EN
TR
Psychometric Properties of Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale - Short Form in Turkish Community Sample
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the short form of the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale in Turkish community sample. The sample consisted of 236 participants aged between 18-60. The structure of the scale was examined by confirmatory factor analysis. Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form, Emotional Reactivity Scale and Brief Symptom Inventory (depression, somatization, anxiety and obsessive symptoms subscales) were used for the validity study. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis it was seen that the structure model which has 6 subscale and 2 composite scale was in consistent with the structure of the original scale. Multiple linear regression analysis results indicated that the most predictive variable for somatization, obsessive symptoms and anxiety was general negative reactivity and for depression it was general positive reactivity. No differentiation was found between the subscales and composite scales of Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale – Short Form according to the gender. As a result of reliability analysis the Cronbach’s Alpha values were found as 0.91 for general negative reactivity, 0.92 for general positive reactivity, 0.76 for negative-activation, 0.81 for negative-intensity, 0.85 for negative-duration, 0.79 for positive-activation, 0.82 for positive-intensity, 0.83 for positive-duration. As a result it was determined that Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale – Short Form is a valid and reliable scale for Turkish community.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- Bachorowski JA, Braaten EB. (1994). Emotional intensity: measurement and theoretical implications. Pers Indiv Differ, 17(2): 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90025-6
- Barnhart WR, Braden AL, Jordan AK. (2020). Negative and positive emotional eating uniquely interact with ease of activation, intensity, and duration of emotional reactivity to predict increased binge eating. Appetite, 151: 104688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104688
- Barrett LF, Gross J, Christensen TC, Benvenuto M. (2001). Knowing what you're feeling and knowing what to do about it: Mapping the relation between emotion differentiation and emotion regulation. Cogn Emot, 15(6): 713–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000239
- Becerra R, Campitelli G. (2013). Emotional reactivity: critical analysis and proposal of a new scale. Int J Appl Psychol, 3(6), 161-168. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijap.20130306.03
- Becerra R, Preece D, Campitelli G, Scott-Pillow G. (2019). The assessment of emotional reactivity across negative and positive emotions: development and validation of the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale (PERS). Assessment, 26(5): 867-879. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117694455
- Benning SD, Ait Oumeziane B. (2017). Reduced positive emotion and underarousal are uniquely associated with subclinical depression symptoms: Evidence from psychophysiology, self-report, and symptom clusters. Psychophysiology, 54(7): 1010-1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12853
- Bilge Y. (2020). Davranışsal İnhibisyon Sistemi ve Davranışsal Aktivasyon Sistemi Ölçeğinin Türk toplum örnekleminde psikometrik özellikleri. Psikiyatr Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 12(Supply 1): 219-234. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.785113
- Bjureberg J, Ljótsson B, Tull MT, Hedman E, Sahlin H, Lundh LG et al.(2016). Development and validation of a brief version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: The DERS-16. J Psychopathol Behav Assess, 38(2): 284-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-015-9514-x
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
Psikoloji
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
29 Aralık 2021
Gönderilme Tarihi
14 Ağustos 2021
Kabul Tarihi
31 Ekim 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 1970 Cilt: 13 Sayı: Ek 1
