Discussing the Digitalization of the State: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Digital Government Literature

Öz

This study aims to reveal the general view of scientific studies on the digitalization of the state from different perspectives by using bibliometric analysis method. Digital government represents the transformation of the public sector into the next stage of public administration and the delivery of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) based services. The digitization of government is a way to improve public services increase people's participation, transparency, accountability and inclusion. The study from 1998 to 2022, 764 documents in the WoS database were examined. Documents were classified, classified and visualized with Bibliometrix R Studio software. The study was filtered using "Digital Government" "Digital Governance". It was seen that a total of 1465 authors worked in this field in 77 countries. The country with the most publications is the USA, with 469. Again, the country with the highest number of citations in the USA with 3876. The most-published author is Marijn Janssen, with 106 publications, and the most prolific publisher is the Government Information Quarterly. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Digital Government
• Digital Governance
• Bibliometric Analysis
• Bibliometrix

Devletin Dijitalleşmesini Tartışmak: Dijital Hükümet Literatürü Üzerine Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Öz

Bu çalışma, bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi kullanarak, devletin dijitalleşmesiyle ilgili bilimsel çalışmaların genel görünümünü farklı açılardan ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Dijital hükümet, kamu sektörünün kamu yönetiminin bir sonraki aşamasına dönüşümünü ve Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojisi (BİT) tabanlı hizmetlerin sunulmasını temsil eder. Devletin dijitalleşmesi kamu hizmetlerini iyileştirmenin, insanların katılımını, şeffaflığı, hesap verebilirliği ve kapsayıcılığı artırmanın bir yoludur. Çalışmada 1998'den 2022'e kadar WoS veri tabanındaki 764 doküman incelenmiştir. Dökümanlar Bibliometrix R Studio yazılımı ile sınıflandırılıp tasnif edilmiş ve görselleştirilmiştir. Çalışma "Digital Government”, “Digital Governance” anahtar kelimeleri kullanılarak filtrelenmiştir. Bu alanda 77 ülkede toplam 1465 yazarın çalışma yaptığı görülmüştür. En çok yayın yapan ülke 469’la ABD’dir. Yine en çok atıf yapan ülke 3876 ile ABD’dir. En fazla çalışma yapan kurum 47 yayınla Center for Technology in Government ve University at Albany, bu alanda en çok yayın yapan yazar 106 yayınla Marijn Janssen ve en üretken yayıncı Government Information Quartely dergisidir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dijital Hükümet
• Dijital Yönetişim
• Bibliyometrik Analiz
• Bibliometrix

Kaynakça

1. Ashaye, O.R. & Irani, Z. (2019). The role of stakeholders in the effective use of e-government resources in public services. International Journal of Information Management, 49,s.253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.016
2. Bakar, H.A..& Razali, R.& Jambari, D.I. (2021). Legacy systems modernisation for citizen-centric digital government: A conceptual model. Research Center for Software Technology and Management, Volume 13, Issue 23, December-1. DOI 10.3390/su132313112
3. Broadus, R. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12, 373–379. DOI:10.1007/BF02016680
4. Chen, Y.C. & Hsieh, T.(2014). Big Data for Digital Government: Opportunities, Challenges, and Strategies. Computer Science, Business DOI: 10.4018/ijpada.2014010101
5. Criado, J. I. & Sandoval-Almazan, R. & Gil-Garcia, J.R.(2013). Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly, Volume 30, Issue 4, October, Pages 319-326 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.003
6. Ellegaard, O. & Wallin, J.A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? 1809–1831. Scientometrics, 105(3):1809-1831. DOI 10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
7. Fahimnia, B. & Sarkis, J. & Davarzani, H. (2015). Green supply chain management: a review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 162 No. C, pp. 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003
8. Fishenden J. & Thompson, M.(2013). Digital Government, Open Architecture, and Innovation: Why Public Sector IT Will Never Be the Same Again. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Volume 23, Issue 4, October 2013, Pages 977–1004. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus022

9. Hasan, M. & Maarop, N. & Naswir, R.Y.& Samy, G.N. & Magalingam, P. & Yaácob1, S. & Daud, S.M. A. (2018). Proposed conceptual success model of citizen-centric digital government in Malaysiya. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, Issue, 10, 35–46. http://www.jfas.inf
10. Helbig, N. & Gil-García, J.R. & Ferro, E.(2009). Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature. Government Information Quarterly, Volume 26, Issue 1, January, Pages 89-97 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.05.004
11. Gil-Garcia, J.R. & Chengalur-Smith, I.S. & Duchessi, P.(2017). Collaborative e-Government: impediments and benefits of information-sharing projects in the public sector. European Journal of Information Systems, pages 121-133. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000673
12. Janowski, T.(2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, Volume 32, Issue 3, July, Pages 221-236 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001
13. Kavanaugh,A.L. & Fox, E. A. & Sheetz, S. D. & Yang, S. & TzyLi, L.& Shoemaker, D. J. & Natsev, A. & Xie, L.(2012). Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical. Government Information Quarterly, Volume 29, Issue 4, October, Pages 480-491, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.002
14. Lee, G. & Kwak Y.H. (2012). An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly, Volume 29, Issue 4, October, Pages 492-503 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.001
15. Mossberger, K. & Wu, Y. & Crawford, J. (2013). Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities. Government Information Quarterly Volume, 30, Issue 4, October, Pages 351-358 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.016
16. Oakleaf, M. (2009). Writing ınformation literacy assessment plans: a guide to best practice. Communications in Information Literacy, 3(2):80. DOI:10.15760/comminfolit.2010.3.2.73
17. OECD. (2020). Digital government ındex:2019 results. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 03. https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/digital-government-index-2019-highlights.pdf
18. Okoli, C. & Schabram, K. (2015). A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of ınformation systems research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(43). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2699362 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2699362
19. Paolo, P. B. & Buerhan, S. & Denisa, P. & Federico, C. (2020). The bibliometric analysis of Islamic banking and finance, Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(10):2069-2086 DOI:10.1108/JIABR-08-2020-0235
20. Pina, V. & Torres, L. & Royo, S.(2007). Are Icts Improvıng Transparency And Accountability In The EU Regıonal And Local Governments? An Empırıcal Study public administration, Public Administration, May. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00654.x
21. Tangi, L.& Janssen, M. & Benedetti, M. & Noci, G.(2021). Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors, International Journal of Information Management,Volume 60, October. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401221000499?pes=vor
22. Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. & McNeal R.(2008). Institutions, Policy Innovation, and E-Government in the American States. Public Administration Review, pp. 549-563 https://www.jstor.org/stable/25145632
23. UNITED NATIONS. (2020). Unıted natıons e-government survey 2020. Dıgıtal Government In The Decade Of Actıon For Sustaınable Development. New York. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2020
24. https://www.albany.edu/rockefeller/faculty/j-ramon-gil-garcia erişim tarihi 28.01.2022
25. https://www.govtech.com/cdg erişim tarihi 22.01.2022