Relationship Between Intolerance of Uncertainty and Cyberchondria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Öz

Cyberchondria is a phenomenon characterized by individuals engaging in excessive and repetitive online searches for health-related information to alleviate their concerns, which can lead to anxiety and behavioral disorders. Recent studies have shown that intolerance of uncertainty is an important psychological factor that increases cyberchondria, however, there is a notable lack of systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining the relationship between these two variables. The aim of this study is to systematically review and meta-analyze quantitative research published between 2020 and 2025 that investigates the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and cyberchondria, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Following a comprehensive search in the Web of Science, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and DergiPark databases, 21 studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the meta-analysis. The analyses revealed a moderate and significant positive relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and cyberchondria, with no significant effect of moderator variables such as year and country. The findings contribute significantly to the literature by enhancing the understanding of the impact of individual psychological characteristics on online health information-seeking behaviors and highlight the need for future research to consider different methodological approaches and moderator variables.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Intolerance of uncertainty
• cyberchondria
• systematic review
• meta-analysis

Belirsizliğe Tahammülsüzlük ve Siberkondri Arasındaki İlişki: Sistematik Derleme ve Meta-Analiz

Öz

Siberkondri, bireylerin sağlıkla ilgili endişelerini gidermek amacıyla internet üzerinden aşırı ve tekrarlayan bilgi arayışına girmesiyle ortaya çıkan, kaygı ve davranışsal bozukluklara yol açabilen bir olgudur. Son yıllarda yapılan araştırmalar, belirsizliğe tahammülsüzlüğün siberkondriyi artıran önemli bir psikolojik faktör olduğunu göstermektedir, ancak bu iki değişken arasındaki ilişkiyi sistematik olarak inceleyen derleme ve meta-analiz çalışmalarının eksikliği dikkat çekmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, 2020-2025 yılları arasında yayımlanan ve belirsizliğe tahammülsüzlük ile siberkondri arasındaki ilişkiyi nicel olarak inceleyen araştırmaları PRISMA rehberine uygun şekilde sistematik olarak derlemek ve meta-analiz yöntemiyle genel eğilimleri ortaya koymaktır. Web of Science, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar ve DergiPark veri tabanlarında yapılan kapsamlı tarama sonucunda, dahil edilme kriterlerini karşılayan 21 çalışma meta-analize alınmış. Analizler sonucunda, belirsizliğe tahammülsüzlük ile siberkondri arasında orta düzeyde ve anlamlı bir pozitif ilişki saptanmış, yıl ve ülke gibi moderatör değişkenlerin bu ilişki üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi olmadığı görülmüştür. Bulgular, bireysel psikolojik özelliklerin çevrim içi sağlık arama davranışları üzerindeki etkisinin anlaşılması açısından literatüre önemli katkılar sunmakta ve gelecekte yapılacak araştırmalarda farklı metodolojik yaklaşımların ve moderatör değişkenlerin dikkate alınmasının gerekliliğine işaret etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Belirsizliğe tahammülsüzlük
• siberkondri
• sistematik derleme
• meta-analiz

Kaynakça

1. Abdulrahman KAB, Musfir SKA, Alforaih AS, Alshehri AM, Aldossari AK, Dawood FDB (2024) The prevalence of cyberchondria and the impact of skepticism on medical decisions among Imam Mohammed Ibn Saud Islamic University students, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Family Med Prim Care, 13:5334-5340.
2. Ahadzadeh AS, Sharif SP, Ong FS (2018) Online health information seeking among women: the moderating role of health consciousness. Online Inf Rev, 42: 58-72.
3. Al Dameery K, Quteshat M, Al Harthy I, Alkhawaldeh A, Khalaf A (2021) Cyberchondria, uncertainty, and psychological distress during COVID-19: An online cross-sectional survey. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 48:140-146.
4. Arsenakis S, Chatton A, Penzenstadler L, Billieux J, Berle D, Starcevic V et al. (2021) Unveiling the relationships between cyberchondria and psychopathological symptoms. J Psychiatr Res, 143:254-261.
5. Aydın A, Kargın M, Çalışkan E (2023) The effect of coronavirus anxiety and intolerance of uncertainty on cyberchondria during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic in Türkiye. Archives of Health Science and Research, 10:155-159.
6. Bahadir O, Dundar C (2024) The impact of online health information source preference on intolerance to uncertainty and cyberchondria in a youthful generation. Indian J Psychiatry, 66:360-366.
7. Bajcar B, Babiak J (2020) Neuroticism and cyberchondria: The mediating role of intolerance of uncertainty and defensive pessimism. Pers Individ Dif, 162:110006.
8. Batool I, Batool H (2022) Cyberchondria: Role of potential risk factors. Khyber Medical University Journal, 14:251-255.

9. Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50:1088-1101.
10. Błoch M, Misiak B (2025) Problematic online behaviors and their early patterns of co-occurrence in young adults: Insights from directed and undirected networks. Front Psychiatry, 16:1446338.
11. Boysan M, Eşkisu M, Çam Z (2022) Relationships between fear of COVID‐19, cyberchondria, intolerance of uncertainty, and obsessional probabilistic inferences: A structural equation model. Scand J Psychol, 63:439-448.
12. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to Meta-Analysi. Hoboken, NJ, Wiley.
13. Borenstein M, Higgins JP, Hedges LV, Rothstein HR (2017) Basics of meta‐analysis: I2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity. Res Synth Methods, 8:5-18.
14. Bottesi G, Marino C, Vieno A, Ghisi M, Spada MM (2022) Psychological distress in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: The joint contribution of intolerance of uncertainty and cyberchondria. Psychol Health, 37:1396-1413.
15. Bueno-de la Fuente C, Núñez-Rodríguez S, De la Fuente-Anuncibay R, González-Bernal, JJ (2025). Relationship between leadership, personality, and the dark triad in workplace: A systematic review. Behav Sci (Basel), 15:297.
16. Buhr K, Dugas MJ (2002) The intolerance of uncertainty scale: Psychometric properties of the English version. Behav Res Ther, 40:931-945.
17. Carleton RN (2016) Into the unknown: A review and synthesis of contemporary models involving uncertainty. J Anxiety Disord, 39:30-43.
18. Carleton RN, Norton MPJ, Asmundson GJ (2007) Fearing the unknown: A short version of the ıntolerance of uncertainty scale. J Anxiety Disord, 21:105-117.
19. Clark GI, Rock AJ, Clark LH, Murray‐Lyon K (2020) Adult attachment, worry and reassurance seeking: Investigating the role of intolerance of uncertainty. Clin Psychol, 24: 294-305.
20. Dugas MJ, Gagnon F, Ladouceur R, Freeston MH (1998) Generalized anxiety disorder: A preliminary test of a conceptual model. Behav Res Ther, 36:215-226.
21. Dugas MJ, Laugesen N, Bukowski WM (2012) Intolerance of uncertainty, fear of anxiety, and adolescent worry. J Abnorm Child Psychol, 40:863-870.
22. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315:629-634.
23. Erdoğan A, Hocaoglu C (2020) Siberkondria: Bir gözden geçirme. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 12:435-443.
24. Fergus TA (2013) Cyberchondria and intolerance of uncertainty: Examining when individuals experience health anxiety in response to Internet searches for medical information. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 16:735-739.
25. Foroughi A, Taheri AA, Khanjani S, Mohammadpour M, Amiri S, Parvizifard AA, McElroy E (2022) Psychometric properties of Iranian version of the cyberchondria severity scale (short-form of CSS). J Consum Health Internet, 26:131-145.
26. Freeston MH, Rhéaume J, Letarte H, Dugas MJ, Ladouceur R (1994) Why do people worry? Pers Individ Dif, 17:791-802.
27. Ghouri AW, Wang G, Hussain MA, Li Z, Chin T (2024) Provoking buying behaviors amid crises: Unfolding the underlying mechanisms of psychological impairments. Int J Ment Health Promot, 26:279-291.
28. Gu C, Qian L, Zhuo X (2025) Mindfulness intervention for health information avoidance in older adults: Mixed methods study. JMIR Public Health Surveill, 11:e69554..
29. Guo Y, Wang Y, Li Y (2025) Online health information seeking and cyberchondria among men at risk of HIV infection: A moderated mediation model. J Psychol Human Sex, 37:102-115.
30. Infanti A, Starcevic V, Schimmenti A, Khazaal Y, Karila L, Giardina A et al. (2023) Predictors of cyberchondria during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional study using supervised machine learning. JMIR Form Res, 7:e42206.
31. Joanna Briggs Institute (2017) Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses.Adelaide, Australia, Joanna Briggs Institute.
32. Jokić-Begić N, Mikac U, Čuržik D, Sangster Jokić C (2019). The development and validation of the short cyberchondria scale (SCS). J Psychopathol Behav Assess, 41:662-676.
33. Jungmann SM, Witthöft M (2020) Health anxiety, cyberchondria, and coping in the current COVID-19 pandemic: Which factors are related to coronavirus anxiety? J Anxiety Disord, 73:102239.
34. Khademizadeh S, Rafieinasab F, Radhakrishnan N (2024) The challenging triangle: Online health information seeking, uncertainty, and cyberchondria. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 22:247-259.
35. Krain AL, Gotimer K, Hefton S, Ernst M, Castellanos FX, Pine DS et al. (2008) A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of uncertainty in adolescents with anxiety disorders. Biol Psychiatry, 63:563-568.
36. Laato S, Islam AN, Islam MN, Whelan E (2020) What drives unverified information sharing and cyberchondria during the COVID-19 pandemic? Eur J Inf Syst, 29:288-305.
37. McElroy E, Shevlin M (2014) The development and initial validation of the cyberchondria severity scale (CSS). J Anxiety Disord, 28:259-265.
38. Mihić L, Sokić J, Samac N, Ignjatović I (2014). Srpska adaptacija i validacija Upitnika netolerancije na neizvesnost. Primenjena Psihologija, 7:347–370.
39. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339:b2535.
40. Nesibe GM, Ceylan B (2022) Intolerance to uncertainty and cyberchondria during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Caring Sci, 15:1556-1564.
41. Norr AM, Albanese BJ, Oglesby ME, Allan NP, Schmidt NB (2015) Anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty as potential risk factors for cyberchondria. J Affect Disord, 174:64-69.
42. Percheski C, Hargittai E (2011) Health information-seeking in the digital age. J Am Coll Health, 59:379-386.
43. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol, 88:879-903.
44. Primastio GD, Masyithah IU, Maulero R (2023). Differcence in levels of hardiness personality between generation x, generation y, and generation z. KnE Social Sciences, 19:82-93.
45. Rashid Z, Rathore MA, Khushk IA, Mashhadi SF, Ahmed M, Shahzeb M (2022) Intolerance of uncertainty and anxiety sensitivity as prospective risk factors for cyberchondria in undergraduate students. Ann King Edw Med Univ, 28:91-96.
46. Rashid N, Shahid A, Munir M, Khan MU, Ramzan Z (2023) Role of anxiety sensitivity, intolerance of uncertainty, and cyberchondria behaviors among individuals diagnosed with COVID-19: Role of anxiety sensitivity and cyberchondria behaviors. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 4:122-128.
47. Rayyan (2016) Intelligent systematic review tool. https://www.rayyan.ai/ (Accessed 24.05.2025)
48. Rosenthal R (1979) The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychol Bull, 86:638-641.
49. Serafica J, Muria N, Punzalan AGB, Famadico ZJR, Saldua JP (2024) Caught in the web: The relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and cyberchondria among employees in a private institution in Lipa City. Journal of Education and Liberal Studies, 1:1-12.
50. Starcevic V, Berle D (2013) Cyberchondria: Towards a better understanding of excessive health-related internet use. Expert Rev Neurother, 13:205-213.
51. Starcevic V, Berle D, Arnáez S (2020) Recent insights into cyberchondria. Curr Psychiatry Rep, 22:55-62.
52. Tatli Z, Tatli O, Kokoc M (2019). Development and validity of cyberchondria tendency scale. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 11:1-9.
53. Van Ekris E, Altenburg TM, Singh AS, Proper KI, Heymans MW, Chinapaw MJ (2016). An evidence‐update on the prospective relationship between childhood sedentary behaviour and biomedical health indicators: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Obes Rev, 17:833-849.
54. Vujić A, Volarov M, Latas M, Demetrovics Z, Kiraly O, Szabo A (2024) Are cyberchondria and intolerance of uncertainty related to smartphone addiction? Int J Ment Health Addict, 22:3361-3379.
55. Wang P, Chen W, Li L, Yi M, Ding H (2025) Exploring the routines from fear of missing out to cyberchondria via a dual system perspective. Int J Hum Comput Interact, 41:9137–9150.
56. White RW, Horvitz E (2009) Cyberchondria: Studies of the escalation of medical concerns in web search. ACM Trans Inf Syst, 27:23.
57. Wu X, Nazari N, Griffiths MD (2021) Using fear and anxiety related to COVID-19 to predict cyberchondria: Cross-sectional survey study. J Med Internet Res, 23:e26285.
58. Xu RH, Liang X, Starcevic V (2025) Exploring the relationship between cyberchondria and suicidal ideation: Cross-sectional mediation analysis. J Med Internet Res, 27:e72414..
59. Yığman F, Fidan S (2021) Transdiagnostik faktör olarak belirsizliğe tahammülsüzlük. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 13:573-587.
60. Yılmaz Y, Bahadır E, Erdoğan A (2021) Investigation of the relationships between cyberchondria, anxiety sensitivity, somatosensory amplification, and intolerance to uncertainty. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi, 24:450-458.
61. Zheng H, Chen X, Fu S (2020) An exploration of determinants of cyberchondria: A moderated mediation analysis. Proc Assoc Inf Sci Technol, 57:e214.