Dijital Füg: Sosyal Kaygı ve Çevresel Baskılar Karşısında Durumsal Dijital Kaçışın Kavramsallaştırılması

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, bireylerin günlük yaşamda karşılaştıkları sosyal kaygı ve çevresel baskılar karşısında dijital cihazlara yönelme deneyimlerini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Yöntem: Araştırma, fenomenolojik desende yürütülmüş nitel bir çalışmadır. Veriler, amaçlı örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilen 12 katılımcıyla gerçekleştirilen yarı yapılandırılmış odak grup görüşmeleri aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Görüşmeler, katılımcıların dijital cihazlara hangi bağlamlarda, hangi duygusal ve sosyal gerekçelerle yöneldiklerini ortaya koymaya odaklanmıştır. Bulgular: Analiz sonucunda dört temel tema ortaya çıkmıştır: (1) sosyal etkileşimden ve sosyal baskıdan kaçınma amacıyla dijital cihazlara yönelme, (2) çevresel stresörlerden zihinsel olarak uzaklaşma, (3) dijital cihazların zihinsel kaçış ve kaygı düzenleme aracı olarak kullanılması ve (4) bu yönelimin durumsal ve geçici bir nitelik taşıması. Katılımcılar, kalabalık ve kaygı uyandıran ortamlarda dijital cihazları psikolojik bir kalkan işlevi görecek biçimde kullanarak fiziksel ortamdan kopmadan zihinsel bir geri çekilme yaşadıklarını ifade etmişlerdir. Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın bulguları, bireylerin dijital cihazlara yönelme davranışlarının mevcut dijital bağımlılık ve patoloji temelli kavramlarla tam olarak açıklanamayacağını göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dijital füg
• dijital kaçış
• sosyal kaygı
• baş etme stratejileri
• dijital davranışlar

Digital Fugue: Conceptualizing Situation-Specific Digital Escape in the Context of Social Anxiety and Societal Pressures

Öz

Objective: This study aims to examine individuals’ experiences of turning to digital devices in response to social anxiety and societal pressures they encounter in daily life. Method: The research is a qualitative study conducted using a phenomenological design. Data were collected through semi-structured focus group interviews with 12 participants selected using purposive sampling. The interviews focused on identifying the contexts in which participants turned to digital devices and the emotional and social motivations behind their use. Results: The analysis revealed four main themes: (1) turning to digital devices to avoid social interaction and social pressure, (2) mentally distancing oneself from external stressors, (3) using digital devices as a means of mental escape and anxiety regulation, and (4) the situational and temporary nature of this tendency. Participants reported experiencing a form of mental withdrawal—without disconnecting from their physical surroundings—by using digital devices as a psychological shield in crowded and anxiety-inducing environments. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that individuals’ behavior in turning to digital devices cannot be fully explained by existing concepts based on digital addiction and pathology.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Digital fugue
• digital escape
• social anxiety
• coping strategies
• digital behaviors

Kaynakça

1. Acuner E, Turan Y (2024) Dijital bağımlılık farkındalığı için dijital detoks turizmi deneyimi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15:312-331.
2. Alrobai A, McAlaney J, Phalp KT, Ali R (2016) Exploring the risk factors of interactive e-health interventions for digital addiction. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development, 8:1-15.
3. APA (2013) Diagnostic And Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5™ (5th Ed.). Washington DC, American Psychiatric Association.
4. Balcı Ş, Kaya E (2023) Yaşantısal kaçınma ile dijital bağımlılık ilişkisinde dijital araç kullanımının aracılık rolü. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 44:1-22.
5. Billieux J, Maurage P, Lopez-Fernandez O, Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD (2015) "Can disordered mobile phone use be considered a behavioral addiction? an update on current evidence and a comprehensive model for future research." Curr Addict Rep, 2:156-162.
6. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol, 3:77–101.
7. Christakis DA (2019) The challenges of defining and studying “digital addiction” in children. JAMA, 321:2277–2278.
8. Elhai JD, Levine JC, Dvorak RD, Hall BJ (2016) Fear of missing out, need for touch, anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use. Comput Human Behav, 63:509–516.

9. Elhai JD, Dvorak RD, Levine JC, Hall BJ (2017) Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology. J Affect Disord, 207:251–259.
10. Griffiths M (2005) A ‘components’ model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. J Subst Use, 10:191–197.
11. Guba EG., Lincoln YS (1989) The Methodology of Fourthy Generation Evaulation. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
12. Hall T, Peters N (2022) Age and gender differences in digital escapism: A comparative analysis. Behav Sci Rev, 19:58-75.
13. Kanbay Y, Akçam A, Özbay SÇ, Özbay Ö, Fırat M (2022a) Developing Fırat Nomophobia Scale and investigating its psychometric properties. Perspect Psychiatr Care, 58:2534-2541.
14. Kanbay Y, Fırat M, Akçam A, Çınar S, Özbay Ö (2022b) Development of Fırat Netlessphobia Scale and investigation of its psychometric properties. Perspect Psychiatr Care, 58:1258-1266.
15. Kassymova M, Berdibayeva S, Kukubayeva A, Garber A, Berdibayev S (2025) A digital escapism and stress: exploring the connection. The Journal of Psychology & Sociology, 94(3):4-13.
16. Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD (2017) Social networking sites and addiction: ten lessons learned. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 14:311.
17. Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984) The Concept Of Coping stress. Appraisal, and Coping. New York, Springer.
18. Lisenkova AA, Trufanova EO (2023) Digital Escapism—from addiction to asceticism. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 5(3):17-34.
19. Mutsvairo B, Ragnedda M, Mabvundwi K (2023) ‘Our old pastor thinks the mobile phone is a source of evil.’ Capturing contested and conflicting insights on digital wellbeing and digital detoxing in an age of rapid mobile connectivity. Media International Australia, 189:89–103.
20. Panova T, Lleras A (2016) "Avoidance or boredom: negative mental health outcomes associated with the use of information and communication technologies depend on users' motivations. Comput Human Behav, 58:249-258.
21. Patton MQ (2014) Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
22. Primack BA, Karim SA, Shensa A, Bowman N, Knight J, Sidani JE (2019) Positive and negative experiences on social media and perceived social isolation. Am J Health Promot, 33:859–868.
23. Przybylski AK, Weinstein N (2013) Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. J Soc Pers Relat, 30:237-246.
24. Reinecke L, Wolf A (2020) Media Use as Individual Coping with Psychological Stress. In The Routledge Handbook of Media Use and Well-Being (Eds L Reinecke, MB Oliver):135-148. London,UK, Routledge.
25. Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B et al. (2018) Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant, 52:1893–1907.
26. Shensa A, Sidani JE, Dew MA, Escobar-Viera CG, Primack B (2018) Social media use and depression and anxiety symptoms: a cluster analysis. Am J Health Behav, 42:116-128.
27. Subudhi RN, Das SC, Sahu S (2020) Digital escapism. Horizon Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 2(S):37-44.
28. Sundler AJ, Lindberg E, Nilsson C, Palmér L (2019) Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology. Nurs Open, 6:733-739.
29. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care, 19:349–357.
30. Turel O, Serenko A (2012) The role of self-esteem and self-efficacy in the problematic use of information technologies. Comput Human Behav, 28:1347-1357.
31. Turkle S (2011) Networked: Anxiety. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less From Each Other. New York, Basic Books.
32. Twenge JM (2017) Igen: Why Today's Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy - And Completely Unprepared for Adulthood. New York, Atria Books.
33. Vanden Abeele, M, Hendrickson AT, Pollmann MMH, Ling R (2019). Phubbing behavior in conversations and its relation to perceived conversation intimacy and distraction: An exploratory observation study. Comput Human Behav, 100:35–47.
34. World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310: 2191–2194.