihan H. Relationship Between Types of Aggression and Executive Functions: A Meta-Analysis Study. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar.;18:1089–1104.

Creative Commons Lisansı
Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar Creative Commons Atıf-Gayriticari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.