Değişime Aracılık Etmek: Etkin Tasarım ile Sürdürülebilir Geleceğe Doğru

Öz

Enerji verimliliği ve teknolojik gelişmelere indirgenen sürdürülebilir mimari, ancak bütüncül tasarım anlayışının yansıması olarak verimli bir tasarım anlayışıyla mümkündür. Çalışma, seçilen alan çalışması üzerinden güncel Türkiye konut planlarının değişen ihtiyaçlara uyum sağlamadığına dair eleştirel bir bakış açısı sunar. Bir tasarım stratejisi olarak konut planlamasında mekansal verimlilik kavramını ele alarak gelecekte değişim için bir perspektif oluşturmayı ve mimarinin toplumsal paradigmayı etkilemekteki gücünü ortaya çıkarmayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada mekanın esnek ve etkin tasarımının tümevarımsal bir yaklaşımla sürdürülebilir mimariye olumlu etkisi vurgulanırken, esnek ve etkin konut planlaması karşılaştırmalı örneklerle tariflenir. Bu amaçla, mekan verimliliğine ilişkin Ankara ve Konya’da 46 apartmandaki 1042 dairenin plan özelliklerine ve hane halkı sayılarına ilişkin bir veri analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veri analizine altlık oluşturan bilgilere araştırma sahasını oluşturan ve her apartmandan en az 2 kişi olacak şekilde 185 kişi ile amaçlı ve kartopu örneklem tekniği kullanılarak yapılan yapılandırılmış formdaki görüşmeler sonucunda ulaşılmıştır. Daha yaşanabilir yaşam çevreleri için hassas ve akıllı bir yaklaşımın gerekliliğini ortaya koyan veri analizlerinin yanı sıra, apartmanlardaki daire çeşitliliği ve dairelerde yaşayan insan sayısının daire kapasitesine (bir dönüştürme faktörü “Fc” uygulanarak hesaplanmıştır) oranlanması sonucu elde edilen bulgular eleştirilerin haklılığını ortaya koymaktadır. Veri analizi sonucu bir apartmandaki konutların büyük oranının tek tip planlardan oluştuğu ve dairelerde kapasitesinin altında insan yaşadığı belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak çalışmada konutta mekan verimliliği analiz edilmiş; etkin ve esnek mekan tasarım anlayışıyla daha iyi bir geleceğin nasıl tasarlanabileceği konusunda önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sürdürülebilir mimarlık
• mekânsal verimlilik
• esneklik
• konut tasarımı

Mediating a Change: Towards a Sustainable Future with Efficient Space Design

Öz

Sustainable architecture, which is reduced to energy efficiency and technological developments, is only possible with an efficient design approach as a reflection of a holistic design approach. The study offers a critical perspective on the fact that current Turkish housing plans do not adapt to changing needs. As a design strategy, it aims to create a perspective for future change by addressing the concept of spatial efficiency in housing planning and to reveal the power of architecture in influencing the social paradigm. In the research, the positive effect of the flexible and effective design of the space on sustainable architecture is emphasized with an inductive approach, while flexible and effective housing planning is described with comparative examples. For this purpose, a data analysis on the plan characteristics and number of households of 1042 flats in 46 apartment buildings in Ankara and Konya regarding space efficiency was carried out. The information forming the basis of the data analysis was obtained as a result of structured form interviews conducted with 185 people, at least 2 people from each apartment building, using snowball sampling techniques. In addition to the data analysis revealing the necessity of a sensitive and smart approach for more livable living environments, the findings obtained as a result of the ratio of the variety of apartments in the apartments and the number of people living in the apartments to the apartment capacity (calculated by applying a factor of conversion “Fc”) proved the criticisms justified. As a result, in the study, space efficiency in the house was analyzed; suggestions have been developed on how to design a better future with an effective and flexible space design approach.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sustainable architecture
• spatial efficiency
• flexibility
• housing design

Kaynakça

1. Akalın, A., Yıldırım, K., Yücel, Ç., & Güngör, C. (2007). User interventions in Turkish mass housing. open house international, 32(3), 77-89.
2. Albostan, D. (2009). Flexibility in Multi-Residential Housing Projects: Three Innovative Cases from Turkey. The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of the Middle East Technical University.
3. Altaş, N. E., & Özsoy, A. (1998). Spatial adaptability and flexibility as parameters of user satisfaction for quality housing. Building and environment, 33(5), 315-323.
4. Ayçam, İ., Akalp, S., & Görgülü, L. S. (2020). The application of courtyard and settlement layouts of the traditional Diyarbakır houses to contemporary houses: A case study on the analysis of energy performance. Energies, 13(3), 587.
5. Bansal, D., Minocha, V. K., Kaur, A., Dakwale, V. A., & Ralegaonkar, R. V. (2021). Reduction of embodied energy and construction cost of affordable houses through efficient architectural design: A case study in Indian scenario. Advances in civil engineering, 2021, 1-11.
6. Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our Common Future World Commission On Environment And Developement.
7. Çalışkan, E. B. (2023). Seeking form and material for university gate: Erzurum Technical University Campus Gate. PLANARCH - Design and Planning Research, October 16, 2023. DOI: 10.5152/ Planarch.2023.23144.
8. Descartes, R. (1999). Discourse on method and meditations on first philosophy. New York: Hackett.(Original work published 1633).

9. Estaji, H. (2017). A review of flexibility and adaptability in housing design. International Journal of Contemporary Architecture, 4(2), 37-49.
10. Gauzin-Müller, D. (2012). “A short history of Sustainable Architecture”. In Drexler H., El khouli S. (eds), Holistic Thinking: Concepts, Design Strategies and Processes (p.20). Munich: Detail Edition.
11. Gonzalo, R., & Habermann, K. J. (2012). Energy-efficient architecture: basics for planning and construction. Walter de Gruyter.
12. Gysin, B. (2012). “Sustainable Design. A Statement”. In Drexler H., El khouli S. (eds), Holistic Thinking: Concepts, Design Strategies and Processes. Munich: Detail Edition.
13. Hagan, S. (2007). Taking shape: a new contract between architecture and nature. Routledge.
14. Hatipoğlu, H. K., & Ismail, S. H. (2020). Housing. Flexibility: A framework for a quantitative evaluation method due to turkish designers. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 8(2), 545-566.
15. Herring, H. (1999). Does energy efficiency save energy? The debate and its consequences. Applied Energy, 63(3), 209-226.
16. Hillier, B., Hanson, J., & Peponis, J. (1984). What do we mean by building function ? InPowell, J. A., Cooper, I., & Lera, S. (eds.), Design for building utilization (pp.61-72), London: Spon.
17. Ilozor, B. D., & Ilozor, D. B. (2001). Understanding concepts of efficiency and effectiveness in architectural facilities space planning and design. Journal of architectural engineering, 7(4), 126-130.
18. Kain, J. (2003). Sociotechnical knowledge: An operationalised approach to localised infrastructure planning and sustainable urban development. Göteborg: Chambers University of Technology. ISBN: 91-7291-304-5
19. Kendall, S. (1999). Open building: an approach to sustainable architecture. Journal of Urban Technology, 6(3), 1-16.
20. Kent, S. (1993). Domestic architecture and the use of space: An interdisciplinarycross-cultural study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Koolhaas, R., & Whiting, S. (1999). Spot check: a conversation between Rem Koolhaas and Sarah Whiting. Assemblage, (40), 36-55. Cambridge: Massachusetts
22. Mahdavinejad, M. J., Ashtiani, S. R., Ebrahimi, M., & Shamshirband, M. (2013). Proposing a flexible approach to architectural design as a tool for achievement eco-friendly multi-purpose buildings. Advanced Materials Research, 622, 1856-1859.
23. McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2010). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. North point press.
24. Mzoori, F. A. (2014). Spatial configuration and functional efficiency of house layouts. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
25. Neumann, D. (1992). Three early designs by Mies van der Rohe. Perspecta, 77-97.
26. Per, A. F., Mozas, J., & Arpa, J. (2007). DBook - density, data, diagrams, dwellings: A visual analysis of 64 collective housing projects. A+t ediciones.
27. Pérez-Lombard, L., Ortiz, J., & Velázquez, D. (2013). Revisiting energy efficiency fundamentals. Energy Efficiency, 6, 239-254.
28. Rapoport, A. (1982). The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
29. Raviz, S. R. H., Eteghad, A. N., Guardiola, E. U., & Aira, A. A. (2015). Flexible housing: The role of spatial organization in achieving functional efficiency. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 9(2), 65.
30. Sassi, P. (2006). Strategies for sustainable architecture. Taylor & Francis
31. Schmidt III, R., & Eguchi, T. (2014). Mediating change: A Japanese perspective on adaptable architecture. Architectural Design, 84(2), 74-79.
32. Schneider, T., & Till, J. (2007). Flexible housing (p. 237). Oxford: Architectural Press.
33. Shadmand, A. & Arslan Selçuk, S. (2021). Tebriz Geleneksel Konutlarında İklimin Bina Yönlendirilişi üzerine Etkileri: Benham Konutu Örneği. ATA Planlama ve Tasarım Dergisi, 5 (1), 15-26.
34. Slessor, C. (2002). The quest for ecological propriety. Architectural Review, 211(1259), 32-33.
35. Sposito, C. (2012). Identity, flexibility and sustainability for the new social housing. TECHNE-Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, 153-159.
36. TUİK (2020). Adrese Dayalı Nüfus Kayıt Sistemi Sonuçları. Son güncelleme 31 Ağustos 2021. https://data.TUİK.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Adrese-Dayali-Nufus-Kayit-Sistemi-Sonuclari-2020-37210
37. Van Doesburg, T. (1924). Towards a plastic architecture. de Stijl, 12(6/7), 78-83.
38. Van Eldonk, J., & Fassbinder, H. (1990). Flexible fixation :the paradox of Dutch housing architecture = Deparadox van de Nederlandse woningbouw. Assen: Van Gorcum.
39. Voordt, D. J. M. van der, & Wegen, H. B. (2005). Architecture in use: An introduction to the Programming, Design and Evaluation of buildings. Oxford: Architectual Press.
40. Williams, D. E. (2007). Sustainable design: ecology, architecture, and planning. John Wiley & Sons.